yawn...., sorry, Joe, BIG YAWN!

Thanks for that explanation, Doma. Too bad your expertise is treated dismissively by some.here.

scorpio_esq

Joe Wave reminds me of American Joe. BEEN there, HEARD that! Big yawn....

I smell a pathology, not a 'red herring'.

HhH, What do you hav against "inspiring Wavoids"? The train moves on, and you
are still here, uninspired and carping.

Bull, I share your logic on Wave's currrent upside versus downside risk.
I don't have 100k woth of 'bread'... unfo rtunat ely.

Bull, Isha

Logically, It should, because that's a (trusted) application-level issue.

scorpio_esq

Logically, it should, since supporting one trusted user or several (specifl issue.. In
layman's terms, if two fingerprints from a singleic)
trusted users can be an authentication criterion for trusting an
application's input data, then what's the problem with autherizing multiple trusted users at the (trusted) application level?

scorpio_esq

OT - Thanks, VH. That was the kindest thing I have heard in this long (health) ordeal.

scorpio_esq

Cost penalties are a less critical issue, once the industry understands the magnitude of the E2 benefits. We have' Intel' now, to
awaken and educate the industry to the entire picture of possible benefits..

he clue? "key server" sounds like the Wave TAN, to me!
More stealth...? Give me a break.
scorpio_esq

Factoid: It was expected.

My recollection is that there is some Wave I.P. in the TPMs. Re-chek your DD.

I have a simple, functional definition of a Wavoid, one that possibly encompasses all of us: "One, who despite
any misgivings, will never abandon his/her WAVX poition in favor of another stock.

scorpio_esq

Rachel, Are you distinguishing a LAN from a 'netwotk'?

An e

Doma, you are so gracious -- giving a serious answer to an un-serious question.

One word, Rachel -- "touche"...!

scorpio_e sq

Are you sure it's not a 'homeoffice' for the listed V.P.?

scorpio_esq

What an uninformed statement. The internet is an open network (an unsecure 'mesh') and the WiFi environment is basically a a similar construct, using RF links between the nodes. Think about it.

A matter of tone. Is Wave's concept and potential execution viable? The burder of
proof is on interrogators like Ze'ev, not usor Wave. This newbie-nit-picking bores me. Sorry 'bout that.

re: NE C -- "live and learn!"

And did you read the logo, or actually WEAR the T-Shirt?

Confused, or 'fishing' incoherently?

Which one?

'Outed'...?

Seriously, who here are willing to bet anything SIGNIFICANT that Intel doesn't know what it's
getting into???

The people who wanted ADKs got them. That's history now. Why waste scarce resources updating that info on the website now? It's not now germane to the intended audience (interested software engineer and programmers). They know about the ADK!

AWK You've been reading my posts for years, so, you know I'm 100% with you on that!

The localclock integrity check is just another encrypted bit stream passing from TAN server to Embassy client. Why should it be any less secure than any other? (duh?)

No lesson learned from the Intel deal? Maybe the pipelineaque! is not "clogged", but simply, the pipe is still opaque.

platudes, platitudes....

Don't confuse our critics/skeptics with the facts. Facts can be unsettling.

scorpio_esq

Comme ce-ci me fatigue....

Ther e are community-building, and social aspects of this board that are unconnected with pure reseach and due diligence. Clearly, you are insensitive, or unimpressed by, these aspects. Given that narrow perspective, I'd suggehst that you retire to a well-stocked research library.

It's all hop and hype, Smokey, so short away. I susp ect that your real intention is not to short the stock, but to scare off newbies. Look at the volume ... you should know that that is a fool's errand.


scorpio_esq

Both bigtim and tophersaint posted in the last few days, but not extensively.

scorpio_esq

Larry, as SKS said at the last shareholder meeting:.. It couldn't be done (my paraphrase) because "no-one owns the company." Meaning that the shareholder base is too fragmented among too many individual (potentially fractious) investors, a preponderence of which are long-term Wavoids. This will change at some point, but now it is not a question worthy of much spectulation.

scorpio_esq

Ayn Rand, huh? It looks like Wave just cut through the steel beam!

scorpio_esq