Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Nice. He'd you factor in the investigation into bad behavior that appears to have gone nowhere?
The one that said "This is Peregrine all over again"?
But the lack of Director profiles on their own website doesn't bother you?
...Do you believe they're changing inclusion/exclusion criteria?
Great post, thanks.
What kind of attacks? Looks like the share price is down 90% so it didn't work...From a shareholders perspective that is. Shareholders should be praying for a hostile takeover but you seem to be saying she prevents it. I've been through this before and it doesn't end well for common's - Trust me.
So Powers is Chairman, CEO and CFO?
You've got compliance people rolling over in their graves. What on earth are you talking about "Quasi"? Does this company have a BOD that answers to common shareholders or not?
"This is actually a quasi-public and a quasi-private company since LP has final voting say..."
Or maybe the company is selling shares at 58 cents??
Yes well, I suppose you can always pull out those rare ships that actually do lift off, but 99% never leave the pad. I see patterns with this one that indicate serious fuel leaks.
Seems like they don't want the association too visible. I'd be concerned. Such a strange omission.
That's what everyone thought about Dart and Peregrind too. Turns out he's a bone picker.
Aren't you at all concerned that the Board of Directors profiles are missing from the NWBO website?
What's brewing is they're selling shares for dich, likely.
Locked under the cone of silence along with Peregrine management until the dastardly deed is done. Reverse split and say hello to the next generation of "investors".
So why no BOD description on their website?
Very well said. Don't think I've ever seen a common shareholder excited about an S3. Go figure.
I don't believe I've ever come across a public biotech which did not present its BOD on its website. What's up with that?
Well, with the addition of those two to the board you are certainly right. No comparison now to PP's awful BOD. But neither has scientific background. Black could easily find out there are no attacks and management is just going through the research motions. Where's his report?
I've stated in the past I don't know a lot about NWBO BUT I DO SEE PATTERNS. Here's one: A Friday evening financial event release. Never seen as good.
...And here's what I've learned over all the years: How is an investor able to tell the difference between a clinical trial with an end goal of research and a trial meant to commercialize a drug? Too often management (with the FDA's blessing) is performing research for the sake of research while being compensated generously, all the while having their shareholders believe the goal is commercialization. With the right pieces in place ("empty stethoscopes", I like to call them) it's nearly impossible to know.
Thankfully, investors and their money are catching on.
Peregrine management never challenged Feuerstien either, even after he called them "a shiddy enterprise". There have been many detractors and never once did they come to shareholders aid. PPHM now down 95%. See a pattern?
Take Peregrine, for example. "Shareholders" talked revolt, gave drop dead dates, almost daily chatter of impatience with management. And what came of it? $500 million up in flames over twenty years and still running. Chris wrote no less than four articles showering the company with praise, even given management's history. So where's Chris' critical article? Where are the shareholders demanding this crew step down? Neither exist.
....That's a big problem for the common investor today as compared to times past. The shelf, the shell, the packages, are all worth something to somebody, even without any real potential for commercialization and true profits. Like squeezing a sponge dry.
You people all seem to speak the same language -The one that always seems to leave common shareholders out in the cold. Where's the duty to them?
Then why doesn't the CEO just say that? Or is it better to crush the sp and sell shares for breadcrumbs while violating all sorts of fiduciary responsibilities? I asked the same questions over and over again on Peregrine with their alleged Plll. Turns out I was right all along and almost all the rest of the hope filled were plain wrong.
It wouldn't be released on a Friday night if it was good. That's just the way it is.
Beyond toxic. Used in ways never imagined. The SEC should be made aware. Where's that article?
This is a Friday night special.
I see. So nothing to do with being on the verge of insolvency?
Bounces up like this likely indicate more dilutive news.
This may indicate the end.
They tricked investors with this little bump up and then the depressing news. No way they let them off the hook.
You don't give gifts when news is on the horizon. Too much scrutiny.
So another thirty days needs to go by.
So just so I have it straight, you're saying management told you they were holding out for Bette roofers?
Could mean toward completion of rapping things up since it stopped recruiting?
Maybe "toward completion" is similar to "On track"?
Honest?
So you're saying management mislead but it's good to move on with no repercussions?
Very insightful post thank you.