Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That's my girl lol
No it is real heavy, It was made off the backs of his shareholders. You know come to think of it. Why didn't people like you SCREAM that Maddoff was a crook. Before so many got hurt? Most of you guys say "WELL IF YOU WOULD OF LISTENED TO US, YoU WOULD NOT OF LOST TO UC"
So where were you smart people with MADOFF Company
I do not know about your home, but where I live. the man helps in the kitchen and does the BBQ 100%
Do you know that was MADDOFF's boat
Don't you have a man to do the BBQ? I am sure Hasher would come over to make you a HASH Burger
Only 88 degrees in PA? Not that hot to cook. No air condition?
He isn't a complete fool.
Dam I am exposed. The KINGPIN STRIKES AGAIN!
PS Happy Holiday. Making BBQ?
Who's?
Remember TROLL BLOCK
Sometimes message board trolls are new identities created by long-established members of the board; they create the message board troll to cause mischief, or to say nasty thoughts they feel they cannot express as their more established identity. Message board trolls can make or break a message board. It's important to know how to spot a message board troll.
Instructions
1.
* 1
Examine the pattern of message board posts to see if the user knows more about the message board than a new user ("newbie") should know. Does the suspected troll mention events that happened long before their join date? If so, be suspicious.
* 2
Look at the suspected troll's user name. If it seems to allude to a past even or other user's identity, watch out. This can be a big clue in spotting a message board troll.
* 3
Go to the suspected troll's member profile, and read his or her past threads and posts. If they all seem negative or about a thread that happened before joining, that is a huge red flag. If so, that's a big clue you're dealing with a troll.
* 4
Ask the suspected troll lots of questions on the message board. Eventually he or she will trip up, and he will say something that is inconsistent with the persona they've created.
* 5
Call the troll out. Start a new thread in the most-trafficked area of the message board, and be ready with your suspicions, links to posts where the troll is inconsistent, and start a "flame" on the suspected troll.
* 6
Ask an administrator to do an "IP check" if the suspected troll denies being a troll. IP cross-checks can show whether two different users come from the same IP address. Some message board administrators will do this for you.
* 7
Search in a search engine for the troll's user name. You may find other message boards where he or she posts, and find good evidence to use to flush him or her out. Many trolls aren't creative, and reuse the same user name.
* 8
Put the troll on "ignore" if the board has that feature, and just don't respond to his or her posts.
Not funny, I heard people lost much money because of this Jackmass
HAPPY HOLIDAYS! you TROLLS!
I am sure Sandy thanks you lol
Well my point is if a guy gets 15 years for Freedom of Speech. Can you imagine what the Thai Government will do to sandy
So my point with the American being arrested for Insults to the Thai King while living in America. When he made a vacation to Thailand. So if this guy can look at 15 years for insulting the king with words.
How many years can Sandy get for what he did? WOW!
Thailand arrests American for alleged king insult
AP
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110527/ap_on_re_as/as_thailand_monarchy
Bhumibol Adulyadej AP – FILE - In this Dec. 5, 2010 file photo, Thailand's King Bhumibol Adulyadej is assisted while leaving …
* Thailand's King Bhumibol Adulyadej Slideshow:Thailand's King Bhumibol Adulyadej
By TODD PITMAN and SINFAH TUNSARAWUTH, Associated Press Todd Pitman And Sinfah Tunsarawuth, Associated Press – 33 mins ago
BANGKOK – Thai authorities said Friday they arrested an American citizen on charges he insulted the country's monarchy, in part by posting a link on his blog four years ago to a banned book about the Southeast Asian nation's ailing king.
The man is also suspected of translating, from English into Thai, portions of "The King Never Smiles" — an unauthorized biography of King Bhumibol Adulyadej — and posting them online along with articles he wrote that allegedly defame the royal family, said Tharit Pengdith, who heads the Department of Special Investigation, Thailand's equivalent of the FBI.
The American has denied the charges, according to the Thai-language prachatai.com news website, which tracks cases of lese majeste, as the crime of insulting the monarchy is known.
The 54-year-old Thai-born man lived in the U.S. state of Colorado for around 30 years before returning recently to Thailand for treatment for high blood pressure and gout, the website said. If the allegations are true, the infractions would have been committed while he lived in America — where they are legal — raising concern about the reach of Thai law and how it is applied to Thai nationals and foreign visitors.
Tharit said the man's Thai name was Lerpong Wichaikhammat. Walter M. Braunohler, the U.S. Embassy spokesman in Bangkok, identified the American as Joe Gordon and said a consular officer visited him on Friday morning. He declined comment further, saying only that officials were following the case "very closely."
"We're still looking into what the exact charges are," Braunohler told The Associated Press.
Thailand is a constitutional monarchy but has severe lese majeste laws that mandate a jail term of three to 15 years for any person who "defames, insults or threatens the king, the queen, the heir to the throne or the Regent."
Critics say the lese majeste laws — used with alarming frequency over the last several years — are often a weapon of political harassment and calls have grown recently to amend or abolish them.
Thai-based media routinely self-censor coverage of the royal family, but the Internet has tested the taboo. Thai authorities have responded by trying to block thousands of websites considered subversive, arguing that defending the monarchy is a priority.
Tharit said the man was arrested Tuesday and is facing charges that include inciting public unrest and violating Thailand's Computer Crimes Act. Gordon appeared before a Thai court Thursday, which denied him bail.
A DSI spokeswoman, speaking on customary condition of anonymity, said the American was arrested in the northeastern province of Nakhon Ratchasima and is being held in a Bangkok prison.
Praachatai.com said police arrested the man at his home and seized a computer and cell phone.
Sensitivity over criticism of the monarchy has increased in recent years as the poor health of the country's 83-year-old king has elevated concern about a smooth succession. At the same time, sharp partisan political battles in the wake of a 2006 military coup have unleashed unprecedented questioning of established institutions, including the palace.
Thailand's freedom of speech reputation has taken a battering in recent years, as successive governments have tried to suppress the opposition. Its standing in the Press Freedom Index issued by the Paris-based group Reporters Without Borders slid to 153 last year from 65 in 2002, when the ratings were initiated.
The number of lese majeste cases has grown dramatically in recent years. Between 1990 and 2005, an average of five per year made their way through the Thai court system. Since then, however, there have been at least 400 cases — an estimated 1,500 percent increase, according to David Streckfuss, an American scholar who wrote a recent book studying the harsh laws called "Truth on Trial."
In March, a Thai court sentenced Thanthawut Taweewarodomkul — the operator of an anti-government website — to 13 years on charges of defaming the monarchy and three more years for violating the Computer Crime Act. The 38-year-old ran a website affiliated with the anti-government Red Shirt movement whose aggressive street protests last year deteriorated into violence and were quashed by the army.
The 2007 Computer Crime Act addresses hacking and other traditional online offenses, but also bars the circulation of material deemed detrimental to national security or that causes panic. It carries a penalty of up to five years' imprisonment and a fine of 100,000 baht ($3,285).
The DELI Market was famous. Didn't you hear about it?
speaking of the STING CREDIT GOES TO ORIGINAL POSTER. thanks
US v. John Edwards et al (CMKM)
Defendants: John Edwards, Jeffrey Turino, Urban Casavant, Nickolaj Vissokovsky, Melissa Spooner, Helen Bagley, Jeffrey Mitchell, Brian Dvorak, Ginger Gutierrez, James Kinney
Scheduled Court Hearings
A false rumor has circulated that confuses the criminal prosecution in the District of Nevada (United States v. John Edwards, et al., 2:09-CR-00132-RLH-RJJ) with a civil suit out of the Central District of California that has now been dismissed (David Anderson, et al., v. Christopher Cox, et al., 8:10 –CV-00031-JVS-MLG). There are many variations of this rumor. However, in short, the Anderson civil case is not related to the Edwards criminal case. In Anderson, the plaintiffs allege that the SEC and other agencies of the U.S. Government conducted a sting operation against “illegitimate brokers, dealers, market makers, hedge funds, and other persons and entities that had engaged in naked short selling of CMKM Diamonds Inc. stock.” Anderson Rev. First Amended Complaint, p. 17, para. 48. Essentially, the Anderson case involved allegations against an entire industry. In contrast, the superseding criminal indictment in the Edwards case charges a more clearly defined group of defendants: insiders at one company (CMKM) and people who enabled them.
Additionally, in the course of investigating and litigating the Edwards criminal case, government personnel in the District of Nevada have not encountered any evidence indicating that a government agency conducted a sting operation against naked short sellers of CMKM stock. Government personnel in the District of Nevada have also not come across any evidence of any settlement fund (much less any settlement fund with trillions of dollars) potentially available to pay possible claims of CMKM shareholders. The criminal investigation in the District of Nevada resulting in the United States v. John Edwards, et al., indictment involved no sting operation.
We hope this statement clarifies the differences between United States v. John Edwards, et al., with the facts alleged in David Anderson, et al., v. Christopher Cox, et al. The public is reminded that defendants are innocent until proven guilty. Thank you.
ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE
Status Hearing - April 4, 2012 @8:45
Trial Date - April 9, 2012 @8:30
Order To Continue (May 18, 2011)
2005? Hasn't traded since. WRONG!!! 100% WRONG!!!
Just ask Delidog
USE TROLL BLOCK TO BLOCK PEOPLE THAT bother you. It's FREE
The reason is that every time my TROLL BLOCK is activated. I hear the ARRRRR DUH! chime. It get's annoying.
Please do not talk to the people I have on TROLL BLOCK. Thanks
What does that mean? Friend hasher?
Yes they sell the RAT steaks as chicken. In POW camp. Real 1965 B&W film. You should watch it
Did you ever see the movie KING RAT? Where WW2 POW's raise a rat farm and serve it as chicken. They make RAT fricassee
You think Tyler will ever get CMKX to trade or merge to a trading platform?
You are still my hero. Thanks
Thai jails have a terrible reputation.
Good. Hope Sandy rots in that jail for a long time
The Quackateer is on this board and watching all the trolls.
Oh boy when is pay day JIMMY You promised
So what happens next with AL and thew GREAT appeal?
I saw some e-mail that he answered SOON
Why is Al so quite?
Was that ever confirmed? That it is truly him?
Al has been quite. HYMMM
anything new dd?
Thanks detective
Never! Then I would truly have no one to talk to.
Do you think that Janice and Hasher will also feel special? That they are on the approved for chatting with.
Nope all the people on the APPROVED list are NOT blocked. That is why the program puts them a different color then the RED BLOCKED people.
That is why I asked you if you feel special.
You are in the approved poster list. Not the block list. silly. That is why I can see you. I did not block you. Feel special?