Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm just shaking my head at this mess wondering when this crap will finally fold. I still find it hard to believe that George really sounds like some type of jerk?
King...did you listen to the meeting?
Just now going to look at business deals?
Firstly George is working out of his home without the phone nor office area he let expired < that is according to SEC filings.
It sounds like he is finally now scratching his head...he waited FAR TO LONG so this sounds like sincere "SMOKE AND MIRRORS"
I wonder if MBMoney will ever post here again but sure would love to hear his views however, all this crap has been painful to all of us as we once sincerely enjoyed posting positive messages but all this sucks to hear George still is not able to come across in a share holders meeting as a likeable person.
MBMoney and I wanted to meet him but nothing ever transpired. It is sad to hear that you believe George sound like that. My take from the last HDC investor meeting that George sounded resentful that investors had questions. In other words George might not be a people person? As a CEO one needs that quality but also know George was the only one that stood up to be CEO at a bad time.
We had to try and survive and although GEORGE has tried his best (I hope) we were too little too damn far down the road. I have watched our patents sink into the ocean to never come back and by mid 2022 you will be totally blown away with this card game, that is if it plays that long. HDC has held a dead mans hand for years. The only "possible" winner is the one who controls the type of cards thrown onto the table when the time comes.
I believe most of us knew that just by reading past filings. Just how far George will go in wagering the out come of the trial verses another round of series "D" or "E" shares will come soon enough.
It is also a shame to be here prior HDVY and not lift a finger to listen to our corporations shareholder meeting or even vote. My many thanks to HDC for all they have done for us shareholder over the past two decades well not quite two decades.
King...I doubt that but maybe. The share price rise is probably due to traders that have no clue.
You should now be able to see the recent HLYK interview ....
PamelaR...you might wish to start your journey with these links. If you decide to deal with the SEC main website as I did a few years back in a different stock, I believe I emailed them but may have called? I do recall getting a returned phone call and at any rate it generally will be by an Attorney who is well versed however, they will generally tell you nothing will be done until you fill out a complaint and have tried to deal with corporate, the corporation first. Below are regional offices which might return a quicker response in what you and other share holders might try to do to get some type of positive actions however, any lawsuit will probably gain investors nothing.
https://www.sec.gov/page/sec-regional-offices
https://www.finra.org/about/locations
_________________
For anyone interested..............
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResults/EntityName/careclix/Page1?searchNameOrder=CARECLIX
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResults/OfficerRegisteredAgentName/careclix/Page1
Well? maybe it is finally time for this to move upward again?
Shiloh12...really look at this it would drive our stock price over the top. Yes somethings look a bit so so but I also believe that the "Patient Access Hub" can not be patented as Dr. Dent had hoped.
With the following acquisition or merger combination we will fly.
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=CARECLIXHOLDINGS%20P040001477352&aggregateId=domp-p04000147735-5325f866-ad08-48f1-a4a1-d5a787f3e770&searchTerm=careclix&listNameOrder=CARECLIXHOLDINGS%20P040001477352
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/GetDocument?aggregateId=domp-p04000147735-5325f866-ad08-48f1-a4a1-d5a787f3e770&transactionId=p04000147735-14862713-6006-478d-bf25-f64bd52d6fe5&formatType=PDF
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/GetDocument?aggregateId=domp-p04000147735-5325f866-ad08-48f1-a4a1-d5a787f3e770&transactionId=p04000147735-d5cfafdc-3c86-40bc-9b4b-f2ce97085ed5&formatType=PDF
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/ConvertTiffToPDF?storagePath=COR%5C2021%5C0415%5C30460513.tif&documentNumber=P21000033302
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/ConvertTiffToPDF?storagePath=COR%5C2021%5C0525%5C10937931.tif&documentNumber=P21000049009
Now could Arthrex come into the picture too?...what a combination of overdrive...to the moon?
Wow... down the road we will be getting into RX and lab testing! I need to replay the interview in the next hour.
I don't believe Dr. Dent could have done any better in the interview and he is so down to natural and this.
1 more acquisition before up listing this year.
Value...have no funds to play right now.eom
King.........
all us investors can feel different and have comments one way or another but I the biggest mistakes HDC has done was not filing a lawsuit against Intel many many years ago.
See...no problem, add another 12 cents on top of our share prices and we will kiss 18 cent.
I don't understand why they would allow such a range in share price buying with very little volume? I'm also surprised they took the .6411 bid?
OK Salty who turned the lights off this time?
Yes that was the timing...we felt good about that but I didn't sell any stock then. I do feel 30 cents on a court win announcement but we are a long ways from that. Did you check out what Alan posted here?
OU71764....it is hard isn't it...too many years to not see the ending of this lawsuit. Sure it looks like Intel will wait for HDC to buckle
but doubt that will happen. My money says George knows where HDC is keeping the stack of new series"D" shares and why not print some series "E" and "F" if needed. No reason to ever RS the stock since our management and future drive for business doesn't seem to work out like no licensing deals etc. Do wonder if HDC is at least knocking on a few doors and trying to license something that we have.
Hey share price should rise to 18 cents with good news :)
Recent Proaction Interview with Dr. Dent & Mr. O'Leary
This is going to be a wild call but believe I have it figured out but of course that is just me and I maybe wrong again. Could this be our target merge.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/Solei-Systems-Inc-SOLI-12729/
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001750384/000106594920000028/ex99_1.htm
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001750384/000101054920000036/solisch14c.htm
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=CARECLIXHOLDINGS%20P040001477352&aggregateId=domp-p04000147735-5325f866-ad08-48f1-a4a1-d5a787f3e770&searchTerm=careclix&listNameOrder=CARECLIXHOLDINGS%20P040001477352
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6142507223001?playlist_id=930909749001#sp=show-clips
They also have another threat....... https://www.yahoo.com/now/sec-overhauled-rule-determining-companies-125000481.html
Maybe in the end we get "CareClix" which is already established!
8-K Exhibits
UPDATED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1141788/000168316821002368/hdc_ex9901.htm
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1141788/000168316821002368/hdc_ex9902.htm
New 8-K June 4, 2021
Item 8.01 Other Events.
The following is an update regarding patent matters for Health Discovery Corporation (the “Company” or “HDC”). As with many legal matters, it is difficult to predict outcomes and therefore any assumption of success cannot be assured.
As previously disclosed, the United States Patent and Trade Office (“USPTO”) had declared an Interference between the Company’s Support Vector Machine – Recursive Feature Elimination (“SVM-RFE”) patent application and Intel Corporation’s (“Intel”) Patent No. 7,685,077, entitled “Recursive Feature Eliminating Method based on a Support Vector Machine”. On February 27, 2019, the USPTO ruled in favor of the Company on the SVM-RFE patent application. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the USPTO issued its decision, finding that HDC is entitled to claim exclusive ownership rights to the SVM-RFE technology as set forth in the SVM-RFE patent application that was filed to provoke the Interference.
On September 2019, the USPTO issued U.S. Patent No. 10,402,685 (“SVM-RFE Patent”) for the Company’s patent application covering SVM-RFE. The Company is the sole owner of all patents related to SVM-RFE. As a result of the issuance of the SVM-RFE Patent, the Company now has the right to exclude others from developing, commercializing, or licensing this patented technology without the uncertainty of the Interference or concerns over the ownership of the SVM-RFE patents.
On July 23, 2020, the Company filed a patent infringement lawsuit (“Infringement Lawsuit”) against Intel pertaining to the Company’s SVM-RFE technology. The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division (the “Court”). Subsequently, on October 19, 2020, Intel filed a motion to dismiss with the Court. On November 23, 2020, the Company filed a response in opposition of Intel’s motion to dismiss.
On December 21, 2020, the Court approved a scheduling order (“Scheduling Order”) for the Infringement Lawsuit. One of the items in the Scheduling Order was the Markman Hearing which was scheduled for June 3, 2021. A Markman Hearing is a pretrial hearing in a United States District Court during which a judge examines evidence from all parties on the appropriate meanings of relevant key words used in a patent claim. Prior to the Markman Hearing both parties submit Markman briefs, in which they explain their positions on the relevant key words. In the Western District of Texas, both parties file two briefs, with the Plaintiff (here, the Company) filing the Opening Brief.
Once briefing concluded on May 18, 2021, HDC and Intel submitted a Joint Claim Construction Statement to the Court. Within that Joint Claim Construction Statement, the parties identified several claim terms (i.e., key words) that were still in dispute. During the Markman Hearing on June 3, 2021, the Court considered arguments related to these disputed claim terms. Ultimately, the Court ruled in HDC’s favor on all the disputed claim terms and issued the Claim Construction Order. During the Markman Hearing, the Court also spoke regarding Intel’s pending motion to dismiss. The Court will review and determine if a hearing is needed on that motion or if it will rule on the previously filed pleadings. Per the Scheduling Order, the next step is fact discovery, which begins June 4, 2021.
Additionally, on February 27, 2021, Intel filed a Petition for Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) of the Company’s SVM-RFE technology with the PTAB of the USPTO. The Company is currently in the process of completing its response to the IPR and it will be filed shortly.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1141788/000168316821002368/hdc_8k.htm
No doubt, if we don't see 18 cent anytime soon then just wait another year for the Trial to start, we can increase authorized shares, more patents will expire according to SEC filings and of course we must pay management for all the hard work they are doing. Heck, when we run out of "D" series we can do a series "E" and even increase voting rights even further.
It seems to me that the more stock people buy the higher the share price will go? It appears with the share price where it is sitting that investors are not holding this stock. Why sell? with so much potential? Oh well what in the world do you expect, it appears share price seems to tell the tale?
Nothing like a win win situation right, sit tight and enjoy the ride!
$$$$$$$$$ "Yippee ki-yay" $$$$$$$$$$$$
Heck...if HDVY's share price would move up 93 more cents we might break a dollar.
We had another 8-k...I sure hate to see some of this.....
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1698530/000169853021000065/exicure8-k6321.htm
Well in that case that S-3 filing will be coming into play soon enough.
I believe this is a new video but I'm not sure?
Maybe in the future I might look into the ZOOM aspects but actually thought you need to be invited by one side or the other. I do have ZOOM accounts etc but haven't used that in a while. Not a big deal but I had no clue that we could access the hearing, cool!
OK...CEO David A. Giljohann, Ph.D. two future presentations
https://investors.exicuretx.com/news/news-details/2021/Exicure-Inc.-Announces-Participation-in-Upcoming-Conferences/default.aspx
I think 1 of the hinging factors that Intel has submitted is a jury trial going to happen? Is Intel correct in telling the Judge that this case is too complicated for a jury to understand or is that Bull$hit!
We all know just how complicated SVM-RFE technology is so how will the Judge react to what Intel says about allowing or not allowing a Jury trial?
...remember the Judge likes to keep things ""simple"" ))
...even if the Judge is leaning towards one side after the hearing and a jury trial is to happen in the feature we still won't know how he is leaning prior to trial. I do wonder how much of a plus factor that we have since the USPTO has accepted our patents in recent years.
...just maybe the Judge will tell Intel if they are smart to start digging a deep fox hole!
It appears that a strong message is being sent to David A. Giljohann, Ph.D.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1698530/000169853021000062/exicure8-k6221.htm
Now if we lose him then what???
I like what Good_Sport said about the volume and yes they seem to parallel with one exception. When I mentioned that date posts prior it was just that one date which was the 27th a Monday. I didn't say anything about July 24th 2020 which was the the Friday prior which moved 17 million shares....at any rate I like what he said about all that.
...as for people at the court or court system buying truck loads of shares. I just don't think so since these court cases are a dime a dozen to them...plus isn't it too early as the Markman hearing hasn't started yet?
Good_Sport....now that is a thought?...anyways I checked 12 traders that messaged in our message thread during that time and none have made any public comment about HDC or selling. Now we did have one message here Tuesday that took news over to BB's board but nothing seem to stir. I sure thought the share price would have increased again today but as everyone can see it isn't impressive but I gather better than 5 cents?
Now I'm wondering, we tested .13 how about if we get positive news in some manner? I do not see a reason why the stock price moved upward in the first place. Was that started for the purpose for news to be spread and NOT actually for traders? We had just about zero talk within traders in this message thread.
I find it hard to believe that some entity or club would only work this stock for basically only 1 day when they could have used tomorrow morning as we would not hear anything about the Markman hearing for at least a few days.
The company has done a good job with doing that as I see things. Mind up that too many people read too hard and deep into Arthrex possibilities, not to say nothing will happen but some were tripping over one another. As I said prior I am an investor and believe in this company but I will buy this and sell in order to buy more shares in HLYK. Even when we reach the Nasdaq I will buy and sell this as I'm doing now. That process keeps me grounded and raises both the ability in the cards I hold and of course to make smart choice and not follow any stock into the ground anymore.
I do believe we have a winner here but time and money is what we need and of course someone like Arthrex to body block for us, well sort of?
But at least we are holding share price!
King...I still see the possibility of closing above .13 today but do feel we should have moved upward sooner. Maybe the OTC will kick in the SVM-RFE Algorithm in a few minutes.
...who know 50% of the volume from yesterday has played and played out and still more money to be made so I see this as tracking upward as soon as they change the Algorithm.
...damn what happen did the OTC lose electrical power?
Now none of that may not have value but still what the heck and if anyone thinks I'm afraid to put both of my feet in my mouth think again!
Ou71764...I gather the speculation will rise even higher today and we will know early Friday morning if share price will hold or not but of course it can break at any time but generally speaking we should be fine at least until that time. It seems many are thinking about the upcoming Shareholders meeting to be held on June 29th. We have investors thinking a settlement has been reached but I do not feel that to be so and as you know a spike in price is a spike and it seems need to focus on that due to other existing short comings.
Now I don't know if the following hold true but worth reading and this is an old case.
The Markman hearing tomorrow?
A Markman hearing is a pretrial hearing in a U.S. District Court during which a judge examines evidence from all parties on the appropriate meanings of relevant key words used in a patent claim, when patent infringement is alleged by a plaintiff. It is also known as a "Claim Construction Hearing".[1]
Holding a Markman hearing in patent infringement cases has been common practice since the U.S. Supreme Court, in the 1996 case of Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., found that the language of a patent is a matter of law for a judge to decide, not a matter of fact for a jury to decide. In the United States, juries determine facts in many situations,[2] but judges determine matters of law.[3][4]
Markman hearings are important, because the court determines patent infringement cases by the interpretation of claims. A Markman hearing may encourage settlement, because the judge's claim construction finding can indicate a likely outcome for the patent infringement case as a whole. Markman hearings are before a judge, and generally take place before trial. A Markman hearing may occur before the close of discovery, along with a motion for preliminary injunction, or at the end of discovery, in relation to a motion for summary judgment. A Markman hearing may also be held after the trial begins, but before jury selection.[5]
The evidence considered in a Markman hearing falls into two categories: intrinsic and extrinsic. Intrinsic evidence consists of the patent documentation and any prosecution history of the patent. Extrinsic evidence is testimony, expert opinion, or other unwritten sources; extrinsic evidence may not contradict intrinsic evidence.[6]
And again I'm not sure if any value can be placed with the following weblink? Maybe Alan could comment on this?
https://www.radiation-dosimetry.org/what-is-intrinsic-and-extrinsic-semiconductor-definition/
With the timing as played plus 3 day 45 minute rule we are good for .18+ prior close of business Thursday.