Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
it's actually chokingdog@hotmail.com
Dog - you spoke with the chairman of the firm - not just one of the lawyers. That's a great sign that he is interested and makes me believe we've got a chance.
NEIL B. GLASSMAN is the Chairman of The Bayard Firm and heads the Business and Administrative Law Department and Bankruptcy Group. He focuses his practice on commercial transactions and insolvency law, while specializing in debtor/creditors' rights. Neil can be reached at 302-429-4224 or nglassman@bayardfirm.com.
I know its a common last name but strange that one of the 2 bod is also Jackson.
Sorry found it in filing.
Ultimate, thanks for posting. eom
Why are some companies listed on page 4 and not others? JCNationwide is and Parker Services is not?
I agree that someone wants shares cheap. Any time we've gotten news its been in an 8k. Why would they release this as a pr instead of just putting it in a 8k? Jackson is private so shouldn't help them any.
Interesting it doesn't seem like Parker fits the profile of new company either. Don't know how or if this effects all this but people have always said that this is one of wh's most profitable companies.
http://www.parkerservices.com/joblist.cfm?type=1
OT: Thanks. eom.
OT: RJR-good call on erhe - just curious, what do you think will happen tuesday?
Very helpful. Thanks for posting.
OT: Elsie - same ones "fly by" bashers on ehrc on rb also bashing immg. With Mongo and others working overtime, I think we're golden here, too.
Mongo, any thoughts on immg?
Yeah, all true - but I like seeing them there because I'm pretty sure there's more news coming. Don't know how/why they know but the pattern has been increased posts right before news. I'm long so not flipping but would love to be on another exchange.
BTW, the same ones bashing are pumping on another one of my longs pphm and so pretty sure we're going to see a rapid decline in pps there. lol
Aqua: Know of any place that cmda is discussed? tia.
http://biz.yahoo.com/e/060215/cmda.ob8-k.html
15-Feb-2006
Non Reliance on Prev Financials, Audits or Interim Review, Change in Directors
Item 4.02 Non-Reliance on Previously Issued Financial Statements or a Related Audit Report or Completed Interim Review.
Section 5 - Corporate Governance and Management
Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Principal Officers.
(a) On January 26, 2006, Edwon Lam's resignation as a Director of China Media1 Corp. was accepted by the Board of Directors. Mr. Lam's resignation was not based on any disagreement with us on any matter relating to our operations, policies or practices.
(b) On January 26, 2006, Ernest Cheung resigned from his position as Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Cheung's resignation was not based upon any disagreement with us on any matter relating to our operations, policies or practices. Mr. Cheung will continues to serve as our President and Chief Operating Officer.
(c) On January 26, 2006 our Board of Directors reconfigured the officer structure of China Media1 Corp. as follows: Adrian Hanxiong Cai, our former President was appointed as Chief Executive Officer; (ii) Ernerst Cheung, our former Chief Financial Officer was appointed as President and Chief Operating Officer and (iii) Danny Hon was appointed as Chief Financial Officer. There is currently no employment agreement with Mr. Hon and compensation terms are being negotiated.
Danny C. Hon, 44, was appointed as a Director and our Chief Financial Officer on January 26, 2006. Mr. Hon will devote approximately 30% of his time to the position of Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Hon is a Certified General Accountant that has over 20 years of experience in accounting and finance experience. Mr. Hon has been an Associate member of The Certified General Accountants Association of Canada since 1994 as well as a Certified Financial Planner since 1998. Mr. Hon has been a Fellow member of The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants of United Kingdom since 1992 and The Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants since 1999. Mr. Hon received his Master of Science in Administration from Central Michigan University of USA in 2000. Mr. Hon has various international accounting and finance exposures through working with various companies in Hong Kong and Canada. Mr. Hon has been a partner of Hon & Wong, Certified General Accountants since 1996 and is specialized in financial reporting of companies listed on North America. Mr. Hon also serves as Chief Financial Officer for Maxy Gold Corp. (MXD.V) and Silvercorp Metals, Inc. (SVM.TO), both on a part time basis.
(d) On January 26, 2006, pursuant to a resolution our Board of Directors appointed Danny Hon as a Director to fill the vacancy created by Mr. Lam's resignation.
Item 5.05 Amendments to the Registrant's Code of Ethics, or Waiver of a Provision of the Code of Ethics.
Section 6 - [Reserved]
Section 7 - Regulation FD
Market Scan
Google Still Seen 'Leagues Ahead' Of Competitors
Maya Roney, 02.14.06, 8:50 AM ET
Caris & Company equity research analyst Mark Stahlman maintained a "buy" rating on Google, citing an "attractive" valuation and continuing market share gains among his reasons to own the stock.
"This is a real company with real earnings and tremendous real growth, not some Bubble-era dot.com wannabe promising stellar numbers in the December quarter of 2012," wrote the analyst in a research note Monday.
In the report, Stahlman argues against the proliferation of a bearish outlook on Google (nasdaq: GOOG - news - people ), and what he calls "the nine horsemen of the Google apocalypse." Recently published articles have suggested that the stock is overvalued and the company is facing strong competition and slowing query volume growth, among other critical points.
However, by Stahlman's estimates, Google's valuation is conservative relative to that of both eBay (nasdaq: EBAY - news - people ) and Yahoo! (nasdaq: YHOO - news - people ), which he says trade much closer to a PEG multiple of 1.0 than Google on a price-to-earnings, price-to-free cash flow and enterprise value-to-EBITDA basis.
In addition, Google still has the best current fundamentals in the Internet sector, said the analyst.
"We have great faith that the invisible hand will make Google an even better company over time," the analyst said. "In terms of the current competitive landscape, it seems very obvious to us that Google is leagues ahead of everyone else."
http://www.forbes.com/2006/02/14/google-earnings-0214markets02.html?partner=yahootix
Ha! Had to call etrade to get filled @.48 when bid .475. Pure manipulation. Buy while you can.
Pretty new to erhe and have to say I like seeing Mongo here and rb. I know it sounds like bb crap but somebody is trying to keep this stock price down. Just saw it happen on immg and stock is up 400+% since beginning of year - Mongo was that you? same tactics with pulling up stuff from years ago.
Mongo's convinced me. I'm buying more tomorrow.
Elsie glad you asked for link, I wasn't having the same problem before but now I can't get to immg either on rb.
Btw, anyone use ameritrade here? Thinking about swithching from etrade. Can't get anyone at etrade to answer phone after 20 minutes and no response to email other than "thanks we'll get back to you". tia
09:53 IMMG IMMG.OB: Impart Media Group buys InTransit Media assets (4.20 +0.30)
Impart Media Group is a name we profiled on Jan 20 at $1.85. We caution that it's a bulletin board name, but the stock has more than doubled since then, so we thought we'd take another look. Impart Media provides complete, turnkey dynamic media solutions for display devices such as plasma screens or LCD displays at retailers, airports, grocery stores. Today, the co announced it had purchased the assets of InTransit Media, a privately-held advertising and marketing co. Its PATHVision system includes more than 277 displays throughout 13 transit stations in NY City and New Jersey. See our profile for more details. www.briefing.com
OT: LOL! Bet that went over well! That board has too many posters with too much time on their hands and a few go a little nuts if you have anything negative to say about QBID - I mean come on the stock is trading at .0001 - definitely some negatives that are justified.
FWIW - from Motley Fool
Debunking the Bunk
You Can't Spell 'Do No Evil' Without Devil
By Rick Aristotle Munarriz
Look up the word "two-faced" in the popular Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) search engine and you will be treated to everything from the chronicles of a legendary sprint bike rider to a 1941 Greta Garbo flick. You won't find Google there, but maybe you should. Last week, the company agreed to censor its website in China. References to things like the Tianenmen Square massacre of 1989 would be left out of the results pages if Chinese residents were searching for answers on the Google.cn domain.
Google kowtowing to the Chinese government strikes a completely different tone than that set closer to home when Google recently refused to honor a subpoena request as this country's Department of Justice searched for a week's worth of search threads related to certain sites.
How can this be? How can Google side with the government in China but back the casual Internet user stateside? It's a contradiction. It's hypocritical. It's good business.
Yes, it's a shameful Faustian bargain that Google had to broker in China, but it was the only way that the politically staunch nation would accept the fast-growing search engine as a social import. China has 1.3 billion residents, four times the citizenry of the United States, and having the government block local access to Google would be devastating.
It wouldn't have been a blow to Google in the near term. Less than 10% of the country is online and the pitiful per capita income translates into a pauper's pittance when it comes to generating online advertising revenue. However, it won't always be that way. Playing hardball with China would have been like the hunger striking protesters that were killed in Tianenmen Square. Taking a stand would have been a noble thing to do. Lord knows it would have been the right thing to do. But in the end, had it held its defiant ground, it too would have been relegated to a censored footnote in the thriving Chinese search engines.
The company that aspires to live by the "do no evil" mantra had to sell its soul to get its foot in the door and over the Great Wall. It stings, but the alternative was to protest from the outside with an unstamped passport. It could have fought on principle, but its actions would have gone unheard within the already censored nation. Let's give history a chance to vindicate Google's actions in China. Some pretty amazing things can happen once you're on the inside. Today the shoehorn. Tomorrow the steel-tip boot.
That is certainly not the same situation that Google finds itself here, where ratting out its user base for the sake of a government study could have some serious ramifications. Trust and credibility can't be easily restored once torched. This doesn't mean that Google will prevail in its legal scuffle. It may very well have to hand over its records once all is said and done. However, by kicking and fighting every step of the way, it allows Google to come out of this as a defender of the people.
Google's actions are simply a company doing what it takes in the two countries with the largest Internet user populations to make sure that it continues to grow in each one. So maybe it's a contradiction. Perhaps it's hypocritical. But it's still good business.
thanks for posting. eom
thanks. eom
OT: Followed whai when on rb and remember alot of discussion about different companies involved in financing. Another company I follow just got financing through Laurus Fund and it seems to ring a bell as being included in the HPC, Palisades group. So far I haven't found been able to find a connection when googling. Anyone remember this company? (Or know anything about them?) Appreciate any information. Thanks.
The "Pink Sheets" is an electronic quotation system that displays quotes from broker dealers for many over-the-counter (OTC) securities. "Market makers" and other brokers who buy and sell OTC securities, can use the Pink Sheets to publish their bid and ask quotation prices. The name "Pink Sheets" comes from the color of paper they were historically printed on. They are published today by Pink Sheets LLC, a privately owned company. Pink Sheets LLC is not registered with the SEC in any way and it is not an NASD Broker-Dealer.
The Pink Sheets does not require companies whose securities are quoted upon its systems to meet any listing requirements. With the exception of a few foreign issuers, the companies quoted in the Pink Sheets tend to be closely held, extremely small and/or thinly traded. Most do not meet the minimum listing requirements for trading on a national securities exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market. Many of these companies do not file periodic reports or audited financial statements with the SEC, making it very difficult for investors to find reliable, unbiased information about those companies. For all of these reasons, companies quoted in the Pink Sheets can be among the most risky investments. That's why you should take extra care to thoroughly research any company quoted exclusively in the Pink Sheets. Be aware that some broker-dealers are required by Rule 15c2-11 under the 1934 Act to have some information about the issuer. Ask your broker-dealer whether it has any Rule 15c2-11 information before you invest.
For information on the risks of investing in small companies, be sure to read our brochure, Microcap Stock: A Guide for Investors.
http://www.sec.gov/answers/pink.htm
From briefing.com
11:31 CMDA CMDA.OB: China Media1 -- a speculative sympathy play on Focus Media (0.37 +0.00)
Focus Media (FMCN 49.59 +5.49, +12%) is having another huge day today The stock has been a huge winner for us since our Aug 22 profile at 21.65 as a forgotten IPO. The co operates the largest audiovisual tv advertising displays in China. Instead of traditional billboards to broadcast advertising, its LCD displays are placed primarily in high-traffic areas.
Last week, we profiled Impart Media (IMMG.OB 2.03) as an interesting secondary play.... China Media1 is name we think is more speculative than IMMG.OB, but we thought we'd present the idea.
The co has obtained rights to what it calls premiere Chinese advertising media assets in the city of Guangzhou in Southern China. It contracts with top-tier brand names and large advertising agencies for use of its illuminated scrolling poster signs at the Guangzhou New Baiyun Intl airport and the Guangzhou MTR (12 Subway Stations). Consider that FMCN bought Target Media, the second largest out-of-home flat-panel display ad network operator in China, just 3 weeks ago for $325 mln despite revs of just $21.6 mln for 9 mos ended Sep 30. Mkt cap $12 mln, avg vol 61K.