Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ok.I checked trades on Ihub,and it was the last one.
Agree 100%:)
1,989,000 at .0001??Gotta be a mistake.Or else someone got a helluva deal,lol.
mickey,Can you please explain why the O/S has been reduced two time's in the last few month's?Is that how dilution work's?Awaiting your educated answer.Thank you:)
Great buying opt. mickey.Better get em while you can:)
GO DNAD.
Maybe news tomorrow?:)
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-form-t.htm
For the individual as well as the institutional investor, Form T trading does present a few important advantages. If the investor happens to find out something that may have an effect on the price of a stock after hours, they have the convenience of acting on that information immediately. Otherwise, it would be necessary to wait until the markets open again, by which time the information will have reached many more investors, making it harder to profit from the situation. Form T trading also makes buying and selling U.S. stocks more convenient for foreign investors who operate outside the usual hours of trading in the U.S.
Great.Thanks.
I respect you knowledge,but why are you replying to a post that's 6 months old,from someone who is no longer here?To my knowledge,no one is claiming a short squeeze with DNAD.
Kopper,do you know if they will receive any revenues from this game?TIA
Come on mikey,I know you love DNAD,because you spend all day here trying to make the pps go down so you can buy some more.Keep trying buddy,I want to buy more too:)
Great job on IBOX and member mark from me:)
For every sell there is a buy.796,000 shares bought today. Case closed.
mikey,I hope you're right about Nintendo taking a stake in DNAD.That would be great news.Please keep us informed:)
With almost 1 and a half billion shares o/s,this pos will be at .0001 pretty soon.More shares added every day,think twice before putting money into this dog.
"The stock has been losing 10% almost daily now and I also think the last of the longs who are down huge on this scam are finally just gonna be smart and cut their losses before it hits no bid"
This is the DNAD board.You shouldn't be posting about any of your three favorite stocks here.But I agree.Anyone who owns any of those stocks should be selling:)GO DNAD.
Do you own any shares?
Lets look at DNAD's share structure.
SHARE STRUCTURE INFORMATION - OCTOBER 14th 2011
MARKET VALUE: $937,376
AUTHORIZED SHARES: 350,000,000
OUTSTANDING SHARES: 208,305,793
FLOAT: 128,655,843
SHARE HOLDERS OF RECORD: 34 (Sep 06, 2011)
PAR VALUE: .001
How do you spell hypocrite?:)
Got you.Sorry I misunderstood:)
Here are some links,and a little info to some of your favorite stocks.After looking at these,DNAD looks very good:)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=10986
As of the Second quarter ended June 30, 2011
The Company had 6,498,671,683 common shares issued and outstanding
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=8576
SHARE STRUCTURE INFORMATION - November 03, 2011
MARKET VALUE: $806,414
AUTHORIZED SHARES: 2,400,000,000
SHARES OUTSTANDING: 1,344,022,614
FLOAT: 1,344,022,614
SHARE HOLDERS OF RECORD: 185 (Jun 30, 2011)
PAR VALUE: .0001
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=68924248
A/S recently increased to 2.5 billion share's.
Now lets look at DNAD's share structure.
SHARE STRUCTURE INFORMATION - OCTOBER 14th 2011
MARKET VALUE: $937,376
AUTHORIZED SHARES: 350,000,000
OUTSTANDING SHARES: 208,305,793
FLOAT: 128,655,843
SHARE HOLDERS OF RECORD: 34 (Sep 06, 2011)
PAR VALUE: .001
How do you spell hypocrite?:)
PPS going down while A/C goes up is a good sign.PPS will go up:)
Accum/Dist still looking good.Gotta love it,uh mikey?:)DNAD
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=DNAD&p=D&b=5&g=0&id=p10498573972
How was jail food?LMFAO
What happen to Legacy:Mystery Mansion?I can't find it in the Apple store.
"This is getting excited. Not to say that Soshi is the possible acquisition. But DNAD could do worse."
David Lovatt follows Soshi Games on Twitter,so it could be.I would rather it be a more established company,but as you say,DNAD could do worse.On the bright side,they've already secured some funding,which would be a big positive for DNAD.
Wow,down 80% from last month.Great stock you got here,micky,LMAO.
Why not buy 200 million for .0002?Shouldn't be a problem with this pos,lol.
DOWN 33%.LMFAO
"As of the Second quarter ended June 30, 2011
The Company had 6,498,671,683 common shares issued and outstanding
and 30,000,000 Preferred A shares issued and outstanding."
Wow,that was way back in June.Must be close to 10 billion by now.What a POS,lol.
Hows HF*G doing?Not too good,considering it has over 6 BILLION shares and is trading in the low .000's.It's also down about 60% in the last couple months.Guess that's why you're here,too depressing over there,lol.
"Down 22% I can see why ur getting concerned"
HF*G,a stock that you like and gush over,is down about 60% in the last couple months,has over 6 BILLION SHARES,and is trading in the low .ooo's.I can't see why ur not concerned,lol.
Right on.I'm buying a few shares every week,hopefully I can double my position over the next few weeks.Holding tight,adding more,feeling good:)
Bullish Signals
Bullish signals occur when the price of a security is moving down or is in a downtrend, but A/D line is trending upward (see Figure 1). This divergence signals increased buying pressure, which can indicate weakening seller strength. It is usually followed by a change in the trend of the security from downward to upward.
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/trading/08/accumulation-distribution-line.asp#axzz1Z5waHPVP
http://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=DNAD&p=D&b=5&g=0&i=t27300370561&r=8261
"This is just a diluted pos junk stock"
Think you for your insightful info.Guess I better sell:)
New tweet,
Our point and click with a CSI twist adventure game, complete with Zucker brother quirk will be unique among existing mobile phone games.
Very good point.I would love a 500-1000 percent profit,and would take it in a heart beat:)GLTU
A year from now sounds better to me:)
Fly,since you're one of the more knowledgeable people here,I have a question for you regarding this comment from the last pr."The mobile game is expected to gross $2 million over the lifetime of the product. Going to Market in Q4, DNA Interactive expects to report the revenues in its end of year financial statement."Is that total gross,or just gross of DNAD's share?TIA.
DNAD is in the right place at the right time. http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=66253228
Developers don't worry about mobile free apps, app stores sales to increase by 77% in 2011
Mobile phone apps Developers bemoaning the dominance of free apps in app stores like the Google's Android Market:
Do not despair, there’s money yet in apps.
According to a new report, revenue from the four top app stores run by Apple, Google, Nokia and Research in Motion (RIM, maker of BlackBerry) will total US$3.8 billion in 2011, a rise of 77% compared to the year before.
The figures, from the analysts at IHS Screen Digest (via iSuppli), indicate just how much apps revenue has grown in a relatively small period of time.
In 2008, when apps first started getting tracked by the company, revenues totalled a meagre US$206 million, with Apple’s App Store the only real contender.
That in itself is an instructive point for those who are questioning what kind of growth the tablet market might see — given that it, too, is dominated by Apple in its early days.
The researches forecast that apps will bring in revenues of US$5.6 billion in 2012, US$6.9 billion in 2013 and US$8.3 billion in 2014.
But it notes that the rise of the Windows Phone Marketplace from Microsoft, helped along by Nokia’s push in Windows Phones, could impact those forecasts. (No mention of HP/Palm webOS in the report.)
The numbers provide an interesting counterpoint to research from Distimo released last week, which is noting the rise and rise of free apps:
The Android Market now has more than 134,000 free apps, while the App Store from Apple has more than 121,000.
Indeed, when it comes to making money, Apple is bringing in more than all the others combined at the moment.
It’s projected to bring in US$2.91 billion in revenues in 2011 — that’s the gross revenue, not Apple’s share — and will continue to hold on to 60% of the market even in 2014.
But that figure could be even wildly low — Distimo notes that today, in the iPad store, “daily revenue in the Top 100 paid is approximately US$400,000,” and that’s before counting in-app purchases.
The App Store this year will see 10.3 billion downloads in total.
In second place after Apple is the Android Market with US$425.4 million in revenues (growing nearly 300%, on downloads of 5.8 billion), followed by RIM App World’s US$279.1 million (growing only 69.2%, similar to Apple’s growth), and Nokia’s Ovi store with US$201.5 million.
http://www.mobilityfeeds.com/mobility-feed/2011/05/developers-dont-worry-about-mobile-free-apps-app-stores-sales-to-increase-by-77-in-2011-.html
Why we all continue to invest in DNA Dynamics
Posted on Mon, Aug 15, 2011
Email This Email Article
inShare
Add to delicious delicious
0digg
When DNA acquired Slam Productions, one of the first decisions we made was the stop the ‘Work for hire’ projects that had been the bread and butter of the business. On average, over the previous 3 years, Slam and been profitable and had seen turnovers of around $250k. So why throw that away? People thought we were crazy!
The thing about ‘work for hire’ is that, unless you are charging top whack, you get nowhere quick. And here is some news - DNA didn’t buy Slam for its revenues. In fact, we were concerned that the revenues were going to hold back our plans – maybe it would be easier to build a new team from scratch without the legacy of revenues which would act like a comfort blanket?
We bought Slam for its people and its technology. We could have grown the ‘Work for Hire’ business by 20% each year, and soon been at a $1m turnover business. Ask yourself this though – would you invest in a business that shows steady, small growth? Or would you prefer to invest in something a little more interesting; something that is created to catch the eye of the big boys in the consolidation game and eventually to get acquired for a tidy sum, o
achieve a share price 100 times what you paid for it. It is all achievable now
.
So we took out the ‘Work for Hire’ element and took the people and the technology to the big names in the industry. In a high risk strategy, we are raising capital to acquire some household name licenses and set the studio the job of creating some fantastic games that would appeal to the masses. Four are nearly finished and we think the game buying public are going to love what they see.
I guess the reason we are all doing this, though, is to make money – right? Well we see an industry that is crying out for what we have and the acquisitions and floatations made in 2011 absolutely back that up. But the key question on everybody’s lips is – what will the company be worth at that key moment?
Market Valuation is always an interesting subject and, of course, none of us is ever valued at a price we believe reflects our full market worth. As a ‘public’ company, getting a valuation is seen to be much easier. Essentially, our market cap is published for all to see. However, with a major change in direction and no financials published yet which show the true value of the business – those will only come when the new direction starts to bear fruit in Q3 or Q
4 2011 – our valuation is about 1/3 of where we believe it should be right now an
d we are looking at a market cap in excess of $50m once we show good financial results from 2011 – and that is just the start.
However, if you compare our ‘Market Cap’ with how others, private companies, lay out their valuations it becomes a different ball game. Taking Groupon as a good case in point, they showed that they made a profit of $60m in 2010. This is calculated using the CSOI method – Consolidated Segment Operating Income. Talking simply, the CSOI method takes out major expenses which could include Marketing, for example, which has to be one of their top five expenses. If you add in all of their costs, they, in fact, made a loss of $456m in 2010. But we’ll all jump in to buy their shares right? In fact, they are hoping for a $60b valuation. Now, I doubt we’ll achieve an operating income near that in 2012, but I would happily take 30% of that valuation in December 2012.
In short – keep an eye on DNAD over the coming months and you’ll see a company that, in my opinion, fast becomes the company to watch in terms of shareholder value. Yes we are raising capital – but you just wait and see what we have bought and what we have produced – you will be amazed, and want to invest in us.