Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
He is not clear in some of his talks, some times does not differentiate eminent events and speculations. So it is not easy to interpret his words to get accurate info. But he is not necessarily a liar.
If there is not new deal between SFOR and MSFT, SFOR might not get more payment besides that 9.7m. Kay emphasized last year, it was one time payment.
In the May 31st,2017 webnar, SFOR mentioned the largest deal for the first time. It might be a new deal, and a to be paid deal.
All we want to know is yes or no to the specific question: whether the settlement fee is the payment from MSFT for using Strike Force technology forever?
The deal with MSFT is the largest one Strike Force has, and income from deals takes a big part in Strike Force's revenue. I would not want to guess the finance of this deal.
Thanks.
Would you ask Kay directly to find out the truth so that we don't guess.
It does not sound reasonable for Strike Force to license MSFT forever without charging money. That 9.7m was settlement fee.
It's better to ask Kay directly to find out the truth.
I remember he was very clear at least once last year that it was a one time payment. But why did the company mention in the May 31st,2017 webnar that MSFT is the largest customer of Strike Force if the company is not making more money from MSFT?
Wish Kay can make it clear whether Strike Force gets paid by MSFT or not after that 9.7m. If not, forget about this customer. What Strike Force really needs is money.
Have you asked Kay about the contract with MSFT? Are they going to pay for using Strike Force technology in the future?
I see. Thanks.
I see. Thanks.
Has Strike Force claimed push notification? The link WECtrader posted didn't mention Strike Force.
The link does not say Push notification is Strike Force's patent. How do you know it belongs to Strike Force?
That was true. 9.7m was part of the settlement. What was the rest part? Kay said before, 9.7m was all Strike force could get from MSFT. But in the most recent webnar, he said the contract between MSFT and SFOR is the largest contract SFOR has. Is there a new contract or the contract he talked about is that settlement?
I think a contract should not be that old settlement. But I cannot understand why SFOR price is so low after Kay announced a big contract.
Cannot wait for the power of righteous to show up.
Fortunately, there are court and judges, thieves cannot take other's properties away freely. They have to pay for what they have done.
As long as they cannot defend that they have not infringed the patents of Strike Force, whatever they say, they have to pay for the punishment.
Our company had a big lawsuit with a big company a few years ago. The defendant was very aggressive in the first year, and they had to pay us 20 million at the end.
If there is a new contract between Strike Force and Microsoft, the revenue could not be shown in EOY report of 2016 or any reports so far, because it was signed in 2017,and the money has not been sent to Strike Force yet.
Wonder what MSFT paid Strike Force 9.7m for. Was it for the lawsuit, or the license. Kay did say it was the only money Strike Force got from MSFT, no more. Does the contract he talked about recently have any financial relationship with that 9.7 million?
Did he clearly state that the new contract will generate new money?
My friend just bought $5000 SFOR a few minutes ago. She doesn't have more money
Good to know. FINRA's decision will clear puzzles for us. Either accepted or dismissed, there will be a result. I am tired of waiting for endless delays.
Thanks for the info. I was asking how long it takes for the files to reach the hands of FINRA officers, or OTCM, and then how long it takes them to make decision.
Hopefully the application will be approved.
How long does it usually take from the day they submit the files to the day we see their decision?
Then I will be rich. You make my day. Thanks
How can they change the trend of SFOR by taking the price down to 0.0143 today? Can they change the facts that lawsuits are going to settle, and big deals were already signed? If not, how can they change the trend of stock price? If they sell their shares too cheap, others will pick up, then they lose their shares.
You are right
I see. I added too early this morning. Should have waited for a few hours.
I see. Thanks
Dip for what?
He said a big number, not just 4.5m. I guess, to him , that was "forward statement", which means they might not do it. Let's forget about it. Actually the way OM and the reporter talked in the video already indicated it was a trick. Should have dump more shares when the price jumped up.
Now, I only want him not to lie about the 13m deal, which cannot be a forward statement. They confirmed multiple times, and still not finalized.
Selling 4.5B shares could bring in him a big money, but selling 4.5M shares does not worth him to make lies and BS. Are you sure you are telling the truth?
Ok. Thanks
Changing name does not generate any revenue. What is good about that? Do they still remember the 13m deal? They have not done anything good for so long. Even cannot finalized a deal which was started a long time ago. Have lost hope with this company.
You did say the stop sign was going to be removed. Have you confirmed the message? They have delayed too many times. I cannot trust anything they announce.
It was not you, it was another poster who said DL tweeted that they were going to get the stop sign off in a few days. Sorry.
The company has had too many delays. Although other companies also have delays some time, this one has much more delays than most other companies. Have not got any confirmed positive news for over 3 months. Hopefully they can do at least one thing as scheduled. Don't whether this company does have anything good.
When will the "stop" be removed? You said a while ago it was going to be removed in a few days. But it is still there now.
I see. Thanks for the message.
Did you get the message from private email or from their tweeter?
I see. Thanks
Do you see the share price is manipulated in the past few days? going up nicely during day, and dropping sharply at market close. Why do they do that? Hopefully not to keep the stock holders for the company to do RS after the merger is completed.
Thanks. Share price is controlled by big investors, not small ones like us. They don't make decision based on the posts in this board, but on the reliable message from company. So I think we can ignore the posts on this board.
Do you know whether DL will do RS or not after the merger is completed? Why did the company say the 13 deal is not finalized? iBRAND said the transportation was done on March 23rd. Why is not finalized so far? I am still holding all my shares, and like to know what is going on in the company.
When I sue somebody, I never call him customer.