Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So, I don’t give a rat’s ass if you believe me or not
Around what timeframe did you buy your shares?
Feel free to correct things otterman.
He would have had to bought after for the story to make sense, all while saying how terrible the CEO and company is and than also buying more shares. I doubt he ever held shares in the company...
I'm curious have you owned shares of DBMM in the past?
Otter you want to explain this one?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170481093
If you bought most of your shares before the 2 RS how would a minor short squeeze get you out? 100 million shares after the two RS would be about a 1000 shares... Is 1000 shares enough to break even on a short squeeze lol.
Remember if there was no risk to naked shorting this board would be quiet as a mouse, margin, cost to carry and interest all apply. Normally they have guaranteed shares from the convertible debentures as a sort of insurance but that no longer applies here and same with GTII. This why you have basically the whole ihub bash crew here, this is why we had the famous DBMM "advocacy post" asking for shareholders to email the company and ask for revocation!! Even today we see from bashers threats of messaging the SEC! They are stuck bad, even if the short position is 500 million can you imagine trying to buy that back in this stock. Stock will scream higher so fast it will make your head spin.
Haven't you heard pennypauly? They are all bored retirees who all somehow stumbled onto the DBMM board.. hahahah!
Updated basher list:
- Stock_Barber
- Jetmek_03052
- loanshark007
- otterman
- janice shell
- rozzy
- crowin
- Idiot Mayor
- Renee (famous DBMM advocacy post)
- I-Glow
- toncatmad
- THall
- Gotham Bay Group
- Beef Wellington
- space1230
- luvthemtrainz
- Hugie
- VrilSociedad
- fourcloze
- Homebrew
- Huggy Bear
Lol let's just get right down to meaning of a word, always semantics with you.
Don't post childish garbage like that, how would we even verify that? We gonna meet up at a steakhouse somewhere in the midwest? lol.
The fact that you try to obfuscate, gaslight, minimize any case of naked short selling that's brought up show everyone just what a bad actor you are.
Granted, there aren't all that many, but I should think you could find at least a few.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2023/comp25746.pdf
II. VIOLATIVE SHORT SELLING IN THE SECURITIES OF ISSUER 1
41. In June 2018, Defendants engaged in a scheme to circumvent Regulation SHO
requirements in connection with the short sales of millions of shares of the common stock of
Issuer 1. As more fully described below, Defendants’ scheme including short selling without
having locates in place and naked short selling in which they not only failed to have locates but
also failed to timely deliver the securities being sold. Defendants’ goals were two-fold. First,
Defendants knowingly or recklessly used their violative short selling to push down artificially
the price of Issuer 1’s stock so that Defendants could lower the price at which Defendants were
able to exercise their Issuer 1 convertible securities, thus obtaining more stock upon conversion.
42. Second, regardless of whether Defendants succeeded in driving down Issuer
1’s stock price by their improper short selling, Defendants knew or were reckless in not knowing
they could profit additionally from selling Issuer 1’s stock in violation of Regulation SHO’s
locate requirements. As set forth more fully below, their fraudulent trading scheme worked as
follows: first, they entered into a securities purchase agreement with Issuer 1 on behalf of the
Warrant Fund that, for a brief period, effectively allowed Defendants to exercise convertible
preferred securities in exchange for Issuer 1’s stock at an approximately 20% discount to the
market price. Then, prior to exercising the convertible securities, they entered short sales orders
without first obtaining a locate, circumventing Regulation SHO. Almost immediately after those
short sales, they executed their conversion rights to acquire Issuer 1 stock and attempted, albeit
unsuccessfully, to use those shares to cover their short sales. In this manner, Defendants locked
in an approximate 20% spread. In other words, by short selling without first obtaining a locate,
they effectively were able to sell at market price and then acquire the shares at a 20% discount to
market price, earning substantial illicit proceeds. Defendants would not have been able to do this
Case 2:23-cv-03201 Document 1 Filed 06/12/23 Page 12 of 36 PageID: 12
13
if they had followed the rules that required locates for their short sales because they would not
have been able to obtain locates in sufficient quantity, if at all.
I believe StayHumble uses that in jest because there was a typo or a mix up or something back late December of last year.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170802987
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170803124
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171006496
Oh you mean this...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170606474
I have never seen something so blatant in my life.
Remember if there was no risk to naked shorting this board would be quiet as a mouse, margin, cost to carry and interest all apply. Normally they have guaranteed shares from the convertible debentures as a sort of insurance but that no longer applies here and same with GTII. This why you have basically the whole ihub bash crew here, this is why we had the famous DBMM "advocacy post" asking for shareholders to email the company and ask for revocation!! Even today we see from bashers threats of messaging the SEC! They are stuck bad, even if the short position is 500 million can you imagine trying to buy that back in this stock. Stock will scream higher so fast it will make your head spin.
Take a look at GTII, went from around 2 cents in late 2020 to an initial run close to 5 bucks in early 2021. Than it drifted for a bit all the way down to 40 cents and ran again to 9 bucks, now it's around 90 cents still with market cap around 300 million. It's maintained that even with manipulation like more naked shorting and wash trading, and basically zero fundamentals to back up the price. At some point imo that will happen here as well, the dam will break and the price will have to recalibrate higher. A 300 million market cap puts DBMM at around 40 cents.
My last post show 5:34 pm, but it's 2 pm over here.
They are toxic lender to FNGR, trapped.
This is pretty familiar eh Renee...
https://contracts.justia.com/companies/bantek-inc-5858/contract/184044/
Updated basher list:
- Stock_Barber
- Jetmek_03052
- loanshark007
- otterman
- janice shell
- rozzy
- crowin
- Idiot Mayor
- Renee (famous DBMM advocacy post)
- I-Glow
- toncatmad
- THall
- Gotham Bay Group
- Beef Wellington
- space1230
- luvthemtrainz
- Hugie
Did you see the tickers the guy has been bashing?
DBMM
GTII
BANT
CYAP
All Kramer notes in the past.
Otter you want to explain this one?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170481093
If you bought most of your shares before the 2 RS how would a minor short squeeze get you out? 100 million shares after the two RS would be about a 1000 shares... Is 1000 shares enough to break even on a short squeeze lol.
The only scam is naked shorting against these convertible notes. And you are quite clearly a paid basher for these LLC's that do criminal naked short selling.
Look at where I started exposing CYAP and where it is today! Nearly 100% losses!
He is also a basher on the ticker CYAP, they have had convertible notes with the Kramer's in the past as well.
https://contracts.justia.com/companies/cyber-apps-world-2496/contract/199157/
"FOR VALUE RECEIVED, CYBER APPS WORLD INC., a Nevada corporation (hereinafter called the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to the order of GENEVA ROTH REMARK HOLDINGS, INC., a New York corporation"
GTII also had a note with Kramer Geneva Roth but retired it and trapped them:
https://stopnakedshortselling.org/2021/03/tip-a-naked-short-selling-death-spiral-lending-group-
exposed-and-trapped-by-a-public-company-gtii-this-firm/
That makes three Kramer linked tickers this guy is bashing.
Lol now they bring the ask down to .0056 like clockwork everyday, who wants less all the time?
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2023/comp25746.pdf
II. VIOLATIVE SHORT SELLING IN THE SECURITIES OF ISSUER 1
41. In June 2018, Defendants engaged in a scheme to circumvent Regulation SHO
requirements in connection with the short sales of millions of shares of the common stock of
Issuer 1. As more fully described below, Defendants’ scheme including short selling without
having locates in place and naked short selling in which they not only failed to have locates but
also failed to timely deliver the securities being sold. Defendants’ goals were two-fold. First,
Defendants knowingly or recklessly used their violative short selling to push down artificially
the price of Issuer 1’s stock so that Defendants could lower the price at which Defendants were
able to exercise their Issuer 1 convertible securities, thus obtaining more stock upon conversion.
42. Second, regardless of whether Defendants succeeded in driving down Issuer
1’s stock price by their improper short selling, Defendants knew or were reckless in not knowing
they could profit additionally from selling Issuer 1’s stock in violation of Regulation SHO’s
locate requirements. As set forth more fully below, their fraudulent trading scheme worked as
follows: first, they entered into a securities purchase agreement with Issuer 1 on behalf of the
Warrant Fund that, for a brief period, effectively allowed Defendants to exercise convertible
preferred securities in exchange for Issuer 1’s stock at an approximately 20% discount to the
market price. Then, prior to exercising the convertible securities, they entered short sales orders
without first obtaining a locate, circumventing Regulation SHO. Almost immediately after those
short sales, they executed their conversion rights to acquire Issuer 1 stock and attempted, albeit
unsuccessfully, to use those shares to cover their short sales. In this manner, Defendants locked
in an approximate 20% spread. In other words, by short selling without first obtaining a locate,
they effectively were able to sell at market price and then acquire the shares at a 20% discount to
market price, earning substantial illicit proceeds. Defendants would not have been able to do this
Case 2:23-cv-03201 Document 1 Filed 06/12/23 Page 12 of 36 PageID: 12
13
if they had followed the rules that required locates for their short sales because they would not
have been able to obtain locates in sufficient quantity, if at all.
Look at the MM's set wide spreads and like clock work someone dumps into the bid, to me looks like wash trading. All in an attempt to try and grind longs down and get them to sell.
Why are OTC stocks not shorted? Is it because of margin? lol.
- Stock_Barber
- Jetmek_03052
- loanshark007
- otterman
- janice shell
- rozzy
- crowin
- Idiot Mayor
- Renee (famous DBMM advocacy post)
- I-Glow
- toncatmad
- THall
- Gotham Bay Group
- Beef Wellington
- space1230
Woweee that's a lot of bashers!
Ah yes I forgot the wonderful beautiful Thall, how could I forget!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172386777
Yah TOS has changed, me thinks ihub may be trying to distance themselves from the short and distort crew. The old TOS made it seem like they were running a protection racket for those criminals. Maybe they know a couple of squeezes are on the way...
The characters these guy come up with eh, from jet-setters to bored retirees to guys burned X amount of years ago now trying to protect others. It would all be a lot funnier if they weren't destroying companies, jobs, peoples lives etc..
Oh yah Gotham Bay Group the big shot private jet setter lol.
How many of the bash crew have we had on the DBMM board now?
- Stock_Barber
- Jetmek_03052
- loanshark007
- otterman
- janice shell
- rozzy
- crowin
- Idiot Mayor
- Renee (famous DBMM advocacy post)
- I-Glow
Did I miss any lol? Now I haven't been on the OTC super long but I have not seen another board so saturated with bashers like this one. It's amazing that so many good samaritans found there way to this tiny little companies forum lol.