OMG, quick, someone call the IAIR folks and tell them they just gave this award to a scam company and this is garbage news,lmao.

100% correct!

Correct.

Yes,correct, the plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit against PT, SA, and associates.

Just like the list of plaintiffs being compiled by the class action law teams.[b/]

Uh, yeah, how about naming all those hedge funds that have lost money.

Thanks, I sure enjoy reading correct info from those who actually understand biotechnology .

Correct, I just sent her a thank you a few mins ago there, for being a true professional vs "non professionals " in biotechnology.

Thanks to you, a true professional who knows her biotechnology.

Has anyone seen comments from drugdoctor lately? I think he was the one who started this board . He had some excellent DD when I first bought in at under .02.

Robi, please send your analysis to the SEC at the address in my sig. Thanks.

Ask drugdoctor. I think he started this board.

I need to short trash like this. Down again today, looks like the party for shorts is just getting started.

Thanks for this truly informative DD from an expert (you) who has the intelligence to dig deep for the truth vs "shoot from the lip" DD.

If not true it should be , just from my personal "files" I have sent "authorities" as per my sig.

Wow! Congrats for never being wrong on a biotech and outperforming 100% of other biotech investors.

100% correct.

So, show us the proof it does not work. Those who understand bio techs know that it DOES work!

Yes, even I knew this, so why is there a question? Perhaps NNVC can use a hammer and kill the other 50%,lol.

The therapeutic index (also known as therapeutic ratio) is a comparison of the amount of a therapeutic agent that causes the therapeutic effect to the amount that causes death (in animal studies) or toxicity (in human studies).[1]

Quantitatively, it is the ratio given by the lethal or toxic dose divided by the therapeutic dose.

In animal studies, the therapeutic index is the lethal dose of a drug for 50% of the population (LD50) divided by the minimum effective dose for 50% of the population (ED50).

Lethality is not determined in human clinical trials; instead, the dose that produces a toxicity in 50% of the population (TD50) is used to calculate the therapeutic index.

Oh, so NNVC is only into their ninth year of testing with no product on the market. Well even I, with half a brain, know that most biotechs take take much longer than that to develop. I've been following one since 1987 that is just now into Phase 3.

But what do I know. I only spent 35 years in the biotech/drug business,LOL.

After all the SA article read like PT received his NNVC DD from a village newspaper in "Zimbabwee" (sic), LMAO.

OMG, don't tell me these brilliant institutions are involved with a scam,lol.

Besides the collaborations with the world leading infectious disease research test centers, universities and laboratories, all reporting great results, the discussion of history and management operating practice, as well as the timelines and costs impressed me even more than the first read.

Thanks for your intelligent response on funding.

WARNING!!!!! Illegal, stock manipulating scammers are attempting to lower pps of NNVC ?!!!

All those prestigious institutions associated with NanoViricide lab studies certainly prove to me this is one big scam. But what do I know as I only have half a brain.

Not all done in house:

*University of California at Berkeley, Prof. Eva Harris Lab;

*TheVac, LLC, LSU;

*Northeastern Ohio Medical University (NEOMED);

*United States Army Medical Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), Dr. Gene Olinger Lab;

*Feinstein Institute of Medical Research;

*Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Dr. Charles Rupprecht Lab;

*National (Central) Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology (NIHE), Vietnam

*Southern Research Institute, Frederick, MD.

*Southern Research Institute, Alabama.

*University of California at San Francisco (Dr. Cheryl Stoddart, PI), CA.

Our schools really should be teaching more science, like nano technology, instead of teaching the slow learners how to ROFL.

A more positive outlook? Pump Turdinator will not be happy?

Wise.


Crossbone09 Friday, 02/21/14 10:04:07 PM
Re: None
Post # of 84456
Bank of America is an Institutional Holder of NNVC stock!!!

This is one of over two dozen insitiutional firms who are now holders of NanoViricides stock:

http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/nnvc/institutional-holdings

Having institutional investors is a DIRECT RESULT of the successful reverse split and subsequent uplisting to an NYSE exchange that the company orchestrated last fall.

A great post. Boy, the little elves with little minds sure have been busy today.

As one who bought into PAWS under .02 when the board was filled with facts, I would be scared off the stock today as it (board) is beginning to look more and more like a P&D thread.

The market was not so smart when it sold off after the scandalous, criminal, SA hit piece on NNVC.

I would presume the SA blog is about as illegal as the hit piece and follow up by criminal shorts attempting to illegally manipulate the pps of NNVC downward, as in my sig.

WARNING!!! Illegal scammers are attempting to scare you into selling your NNVC shares!

OMG, an article from ScienceNow! How dare they have the nerve to print such non-science propaganda actually researched by scientists with decades of training in their field!

We all know that research scientists such as those working with NanoViricides are lacking in scientific knowledge,lol.

Pre market trade? BB stocks do not trade pre market.

I'm still here at .018 but don't want to act like a P & D'er by screaming about it all day,lol.

BooDog, good find. You should repost this on NNVC board.

OMG, someone better call those uneducated institutional investors and inform them they are investing in a scam,lol!

Those "investors" who do not the difference between their ears and a petri dish should never invest in a biotech.

Correct.

IMO,.... the volume of cretins showing up merely indicates that the vultures are looking hard for something to latch onto.

My guess,.... they isn't anything smoking other than some people who hold short positions the want to make them more money,....

And hopefully SA and the anonymous poster of a week or so ago will find their own backsides 'smoking' shortly.

So sorry Mick, so did my "second" father who was a Vet and in his late '40's.