Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No bout-a-doubt-it.....vplm has become a daily mini p & d. And that is the smartest way to deal with it. It works for the not too greedy....
Oops, I spoke too soon......looks like it just found it's way again....the usual way, down! All is copacetic!
Looks like the pos...I mean the pps, doesn't know which way to go today. It doesn't know which way is up? Maybe it doesn't care.....so long as all these insider shares keep selling as tho there was no tomorrow, haha.......but a little secret...there IS a tomorrow and many more to come for the next 7 to 8 yrs of this before vplm becomes a red giant and then a black hole.
Thankyou.....but I just found a whole new case.....lol, it was mismarked as pancake syrup. No wonder the stomach aches......and I thought it was the pps.
So much to be thankful for here at good ol vplm. It should have its own special Thanksgiving day. I mean what more could you ask for in a stock? Lots of encouragement from the sec to invest in these OTC pennystocks because of how so many realize the benefits. Shit....4 whole cents (or close to..)......now that's not some old English style half cent crap......that 4 WHOLE freakin American cents!!! And...and...a whole flippin army of lawyers.....not just any ol lawyers.......not ambulance chasers, but we're talking every single one of em is rated as the best there is......mostly by their own damn selves...And then, let's see......oh yeah, we are so blessed with the great leader evil magpie malechhh......oops, sorry about the dang predictive....that's emil magdi malak....and wife, who have recently demonstrated their undying and unmatched supercharged fiduciarily responsible individuals.....whose focus is not on themselves but on us, his loyal subjects. And we cannot, must not for a moment forget the great mouthpiece of so many failing otc pennystocks, the slickster rich, inYA pockets, Inza, whom all those failed pennystocks owe so much to for the pure truth he slews and takes so little to do for it. So wonderful he's always there at a moments notice with ALL THE ANSWERS. There's more, mind you but I'm running out of virtual ink...
Love the encouragement you get here at vplm... The best!
So happy and relieved that Rich inYA pockets, Inza, has recently (according to a poster who recently spoke with him) assured us that there IS a settlement and it IS a good one for vplm shareholders. Looks like I'll be getting my 50 cents after all! I can't wait!...........................or can I?
If vplm is in the best position ever......then no where to go from here, it's already the best! Nothing to see here. You can go home now...
Wow, 28 IPR "wins".........should be at least 28 cents....?
Ok, then how bout a nickel ? ..........4 cents?
Another day, another hundredth or thousandth of a penny. Wait for it
Vplm.......home of bitch, holler and complain.
Vplm.......a leader with no followers for 23 yrs
Vplm......has more lawyers, court dates and empty promises than you can count.......yet all summed up, amount to zilch which is less than a hill of beans in a sinkhole. Lololol. But.......so much fun to watch
Another day, another 3 or 4 cents. Gotta luv those effects of 28 favorable IPRs....
So would you buy the company, had you the money? Huh, huh?
Sorry the patents didn't need any verification. They were totally verified by the procecution of the USPTO but if it makes you feel better to thing they gained more in the IPRs good for you.
And there are no infringements but it's nice to believe in something
Hell it was in far better shape 15 years ago
Sorry you are wrong. Poor character judgement. Not on any hi horse. You call defending you from unfair statements being on some hi horse. Nonsense. And I tried to put a stop to your argument with accuser not join in arguing. I see there's no point in setting the record straight so I'm done with this. Good luck
Sorry but you have it wrong. You just said we finally have all the patents approved. That's 100% incorrect. The patents were "approved" by then USPTO years ago when they received their patenthood. That's when they were approved and have been approved patents ever since to this day. Not one thing has ever changed. You seem to have some other idea how it works. They have been valid patents since day 1 nearly 10 yrs ago for the core patents. What you and some others don't seem to understand is that the IPRs were alleged infringers or a group working on their behalf in one case, who decided to challenge various aspects of the patents in order to get them invalidated. Vplm defended against those challenges and the challengers lost in every case (because the CEO threatened to bring federal RICO charges against the PTAB). So since the challenges failed, vplm gained nothing and lost nothing. A wash. A good thing but it did nothing for vplm except to give a little short lived boost in price based on speculation a few times. The patents simply stayed intact. They gained nothing as all their attributes were established by the USPTO in the initial prosecutions. And those patent approvals are fairly easy to get past. Over 90% of patents never garner any value for their their owners anyway.
As to you not being sure of the point, my opinion would be lack of focus and all over the road. I got into this conversation by basically defending you, which turns out to have been a mistake. Not a mistake on my part, but you turned it into that. Someone accused you of 3 things. Being Canadian, being a shorter and being a liar. So I jumped in a said basically that being Canadian doesn't matter to anything nor being a shorter as that's entirely your business and perfectly legal and as to his accusation of you being a liar, I said personal attacks are not allowed here and posts are supposed to be about the company. None of that was about the company and I defended you not because I know anything about you but it was unfair statements and against the TOS. And I directed my questions to the accuser. So instead of thanking me for defending what's right, you responded by telling me that he was the 1st guy you ever outed as a pumper on raging bull, which I wasn't interested in knowing and calling posters pumpers is not allowed. So what I see at that point is 2 ppl looking for an argument. So once again, I responded by reiterating that I didn't care about those things and that it was your business. I tried to stem any arguing and I tried to derail it by talking about the raging bull site because I was very involved there for about 5 yrs and I mentioned the company that went down in flames as a partial analogy to vplm in several aspects. And I had done the same kind of comparison with the same company here several times before. There were certain similarities in thought appropriate to note here.
Your response was how you did care about what ppl said about you as you felt it affected your reputation. I countered that I didn't think you should be too concerned about what others say on a msg board esp if it's unsubstantiated negatives. I thought if you worried about what msg board goers had to say in a he said/she said match, it's wasted time and energy and dirties up the board. Then you jumped clear across to his CEOs were banned by SEC and how that amounted to nothing, which I didn't know what that had to do with anything so I said as much...and fine corporations with little effect which I still had no idea what it had to do with anything originally posted. Then you jumped to the whole thing about how Madoff's victims were "rubes" and I thought that was unfair and inappropriate to say. I said I thought it was wrong to call them rubes which is a very nefarious insult to ppl who got ripped off for everything they had and I didn't think they deserved that. The only thing I agreed with was about the sec wanting money but again, that was off the wall and had nothing to do with anything discussed to begin with. Once again I tried to get then discussion back on track by reiterating that I didn't care what joe blow says about you or anyone else. I tried to remind that fair minded ppl don't care about unsubstantiated shade thrown here, so you shouldn't be concerned about it and that it's not allowed here anyway. I said other mouths don't create your reputation, you do. What I was saying was correct, positive and I stayed focused. I asked again what CEOs being banned and amounting to nothing, meant?
Then you jumped to sort of insulting me by saying the board is not just about me and my viewpoint, that others read and believe crap said about you. Usually the mods and/or admins just delete that stuff anyway. Then you said for someone who has been labeled a basher for 20 years, you could understand how labels worked. I didn't know if you meant yourself or the guy who accused you or who....? Then you said CEO bans meant nothing and had to do with other stocks and asked for PM. But I didn't care. It's only about vplm or something associated. Then back to Madoff victims being greedy rubes which I thought was not fair. I did a little research on that question and found other opinions on the subject. I found nothing that blamed the victims for their losses and like I said earlier, if they were guilty of anything they would've had charges put on them for aiding and abetting if they had actual solid knowledge of fraud being committed. Hell, ppl believe in this cockamamie unsubstantiated story about patents worth kazillions without any proof of anything and plenty of lies told over a 12 year period. I reminded that it was Madoff in a jailhouse interview that called the victims greedy when they lost everything and he pulled in $56 big ones with a B. What an ultimate insult.
In think I was clear and focused and all I did was defend you against some unfair statements. I'm done. I'll move on now to my favorite subject......how to get the most value for my vplm entertainment dollar.
Look at the effects of those charming IPRs ....... They are truly steering the price here.... You can't miss it.......(can you?). Yeah buddy, Mr market knows allright and...and...those damn infringers ......they know it too.....they're shaking in their boots so hard it's registering on the Richter scale. They're so frightened, they can't move...they're frozen. If they could move, maybe they'd move to buy, license or settle.......but they can't move. Woe are them.
Question:
For how many years have we been told that vplm will be collecting large sums of money soon?
A) 5 years
B) 10 years
Ç) 12 years
D) this is the 1st time it's ever been said...
the answer is 12 yrs I have the documentation
Oh I see.....so you agree that it will do ALOT for the company but nothing for the shareholders, which is what I said in the 1st place. How about you explain how the IPR decisions do ANYTHING for ANYTHING. Connect the dots with facts that shows how an IPR directly causes anything to happen. Please explain this.
All I want to know is.....if Madoff's victims were greedy.....implying they knew it was an illegal thing going on, then 1) why were none of them charged with aiding and abetting a fraud and 2) if it was so obviously a scam, then why did the SEC not see the fraud in 3 seperate investigations? In other words, if the SEC didn't see the fraud then how can anybody charge the victims with fraud.......unless of course, the SEC is a fraud as well, which is a whole nuther movie.
I don't remember if I saw the sting of not. But it was Madoff who called his own victims greedy. I find that ridiculous. Admittedly, I don't know all the details but I do recall watching some kind of documentary that did have the details. I don't recall the victims being depicted as greedy. After all, what do ppl invest for, but to make money? I doubt if they say, well, I don't want to make too much... I don't want more than my fair share...no, they want every penny they can get and legally! If Madoff's victims knew it was an illegal scam, then yes, I would consider that greedy, but I don't have such knowledge they were aware they were making illegal money. If they were aware, then that in of itself would be illegal. Did any of them get charged with a crime? If so, I'll adjust my thinking. If not, then it's nothing more than your opinion or characterization of them.
By the way, several dictionaries define rube as a noun, not slang. And I won't bother posting it but I looked up lower class and several of the same description words were used for both that and rube so.....
I'll be looking for some place that says Madoff's victims were just greedy. And greedy or not, doesn't make them uneducated country bumpkins. I'll bet they could come up with a few very educated epithets for your description of them.
Many believe vplm is a scam. So you better not be invested or risk being short for Rueben
Whoop dee doo, spit in your shoe. Means nothing. Does nothing for shareholders...
It was Bernie Madoff himself who said his victims were greedy. He said that in a jailhouse interview. That's the biggest insult I've ever heard and the best example of the pot calling the kettle black that I ever heard. The utter nerve and gall of him to call his victims "greedy" seems to be lost on you. He made something like 40 of 50 billion off his victims and you believe THEY were the greedy ones??? My goodness, that's warped!
A & B) I never suggested that it's all about me and my viewpoint. It's simply that me and my viewpoints are the only ones I have. I don't speak for others. As to "others read and believe", I already addressed that by suggesting that you ought not be concerned with those who will simply believe negative things said about you without any proof of substantiation. Why be concerned about those who believe anything the hear? They are not your friends or partners. If they do so, they are the "rubes" you ill defined earlier. Rubes means low class, uneducated. You attached that to Bernie Madoff or his victims and that is wrong IMHO. The smartest ppl can still be tricked by evil stuff.
C) no need to use PM (which I don't have use of anyway). Info and explanations belong out in the open for all to see and benefit from, similar to your point about how I'm not the only viewpoint here. All I wanted was a basic idea of what that phrase "CEO bans". I'm aware of the FCC banning ppl from being a CEO anymore, if that's what you refer to?
D) I don't understand what you mean by those who "invested"with Madoff felt that deserved better than avg investors unless you mean it should've been obvious to them that something was wrong, therefore they "knew" and were simply greedy. Well, I'm not deeply knowledgeable about such details but I will tell you that the FCC investigated Madoff at least 3x and found nothing until the 4th investigation. Did you know that? So that being the case, I'd say negates the ideas that his investors were just greedy... And I seriously doubt there were stupid and/or uninformed. The guy was a master manipulator. His investors were apparently smarter than him as they didn't die in prison, a pariah and some monies were recovered.
I said I don't care about what some joe blow says about you. That's supposed to let you know that fair minded ppl don't care what ppl say about other ppl here. For 1 thing it's just unsubstantiated shading and it's not allowed here anyway. Why be concerned about ppl who will just believe anything someone says. Those ppl don't create reputation, you do.
"I've seen the SEC ban CEO's that amounted to nothing."
I don't understand what you mean? Restate please
I also don't understand your associating Bernie Madoff with rubes, unless you are referring to his victims in which case I think you're unfairly calling them rubes, after saying you're concerned about what ppl call you...
We need some more of those nifty IPRs. They rock! A few hundred more IPRs and maybe I'll see my 50¢..........?? Keep em coming, you lousy infringers you...
Let's hear some more good news... Price is flying. Mr market knows.....
Best P.O.S. evvvvvver!
Can I have my 50¢ please
And yet how strange it is that not a single one of these alleged infringers is concerned enough to get froggy and leap to buy, license or settle......EVEN IN THE FACE OF ALL THESE IMPROVED CONDITIONS AND BOLSTERED POSITIONS AND TRIALS LOOMING EVER CLOSER AND THREAT OF TRIPLE DAMAGES AND THE THREAT OF ONE OF THEIR COMPETITORS TO GRAB THE PATENTS OUT FROM UNDER THEM AT ANY MOMENT AND ALL THE MASSIVE FUTURE LOSSES THST WOULD BRING AND ALL THE ROYALTIES THEYLL NEVER SEE AND ALL THE INFRINGEMENT TRIALS THEYLL NEVER HAV.
Yeah......makes perfect sense. Dots all connect. Of course.
So you got proof they stole the technology"? Plz share. I know...I know.....patience! Lololol
It musta been borg assimilation of ALL the many CEOs to think the same dishonest thoughts to go out and steal steal steal like zombies. Ok, I get it.
Not September.....only about 2 weeks til filing comes out. Rich inYA pockets Inza just categorically stated a few days ago that there is a settlement and it's a good one for shareholders. Didn't you see that. It's all over! Ship has come in!!! Plus 4 more fresh new IPR decisions. That oughta double it! No bout a doubt it....Halleylulu!
For the life of me I can't understand how y'all miss these things
Omg... 4 more IPR decisions! What we've all been eating for!!! Looky that price FLY! put the yacht dealers on speeddial! Come to papa. This is amazing! No company has ever accomplished this before. The wait is over.........
"patents are real and strong"
You cannot have patents that are not real. This is just wordcrafting. If it's a patent, then it's real, period.
Same is true about use of the word "strong". You can't have strong or weak patents. They are either patents or not. There is no strength rating like the punching bag machine or the hand grip machine. It's either a patent or it isn't. There are no class A patents and class D patents, only patents.
28 favorable IPR decisions. I don't believe any other company has ever come even near such an accomplishment... Hmmmmmm....... It was not untill the famed Sawyer letters threatened federal RICO charges against the PTAB that the string of favorable outcomes began to take place. And they always take enough time to appear as legitimately arrived at decisions. That's how it looks to me. And again, favorable decisions simply means the specific challenges against USPTO grants were not successful and that the patents in question still hold the same validity they were given on the day they became patents, nothing more, nothing less. Assigning MORE will surely go on.
Notice they are referred to as "favorable IPR institution decisions". Wow, fancy that. I have been saying ever since the initial IPRs, that they are not "wins" and if course I've gone into detail why. And now here I see the great Emu himself (or inYA pockets. Had to be written by one or the other") referring to them in this proper and correct manner. Will wonders never cease. "Favorable decisions" is the exact phrasing I have used. Should I sue? Lol.
I think that's a fair point. I thought it was just maybe a personal thing since the accusations were directed at just one guy. Are you aware of him using the same attitude against others as though an agenda existed?
Go up? hahaha....
That like saying the word "work" to Maynard G. Krebs
Chart looks pretty much the way I called it yesterday..........again..
Dumped.....all the way down to .031s. So easy to predict.