Quote: In addition to this site being one of two 1715 ships, he also speculates that it could be the stern castle of the capitana. Which would explain the lack of cannons and ballast stones in the area.
___________________________

Who made that statement? Stern castle? Easy unsubstantiated statement to make. Bull crap. Sounds like someone doing his best to please the boss.

As to the coins on the beach; its he said she said. As to an old 8mm home movie, that could have been taken anywhere. Are you saying that in all these years now that SFRX has been playing out there, on bad unworkable weather days, dive personnel weren't working the beach with metal detectors? I know for a fact that they have done that numerous times and couldn't find zilch.

The very bottom line is you people are now down to the wire on the old 'just you wait and see'. The sea conditions are workable, its a relatively small area, Tinkerbell is supposedly tinking and you believe there's tons of treasure there for the taking. Well, lets say by first week in July this should all be a done deal. Right?

Quote: But those coins on the beach that have been found for decades came from a source.
__________________________________________

Would you please post photos and believable validation of those 'coins on the beach'.

Quote: Kyle told me 2 weeks ago that they had 2 days left of testing. That the seasercher was working perfectly was his exact words.

Now we should be expecting some damn good news.
My guess is theres no treasure there, all the years diving there , how can you miss 4-5 billion worth of treasure in 20 feet of water.

I blind gold fish could find it. Hooefully this tech can make sfrx some money somewhere else.
_______________________________________________

Who ever told you 4-5 billion dollars? As the description states below the 1715 'Concepcion' would be lucky to reach a value of 15 to 20 million dollars. They're not stating 3,000 gold doubloons but 3,000 peso value. I believe the 4-5 billon might have been a Torres statement (exaggeration) which the company had no problem with him saying it. If anyone of more credibility had said that, I would hope they had the actual manifest to support the statement.

It can be validated that this company CEO has said allot of things over time that were not factual. The Buck Rogers sea mobile (Tinkerbell) seems to (publicly) remain unproven. Allot of on going 'blow-smoke'. Here again the matter of the 32 iron cannons. Very easy find with a magnetometer but they have not found one, with the exception of the only one being that previously found by Heartland. Where the bulk of those cannons lie, there will be treasure and artifacts also. The true track record for this company is embarrassing I would say.


The patache Nuestra Señora de la Concepción, San José y San Francisco is one of the missing 1715 shipwrecks awaiting discovery. The Concepción struck the south side of Cape Canaveral and sank. Seven survivors floated on a hatch cover for three days as the currents swept them around the shoals and sand bars of the cape, where they landed on beach and walked to St. Augustine. Treasure hunters have been looking for the Concepcíon for years without success.
Patache, Nuestra Señora de la Concepción, San José y San Francisco: 265-tons, armed with thirty-two iron cannons, Master Pablo Soliac, owner Don Antonio Echeverz went to Havana where she loaded 3,000 pesos in gold doubloons, four gold bars valued at 5,703 pesos, 15 serons of cocoa, one chest of vanilla, 15 3/4 tons of brazilwood, 1,440 cured half-hides and a large quantity of tobacco.

Quote: Did the company loan the treasure finder to a group in Italy? I see an Italian company discovered a 1600 Italian ship.
_____________________

The Italian discovery is not a treasure ship. "The company so called treasure finder" has yet to find anything.

Quote: You have your opinion. We will see who's right about many things very soon. Oh, there I go using the word 'soon'. Hope I didn't trigger you.
___________________

I have more than just an opinion. I have verifiable facts. As for you and your opinion regarding the all knowing, all seeing Tinkerbell, you have nothing but unverifiable B.S.

Hey Goldenboy, the sea conditions are great out there, so forget about the wreck but where's all the gold and silver?

AMZ552-222030-
Volusia-Brevard County Line to Sebastian Inlet 0-20 nm-
911 AM EDT Mon Jun 22 2020

THIS AFTERNOON
Variable winds 5 knots becoming southeast 5 to
10 knots early in the afternoon, then increasing to 10 to 15 knots
late in the afternoon. Seas 1 to 2 feet with a dominant period 8
seconds. A moderate chop on the intracoastal waters. Isolated
showers and thunderstorms in the afternoon.

TONIGHT
South winds 10 to 15 knots becoming southwest 5 to
10 knots after midnight. Seas 2 to 3 feet with a dominant period
8 seconds. A light chop on the intracoastal waters. Slight chance
of showers and thunderstorms in the evening.

TUESDAY
South winds 5 to 10 knots. Seas 1 to 2 feet with a
dominant period 8 seconds. A light chop on the intracoastal
waters. Chance of showers and thunderstorms.

TUESDAY NIGHT
South winds 10 to 15 knots becoming southwest
5 to 10 knots after midnight. Seas 2 to 3 feet. A light chop on
the intracoastal waters.

WEDNESDAY
Southwest winds 5 knots becoming southeast 5 to
10 knots in the afternoon. Seas 2 to 3 feet. A light chop on the
intracoastal waters. Chance of showers and thunderstorms.

WEDNESDAY NIGHT
South winds 10 to 15 knots becoming southwest
5 to 10 knots after midnight. Seas 2 to 3 feet. Slight chance of
showers and thunderstorms.

THURSDAY
South winds 5 knots becoming southeast 5 to 10 knots
in the afternoon. Seas 2 to 3 feet. Chance of showers and
thunderstorms.

THURSDAY NIGHT
South winds 5 to 10 knots. Seas 2 to 3 feet.

FRIDAY
Southeast winds 5 to 10 knots. Seas 2 to 3 feet. Chance
of showers and thunderstorms.

Quote: That's a very good point. Massive income potential. Imagine having a wreck and they say "This wreck has this treasure on it and we will sell the info and exact coordinates for all the treasure on it for X % of the treasure.

Seafarer collects their money and moves on to the next wreck.

Details would have to be worked out of course. Anyone would expect that, obviously.
© 2020 InvestorsHub.com, Inc.
_____________________________________________

These are unbelievably naive statements right out of fanticy land. Countries that issue 'exclusive' contracts (and there are few because of UNESCO) don't take kindly to treasure hunters seeking gold and silver with disregard to the excavation and recovery of the cultural content of the shipwreck. People who think like you are classified as 'looters'. Read the article which also makes it clear that any Spanish ship found with treasure will be claimed by the nation.

Disney might be a good prospect for the Buck Rogers sea mobile. They could use it in the moat at Disneyland and maybe pull a royalty. By the way, how are those SFRX government contracts working out. Don't hear much about that fluff anymore.

https://english.elpais.com/arts/2020-06-22/spanish-archaeologists-recover-new-treasure-from-famed-mercedes-shipwreck.html

Quote: The current tech sucks which is why you rarely hear of anything being found with it (your point and a good one).
_________________________

Are you kidding? 'Current tec. sucks'. Current Tec. has found every famed treasure ship found. The Tinkerbell toy has found nothing. All talk. The instrumentation has zero creditability same as SFRX.

Quote: That's a very good point. Massive income potential. Imagine having a wreck and they say "This wreck has this treasure on it and we will sell the info and exact coordinates for all the treasure on it for X % of the treasure.

Seafarer collects their money and moves on to the next wreck.

Details would have to be worked out of course. Anyone would expect that, obviously.
_________________________

There's one word that sums all of this up: Horseshit

Quote: When the SeaSearcher has past its last test (now? next week?) and begins finding treasure on a multitude of wrecks around the world there will not be GAPS OF 5 YEARS between treasure finds. And discoveries of 350 coins will be considered small. Large discoveries will come on a regular basis. Others will understand this once the company has 4 or 5 announcements in a row over a relatively short period of time. The standard will be raised and only one company will be meeting that standard - Seafarer.

Set your sights higher.
_____________________________________

The masters of WHEN'S, WANNA BE'S, GONNA BE'S. 'Finding treasure on a multitude of wrecks. What wrecks? SFRX doesn't even know how to find them. Where? On what permits or contracts and with who?
Wrecks around the world. Really? Why do you choose to ignore the fact that nearly all countries holding viable treasure wrecks in their waters have signed the UNESCO Underwater Cultural Heritage Treaty. THEY DON'T CONTRACT WITH TREASURE HUNTERS.

Three hundred fifty gold coins is three hundred fifty more than these jokers have ever found.

The difference is more than obvious. These people are the real deal. Not all talk but action and results. Not all talk wanna, gonna be's. The folks at clown town put a 3D sub-bottom profiler and a ferrous, non-ferrous metal detector on a pretty submersible umbilical connected vehicle and all the company cheerleaders are going ga-ga, goo-goo over it. No evidence it even does anything. Listen up folks. Everything they're trying to accomplish can be done using surface towed remote sensing technology.

Yes, and the band played on. Being candid, its more than obvious that you know little to nothing about treasure hunting / treasure finding. Your comments are unfounded nonsense. I'd be happy to prepare a list of books you might want to consider reading so at least you'd be better prepared with your comments.

No, I'm not implying the shipwreck is just over the SFRX boundary line. The real probability is that its miles away which is supported by research. I'm talking about AGI, Seville, Spain documentation, not fairytales.

Its all been done before archaeologically, professionally.

The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 1997
"The Mary Rose Site" - Geological evidence.

Sub-bottom, and now 3- dimensional has come a long way since then but the SFRX cheerleaders haven't a clue.

https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/346552/1/Quinn_et_al_1997_IJNA_Mary_Rose.pdf

Many more supportive articles.

Of course this technology couldn't define the hair on a gnats ass like they believe the Tinkertoy will.

Quote: It's not that difficult to understand.

If confused you can just read the post again until it's understood!
____________________________________

I do understand but apparently you don't. I'm representing facts whereas you're not. When you have substantiated facts that the Tinkerbell does what they want it to do, I may very well have a different opinion. I am not impressed by posts made by, not game players, but rather sideline cheerleaders for a on going loosing team. More so, I have no respect for a bunch of clowns who lack the common sense to read and assess the overall signs and realize that the shipwreck they're seeking isn't even there. Certainly that's but my opinion but true facts hardly contradict it.

Quote: Old mag survey equipment is about to go the way of the spittoon and buggy whips. Just useless outdated equipment.

SeaSearcher testing continues to go perfectly. I'm ready for them to use it on site! Let's do it!
_______________________________________

That's about the most outlandish, naive comment one could possibly make. I won't even comment further as its so ridiculous.

Quote: Well I guess you don't have to worry if or when they find treasure, since you don't own shares. Real shareholders don't mind waiting. JMO. Those poor people that sell the mags! I almost feel sorry for them
_________________________

I'm not a 'hot air balloon" profiteer so I could care less about owning shares.

Your statement is actually hilarious. Mag's. have found mostly all the major treasure shipwreck discoveries. Thats a soundly provable fact. As to this clown town operation, they have never found anything even worthy of mention. Now the CEO's Tinkertoy is suppose to save the day finding a wreck that isn't even there. Yes, magnetometers find shipwrecks and would have found this wreck (with 32 iron cannons) if it was there. Do you have a problem with acknowledging proven success, just asking?

Could you tell me, do any of these SFRX people including the wild jumping Manta group have any marine science/ tech. people with credentials? I just wonder what they fleeced Kennedy to build this Buck Rogers Sea-mobile? He got scammed by the wonderful 'Indiana Jones' but, of course, not by these brilliant people. They say a picture is worth a thousand words. The photo said it all when I saw the CEO sitting at the controls. An on going clown show. Really, the bottom line is results and I seriously doubt you're going to see any unless the magic machine can produce a wreck that isn't there.

Quote: I'll be glad when they prove themselves.
___________________________

Suggest for your own wellbeing, don't hold your breath.

Quote: It certainly wasn’t from the piss poor blockchain revs.
_____________________________________

Isn't it funny how this kind of crap, along with the big military contracts, kind of gets swept under the carpet. You can follow this company easily by just following the streaming trail of B.S. it leaves behind it for over fifteen years? If I'm not mistaken didn't it all begin with great treasure find expectations on the 'dud' portion of a shipwreck at Juno Beach? I mean that should be an easy one for Tinkerbell (assuming it works), so why aren't they there?

Quote: Time for some treasure! That's what matters.
____________________________________________

Its been 'time for some treasure' for well over fifteen years now. Obviously these amateurs don't know how to find shipwrecks nor the treasure they carried. Has it ever even occurred to you, you may have bet on the wrong horse?

Quote: This gets funnier by the day.........
__________________________________________

A continuous barrel of laughs on going.

I worked as a diver on a sub-bottom coring project off of Cape Hatteras some years ago with one pro. geologist supervising, When I read this process SFRX is supposedly using, I had side-stitches laughing. Not at all the way its done professionally. How do these clowns come uo with this stuff? Well, its fast approaching July and before you know it another seasons gone. From my perspective, allot of wheel spinning for nothing. If you want treasure it usually starts with definitive evidence of a wreck first. A shipwreck that has 32 iron cannons is easy to find if performing competently managed surveys. There should be no concern for the CEO's toy will surely find it. The sheeple eat all this stuff up.

Quote:


"anyone"?

You've checked them all?

Are you aware of or do you have extensive knowledge of the inner working of the SeaSearcher? No, you do not.

Are you aware of Kyle's international plans? State plans? Federal plans? No, you are not.

Guesswork that always comes down to the same conclusions. That much you've got covered.
_________________________________________

I don't have to have knowledge of the inner working of Seasearcher, or for that matter, SFRX. If Tinkerbell worked, for the sake of the stockholders, it would be shouted from the roof tops. As to the CEO's plans, I could care less nor would I be impressed. His pitiful track record speaks for itself.

Quote: If what you are saying was true and accurate there would be massive amounts of treasure found all the time. Not just trinkets and broken watches some are keen to celebrate and tout as 'success'.

But large finds of treasure are rare.

The SeaSearcher is about to change that.

Are you too overwhelmed to see that that would be a good thing?
__________________________

Once again you're wrong. You obviously don't know how the business (if it can be called that) works.

1. Extensive archival research.(incidentally, Spanish archives are now prohibiting research if they know its treasure hunting associated).

2. Host country (or state) contract acquisition. The major key. Most viable Western Hemisphere countries with treasure ships in their waters have signed on to the UNESCO Underwater Cultural Heritage Treaty. Although the U.S.A. has not, states like Florida still issue exploration contracts to qualifying entities but serious salvage contracts are no longer part of their plans. They too do not like treasure hunters.

The point is there still remain many high potential unfound treasure galleons that could be found using real performing remote sensing survey instrumentations but, as stated, governments are not (now by law) granting contracts.

Even if this Tibkerbell even could do what all of you want it to do, its becoming more obvious its not even a shipwreck finding tool capable of performing fast and lengthly surveys but rather a 'on the wreck site' precious metal pin-pointing instrument. As I stated before, something divers can do within the wreck site with already existing technology. To date, I nor anyone else has seen proven results that prove 'Kyle's toy' can do anything above and beyond technologies that already exist.

Quote:
I'm giving you MY opinion that I like the fact that we will be able to find the TREASURE without having to hunt and peck for decades to find junk iron bits and pieces. I do not care about cannon balls and grappling hooks. I care about the treasure.
____________________________________________

The intent is not to demean you but you obviously don't know anything regarding the discovery or excavation of a shipwreck site. It may be that you are so overwhelmed by the Tinkerbell prospects that you are not even aware that once a site is located divers are then able to use ferrous / non-ferrous deep penetration detectors that can perform analytical processes. Don't need 'Kyle's toy' bobbing around over a site to do that.

Quote: "Magnetometers find shipwrecks"

And the SeaSearcher finds the treasure on those wrecks. Or near the wrecks. Or on the site.

Or just treasure. It finds treasure. That is much more valuable than finding useless iron.

I know, I know. YOU don't believe it.

Your beliefs have no bearing on it's abilities.
______________________________________________

Naively, you are apparently not aware of the fact that no governmental agency these days issues salvage contracts allowing the salvor to concentrate on precious mental recovery alone. That is not 'archaeologically' correct. They all loathe treasure hunters period. When a shipwreck is excavated its done entirely, methodically, recovering everything. Within a wreck site and its perimeter, are multiple ferro-magnetic targets; iron cannons, cannon balls, anchors, grappling hooks, tools, ship fittings as spikes, deadeye straps, forelock rods, deck rings, etc., etc. The kind of targets readily seen by a marine magnetometer, 'wink, wink'. Yes, usually where the "iron" is the bulk of the treasure lies also. Truly hope you found this enlightening. We all need to start learning somewhere. After over fifteen years of spinning wheels, one would hope even this company would begin to learn something. But of course I'm likely to forget they got top notch military and NASSA divers along with executives and technicians who know little to nothing about historical colonial period shipwrecks and how to find them.

Quote: I prefer to base my posts on due diligence and actual company information
__________________________________

The 'hot air balloon' kind of stuff. Due diligence. Really? If proper due diligence was in fact done, one would know all this marvelous 'new technology' is nothing new with the exception of a submersible mobile platform on the end of an umbilical cable. As to what its suppose to do, its the gonna be, wanna be on going. Maybe the Tinkerbell see all, find all, know all has the means of even producing a shipwreck that isn't even there? Magnetometers do find shipwrecks. That's historic. Thats factual. This ridiculous nonsense of believing it takes this Tinkerbell to find a shipwreck is beyond absurd. Its expressive of people who know absolutely nothing about surveying snd finding shipwrecks. The record speaks for itself.

Quote: I'm also ready for them to prove themselves. All indications are that they will be doing that very soon.

From Dr. John de Bry's opinion on the wreck site:

Quote:
Archival research on the Santisima Trinidad y Nuestra Señora de la Concepcion and the artifacts so far found are the Melbourne Beach Site strongly suggest, if not prove, that this particular site holds the remains of a richly laden shipwreck of the 1715 Fleet.


He goes on to note that it could be the stern castle of the Ubilla.

Either way, it's worth scanning with the SeaSearcher to know for sure. If it finds treasure then it proves itself and changes the industry.
_______________________________________________

Those statements as made by de Bry were that of a paid consultant that is clearly enhancing what the CEO wants to hear. Note that I am not implying de Bry is lying. Furthermore he is not a discoverer of shipwrecks but dives on shipwrecks found. I'm surprised he makes the statement 'richly laden' because its not. Why haven't you troubled yourself to quote what Bauer has officially commented regarding the site. He refers to it as a debris trail and not a shipwreck site (which it is not). You seem to believe that the unproven Tikerbell find all, see all is going to produce a shipwreck and treasure that in all probability isn't even there.

Quote: Seem like I remember seeing a manifest that did have treasure listed. But even it someone posts a manifest, wouldn't there really be several manifests – one for each stop as they made the rounds before returning? So any single manifest, treasure listed or not, would not give an accurate description of the total cargo.
__________________________

That is not correct. The Concepcion was part of the New Spain Fleet out of New Spain (Mexico) where what she had on board was manifested.From there the final port was Havana, Cuba. Where final inventory was confirmed (with the exception of contraband of course). No, the vessel didn't make rounds as you put it.

As for the Tinkerbell technology, its all talk with no proven performance as per what you are going on about. Allot of impressive words and wanna-be concepts and nothing else.

Quote: I do think it is odd no cannons have been found on what is suppose to be a wreck site. Below the site? Above it? Farther out? Don't know. But I'm not really concerned with finding cannons or a wreck. I just want the treasure at this point. Which is what a fully functioning SeaSearcher will do.
___________________________

The difference between myself and the many others posting here is that I have had the experience of having dove on many Spanish colonial period shipwrecks. The presence of but one cannon out of thirty two well validates the area currently worked by SFRX is flotsam and not a wreck site which according to the research is likely miles away. As is usual here, the facts are ignored just like the manifest of the "1715 N.S. Concepcion" which I have posted here before. There are no chests of gold (plural) or stacks of gold and silver bars as one would want to believe. Should I post it again?

Even I might be impressed with Kyle's toy if common sense had dictated for them to actually do tests and calibrations on a known buried shipwreck site. So far the bottom line appears to be that the Tinkerbell is really nothing more than a umbilical cable connected mobile underwater platform carrying a 3D sub-bottom profiler and now, perhaps, a ferrous/non-ferrous metal detector. What I find so ridiculous about it all is that all could have been achieved from a surface vessel with more speed and accuracy.

Dream on. Kids believe In both the tooth fairy and Santa Claus (seems adults do too). Nothing wrong with that.

Quote: Did Global Marine not lie to authorities? Did they have the navy block them and then lose in court?

Sounds like a bunch of bad actors to me...
__________________________________________________

Global Marine had a contract with the State of Florida. When they made the 16th Century shipwreck discovery off of Canaveral, the State stabbed them in the back and aligned them self with the French Government's wishes. You may call them 'bad actors' but they certainly aren't a clown show the likes of SFRX. They made discoveries. Significant discoveries which is more than this outfit can say.

Quote: But the coins came from a source. And they should find out what it is. Then either dig it up or move to the next site.
______________________________

There are dozens of stories of coins on the beach, up and down the Florida coast. Show me photos and documentation validating those coin finds. If valid, they could easily be associated with the flotsam debris trail. What about those 32 iron cannons which even a unsophisticated magnetometer could find. Kyles toy isn't even necessary, assuming the wreck was there.

Quote: "Professional treasure hunting circles" is itself a joke. Not an honorable person among them. A bunch of ignorant thieves with "more tattoos than teeth."

Why do you think Kyle has fired so many of these "professionals" and replaced them with Navy, NASA and military trained divers and crewmen?

This entire industry is about to be turned on it's head and the old trash taken out so it's no wonder there is pushback from those who want things to stay the way they are – too stupid to know Kyle is about to indirectly help the whole industry via proximity to the fame and fortune Seafarer will bring.
___________________________________________

I'm talking about Treasure Salvors, Inc.. Motivation, Inc. , Global Marine, Inc.and many other legitimate current contract holders on the treasure coast of Florida. I am not discrediting Navy, NASA or other military trained divers, as divers, but they know as much about treasure hunting / treasure finding as Kyle Kennedy does. Nothing. Never found a historic shipwreck, never worked and salvaged a historic shipwreck and never found treasure. Apparently, you fail to realize that finding a shipwreck armed with thirty two iron cannons is like 'shooting ducks in a barrel' . A professional entity knows what technology does and does not do and based upon proper assessment of the overall situation, know when its time to move on. Flotsam yes. Shipwreck no. In my opinion and that of others, this has been a fifteen year clown town show which continues to entertain.

Quote: I'm betting all my shares that the silver and gold is on our site. Doesn't matter which site because we will have a treasure finding machine.

No congratulations yet but it is coming.

...for shareholders.
__________________________________

Its apparently a "machine" that finds iron junk, wood, and grouper fish in a hole. The on gong joke in professional treasure hunting circles.

Quote: Why are they still referred to as targets?.........

I thought Tinkerbell 2.0 could do what Tinkerbell 1.0 supposedly could, which was identify the metals.
_______________________________

The sea conditions are very workable today and tomorrow. With Kyle's toy out there doodling, they should be rolling in treasure. Frankly, I question whether they even know what a 'target' is.

Quote: Its obvious he doesnt know where the wreck is or we would have treasure by now.
Im hoping the new tech works, but we are not hearing much about it.
We should have an update soon on the new tech and how its working.
________________________________

Its just my personal opinion but I view you as one of the more sensible stockholders that posts on this board. As I have repeatedly posted with supportive research facts, it doesn't require "new" technology to find this shipwreck. Having been armed with 32 iron cannon, this is an extremely easy wreck to find using a state-of-the -art Cesium marine magnetometer with altitude control. All indications Are that the wreck is not there and what has been encountered in the past has been flotsam and nothing more. That's my opinion also but comes wit experience, whereas this CEO knows little to nothing about shipwrecks, having never found one or worked one. It's always fun playing with new toys just the same. Frankly, for your sake I hope they do find at least something worthy of boosting the stock price, thus making it easier to pull the rip-cord.

Quote:
51. The technology used in the industry is limited to magnetometers to detect metals, and is limited, and any new technology which advances the field and abilities of finding relics such as these would be highly valued, saving time, man hours, effort and huge amounts of money.
_______________________________

The truth is this has become more than ridiculous. It seems that the sheeple simply find it all to convenient to just sweep the facts under the carpet. They are supposed to be looking for a ship that was armed with 32 iron cannons but the magnetometer is inadequate for finding the shipwreck, in their opinion. Whoever wrote that knows nothing about finding a shipwreck, and has never found a shipwreck. Since its more than obvious there is no shipwreck there (don't deny there's flotsam), now the Jim Dandy to the rescue is Kyle's new toy. The never ending circus continues.

Quote: Goldenboy17, very exciting post. Appears the "seasearcher" has been integrated with the metal interrogator, and is performing as projected. Looking forward to Kyle's update and finds.
© 2020 InvestorsHub.com, Inc.
_____________________________________________



It's already been done folks. Only thing impressive here is the impressive selection of words. They put a sub-bottom profiler on a vehicle along with a metal detector. Integration.

https://www.metaldetector.com/jw-fishers-pulse-12-boat-towed-metal-detector

https://www.metaldetector.com/jw-fishers-sub-bottom-profiler-sonar-system

Quote: But its not a drama scene
____________________________

Sorry. I stand corrected. Not a drama scene. A three ring circus.

Quote:
This has been one big drama scene
________________________________________

Indeed it has been for over fifteen years. So now these same performing clowns are going to produce and perform with great new technology. Re-hashed hash.

Quote:
In October 2018, Tampa-based treasure-hunting company Seafarer Exploration announced it had hired “Dr. Michael Torres," a brilliant “wounded war veteran receiving a Purple Heart with Oak Cluster” to do just that – help them find treasure with tech.
________________________________________________

What a bunch of bimbo's. No due diligence, no vetting of the character which is what competent corporations do before hiring allegedly key people. Now everybody's doing 180 degree back peddling.
I 'smelled the rat' from the time he entered the scene and my posts have been clear on that. An the show goes on. What a circus.