Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
PennyPop...this weblink is probably (you) well worth reading?
https://wdtxipblog.com/2021/05/13/judge-albrights-fireside-chat/
________________
In case the above weblink is removed replace "xxx" with "com"
https://wdtxipblog.xxx/2021/05/13/judge-albrights-fireside-chat/
Another thought aside from the weblink above...is it possible the Judge has seen Intel before him far to many times and is becoming a bit bias?...has any of the Attorneys discussed this possibility?
Penny...the most accurate, educated discussions would come from Alan81. I don't know if you are aware but believe Alan retired from Intel. He is a professional, down to earth, honest and I don't believe he has taken a stock position in HDC but does buy and sell Intel stock.
From what I gather reading and listening to various attorney links that work both sides of these type of cases each side takes a big chance at supplying far too much information that can actually hurt their case meaning both sides. There are rules (of course I don't know them!) that they must follow and each side must be cautious not to play these rules to the hilt. Each side can blow a hole in their case by too much presentation....at least that is my layman understanding????
PennyPop...if you have time the following link is interesting in understanding Litigation process on both sides of the table.
In the link below replace the xxx with com
https://www.youtube.xxx/watch?v=J28lcXGucMQ
PennyPop...no the PTAB never dealt with the "Validity" of any of our patents. The facts representing the Intel/HDC fight on ownership was resolved due to our earlier patent materials before the Intel/China fiasco. So as Alan81 has stated over and over again that yes HDC owns certain patents but Intel is trying to state by way of the court system and the PTAB that the patents don't hold water. In other words the patent(s) may prove to be unpatentable.
The Judge never addressed patentability as seen in below.
Read this and it will become clear...........
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=151504654
Irish...I have known Roger for over 20 years. He means well and even believes in the crap he tries to do but as always he fails to deliver to typical shareholders. Now Jack should know better but believe that geowen57 just got caught up in Rogers smooth talking. I believe Geowen57 is very innocent and the only reason I talked with him a few months ago. I personal invested in at least 4 or 5 public corporations of Roger and son in the USA and Australia over the past 21 years and every single corporation turn to crap. Some don't know but Roger was born with a gold spoon in his mouth and doesn't included anyone else.
Did anyone here think we would see a $1.48 share price again?
I picked up a few more shares today and in time we will soar like an Eagle....so "Neogenomic Corporation" make way as here we come.
10-Q page 18
We are pursuing licensing activity and collaborations to increase revenue. Additionally, we are evaluating options to secure funding for infringement activities to protect our proprietary technology or other forms of fund-raising either in the debt or equity markets. None of these options are definitive and there is no guarantee we will be successful in these fund-raising efforts. In addition, while the potential economic impact brought by and the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic may be difficult to assess or predict, it has already caused, and is likely to result in further, significant disruption of global financial markets, which may reduce our ability to access capital either at all or on favorable terms. At March 31, 2021, we had $731,000 in cash and total current liabilities of $753,000. We estimate cash will be depleted by the first quarter of 2022 unless we are able to increase revenues or raise additional capital.
From reading prior SEC filings as far as 3 years ago and to date! The company indicates they are pursuing licensing and collaboration revenue which is good but why is it that us retail shareholders here nothing as to any licensing or collaboration deals with any prospect regardless if it is negative or positive. The company "HDC" appears very distant from every producing any news referencing any positive licensing or collaboration deal I mean our CEO who even shut down the HDC office in Pennsylvania, sure it was probably an office within his home but how would any CEO conduct business with office shut down? It seems he wouldn't but of course if Marty lives in Georgia then he could easily conduct business deals or George could easily blame him for no licensing or collaboration deals.
Maybe HDC might blame all us retail investors on why HDC hasn't any collaboration deal or place blame on COVID which is clearly BS!
Look at that share price is moving upward, cool!
I did not include the Intel matter in this post because I wanted to make an additional comment referencing our existing and (failing patents as they dissolve into thin air)...meaning What has HDC done to try and license the 4 gene prostate patent? Is there anything the company can say on why they have or haven't licensed that "so called" valuable patent? So valuable no body wants to license that patent... and why hasn't anyone since NEO even sniffed at our patents and what is George and Marty doing to promote our patents as to licensing? Now our attorneys are handling the Intel matters not HDC so what is HDC really doing? Anyone see anything in this filing to indicate something positive besides we are still barely breathing?
Our patents only seem exclusive to HDC but something says that is a bunch of baloney, damn shame!
HOWEVER On February 27, 2021, Intel filed a Petition for Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) of the Company’s SVM-RFE with the PTAB of the USPTO. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the IPR and formulating a response.
__________________________________________________
Intellectual Property Developments and Patent Defense Matters
As previously disclosed in our 2020 Form 10-K, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) has issued a Notice of Allowance of Patent Application Number 14/754,434 covering the four-gene prostate cancer test developed using the Company’s proprietary SVM-RFE technology. The allowed claims cover a method for screening for and treating prostate cancer by measuring expression levels of the four genes within a patient sample compared to one or more reference genes and generating a prediction score based on the averaged relative expression levels. This Notice of Allowance is important after encountering the significant barriers to patenting of biomarkers that had been raised by the U.S. Supreme Court’s controversial decisions in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories and Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics. This Biomarker Patent complements the Company’s already issued European Patent that covers similar claims.
We believe that this patent demonstrates the ability of the Company’s proprietary technology in the discovery and validation of biomarkers for diseases. We believe this same method can be applied to numerous different diseases and will explore opportunities with partners to deploy these same methods using our proprietary technology in biomarker discovery.
We hold the exclusive rights to 20 issued U.S. patents covering uses of SVM technology for discovery of knowledge from large data sets. The Company also has 1 pending U.S. patent application covering uses of the SVM technology as well as diagnostic methods that have been discovered using the SVM technology.
As a positive note referencing the prior 10-K concern that was not certified by an independent public accounting firm.......
Note 11 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Financial Instruments – Credit Losses. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-10 which provides a framework to stagger effective dates for future major accounting standards and amends the effective dates for certain new accounting standards, including ASU No. 2016-13, “Credit Losses,” to give implementation relief. The new standard, as amended, will replace the incurred loss impairment methodology under current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The Company will be required to use a forward-looking expected credit loss model for accounts receivable, loans, and other financial instruments. Credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities will also be recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a reduction in the amortized cost basis of the securities. The standard will be adopted upon the effective date for the Company beginning January 1, 2023. Adoption of the standard will be applied using a modified retrospective approach through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the effective date to align the Company’s credit loss methodology with the new standard. The Company is currently evaluating the effects this standard will have, if any, on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
Note 12 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has evaluated subsequent events occurring through the date that the financial statements were available to be issued, for events requiring recording or disclosure in the March 31, 2021 financial statements. Other than disclosed earlier in these financial statements, there were no material events or transactions occurring during this period requiring recognition or disclosure.
HDC files 10-Q today.........
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1141788/000168316821001980/hdc_10q-033121.htm
Penny...tell ZEE the month of June is typical annual meeting for HDC. This is the time when management rewards themselves for all that they have done to..I mean done for their starving shareholders.
Well it looks like June 29th for shareholders meeting!
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1141788/000168316821001804/hdc_8k.htm
King...being a library does seem to make one wonder why it was removed but perhaps it is being modified or something more recent to show the newest progression in mathematics and then it will be seen in the library again...maybe it was moved to the 20th century library?
Alan, I'm not about to check our patents referencing WIPO since I'm totally positive HDC hasn't a clue about protecting those in the first place. I mean if anyone believes Intel is the first player to step on our patents then I'm just going to shake my head. Now Intel is most likely one of the largest players to possibly step on our patents and as I mentioned long ago I feel the lawsuit is HDC's last stand kinda like George Cluster but now days things are handled differently so maybe a settlement agreement for George H. McGovern and his troops I mean shareholders.
In that event why not sue the French Government....I mean white lives matter too I mean shareholders.
King Oil...not a chance, that would be a massive mistake and they are not stupid. It would never be removed to cover up any tracks, period...that would be devastating to Intel.
Good for you...looking great!
Alan...this sounds like a plus for HDC, we might be even be gaining horsepower on Intel's down stream product line(s) too...I'm incline to believe a settlement is definitely on the table.
Any further thoughts from you are greatly appreciated regardless if it is plus or negative.
It seems to that stonemoney is Steven over on Yahoo, is with his post bring deleted is it possible that he did get inside information and from whom? If it is from within I doubt George would personally stick his neck out but of course every company always has a suckup, brown nose or a yes man. Who in HDC would lower themselves that far. Anyone have any clue and if not within than who?
I'm not even going to comment on the out come I'm thinking will happen...as for Intel settling 98% of the time I gather Stonemoney has forgot about all the BS Intel put us through! If there is a settlement it is because George just wants to dump this crap ASAP and leave Dodge City. How some forget about the amount of shares he is holding.
MBMoney...the cancellation of court date on the 30th already moved from the 29th leeds me to believe the Judge has either personal problem or his schedule is so screwed up the clerk of court has to re-schedule many court dates. It would be interesting to know if other court dates have been modified in the last few days. I know it only cost us .10 per page but still not worth me pulling any documents yet.
With Intel's ability to sit on HDC and drag this out until our money runs out is probably (as you stated)what they will do.
Now wouldn't it be cool if they settled
I gather numb nut dog would need to buy back his so called truck load of BS shares.
"Value_Investor"...it just isn't game time yet so they will buy and sell until this really starts to move up much high. Remember this should be a fast mover when the time comes. I think the governing factor will be the volume so KGRI is in a stall right now. Keep on telling investors and traders as this won't stay down forever. She will run or should run and when this one does it will surprise traders as it really didn't perk months ago but this time it should really peg the charts.
King_Oil...Excellent
Come on "buylow2" this is your old alias what is your present? I mean no one stops posting in these threads for almost 4 years and then start posting again...I mean even if you were locked up in prison all this time you would still be able to post from there!
MBMoney...someone must pony up?
So you say as follows..........
( HDC is still in a stalemate with Vennwest (ie Quirk), and who knows how much more money needs to be expended relative to this lawsuit.)
You watch, ole George will end up shaking hands with Vennwest!!!
I will pay you anything not to get mixed up in this company but if you make that mistake just know when you hear a buffalo herd stampeding don't look back as it will hundreds of past investors running for the exit door and believe me bodies could stacked a mile high and never exit.
Do wonder why you haven't posted in almost 4 years.
"BuyLow2"...you are absolutely correct. Now I see why "Stonemoney" posted as he did plus our share price actually move upward a bit.
This hasn't anything to do with the company it is all about buying and selling pinks and nothing more.
I have been watching and it seems the lower they can keep the share price the more shares they can buy and sell! They buy 2 - 5 million shares at 5 and dump at 7 then back down and buy again and sell again. It would seem they might be moving up a tad but see that scenario playing out over and over which will control the share price.
Now if we could get some several large buyer to move this hi enough it will attract more traders such as yourself.
If they are talking about that same company "they" - VLSI did win but it was reversed I believe?
"Value" I gather just join everyone buying and selling from .0005 to .0007 until this really breaks.
NOPE, very bad considering everything but Intel can pay us that $Billion. Actually it really sounds bad and wonder why Stonemoney posted that link. Only conclusion is he may wishes to buy cheaper shares since share price will drop.
...or even lower.......I don't trust the up trend just yet. Actually it doesn't really matter, green is green.
I'm banking on 1 more buy @.0005....and then to the moon!
Believe me I'm not swift at all...those that may really know far more will comment and besides it is a great way to learn. If a person doesn't put themselves out there they may not learn as quick and I'm willing to put my foot in my mouth to learn...maybe both feet, at any rate don't believe anyone is capable of reaching through my monitor and shaking me.
As for that 8-K it may mean very little but I just felt it was a perfect time to voice.
Another point that I keep on thinking about is the comment made by "Armed n Hammered" referencing that "DocLynk" company possibly being associating with Dr. Dent "HLYK". Our "Technical or Technology Officer" is from India. Is India and or DocLnyk" in India a possibly linked? Now is Arthrex Corporation going to get involved in India possibly spin off "part" of their corporation to merge with HLYK. Now there is no way in hell that HLYK could buy Arthrex but they could easily buy HLYK and go private which we as retail shareholders would not want, believe me!!. Most of us have known since 2005 that India's demographics are prime time so just maybe between backing from Arthrex we might open a new global dealings in India.
Excellent!....well! we will see if it sticks this time and starts upward where she belongs....
just checked those .0006 trades. Seems like AI computers are now going to let this play. Maybe that signal will now have traders walking in.
I know I would love to see a 1.5 billion share trade day involving this pinkeye.
Yes sir...it is time running 7's...some what...but finally gaining some positive ground.
Mike...Rule 457(o), on the other hand, is more useful when an issuer knows the dollar amount that it wishes to raise, regardless of the number of shares it ultimately issues. When utilizing Rule 457(o), the issuer will not have to pay additional filing fees if additional shares are issued at a lower price, so long as the maximum aggregate offering price does not increase.
$50 MILLION DOLLARS
I also suspect something to be mentioned about their provisional patent(s) since they are due to transform into a patent application where we can finally see and read about them. After 1 year as a provisional it must then become accessible by those of us that access such information. Aside from that I just wonder if something with detail will be mentioned about AI - Artificial Intelligence licensing from either Amazon, Google or Microsoft.
I understand that but that was mainly pushed in this message thread. When a real news/decent deal is made with them or a different player $1.35 will be history in a big way.