If had a market, yes. Since grey, no.

If we were still a pinky, then probably most definitely yes.

Or the SP would be up there.

At least it would in all doubt be a new high, over .065.

But since stuck in the grey market, brokers don't fill demand.

They haven't allowed it to pass .021 (on any volume).

In the past, people have tried to buy ~.04, but brokers DO NOT FILL.

It's all manipulated.

At least we know if (when) go private, we will have prorated % of company owned (# of shares divided by 1,614,601,069) = your %.

Long & strong UOIP, aka, Scrufferinski, Scruff-Daddy, Scruffer.64

Oh, there are reasons for not commenting.

1) Carter does not run UOIP, Inc.
2) It invites lawsuits
3) It's your choice to invest in Rob's company or not

Oh, and BTW... There are other protein reduced latex products on the market.

And, so I ask, why toot your own horn? Think about it!

Yes, Whitman's response challenging.

It's the appeal by ChanBond to overturn Cisco.

Date: March 1, 2019 by: /s/ Robert A. Whitman

Robert A. Whitman Counsel for Appellant ChanBond, LLC

Quitter? Believer? Half-Empty? Half-Full?

A little perspective appears to be in order.

First, I've never heard such nonsense. We're still in the fight!

This stock was trading in the trips once. UOIP not known to me then.

Had no chance by the unfaithful. ChanBond PTAB win.

Then the stock moved to the deuces and ran to .012 on heavy volume.

(This is when I was informed of stock & started buying. Luckily fell back to deuces and dollar cost averaged in).

Had no chance by the losers. Not even a business or location. Remember?

Then the stock climbed to just under .065.

All thinking going to .10 and this is it.

Wham-O! Got pushed to the greys. Speculation abound.

The world is ending and stock going to lose 95%. Didn't happen.

Now it may get revoked and many are being negative-Nellies already.

We've come a long way.

We've got:

- The infringed upon validated patents
- Willful intent (admittedly) & egregious misconduct by the defendants
- 7 of 8 PTAB wins
- Cisco appeal
- Mr. William R. Carter (Billy)
- Mishcon de Reya. It's business. But it's personal.
- 100M+ shares with accredited investors
- All shares common

Getting revoked is all part of the plan IMO.

"ChanBond wins, we win". "Think logically--All shares common!". Hint, hint.

This is my only OTCBB or pinky or grey (or revoked?) all b/c of outstanding DD provided.

Still believe this is that 1 in 10,000 stock & opportunity of a lifetime.

Let the unLONGS have their input, but just "Noise" to me. Now, going to nil. Not gonna happen.

LONG & STRONG (aka) UOIP, Scruffer

Okay, it's Saturday. Off to do stuff as arctic blast upon us. Burrrr.

I don't know how you Canuckers make it and live warm & happy. Poor livestock.

P.S. Started drafting b4 pacer update.

That's Mishcon's response appealing claims.

Whitman is restating Cisco's claim, and then countering their argument.

Through 746 pages albeit.

But they are "In settlement discussions!"

Mucho, mucho King Henry,

Scruff746

I'm in agreement. Part of plan. Buyout.

I do NOT believe Carter would screw-over shareholders, friends, accredited investors, inventors, Rob's widow or any others.

Plus, never know these days. There are some real nut-jobs out there.

TGIF, Scruffer

T-10 and counting.

Very good PB. U're our communication vehicle.

Since already have an established call/relationship with him.

(Just worried too many people would be calling and piss him off).

We're all very much looking forward (hopefully) to your update.

Also, it's my understanding common shares convert to % of private company.

We've been over this ad nauseam back during grey (Sept).

This is even back from July: % of company owned.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=142532899

GN, Scruffer

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE do NOT bother Billy.

He made that clear when courteous enough to return jbbb and poorboy's calls.

His focus is on the lawsuit.

All shares are common.

Gooferball makes an excellent point. He could end-up saying, "Screw them!".

We're getting a relatively inexpensive investment ride on his financing of this lawsuit.

He has over 100M+ shares with accredited investors, friends, inventors, family, Rob's widow, converted noteholders, etc.

jbbb wrote, "If ChanBond wins, we win".

Also, poorboy's link of my interpretation of what he posted.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=143837069

Thank you for you patience and understanding.

We DON'T want to piss him off.

Sincerely, Scruffer

P.S. We're all in this boat together.

Was referring to your rise up thru 3/11.

This FOMO gets wind of news, tells his FOMO friend and on and on.

That's a lot of FOMO'ing around.

Greed is a powerful thing...................

Possible FOMO demand. Phil posted similar.

Had to look it up but zw posted FOMO (Fear of missing out) before.

Well, there won't really be a squeeze unless MMs still covering from "Surprise"...going grey.

There are no shorts to constrict against (that we know of).

Also, Phil posted something similar yesterday.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147145733

Just wondering where the heavy buying volume is coming from:
> Unreleased news but leakage to buyer(s)
> Shorts still covering
> FOMO since "Probable" revocation
> ?

Puzzled but not frazzled, Scruff

Gotta be in it, to WIN it.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=143837069

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141087211

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=144020533

Are you sure you're on the correct board?

Glowing-Scruff

If all this works out, you'll get a prize.

**King Henry CDLVIII may post when available.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147129845

Discovery must've gone very well, introduced new buyers and/or something's up.

Need pacer of yesterday, 2/26 meeting.

That may have something to do with all this.

Exactly 100%--AGAIN!!!

Something must be up or close.

We never saw 1M share blocks trade in the grey.

Or really even 100k very often.

Someone is buying from those willing to sell.

And the price has held-up well.

I totally agree. The 2/25 revoke not it.

I do not believe this did it.

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2019/34-85194.pdf

I'm expecting news of some sort in the near future.

Volume started increasing on Feb 15th.

https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/unifiedonline-inc-UOIP/historical

Brokers will just NOT let it run.

Plus, would one rather make 15k now on 1M share sell or 150k+ in the future.

Losses cause pain, but the big pay-day loss (by selling) may haunt one for life.

Who the hell knows anymore...?

Brokerage correct. iHub has out-of-sequence trades.

And can duplicate b/c trade called back (or something).

This happens on occasion.

https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/unifiedonline-inc-UOIP/trades

Also, for the other question posed earlier (Buy or Sell):

This statistic is very misleading.

Since it's all based on the "Last official tic or SP", all sells b/c last L2 trade was 0.036 b4 grey.

Date_________Open___Close___Chg___Chg(%)____Low___High___Volume
Oct 02 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Oct 01 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 28 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 27 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 26 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 25 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 24 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 21 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 20 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 19 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 18 2018___0.037___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.034___0.037__106,796

Believers are gobbling this up.

LONG & STRONG "Future revoked" private stakeholder???

Unprovoked-and-still-remain-stoked,

Scruffer

Once again, he couldn't. Had noteholders (debt).

Accredited investors and noteholders want a piece of the action.

He bought the outstanding debt (notes--money owed) when bought ChanBond patents.

He had to meet their existing terms when acquired.

They converted to common when in trips. They aren't stupid!

It's as straightforward as that,

Scruff

Carter had to take control 1st.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=143122023

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=144020533

Unless verdict required, that was my thinking.

Unless a guilty jury verdict is required for indemnification (and only ~30-40% of cable companies indemnified--I think), settlement negotiations must be underway.

I was thinking that exact same thing Gmc.

The 13/17 and/or COMM/ARRS may act before all their negotiating leverage is gone.

Cisco is a monster with lots of influence and capital.

Never know how "A selected" 3-judge panel will go.

It's not necessarily COMM/ARRS, but the 13/17 cable companies as well.

The last thing they want is a loss with triple damages.

If the 13/17 were to settle (with or without COMM/ARRS), it should be less expensive.

If the 13/17 and COMM/ARRS have a losing hand, and at this point they may think (know) it, their best strategy may be to fold now, rather than go ALL-IN later.

In addition, one never knows how long this could drag-out.

I still find it odd the brokers allowed such volume, so I hypotheses, something is up, happening, in-the-works.

Should be an interesting week nonetheless,

Wishful thinking Scruffer

P.S. 50 birds in the hand are better than "A possible" 0-100 later.

Since many believe no way going 2 trial...

And the high grey market volume last week...

Wondering if we will even see Daubert?

________Event_____________Current Deadline_____Proposed New Deadline
Close of Expert Discovery_____February 19, 2019_____February 22, 2019
Opening SJ/Daubert Briefs_________April 2, 2019_________April 4, 2019
Answering SJ/Daubert Briefs_______May 14, 2019________May 16, 2019
Reply SJ/Daubert Briefs__________June 11, 2019________June 13, 2019
Trial Scheduling Conference___________TBD_______________TBD
SJ/Daubert Hearing__________________TBD_______________TBD

It seems like the ChanBond-Cisco appeal is about the last hurdle (if no trial).

Would COMM/ARRS even risk trial with 3x damages? And does Daubert really matter (if not going all-the-way)?

"In an all-cash transaction for $31.75 per share, or a total purchase price of approximately $7.4 billion, including the repayment of debt."

https://www.commscope.com/NewsCenter/PressReleases/CommScope-to-Acquire-ARRIS/

Arris was on the decline until leak of acquisition, then announcement.

We'll say stock @ $24.00 / share (prior to leakage).

As of October 31, 2018, 173,328,693 shares of ARRIS International plc’s Ordinary Shares were outstanding

$31.75 - $24.00 = $7.75 * 173.3M = $1.343 Billion premium

No 10K released yet, but wonder if upon compiling, ChanBond news included this time?

No major volume for months, and then BAM!, 1.3M+ volume exchanged hands 3 times last week.

https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001645494&type=10&dateb=&owner=exclude&count=40

https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?CIK=arrs&owner=exclude&action=getcompany

All this came to mind so wanted to put out there for everyone to ponder.

Anyway, this week may provide more insight,

Scruff-Dillyocious

Oh, add to end of post #62373

But Cisco omits a more fundamental threshold issue raised by ChanBond before this Court: namely, whether the Board “clearly explained, or cited evidence showing, how the combination of the two references was supposed to work.” PersonalWeb Techs., LLC v. Apple, Inc., 848 F.3d 987, 994 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (emphasis in original).

Cisco also ignores ChanBond’s argument that the Board relied on the wrong legal standard when it concluded that “an ordinarily skilled artisan would have sought to combine Tiedemann, Gilhousen, and Gorsuch to arrive at the broad functionality of receiving and processing an RF signal to output a digital stream to an addressable device recited in the challenged claims.”

Final thought...
"But how's it supposed to work--technically, scientifically and exactly?"

Okay, Saturday, off.

Later team, Scruff

And found that link.

ARRIS Int’l. PLC v. Chanbond, LLC, (Fed. Cir. Dec. 27, 2018).

https://www.natlawreview.com/article/failure-to-launch-not-identifying-proper-parties-can-prematurely-end-video-game-ipr

Yes, very, very, very well written.

Combine your highlights and mine, almost sums it up.

Great read.

Our lawyers are fantastic and all over this.

Yes, hopefully higher than that (50%).

Makes a very FACT-BASED response.

Our lawyers R top-notch, best-in-breed.

Once again, we mere peasants bow to His Majesty, King Henry CDLVIII.

Some highlights... (Great read).

It defies logic for Cisco to now argue that ChanBond was required to address Qualcomm’s status as prior art, after the Board’s institution decision said that Cisco could not make such arguments, and Cisco had not even alleged that Qualcomm qualified as a “printed publication[]” as required by statute. 35 U.S.C. § 311(b). Given the Board’s finding on institution, there was no reason for ChanBond to avail itself of the procedural mechanisms of the Board to preclude these arguments, because they had been already rejected by the Board.

Because there is no evidence that Qualcomm was “known” at the time of the invention, let alone “well-known,” had the Board NOT REVERSED COURSE and treated Qualcomm as prior art, there would be no documentary support for that statement.

First, Cisco does not dispute that the Board relied on no alleged prior art other than Qualcomm to support its finding that “allowing cellular phones to connect to portable computers and act as wireless modems for those computers” was known in the art. FWD at 39 (Appx0039).

Removing Qualcomm from the invalidity ground eliminates any documentary support for the Board’s conclusion regarding obviousness.

Having failed to engage ChanBond on the merits of its deficient obviousness theory, Cisco now attempts to limit the issue on appeal to “whether the Board’s determinations that there would be a motivation to combine the references, that the combination would be within the level of ordinary skill, and that there would be a reasonable expectation of success is supported by substantial evidence.”

Fearless little Scruff

The in-house broker or cohort MM.

That's my guess.

Discovery must've gone very well for ChanBond.

If MM, could still be covering as getting closer everyday.

If receiving order broker (my guess), then the good news is...

>> His/Her firm may begin to bid this up.

Unless, of course, they want more shares.

We still haven't breached 0.021 though (with any volume).

Heavy volume (comparably) these last 3 of 4 days.

https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/unifiedonline-inc-UOIP/historical

Should be exciting time ahead.

WAGging tail Scruffer

You as well. No problemÖ.

Water off a duck's back.

EB's post presented the million (or billion) dollar question:

RF Channel or CDMA?

So they have made up basically a merits-based argument saying, aha, we found an X employee, one of our suppliers, who came and testified that this group of products doesn't have purportedly RF channels. But their own expert -- their own expert testified contrary to that. Again, it's a standard based read. There's no non-infringing alternatives. If they want to do CDMA, they're free and they have always been free to do CDMA. The universe of non-infringing alternatives has been the same since day one, because we've consistently read channels as our channel throughout this case for all patents, including those few claims that are at issue in the PTAB decision.

We're on the same team AIF

You say tomato, I say tomahto.

As the majority shareholder, IMO, Carter had some type of communication with the CEO (Rob).

Anyway, we're ALL in the same boat.

We're all rowing, but brokers are providing a strong opposing current.

Have a great day and weekend AIF,

Scruff

What fins? If wanted current, it'd be current.

There are no substantial financials.

Moreover, Carter (and Rob) would not have let this lapse in the 1st place.

I do not think market cap is relevant.

What is = "RF Channel" vs. "CDMA".

Date___Open___Close___Change___Change (%)___Low___High___Volume
Oct 04 2018___0.02___0.0185___-0.0015___-7.5%___0.015___0.02___966,966
Oct 03 2018___0.016___0.02___-0.016___-44.44%___0.01___0.024___2,896,998
Oct 02 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Oct 01 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 28 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 27 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 26 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 25 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 24 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 21 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 20 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 19 2018___0.036___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.036___0.036___0
Sep 18 2018___0.037___0.036___0.00___+0.00%___0.034___0.037___106,796
Sep 17 2018___0.0342___0.036___0.001___+2.86%___0.03229___0.0365___253,579

https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/unifiedonline-inc-UOIP/historical

Grey = Sept 19.

Possibly, but then Carter would become current.

If judgement, verdict or buyout based-on market cap, Carter would definitely bring the ticker current.

In addition, he and his pals would bid it up, up, ÜP! Doesn't take much.

Also, for the others, the 13 (17?) companies are NOT buying, but the "Employees involved" may be "Trying" to load-up.

I believe brokers are even buying.

When the stock was around .06, must've triggered a portfolio alert and received "A call" from the manager of the local branch inquiring if they can provide management assistance in any way.

Lastly, very surprised by high volume as well.

For what it's worth, I think the 631 shares @ .024 were a signal of some type.

Let's see if they'll let it run. Doubtful, but getting closer everyday.

TGIF, Scruff

I'm hoping we've seen the "TURN"



Also, on the other thing, Asia dominates both having the raw material and, of course, the manufacturing.

Yes, has USPTO P & TM's, but may be technologically stolen process and imported anyway.

Just seems a little off.

LONG & STRONG UOIP, Scruff

Thank you LT. Interesting. Expensive now.

But who knows? It's all relative. Couldn't afford many shares.

I know there's nitrile, neoprene and vinyl.

If real deal, billion dollar market.

Do not understand reason for air purifier and other thing.

Should just focus on Vy.

If we all had only known Jan 1st or so.

All I can say is "WoW!".

UOIP is my horse.

Scruffer left on-shore (missed the boat)

Yet so many ALLURING eyes R following.

This stock and opportunity is remarkably enticing, appealing & tempting, eyes cannot help themselves but to follow.

Us "Peeps" are essentially holding "Unrealized" exponential returns.

Fortuna Fortibus Favet.

Valorous ScrÜff (and my comrades, "The LÖNGS")

Always thought AMZN gr8 fit. Buys Eero

Bought Wi-Fi (router).
Now needs modem business.
Then AWS (Amazon Web Services) has most of it all.

Will dominate and control most of the data flow directly from its Hosted Services (Netflix, etc.) to households and businesses.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/amazoncom-to-buy-eero-for-an-undisclosed-amount-2019-02-11

https://eero.com/technology

This is 2 years old, but get my point.
https://www.contino.io/insights/whos-using-aws

Hap, Hap, Happi................Gladly.

My "Mood ring" tells me to BUY, BUY, BUY and ACCUMULATE as much as possible.

Jubilant Scruff

Can only see last fill.

Don't want you to get burned. That L2 ask is NOT CURRENT (it was the last price b4 grey).

Current Last: 0.014 Chg ($): -0.0009 Vol: 382,755

Link below will be delayed ~15-30 minutes, but TDA will show real-time LAST.

https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/unifiedonline-inc-UOIP/trades

May have to put bids in b/t:

.01-.018.

It's half luck to get filled.

Someone from TDA must sell for you to buy since on grey market.

Only in-house (that particular brokerage) shares offered to in-house buyers:

TDA to TDA, Schwab to Schwab, E-Trade to Etrade, etc.

Good luck, Scruff

Yeah, didn't want to get too personal.

Felt LONGS would be comfortable providing a rough range.

Of course, anyone can disclose their exact share count total.

It's apparent irony isn't your thing.

And it can't be removed since he put it there.

I guess good minds think alike.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146530748

Small talk and silly are in the spirit of levity.

I guess I'll have to learn "Which posters" to skip over or block.

And it will expedite my readings.

Thank you for pointing that out.

Share range owned. Completely voluntary.

Just to get an idea about float and who has what.

A) < 1 million (less than)
B) 1M < 5M
C) 5M < 10M
D) >= 10M (greater than or equal to)

I'm "C".