Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Do those 127 HEDGE FUNDS have a lot of escrows, too?
If "All gone" how will the hedge funds of interest and their lawyers react?
Why are bonuses merited at this time?
I read, "follow the big money". Do some hedge funds have a lot of escrows? Are or they positioned in another way to benefit from an escrows payout? What's at stake for them in this deal? As escrow holders, is being attached to them in some way in this potential payout a positive?
Do some hedge funds have a lot of escrows? Are or they positioned in another way to benefit from an escrows payout? What's at stake for them in this deal?
I can't understand why Susman and Willingham allowed Rosen to have anything to do with future of our escrow shares.
Why didn't they protest Rosen's future involvement in the welfare of WMIH and the escrows? Somebody please explain this to me. I'm baffled.
How can Rosen be representing escrows best interests in any capacity? I'm confused if this is the case. LG or somebody please enlighten me on this.
Evidently, there is no ceiling as to how long this can drag on.
I wish the Hedge Funds lawyers could do something to expedite the process and get escrows paid. I would think the Hedge Funds would be frustrated and concerned by this long, drawn-out process if all that money is there and they can't get it.
What Presidential candidate would try to get to the bottom of this rotten Washington Mutual seizure and try to help pre-seizure WM shareholders get justice for this travesty? If post-seizure escrow holders get helped, that's fine, too.
Here's what I don't get. With all the original Washington Mutual shareholders that got "screwed over", wouldn't there be at least one
that was a Washington DC Senator or Rep or related to somebody that got "screwed over"? If so, why didn't they raise more hell about this atrocity?
I believe I would gladly take $2.25 per share for my escrows.
yep, it's been long enough. A lot of talk, it's time for some results. When we released, there should have been a time limit on the escrows getting something substantial or not. Did we get duped?
Please don't tell me Rosen has anything to do with representing escrow holders or WMIH shareholders.
After all this time, that is what bothers me.
Why have not been any meaningful updates on the status of the escrows whether it be positive or negative?
What presidential candidate would be the most likely to help escrow holders get justice if they were elected President?
As part of the releases, why didn't our attorneys insist on a deadline to resolve this mess?
excel, how have Ray and Brad not been prosecuted?
hotmeat, so who is fully released?
Would it be JPM and some hedge funds? Please refresh my memory.
So whom did escrow holders give releases too? It's been so long ago I've forgotten.
Large Green, I think the LONG wait may be making some edgy and skeptical.
Wouldn't it be nice to get some kind of courtesy PR announcing "FDIC holding WM assets" to distributed at a later date? They wouldn't even need to give the specifics. Why couldn't the FDIC do something like this? Or even Susman or our BOD if they know.
I just don't understand, if the FDIC is, indeed, holding WM assets, why does it have to be such a secret?
Let's hope Susman knows what's on the asset list 3.1a.
We need one candidate to make an issue out of it.
Wow !!! This needs to be sent to the Wall Street Journal and other major media outlets. Maybe we could finally get some public awareness generated about this. With the election coming up, this could be a nice topic to bring up at candidate debates. To see where the different candidates stand on this issue. It would tell a lot about them.
This could expedite action and long awaited payback to shareholders that were wronged.
Boris, what makes you think so?
Do "hedgies" have a lot of escrows or do they get a 75/25 cut? How does that work?
Please refresh my memory. What's at stake for the "hedgies" in regards to the escrows?
scrivenerserror, why does 24-160 billion $ have to be delivered til 2018 to the orignial investors of Washington Mutual? By the way, I sure hope you are correct.
Why does the whereabouts of the left-over assets have to be such a secret?
BlueeFoxx, I posted this recently and didn't get any response.
"I'm not trying to be negative about the escrow situation. I'd just like to know what are considered the three most encouraging factual evidences within the last six months that escrows may, indeed, get something substantial."
Maybe I should just ask for one FACTUAL piece of evidence.
What is the alternative for holding on to escrows?
I'm not trying to be negative about the escrow situation. I'd just like to know what are considered the three most encouraging factual evidences within the last six months that escrows may, indeed, get something substantial.
Maybe there should have been a deadline date in the release agreement for escrows to "POSSIBLY" be beneficial to owners of escrows. Maybe that would have encouraged more urgency. As a result, this could be "drawn out" for a long, long, time. It already has. Who drew this release agreement up? Was it Susman, Rosen, Willingham or did they all have a hand in it?
LG, ACowboy, Boris, what % chance of getting these escrow paybacks? $1/escrow share, $3/escrow share, $5/escrow share, $10/escrow share.
Can someone please summarize what CSNY/bop has been posting pertaining to escrows? Thanks.
Boris, do you any quotes from CSNY/bop pertaining to what she foresees for escrows? If so, please post some or provide me some links with her analysis. If nothing else, please give me a summary of what she has posted recently about escrows. Thanks.
Does anybody recall any legislators ever "standing up" and criticizing the Washington Mutual seizure and supporting the shareholders plight? I would think that some would have even been shareholders themselves.