<a class="embedly-card" href="

Active Directory: Protect your business, empower your users</a>
<script async src="//cdn.embedly.com/widgets/platform.js" charset="UTF-8"></script>

Shalley -I'll try to answer the question the best I can.

The story was dated June 15, 2015 I believe the Microsoft settlement was earlier this year. Of which the Deal of are not known Court Sealed, but SFOR did Settle with PhoneFactor (bought by MSFT) for $9.7M.

SFOR probably made a good deal for themselves, but cut Microsoft a break so as to have the Win/Settlement of SFOR over MSFT, SET THE PRESCEDENT for future Patent LawSuits. IMO

You might check the Date of the MSFT Settlement with ZPaul, as I've only been around since Mid-Sept.

Littlet David hath take a Rock and Rolled the Giant.

07up/All - READ Completly - Great DD

Good Information awaits as you read on.

And Perhaps a chuckle or two.

I like that part too, 07up, poor MSFT

I'm just now seeing your reply to my Post.

Yes 07up I like it too.

Basicly SFOR was saying to MoscowSoft (Excuss me, I meant to say Microsoft)

Either you licence our patents at a reasonable Royalty Rate on Microsoft Azure Active Directory (definition below) and Office 365, or we place a Permanent Injunction on you Big Guy. And your Security is Useless in those Services and Products.

Or you are welcome to rewrite your Security Code in your Bloated Software with something Far Less Secure. Don't feel bad Big Boy everybody else has made the same mistake of infringing upon our patents too.


See Definitions Below for the Definition of Terminologies Used.

Microsoft has be shoving it's Bloated OS and S/W Down Consumer and Business's throats for decades. It's Bloated (loosy written) OS and other Software Products have caused Comsumers to have to Buy more Powerful PC's loaded with GOOBS ( very technical Term) of RAM in order not to have their PC's run like a Slow Moving Sloth in a Race. Not to mention the Blue Screen of death users have had to put up with for Decade too, because there was not enough RAM to Run the Progarm and Bam ERROR or Blue Screen of Dheath.

It's almost a Controdiction in Terms to see RAM finally come back and bite them in the A$$ ( Ram Pemmaraju CTO ) ROTFLMAO

It appears Ram Pemmaraju has single-handedly developed a Paradigm Shift in Cyber Security long before there was a mandantory need for such a need for Mulitfactor Authentication. He has been working on ProductID since 2001 or 2003 where Ram initially worked on Single Factor OOB Authentication first, early on.

Has anyone told Ram is an Agent of C.H.A.N.G.E. ? See definition of the acronym C.H.A.N.G.E.below.

In 2016 the need for this type of Multi-Factor Sophistication has become ever present if you have seen the News this year.

Even Hillary is probably thinking, I wish I knew of ProductID when I was Secretary of State. LOL

Definitions:

Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory is a comprehensive identity and access management cloud solution that provides a robust set of capabilities to manage users and groups. It helps secure access to on-premises and cloud applications, including Microsoft online services like Office 365 and many non-Microsoft SaaS applications.

SaaS
Software as a service (SaaS; pronounced /sæs/) is a software licensing and delivery model in which software is licensed on a subscription basis and is centrally hosted. It is sometimes referred to as "on-demand software". SaaS is typically accessed by users using a thin client via a web browser.

Contradiction in terms ?(plural contradictions in terms
A phrase or expression in which the component words contradict one another, often unintentionally, or are claimed to do so when seen from a particular point of view.

Paradigm
A paradigm is a standard, perspective, or set of ideas. A paradigm is a way of looking at something. A paradigm is a new way of looking or thinking about something. This word comes up a lot in the academic, scientific, and business worlds.

Paradigm Shift
Think of a Paradigm Shift as a change from one way of thinking to another. It's a revolution, a transformation, a sort of metamorphosis. It just does not happen, but rather it is driven by agents of change


Definition of RAM
1. RAM (pronounced ramm) is an acronym for random access memory, a type of computer memory that can be accessed randomly; that is, any byte of memory can be accessed without touching the preceding bytes. RAM is the most common type of memory found in computers and other devices, such as printers.

2. RAM one Brilliant Engineer working for StrikeForce Technologies .
Ram is one of the original founders and the inventor of the ProtectID product. Ram has several years experience in security systems and telecommunications. Ram’s prior job was at Coreon, where he developed OSS systems for DSL carriers. Ram was the founder and Chief Engineer of Digitech Telecommunications, a Network Security systems company that manufactured data encryptors, callback systems, access control and voice scramblers. He was employed at Computer Sciences Corporation, Synergy Systems, Bellcore and Bell Labs amongst other technology companies typically as a chief, design and/or software engineer. Ram has a M.S.E.E from Rutgers University and a B.E. from Stevens Tech.


My Definition of GOOBS
GIGABYTES OF OVER BLOWN SYSTEM-REQUIREMENTS of RAM.

My Definition of C.H.A.N.G.E.

Challenge Huge Albatrosses Needing Great Engineering

Definition of Albatros
plural albatross or albatrosses

1. Any of a family (Diomedeidae) of large web-footed seabirds that have long slender wings, are excellent gliders, and include the largest seabirds

2. Something that causes persistent deep concern or anxiety

3. The word albatross is sometimes used metaphorically to mean a psychological burden that feels like a curse.

For others who may not have Read My Post/Article Entitled WHAT SFOR ORIGINALLY AND LEGALLY REQUESTED FROM MICROSOFT From LEGAL LINE NEWS

Just the one Quote of that Article in which 07up was refering
" "

For a better undersatnding of Microsoft AZURE ACTIVE DIRECTLY and how it applies to CYBER SECURITY and SFOR, ( SFOR has its own Cloud Service too for ProductID) You can view this short 11 minute Video entitled:

Windows Azure Active Directory in plain English ( 49'ER Note: That's Plain English if you are Familiar with this simple stuff ( Stuff another Highly Technical Terminology) My Definition of Stuff
( Simple Till You Friggin Freak Out)


For for people that don't want to deal with Stuff I offer this short very Simple Video Explanation:

Azure Active Directory: Protect your business, empower your users


Background:
I was a MainFrame Computer Technician untiL technology mandated me to be a SERVER Engineer/Technician and Network Engineer/Configuration Tech. Utilizing my CCNA Training. (Cisco Certified Network Associate)

Working for Computer Sciences Corp as a Contractor to the USAF 45th Space Wing/NASA at Cape Cape Canaveral Air Station. Also worked in Communications for the same.

Prior to that I worked in Flight Simulation (not the games) on the Apache, Blackhawk and Cobra Helicopters. FULL Cockpit Motion and Visual Simulators. Prior to that just a Jet Engine Mechanic. And finally Prior to that (first Job) worked on Construction of Disney World in the U.S. Steel Union and then for Disney.

Yes a few Drastic but Unique Career Changes in there.

Anyway what I was trying to say there was:
I understand Most of the Technology/Algorithm Theory in what SFOR has. How they do it (the Algorithms developed by Ram and used by SFOR) is a different story.

Good Night and looking forward to SFOR Press Releases, Contract Deals, Patent infingment Hearings Settlements, Royalties Etc.
I hope the Contract Deals are for ProductID for the most part.

If SFOR hits Pay Dirt ! You can say We're Going to Disney World ! LOL

49'er


A Real Blackhawk Simulator

ZPAUL Thanks For posting the Quote from Oct 3rd

If Kay says in his 10/03/10 (I'm sure the year was a typo you meant 16)

Quote to You:

"Here are the patents of which we now own all six with 2 pending.

Then there are 8 and that is what I will take for GOSPEL!

Obviously I was incorrect I thought there were 9 Patents after I had Transcribed the Patent Portion of the video yesterday right after it was placed online.

His use of the word "ALSO" in the video Through my number of patents off by one.

But here's the Transcript, someone may find it Useful.

Wording in (Parenthesis and Green) are mine, stating Kay's wording.
And my interputitation of the word "ALSO"


We have 3 patents for Out of Bandwidth Authentication those are for our product ProtectID were selling of course publicly and constantly.

The other 3 Patents we own are for keystroke encryption which are part of the the GuardID Product as well as leveraged by Mobile Trust, right, so those 3 Patents are part of GuardID.

Remember now last fall last fall we had 8K this is public information that Cyber Safety Inc. did buy an option to buy those patents along with the Products GuardedID and Mobile Trust by Sept  30th 2020 that means by any day by that point can buy those patents, they have the option to buy those Patents actually have to buy those patents by this point.

We still own them today and are obligated not to sell them or go after them at this stage.

SO THAT'S WHERE THOSE PATENTS ARE.

(It sounds like with the last sentence he is finished Discussing those 6 patents. 3 for ProductID and 3 for GuardedID.

We do have 3 Pending patents ALSO.

(He is saying 3 Patents Pending also, I understood ALSO to mean in addition to)

We have two pending patents on Out of Bandwidth Authentication, so those we own and will always own.


And then we have one more Patent thats a Patent Pending Patent on Mobile Trust which is an International Patent which is in process right now.

So that's clear an hopefully you understand that now.

End of Transscript


How I understood it: (Which is Incorrect according to the Quote you recieved OCT 3d.)

SFOR has 3 Patents for ProtectID

SFOR has 3 Patents for GaurdedID (to be purchased by CSI by Sept. 30, 2020)

And 3 other Patents Pending.


Again, Obviously I was incorrect.

Your statement is Incorrect on Patents and misleading.

It sold be worded:

He states 3 of the patents they have, have been sold in a deal to be completed by 2020


You make it sound like they only have 3 Patents, they have 6 Patents.

The 3 Patents for thier Product/Service ProtectID they still own and no other Company has the Rights to Use them. ProductID is the reason why I invested in SFOR.

ProductID is mostly used by BANKS, Heathcare Insurers, Universities and the Goverment.

Your statement is Incorrect on Patents and misleading.

It sold be worded:

He states 3 of the patents they have, have been sold in a deal to be completed by 2020


You make it sound like they only have 3 Patents, they have 6 Patents.

The 3 Patents for thier Product/Service ProtectID they still own and no other Company has the Rights to Use them,

I agree Wholeheartedly.

At least he is Kind enough and Cares enough the not say Just F it about rumors and misinformation being on the boards.

He gets on Camera In YouTube Media accessible to anyone and Answers Questions that have been Emailed and Phones calls he recieve's by the 100's, mostly due to False States made by some on this Board like a R/S is coming, etc. etc.

He told us what he is able to. And clarified many topics also.

Thankfully he cares enough about Current Investors to go on camera and expel rumors about how long the Lawsuits may play out and some Deals could be concluded and announced at anytime, even this week if it happens.

Not many CEO especially OTC Penny Stock would do that.

There maybe out some out there that discuss the Typical explanation about their Companies.

I would like to see the CTO Ram Inna video explaining how and which Patents are used in each of the Products and a small description of each. But then, I'm a Techy Nurd.

If I had any complaint, it would be not to wear a White Shirt on camera or wear a Tie to place some distinction with the way the lighting was arranged.

49'er

Exactly !

They Did Not Sell the Heart and Sole, as you stated jpike.

As I've said before the INDUSTRY PRODUCT PROTECTID is the real Bread and Butter, Banks, Healthcare Insurance Providers, Universities, Government. They did not sell the Patents on ProtectID, Write/Call and ask.

If wanted by the Insittution/Customer, they Can Put ProductID behind the Institutions Firewall, No One Else can figure out how to do it. They have Fortune 10 Fortune 50 and Fortune 100 Companies and Banks as Customers in those catagories.

You need to read up on the CTO Ram.

Symantec does not have an Industry Product/Service like PROTECTID either, that keeps be bad guys out of your Network.

Not that I the believe anything close to a $16B market cap figure either.

SOFR is looking for a buyout ASAP when the right Price comes along.

If it happens during this Litigation ( I bet it will) my bet is on DUO being the one.

I would prefer no Buyout until after 2017, The court can hear a dozen or more Patent Lawsuits at the same time.

If you want a quick rise in PPS and then Out, root for a buyout soon.

GuardedID and MAC OS SIERRA Possible Problem

Try clearing Your MAC Cache or including one of the first few fixes in this video uploaded a week ago.

Keep going little Hedge-Energizer-Bunny. I have read the Court Documents of the PhoneFactor hearing, and Which Claims within '599 '698 ''701 were for the Defendant and which were for the Plaintiff.

Read the expert Witnesses testimony from Defendant’s expert,
Avi Rubin and Ph.D. Plaintiff expert, Alan T. Sherman, Ph.D. and seeing him state Definitions from the the IEEE Standard Computer
Dictionary. (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) is a global association and organization of professionals working toward the development, implementation and maintenance of technology-centered products and services.)

I'm fanailiar with when IEEE especially with regards to ADSL or DSL if you prefer. Also use to attend SUPERCOMM 6 years running, the Big Communications EXPO held in Las Vegas and very Familiar with many of the NETWORKING Customers of DUO, like Cisco, F5, Citrix Systems, etc...


The Document is in PDF format and I don't have the Link, but you can't post a link to your information either, so no big deal.

Just some of the wording in the PhoneFactor Case.

Love the terms Prosecution History when construing Claim terms.

Perhaps the case may go on longer giving the judge time to hear the arguments and Expert Witnesses, but in the end, SFOR will Win, and likely be bought out by one of the Current 3 in the Patent Lawsuit.

My bet is on DUO for a buyout... IMO Only.

You can knock SFOR all you want... Know What You Own.



11,000 Posts and you don't know how to Post a Link ????

Yea ! Pass me a beer and one you and the Gang Too !
LOL

Exactly !

ProtectID is not a Consumer Product, it is for Banks, Corporation's Universities, Gov’t agencies & Social Networking Websites.

ProtectID is not for the Consumer, it is for Banks, Corporation's Universities, Gov’t agencies & Social Networking Websites.

THE BEST SFOR INTERVIEW That I have Read.

It may be dated, it is Lengthy and VERY Informative, Full of great Information.

The Best and Most informitive Interview I have Read

ALL Longs No One Has Mentioned This

It was Posted earlier today, since no one commented so I'm Re-Posting.

The Good Stuff

Evening DR. and All. Take take Moment

I must admit all the great speculating this evening has become Intoxicating!

After doing research for about 8 hours today, one of the Gold Nuggets I came across was an Interview that highlighted a lot of information that I have not seen before on SFOR since I began reading the Board in Mid-Sept. Nor have I seen anything in this lengthy Interview posted.

I'm still re-reading for the 4th time and listened to it using a text to voice app "Pocket" and my eyes and ears can't belive all the Great things I heard. Granted it is from 2013, but it is even more powerful than anything I have heard from the Company Previously.

Tomorrow I will Post it. Look for a Post that begins with BEST INTERVIVEW.

You guys will have a field day picking things out and Posting.

This Interview is even more intoxicating than the speculation I've been reading tonight here, as I do like Lot's of Facts.

Keep up the Great Post's fellow SFOR Knights of the Round Table.





Keep diggin, there's Gold in those searches

49'er

SFOR is Well Aware of FFIEC WBCTrader.

( Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council )

As well as HIPAA and HiTech and Electronic Protected Healthcare Information (ePHI)

WBCTrader
"It literally has 0 impact on strikeforce".

To think that SFOR is not thinking in the Direction of Regualtions regarding FFIEC and how their Patent's also may play a part in how Current Banking Vendors Products are infriging up their Patents would be absolutely preposterous. ZERO Effect ??

I never implied (to use Your words stinky pinky) would be a Banking Vendor while on the OTC.

Again I say as you should contact Management and inquire about what I have discussed and report back to the board. Or have you already inquired already in the past? As You go back to April 2016 on the SFOR Board. If you do inquire, be sure to message myself so I don't miss the Memo.

Thank you,
49'er


The Green Sheet - Lawsuit claims user authentication patent infringement

Post 105722 by WBCTrader

There were two different Suits ! Phonefactor $9.7M

Microsoft's settlement was hidden in Non-Non-Disclosure.

Not trying to mislead - I did not say SFOR needed to be a Banking
Vendor.

Read what was written, please don't Skim and Post.

Possibly one or more of the current FFIEC regulated financial institutions vendors Currently, is perhaps infringing on SFOR Patents.

Ahh, Leave POOR Deutsche Bank out of the conversation for a while, they have enough problems.



They need the Wireless IMF 911 Button.... LOL

Would MSFT had Settled if not found in Violation?

Who found them in Violation does not Matter (SFOR)

You don't know the terms of the Argeement settlement with MSFT.

I'm afraid you are wrong, It has been tested in Court with PhoneFactor.

Microsoft allowed it's Shark Bait Little Fish (PhoneFactor) to test the waters for Great Whites, so MSFT the made a deal when Phonefactor was eaten up in Court. Verdict for the Pantiff $9.7 Million from the little fish.

Thank You, but SFOR is already working in pilot Programs s.

WBCTrader, with all due respect of your Position,

Being in the Cyber Security Sector for Financial Institutions, does this give you insight to what the providers of services and their intimate technology they are using and the possibility of those providers and vendors and that the might be infringing on SOFR's Patents ?

Just because SFOR is Piloting it's own Products in Banking, does not preclued that many Vendors Both Large and Small in the Cyber Security Industry are infringing upon SFOR's Patents. It just needs to have a Patent Infringement Hearing to Bear Out the Facts. and maybe in some Financial as well, not just in Products for Customer to Bank Login, but in Enterprise Systems as well, just as Microsoft was found to be in Violation in the way they utilize SFOR's Patented Technology.

Again there are SFOR's Own Retail Products,Industry Products/Cloud Computing, and SFOR believes other Companies doing the same are Infringing on it's Patents.

So before you make statements such as above I would Suggest you Contact Management and Find Out if they believe any Companies are already providing the Banking/Financial Industry are Infringing upon thier Patents.


Don't be so quick to make statements just because this is a Micro-cap company, that is finally after 15 years in existence, is just begining it's Patent Infringement Lawsuits as older forms of 2FA such as Tokens and SMS are being disguarded if not outright unauthorized to use as New Policies and Regulations are being put in place.

Again with All Due Respect,
49'er

Additional Info on the Subject:

SFOR Working with First Community Bank, Bank of New York and Bank of Tokyo,Credit Card Co's "No banks are yet live with the technology, but he says pilot programs are beginning with First Community Bank, Bank of New York and Bank of Tokyo; Chase and Citigroup are also considering testing the product."

The CEO Mark Kay is a former CIO and COO of JP Morgan Chase , the worlds biggest bank. He just may know a thing or two about banking and Cyber Security also.....

Suggest you check his JPM background on LinkedIn.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=125610236



David and Goliath
SFOR and Microsoft

Slingshot Fully Loaded Again.

Tustwave/Singapore Tel, DOU, and Centrify are just around the corner next Month.



I Love Rock and Roll
Put Another Dime in the Share Price Baby

WHAT SFOR ORIGINALLY AND LEGALLY REQUESTED FROM MICROSOFT


Due to the Non-Disclosure we don't know what settlement was reached.
But here is what SFOR was Seeking:


Facts Du Jour


SOURCE:


June 15, 2015

The company, according to its complaint, sent a letter to Microsoft’s CEO in October 2012 giving him actual notice of the ‘599 patent. The next month, StrikeForce sent another letter -- this time, to Microsoft’s chief patent counsel -- also giving actual notice of the patent.


StrikeForce contends that in the next year, Microsoft began offering its Windows Azure Multi-Factor Authentication product, with multi-factor authentication apps for Windows Phone, Android and IOS devices.

Software company claims Microsoft continues to infringe on ‘out-of-band’ patents

SFOR is affiliated with Azure - Proof Stockprofit


Stockprofit, Since you asked.

Proof 1

Proof 2

SFOR is affiliated with Azure Proof


Stockprofit, Since you asked.

Proof 1

Proof 2

Yes & I'm Santa Clause, Ho Ho Go SFOR

Don't Leave Home Without It ! Mobil Trust

Article - Is Momentum Mounting for SFOR 20 Oct.

Is Momentum Mounting for StrikeForce Technologies Inc. (SFOR) By William Abels - October 20, 2016

Another New Article by John P Mello. Yes 3 years old.

But John is a Valuable Resource in World of Cyber Security, if you read my post.

I also wrote and asked him if he might do a follow up Story.

Just Passing along his name in case someone might want to follow his work such as this current story.

What Should be on the Next President's Cyberagenda?

By John P. Mello Jr.
Oct 14, 2016 3

http://www.technewsworld.com/story/84000.html?rss=1

Now here's a guy that knows Cybersecurity

I checked this guy out, he's not with PC World Magazine anymore, but freelance.

I wrote him and said he might want to do a followup on this story.

Just checkout his other Story Titles from the article page!

He writes on Cybersecurity in a lot of places.

Lawsuit could put kink in Microsoft's push for cloud security

SFOR Countdown has begun.

If SFOR OS Bothers You, Then Suggest

All I can tell you is see ZPaul's Post's for DD


DD, careful analysis, patience

It's a Royal Flush

Factor Tip of the Day

Tip of the Day at the end of the 01:33 Clip

NOV 9TH - 18th

The Golden Age Of Cybersecurity Startups

Cockroaches Versus Unicorns: The Golden Age Of Cybersecurity Startups Posted Jan 6, 2016

Just a Few Quotes to Wet Your Whistle :

The SFOR Board has It's Cockroaches and Unicorns too.

A Little Counter Balance in Posts are Good, to Point out possible Falicies and counter the rah rah Cheerleaders.

But due to the High Visability to SFOR's Dramatic PPS Rise, I think we need to invest in a few cases of:

Rocketman, Basicly with the amount of the Trade being $100K they would prefer you call the trade in, as they prefer to talk to a person and hear from them that they wish to make a trade of such a large Denomination sale.

It seems it's just as a Standard Automatic Message. A trade of that size is a BIG Flag to the broker/trader and they saying hey we don't mind doing the trade for you, we just prefer to talk to the Investor before doing so, as I'm not comfortable making this trade without talking with to the owner first, so it may be sent up the Chain for review. Possibly delaying the Entire Order.

If you owned a stock that was $10 and you accidentally put in an Order to sell for a $1.00 instead of $10.00. Wouldn't you want the Screen to start Flashing Red with a message saying "Are you really sure you want to make this Trade ? "

Tarawa - SFOR AND INTEL CLARIFICATION

Yes Koog' post was out there, kinda not so nice words about SFOR, but the fact is as I have posted 3 times now, And the point I agree with Koog about, as we both see it, SFOR in not working with INTEL the COMPANY, beyond their Product is Certified to work on Intel Processors as are thousands of Programs.

In SFOR's instance it works on INTEL's Trusted Platform Module (TPM) Processor. And is the only Encrypted Keystroke Software that is certified and WORKS DIRECTLY WITH INTEL." Meaning the Chip.

Should you think otherwise (not saying you do, this post is for evryone) please feel free to email Kay to Clarify Further from the Source.

SFOR patented Encrypted Keystroke Technology is Not Built into the Processors Design.

I am the one who first Transcribed George Waller Words and posted them from the Video Link ZPAUL provided.

I did not orginaly offer any intereptitation of the wording but quickly did after I could see some had interpreted the Wording incorrectly and we're getting excited and getting the wrong Idea.

And I quickly Posted ........
Just to clarify :

"It is just in Installed Software wise when it is loaded.

IT IS NOT DESIGNED INTO THE TMP CHIP.

If it were designed into the TMP or INTEL Microprocessor, I would be the happiest guy in the world, right next to many longs here. "

But currently SFOR's Keystroke technology is certified and WORKS DIRECTLY WITH INTEL."

I will say the word "embedding on to the chip" could have been praised better.
But George is the Executive VP Of Marketing! And could be misinterpreted if you are not a person with a Tech background.

Here is the video link again, along with George Waller Statement, which begins just before where George makes the Statement below.

"Our Keystroke encrytion has been accepted by INTEL and INTEL is now we work with directly embedding it on to the Chip.
So when you use Keystroke Guard it literally embeds its key management process down on to INTEL chip and we are the only Keystroke technology that certified and Works directly with Intel."


If anyone emails Kay or Waller feel free also to include this post.
As I will be glad to take the heat from the board if I should be found incorrect in my intepitation.

Gold 49'er

A little background on TMP

Trusted Platform Module (TPM) is an international standard for a secure cryptoprocessor, which is a dedicated microcontroller designed to secure hardware by integrating cryptographic keys into devices. TPM's technical specification was written by a computer industry consortium called Trusted Computing Group (TCG). International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standardized the specification as ISO/IEC 11889 in 2009.

Version 2.0 of TPM specification was published for public review on March 13, 2014 as a library specification that provides updates to the previously published main TPM specifications. Trusted Platform Module Library Specification Revision 01.16 was released in October 2014 as the latest TPM 2.0 release.

The United States Department of Defense (DoD) specifies that "new computer assets (e.g., server, desktop, laptop, thin client, tablet, smartphone, personal digital assistant, mobile phone) procured to support DoD will include a TPM version 1.2 or higher where required by DISA STIGs and where such technology is available." The TPM is anticipated to be used for device identification, authentication, encryption, measurement, and device integrity.[9]

An example of use is Intel's Trusted Execution Technology (TXT). Intel's TXT is used to create a "chain of trust", and to remotely attest that a computer has a specified hardware setup and is using specified software.

Phoenix I would imagine we really do have different points of View on that Statement I Made "my blood began to flow like rocket fuel through the space shuttle main engines"

In the context I used, it was correct if you undertood anything about the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SME) which I would not expect you to.

Just a couple of Amazing FAQ about the SME, the first was my Statement of Reference:

* If water instead of fuel were pumped by the three Rocketdyne SSMEs, an average family-sized swimming pool could be drained in 25 seconds.

* The maximum equivalent horsepower developed by the three SSMEs is just over 37 Million Horsepower.

* The energy released by three of Rocketdyne’s SSMEs is equivalent to the output of 13 Hoover Dams.

* Although not much larger than an automobile engine, the SSME high-pressure fuel turbopump generates 100 hp for each pound of its weight, while an automobile engine
generates about 0.5 hp for each pound of its weight.

* Even though Rocketdyne’s SSME weighs one-seventh as much as a locomotive engine, its high-pressure fuel pump alone delivers as much horsepower as 28 locomotives, while its high-pressure oxidizer pump delivers the equivalent horsepower of 11 more.

_______________________________________________

As to having your Children, thank you but no thank you Phoenix, I've had Kidney Stones on and off every few years for decades, the Pain is Equviant to Labor Pains. Pain on and off until they decided to finally pass, hours or days later. The ONLY thing that can Completly Stop the pain is Morphine, well there is a Spinal Tap but not for a Kidney Stones they would not, since there is no child and they can administer Drugs.

If they CIA could find a way to cause a Kidney Stone at a moments notice, there would be no need for Waterboarding or other forms of torture..!

After years of having kidney stones I don't go to the hospital anymore, I keep some Hydrocordon around for if they occur, unlike pregnancy you don't know when and where it will instantly happen again. All the Hydrocordon does is take the Top Sharp Edge off the pain say from a 10 to a 8.5 Should it not pass in 24hrs I will head to the ER as it may be stuck. Luckily I have passed all mine, some folks are not that Lucky.

I once spoke with a Woman who has had both Children and Kidney Stones, she said she would Prefer Labor Pains over Kidney Stone Pain.... If she did not have to raise the kid for 18 years.

Her Perspective came from 20 YEARS AGO when the US society was not into being so Politically Correct.

Of course you know when it comes to Labor Pains, some statements made while being in that much pain can be far from Politically Correct. LOL

I remember when I was in the USAF and I went to the ER, they tried to say they gave me a Pain Shot, stop Compaining. They had given me a shot of Darvon, which for Kidney Stone pain is like giving an aspirin to someone who just lost their Arm.

By the time they got me in a bed, I told the Nurse, LOOK get a F***ing Doctor in here that can authorize a Shot of Morphine, or just get me a knife and I'll cut my throat and the Pain will Stop.

Fortunately most men will never feel that much pain, nor have to endure the Monthly Cycle for 50 or so years.

My sympathies are with you Mom, but you'll Probably admit it was all worth it, at least I hope so.

For those that never had a kidney stone and read this far, Here is a woman in pain, by herself, notice how the pain eases somewhat for a moment, then bam its back. Luckly she had taken a Hydrocordon or she would be rolling , thrashing screaming and cussing a lot more.

Apologize for going way off Topic.. let's hope for no Pain Just Gain in SFOR.