is... wishing Americans would wake up before it is too late.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I had an angiogram(?) a few years back and the doc told me I had roughly 50% blockage in one spot, but he 'wouldn't put in a stint unless it reached 55%'. That angio gram was the most painful medical procedure I can recall ever having in my life.
Roughly six months later, I had another at a different facilility, and the doc there told me he could not understand what the first doctor was talking about, because he couldn't find anything that would indicate any significant blocking, let alone "50%". Interestingly enough, this procedure ws about as close to 'pain free' as anything I ever had done in a hospital.
The first angio gram was done after I told my primary care doc I was having some shortness of breath....
I chose to believe the second doctor, of course!
Still don't understand why the first one hurt like the devil.
Yep. But just give 'em time....
Great for you! Keep it up! My feeling is there ar just a many crooked doctors as there are crooked lawyers ... well maybe not quite as many, but they're sure out there.
Newt is so narcissistic he just can't admit he's getting beat.
Time for he and Callista to go on another cruise.
Why the hell dont you learn to read? Or think? Did I say a word about a birth certificate? I spoke of general eligibility. You're the obsessed one.
You'd think every single American citizen would want to ensure our leader is eligible to seek the office... Isn't it wonderful to live in a nation where the common man can be heard?
Yeah, ain't that the chits!
Real loyal American there ....
Doesn;t even think enough of the country that afforded her the chance to get where she is, to hold it up as an example.
I knew liberals were nuts, but maybe this one has really gone over the edge.
Whatever the 'reason' she should be relieved of all duties, as mentally incompetent. But, the sad part is, she is reflecting the thought patterns of the majority of the leftist traitors in the country today.
Sounds like a few on some of the other boards here on IHUB.
Yep ..... how you think I got all them scars? LOL
Yep ..... how you think I got all them scars? LOL
Let's see - Holder gets a contempt charge and draws a 'censure' from congress... and doesn''t produce any documents.
He produces documents as told, and ends up with some sort of criminal charges ....
Which would you do?
(assuming, of course, you had the morals of a snake, like the liberals)
Damn morons. More interested in persecuting Americans for not being politically correct, than in averting a terrorist attack.
I just feel there was a reason the other side has 'pushed' Romney from the start.
Got my 'sling' off yesterday, and can now use twohands to type! Yeah!. Can raise my arm to almost straight up vertical. I've been 'cheating' on the flexibility part, I'm sure, because the doc's PA almost had a fit when I did it yesterday in the office. Still have to do the PT though ... Everyone has to get their cut!
Be safe, and we'll just all hang on and see what happens.
Hey, that's cool!
Think we'll still be around for # 1234567?
Yeah, but they're the very ones I feel a need to talk to .... Not much I can do with someone who has already seen the light!
LOL
I know ... but the hair on the back of my neck is standing straight up ............ just like it did the last time I walked in a house to discover a meth lab ..... I should have paid attention to it! LOL
Some here think I am just paranoid. I sure hope they're right!
Figured that out, eh? Man that is one weird dude.
yep, the victim of losing!
But there are more 'surprises' that will emerge on Romney, I am thinking. Forgive me if I sound cynical about the media and the left, but I just can't help it. They've been too anxious to get Romney as the Republican candidte.
Yes indeed. I was very surprised at the results of the lowly .22LR. I feel bettter about my .380 pocket gun now too!
Supreme Court justice: U.S. Constitution inferior
'I might look at South Africa. Canada has a Charter of Rights and Freedoms'
One member of the U.S. Supreme Court, whose members are sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States, says she would look elsewhere – Canada, South Africa and Europe – should she be tasked with writing a constitution now.
The stunning statements come from Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
She was being interviewed by Al Hayat in Egypt, which is trying to develop a government after citizens deposed longtime dictator President Hosni Mubarack last year.
Egypt is facing major obstacles to a democratic form of government as the Muslim Brotherhood as a political party has been assembling a majority in the country. Among its goals is a Muslim caliphate worldwide.
She was asked: “Would your honor’s advice be to get a part of other countries’ constitutions as a model, or should we develop our own draft?
Her response:
“You should certainly be aided by all the constitution-writing that has gone on since the end of World War II. I would not look to the U.S. constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done.
“Much more recent than the U.S. Constitution is Canada has a Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It dates from 1982. You would almost certainly look at the European Convention on Human Rights. Yes, why not take advantage of what there is elsewhere in the world? I’m a very strong believer in listening and learning from others.”
Mathew Staver, chief of Liberty Counsel, said her attitude is problematic.
“For a sitting U.S. Supreme Court justice to speak derisively about the Constitution she is sworn to uphold is distressing, to say the least. Justice Ginsburg’s comments about our Constitution undermine the Supreme Court as an institution dedicated to the rule of law, as well as our founding document.”
According to Liberty Counsel, “For a United States Supreme Court justice, entrusted with the duty to interpret the Constitution, this type of statement is unacceptable. Justice Ginsburg failed to respect the authority of the document that it is her duty to protect. When given the opportunity to promote American liberty abroad, Justice Ginsburg did just the opposite and pointed Egypt in the direction of progressivism and the liberal agenda.”
Ginsburg also noted that among her favorite parts of the Constitutions is the provision that judges’ salaries cannot be reduced, as well as a guarantee of independence to judges.
She also said the U.S. Constitution is “rather old,” and told Egyptians that a constitution will mean nothing unless the people it serves and protects desire liberty and freedom.
“If the people don’t care, then the best constitution in the world won’t make any difference,” she said.
In a commentary at Slate, David Weigel said, “Ginsburg has disturbed the balance of the universe by giving an interview to Egyptian television in which she does not recommend using the U.S. Constitution as a model for post-Mubarak happiness.”
He continued, “If you want, here you go: Proof that a Supreme Court justice … looks to other countries for advice on an evolving Constitution! Of course, we’ve known this about Ginsburg for years, because she’s said so repeatedly.”
At American Spectator, John Tabin said she “gets one of nine votes on the functional meaning of the U.S. Constitution. That she thinks the age of the Constitution she’s charged with interpreting make[s] it deficient relative to newer constitutions is kind of shocking, particularly in the context of her praise for the rights enshrined in the First Amendment – rights that, in practice, are protected far less robustly in South Africa or Canada or Europe than they are in the U.S.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/supreme-court-justice-u-s-constitution-inferior/
==================================================================
Whoa! Who let Ginsberg out of her padded cell?
Supreme Court justice: U.S. Constitution inferior
'I might look at South Africa. Canada has a Charter of Rights and Freedoms'
One member of the U.S. Supreme Court, whose members are sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States, says she would look elsewhere – Canada, South Africa and Europe – should she be tasked with writing a constitution now.
The stunning statements come from Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
She was being interviewed by Al Hayat in Egypt, which is trying to develop a government after citizens deposed longtime dictator President Hosni Mubarack last year.
Egypt is facing major obstacles to a democratic form of government as the Muslim Brotherhood as a political party has been assembling a majority in the country. Among its goals is a Muslim caliphate worldwide.
She was asked: “Would your honor’s advice be to get a part of other countries’ constitutions as a model, or should we develop our own draft?
Her response:
“You should certainly be aided by all the constitution-writing that has gone on since the end of World War II. I would not look to the U.S. constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done.
“Much more recent than the U.S. Constitution is Canada has a Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It dates from 1982. You would almost certainly look at the European Convention on Human Rights. Yes, why not take advantage of what there is elsewhere in the world? I’m a very strong believer in listening and learning from others.”
Mathew Staver, chief of Liberty Counsel, said her attitude is problematic.
“For a sitting U.S. Supreme Court justice to speak derisively about the Constitution she is sworn to uphold is distressing, to say the least. Justice Ginsburg’s comments about our Constitution undermine the Supreme Court as an institution dedicated to the rule of law, as well as our founding document.”
According to Liberty Counsel, “For a United States Supreme Court justice, entrusted with the duty to interpret the Constitution, this type of statement is unacceptable. Justice Ginsburg failed to respect the authority of the document that it is her duty to protect. When given the opportunity to promote American liberty abroad, Justice Ginsburg did just the opposite and pointed Egypt in the direction of progressivism and the liberal agenda.”
Ginsburg also noted that among her favorite parts of the Constitutions is the provision that judges’ salaries cannot be reduced, as well as a guarantee of independence to judges.
She also said the U.S. Constitution is “rather old,” and told Egyptians that a constitution will mean nothing unless the people it serves and protects desire liberty and freedom.
“If the people don’t care, then the best constitution in the world won’t make any difference,” she said.
In a commentary at Slate, David Weigel said, “Ginsburg has disturbed the balance of the universe by giving an interview to Egyptian television in which she does not recommend using the U.S. Constitution as a model for post-Mubarak happiness.”
He continued, “If you want, here you go: Proof that a Supreme Court justice … looks to other countries for advice on an evolving Constitution! Of course, we’ve known this about Ginsburg for years, because she’s said so repeatedly.”
At American Spectator, John Tabin said she “gets one of nine votes on the functional meaning of the U.S. Constitution. That she thinks the age of the Constitution she’s charged with interpreting make[s] it deficient relative to newer constitutions is kind of shocking, particularly in the context of her praise for the rights enshrined in the First Amendment – rights that, in practice, are protected far less robustly in South Africa or Canada or Europe than they are in the U.S.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/supreme-court-justice-u-s-constitution-inferior/
==================================================================
Whoa! Who let Ginsberg out of her padded cell?
Not really surprised. If the judge believes the evidence points toward Obama being born on US soil, then I would expect the judge to rule that Obama is a natural born citizen. Apparently that is the gist of the ruling.
I still maintain the main stream media wants these types of challenges to continue ..... if for no other reason than to portray Obama as the 'victim' of all these crazy challenges ... and as ssome will contend, it's only because Obama is black. Which, of course, he isn't any more black than he is white.
The republicans best get their act in gear, because we are about to witness one of the hardest fought campaigns in modern history.
A cool Billion can buy a lot of sympathy ... therefore a lot of votes.
I hope the right drops this plan of attack, and gets busy campaigning against Obama's 'record', which is certainly bad enough to furnish all the fodder the right will need to win in November.
oh, you ain't seen nothing yet.
Wait until it gets all wound up! LOL
OK - Stogie Lovers!
IF you haven't already done so, then your really need to write your congressman/woman, and urge them to support H.R.1639
(Latest Title: Traditional Cigar Manufacturing and Small Business Jobs Preservation Act of 2011). This is the legislation that needs to pass in order to prevent the FDA from gaining control over imported cigars ....... total control. We need to let our representatives know that we do not want the FDA meddling in our humidors.
I urge everyone to to let your representative hear from you, concerning this matter. Our personal freedoms are already being eroded away on a near daily basis. We need this bill to pass, to help stop this craziness.
Join me in letting congress know how we feel about this matter. Look it up, do your research, and write, write, write your letters or e-mails so they know we do not want the FDA jacking around with our imported cigars.
Put it this way ... can you imagine having nothing but swisher sweets and Phillie Blunts to smoke? Now, I am not knocking anyone who likes these smokes, but personally, I believe I should have a choice and be able to enjoy a Macanudo, Fuente or Cohiba when I get ready, in the privacy of my home, car, or outdoors away from others.
Get busy and get active. The future of importing cigars is most definitely at stake!
Thanks
Should be 100% green.
Maybe someday soon ....
Ain't it the truth! Good piece!
This has been floating around for nearly three years, that I am aware of. I doubt there is any real truth to it, as far as the president issuing any sort of blanket order.
http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/barackobama/a/obama_no_faith_based_events.htm
However, I would not doubt that something was issued .... because it all fits in with the grand plan.
I hear you. counting the hours!
The short clip I saw, he just sort of smiled during it all. Showed more class than Holder, I'd say.
arrogant ass being investigated for directly contributing to the murder of a loyal border patrol agent, and he's worried that he's not being treated fairly? He should be in cuffs and leg irons, and a bright orange jumpsuit.
yep, they're neat, and reasonably priced, with one of the very best customer service departments in the industry. I really like my P3-AT and P-11. Both have proven to be dependable and they're now my favorite carry pieces. Especially like the P3-AT .... just drop it in a shirt pocket and away you go, with no one ever the wiser.
Glad you like it. They're cool pistols.
Please - drop your prejudices and knock off the attitude. The article did not address it, and the real point, what does it matter? Always trying to be the funny man, aren't you?
And tell me .... do you really believe there are no 'crazy' democrats? If so, you shouldn't be voting in any election.
So you're saying democrats don't believe in God?
Man Dies After Eating Ounce of Cocaine Out Of Brother's Butt
By JULIA JACOBO
December 20, 2011
SOUTH CAROLINA (PIX11)— After eating an ounce of cocaine hidden in his brother's buttocks, a South Carolina man died soon after.
Deangelo Mitchell, 23, and his brother Wayne, 20, were in the back of a North Charleston Police Department cruiser on Nov. 30. The duo was being transported to jail when they began whispering about narcotics hidden inside the older sibling.
The Mitchells were arrested when a police officer found three small bags of cocaine underneath a rear seat of their 2001 Chrysler. It is evident in video footage that Deangelo Mitchell encouraged his younger brother to ingest the cocaine. The older Mitchell has a lengthy record and was concerned that he could face life in prison if convicted of a narcotics charge. "I can't get no more strikes," he told his brother.
He further directed his brother to "Eat that s***" and "Chew that s***."
In the footage, Wayne Mitchell can be seen, in handcuffs, reaching back to retrieve the cocaine from his brother. He then drops his head while he eats the cocaine.
Wayne Mitchell soon after began convulsing and bleeding from his mouth. "White powder residue" was found on the rear seat of the police cruiser, cops noted. Deangelo later said "he believed his brother swallowed an ounce of cocaine."
Wayne Mitchell died within an hour of ingesting the cocaine.
Deangelo Mitchell was initially charged with narcotics trafficking and was released from custody after posting $50,000 bond. But after a review of the police footage, authorities rearrested him Tuesday, charging him with involuntary manslaughter in connection with his brother's death.
http://www.ky3.com/news/wpix-man-dies-eating-ounce-cocaine,0,6503301.story
Correct-o-mundo!
I thought I just said it started under Bush. I also meant that if we do say that, then we have to also acknowledge Bush initiated the 'war on terror' which is responsible for getting rid of the terrorists, and it was just continued by this administration, (as was the economic mess).
However I will also maintain this administration has contributed more and faster to the economic mess, than it has toward the 'war on terror'.
Additionally, this administration has been, to some degree, involved in the installation of questionable muslim governments in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, don't you think?
Let's add to that "in a campaign originated by the Bush administration".
If we hold Bush responsible for the economy mess, then we give him credit for the wiping out of muslims ...
Here's hoping you got it all figured out.
Barring some big 'october surprise' it sounds feasible and do-able.