Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So if Apple was not happy why execute a security release on IP back to CIP to allow for the cross license?
Your comments from this reliable source to me blur the lines of insider information, but I could be overextending.
To me the only reliable source would be those that say at table of contract negotiations. If not someone outside that table was told ....
So going from .44 to .413, still going to the moon? Bullish or bearish in the next 6-18 months.
You know Hipple always said 2019....
Posted a while back when still an application, but now issued today as patent by uspto.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=Liquidmetal&OS=Liquidmetal&RS=Liquidmetal
"Needle 220, sheath 230, and nose cone 240 may comprise one or more materials. Suitable materials include metals and non-metals. Suitable metals can include titanium, steel, stainless steel, alloys--such as nitinol, amorphous metal alloys (e.g., Liquidmetal and Vitreloy), etc. Suitable non-metals can include ceramics, thermoplastics, polymers, etc. Examples of ceramics include aluminum oxide, aluminum nitride, and zirconia (zirconium dioxide), though other ceramics could also be used. Suitable thermoplastics include high temperature plastics, such as polycarbonate, polyether ether ketone (PEEK), polyetherimides--such as Ultem plastics manufactured by SABIC), polymide-based plastics--such as Vespel manufactured by DuPont. In some embodiments, one or more of needle 220, sheath 230, and nose cone 240 comprise a mixture of materials: two or metals, two or more non-metals, at least one metal and at least one non-metal. In some embodiments, at least one of needle 220, sheath 230, and nose cone 240 comprises a metal coated with a non-metal or more specifically a plastic material. "
When I first posted this a while back when it first got published people didn't make full connection. Now everyone seems to be excited all of a sudden including Jack Purcher himself .....
Securities Code:300328?Securities referred to: Yee Technology?Announcement Number:2017-070 number
Yee Dongguan Science and Technology Co., Ltd.
Third Board of Directors thirteenth Earnings Release
The Company and its directors hereby guarantee that the information disclosed is true, accurate and complete, not false
Misleading statements or material omissions.
2017 year 9 month 14 , Dongguan Yee Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as"the company")third
Thirteenth session of the Board meeting was held on-site fax and voting at the meeting room of the Company. Meeting notice
2017 year 9 month 8 The date of service by e-mail, telephone. This meeting shall be voting directors 8 people,
The actual voting directors 8 People, the board meeting was chaired by Mr. Li Yang, chairman of the German company. Conference
Convened and held and voting procedures in line with "People's Republic of China Company Law", "Articles of Association" and other relevant regulations.
After careful consideration of directors meeting, the meeting examined and approved the following proposals:
First, the "on its holding subsidiaries Chaohu should Anyun Hai Technology Co., Ltd. replenishment of the motion."
To meet the Chaohu should Anyun Hai Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as"Should ???") Embodiment of the light alloy
Precision Die Casting pre-project investment funds needed to ensure that these projects on schedule put into normal production, the company intends to
An Yunhai yuan capital increase of its own capital Jindui Yi3,000Million, Nanjing sea of ??clouds Special Metals Company plans
An Yunhai capital to own capital Jindui Yi Yuan2,000Million. After the capital increase, the registered capital should Anyun Hai
Book by5,000Million to $10,000Million, the shareholders investment proportion unchanged. See details published in
China Securities Regulatory Commission designated information disclosure GEM-related announcement on the site.
Voting results:8 Votes in favor;0 Votes against;0 Abstentions.
Special announcement.
Yee Dongguan Science and Technology Co., Ltd.
Board of Directors
2017 year 9 month 14 day
Reign or rain?
1.6. “Eontec Exclusive Territory” shall consist of the following countries: Brunei, Cambodia, China (P.R.C and R.O.C.), East Timor, Indonesia, Japan, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, North Korea, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Thailand and Vietnam.
1.21. “LMT Exclusive Territory” shall consist of the following countries the United States and the rest of North America and all of Europe, including the following countries: Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Republic of Macedonia, Malta, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United Kingdom.
1.27. “Non-Exclusive Territories” means geographic regions outside of the LMT Exclusive Territory and Eontec Exclusive Territory.
I am glad that you were one of the few that noticed with all this debate of who can and can't use what in what field.
So your the counsel that represents the agreement? Just want to make sure everything is ironclad in your quoting. The cross license agreement covers the certain IP in the supporting document which is tied to Liquidmetal. Just don't see any agreement that prohibits Eontec with their own IP that Apple has no right to. Don't get me wrong I'm not saying your wrong or right but unless you have a confirmation from the horses mouth then points are moot.
Someone just ask the dam attorneys to settle this once and for all if it's that important.
Li is either real ballsy to use an Apple logo in the published art or there is a NDA between those two. If the former Li would get roughed up by Apple for trademark concerns...
I betcha if someone asked BJ Watrous, we would quickly find out if someone has overstepped their boundaries.
http://pdfaiw.uspto.gov/.aiw?docid=20170259331&PageNum=3&IDKey=23A0360710CC&HomeUrl=http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2%2526Sect2=HITOFF%2526p=1%2526u=%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsearch-bool.html%2526r=1%2526f=G%2526l=50%2526co1=AND%2526d=PG01%2526s1=Eontec%2526OS=Eontec%2526RS=Eontec
Well that didn't take long...published by uspto today under Eontec
http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=4&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=%22Amorphous+alloy%22&OS=%22Amorphous+alloy%22&RS=%22Amorphous+alloy%22
If they get special written permission per the MTA....
Rest...
You need to give things a test TL.
Best of luck to all the ladies and gents on this board! Hope everyone stays focused on Lugee and if he can deliver or not. Him bringing in revenue or strong partnerships will be the key to this company!
Wish there was a way to tell what material that is rige
Only two things for me:
- it's possible that if there are any seals for waterproofing that it could use some technique using Amorphous metal. That is based on patent published this morning.
- there could be an amorphous metal based coating on stainless steel.
Won't know unless someone really breaks this phone down.
Regardless to me two things stood out to me:
- Apple does not believe that bmgs are worthwhile to use in the iPhone as a suitable material.
- The supply chain setup is not ready for a customer like Apple to transition to this material. Maybe that's why the investment by Lugee.
To this end until i for me the CE use by Apple completely goes to the side, so no more IP posting for me unless it's truly NEW stuff. Now I just wait for October and hope that Lugee does not disappoint.
It's a description of potential embodiments found in most CIP IP since the 2010 MTA. Most people over look it. :)
Anytime!
Sure is....
Why .60 cents in 2019 if it's only worth .1467?
How about .1467?
Well guess those that were awaiting confirmation of a Liquidmetal iPhone and didn't get it are jumping out. While would be nice surprise, it's been an item to stop banking on. I'm more interested on how Lugee is or is going to be generating revenue.
I said "I'm" not "we"....
It's amazing what the facts are...if every company had to disclose a contract man my organization which is a Fortune 500 company really is incompetent. :)
Where is the pudding?
I never stated that IP was valued in the 100 millions or billions my friend. If Tom was running this company to the ground why take Lugees offer and bow out?
Well it was a catch 22 wasn't it? Without the $20 million would Liquidmetal have survived?
I didn't make any mistake...I don't get invested emotionally in talk.
Don't take it personal, I'm going off all your posts through the years.
There was nothing in the MTA that forced them to do a security release of the 50+ plus applications/patents. Ever wonder why there is no security release to CIP when the Visser unwinding went through? Along comes Lugee and then they sign away.
Perception is a powerful thing to overcome Watts. What good has speaking to every director given you? What good did it do talking to Tom even if with a personal agenda? Yes it's your opinion to which your entitled, but don't fall into the same mistake you did with the Kangs, your best friend Tom and now Lugee. You went from Lugee being the false prophet to now being the Deliverer.
Nothing personal I promise. Unless you have personally talked to Lugee there is no comparison to anything...
Yes, enjoy the evening in SoCal.
Do you know Lugee personally know, that you know how he operates?
Hmmm so I wonder again why tons of Apple staff like Yurko would be linked to Eontec staff on public sites.... Apple didn't save GTAT so why would they try and save Liquidmetal beyond the $20 million, supposed R&D and IP prosecution/protection.
If Apple was stiff armed by Lugee then why would Watrous sign the Security release to CIP to allow the cross license with Eon....
Why would Tesla become a Liquidmetal client if they are already one with Eon?
I don't see Tesla in a Liquidmetal Presentation, but I do see it in an Eon one...
http://pcsmaa.nimte.ac.cn/view-9161.html
So show us the proof that Apple has moved to manufacturing stage....