Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
New financials posted On Pink http://www.otcmarkets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=37170
EXCEPT for the Head SCAMMER PEE COCK!
YES PEE COCK holds majority so he does what he wants and whe he wants, any minority holders is SOL.
Its the Famous PEE COCK Rope a Dope.....
I agree with DD.This comes right out of the PEE COCK play book. In answer to your question about what business GGII is in it's always been the same. PUMP & DUMP Inc.
SELL PEECOCK SELL
NOPE JUST YOUR FRIENDLY NEIGHBORHOOD PEECOCK!!
YOU GOT SCHOOLED BY PROFESSOR PEE COCK AT GREEN GLOBE UNIVERSITY
YOU GOT SCHOOLED BY PROFESSOR PEE COCK AT GREEN GLOBE UNIVERSITY
I wonder if PEECOCK teaches these classes Stock Fraud 101, Insider trading 102, and how to f*ck investors 103 at Green Globe University???????
PEECOCK doesnt care about anyone but HIMSELF. What don't you understand about that????
PEECOCK is schooling all who doubt today! Make no mistakes, this is not a real company just a shell for PEECOCK and his Croanies to cash it in at the TURKS & CAICOS.
DD is right this is the PEECOCK play.... Do your homework!!!!
It's the Ole PEE COCK loadem up and sell them fast play.....
Hate to say it to all you rookies, but "I TOLD YOU SO" LOL
Remember who holds the cards in this play. It's PEE COCK he controls it all. Get ready for the fall. Maybe some need a history lesson.
Yeah when PEE COCK goes to Jail!!!
Bradeley COX part of the PEE COCK scam is just another scammer himself, he has no knowledge to teach anyone about anything. I know rocks that are smarter and know more about green sustainability than this block head!!! Another JOKE!!!!!
Its funny that this game continues when PEE COCK doesnt even own the brand. The Scam continues!!!
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
RANDALL SULLIVAN, an individual; BARRY RAYKOSKE, an individual; and JACK REILLY, an individual, derivatively, on behalf of UNICO, INC. an Arizona corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.
RAY BROWN, an individual, KEN WIEDRICH, an individual; MARK LOPEZ, an individual; SHANE TRAVELLER, an individual; JAVELIN ADVISORY GROUP, INC., a Nevada corporation, and DOES 1 - 100,
Defendants,
and
UNICO, INC., an Arizona corporation,
Nominal Defendant. )
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
) Case No.: 37-2008-00089801-CU-PN-CTL
NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVE ACTION
Judge: Yuri Hofmann
Dept: 60
TO: ALL CURRENT SHAREHOLDERS OF UNICO, INC. (“UNICO”) COMMON STOCK.
PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY;
IT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS
THIS NOTICE RELATES TO A PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF A SHAREHOLDERS’ DERIVATIVE ACTION AND CLAIMS ASSERTED THEREIN. CURRENT SHAREHOLDERS OF UNICO COMMON STOCK ARE ENTITLED TO OBJECT, IF THEY DESIRE, TO THE SETTLEMENT OF THE DERIVATIVE CLAIMS AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. IF THE COURT APPROVES THE DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT, YOU WILL BE BARRED FROM CONTESTING THE FAIRNESS, REASONABLENESS OR ADEQUACY OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND FROM PURSUING THE SETTLED DERIVATIVE CLAIMS.
The purpose of this Notice is to advise you that the above-entitled action (“Action”) is now pending in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego (the “Court”), and that all parties to the Action have reached a settlement agreement (the “Agreement”) that would fully, finally and forever resolve the Derivative Claims as between Plaintiffs, derivatively on behalf of Unico, and Defendants in the Action on the terms and conditions summarized in this Derivative Notice. The complete terms and conditions of the Settlement are set forth in the Agreement on file with the Court.
This Notice should not be construed as an expression of any opinion by the Court as to the truth of the allegations of the Derivative Claims or the merits of any of the claims or defenses asserted by any party in this action or the fairness or adequacy of the proposed Settlement. This Notice is merely to advise you of the pendency and proposed Settlement of the Derivative Claims and of your rights thereunder.
I. THE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT PROCESS
A. On August 14, 2008, Randall Sullivan, Barry Raykoske, and Jack Reilly filed a shareholder derivative suit on behalf of Unico alleging causes of action against Ray Brown, Ken Wiedrich, Mark Lopez, Shane Traveller, Javelin Advisory Group, and nominal defendant Unico, Inc., specifically: 1) breach of fiduciary duty, 2) gross negligence, 3) corporate waste, 4) breach of contract, and 5) aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty:
B. Plaintiffs alleged a scheme whereby Defendants caused Unico to issue several million dollars worth of 50% convertible debentures with no plan to ever repay them. Plaintiffs alleged that Defendants, along with the investors who purchased the debentures, developed a scheme to convert the debentures to freely trading common stock by employing an exemption under the Securities Act of 1933, Section 3(a)(10), which allows a company to settle bona fide disputes by issuing common stock following court approval at a fairness hearing. Plaintiffs alleged that the debenture investors and Defendants agreed to pre-planned lawsuits and improperly represented to the court in Sarasota Florida that the lawsuits involved bona fide disputes, thus, improperly using Section 3(a)(10). Plaintiffs allege that Defendants caused Unico to issue billions of shares of common stock at unreasonably low discounts to the market price, damaging Unico. The Complaint filed in this Action is available for review by any interested Unico shareholder at the Court Clerk’s Office at the address below.
C. Each of the Defendants has separately denied and continues to deny each and every claim and contention alleged by the Plaintiffs in this Action. Defendants expressly deny and continue to deny all charges of wrongdoing or liability alleged in the Action. Defendants defended the allegations, claiming that they were acting in good faith and in what they believed to be in Unico’s best interest. They argued that Unico’s officers and directors never received any benefit from the debenture transactions. Defendants maintain that all of the proceeds raised in connection with the challenged debenture transaction were used solely for the benefit of Unico and its mining operations. Defendants claim that Unico was in dire financial condition and that its only other alternative was to liquidate the company leaving the common stockholders with worthless shares. Defendants argued that, had they not given the deep discounts to the debenture investors, the debenture investors warned that they would foreclose on Unico’s assets and liquidate the company wiping out common stock holders. Defendants argue that they reasonably believed it was in Unico’s interest and in the interest of its shareholders to avoid such liquidation. Defendants argued that their conduct is protected by the business judgment rule. Defendants claim that the Action is barred by the statute of limitations. Defendants continue to believe that this Action is without merit.
D. The Parties, through their respective counsel, have engaged in substantial arm’s-length negations in an attempt to settle the Action, including mediation, during which the Agreement’s terms and conditions were extensively debated and negotiated, to achieve the best relief possible consistent with the interests of Unico and its shareholders. These discussions were facilitated by the Honorable John K. Trotter, retired Justice of the California Court of Appeal, who strongly recommends the proposed settlement.
E. Despite their belief that they acted in good faith and that this Action is without merit, Defendants have concluded that further litigation would be protracted, risky and expensive, and that it is desirable that the Action be fully and finally settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions summarized herein and set forth in further detail in the Agreement in order to limit further expense, inconvenience and distraction, to dispose of risky, burdensome and protracted litigation, and to permit the operation of Unico’s business without further expensive litigation and the distraction and diversion of Unico’s executive personnel with respect to matters in issue in the Action. The Defendants have also taken into consideration the risks and uncertainty inherent in any litigation, especially in complex cases like this Action.
F. Each of the Defendants has, therefore, determined that it is desirable and beneficial that the Action be settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement.
G. Plaintiffs’ Counsel believes that the claims alleged in the Action have merit. However, Plaintiffs’ Counsel recognizes and acknowledges the expense and length of continued proceedings necessary to prosecute the Action against Defendants through trial and through appeals. Plaintiffs’ Counsel also have taken into account the uncertain outcome and the risk of any litigation, especially complex derivative actions such as this Action, as well as the difficulties and delays inherent in such litigation. Plaintiffs’ Counsel also are mindful of the inherent problems of proof, including proof of damages to Unico and defenses to the claims alleged in the Complaint, including the defense asserted by Defendants both orally and in various papers filed in the Action. Such defenses include but are not limited to defenses based upon the business judgment rule and statutes of limitations. Finally, Plaintiffs’ Counsel is reasonably concerned that the relatively limited amount of insurance available of approximately $925,000 will be consumed nearly entirely by the cost of defending this Action and litigation expenses and attorneys’ fees, leaving little or no insurance funds to benefit Unico.
H. In light of the foregoing, Plaintiffs and their counsel believe that the settlement set forth in this Agreement confers substantial benefits upon Unico and its shareholders and is in the best interests of Plaintiffs, Unico and its shareholders.
II. THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
The following description of the proposed Settlement is only a summary, and reference is made to the text of the Agreement, on file with the Court:
Defendants and Unico agree to the following settlement terms:
a) No payments made pursuant to the Agreement may be used to pay any of Defendants’ salaries or bonuses;
b) Unico shall not issue any stock of any class pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Section 3(a)(10)”) in connection with settling debt arising from any Unico financing activities, including settlements of disputes involving convertible debentures.
c) With respect to settlements not barred by paragraph b above, if Unico enters into a settlement and seeks to issue stock pursuant to Section 3(a)(l0), not less than thirty (30) calendar days before a fairness hearing pursuant to Section 3(a)(l0), Unico shall file a Form 8-K notifying shareholders of the settlement, including the material terms of the settlement. Unico shareholders may object at the Section 3(a)(10) hearing either in person or in writing, and Unico shall not challenge any shareholder objection on the grounds that the shareholder lacks standing to object.
d) Following the Court’s final approval of the Agreement, Unico shall obtain written board approval for any cumulative financing with any one Person in excess of $250,000;
e) Unico shall not engage in any financing activities of any kind, either directly or indirectly, with Mark Lefkowitz (or any company he represents), Hugh O'Neil (or any company he represents), or Compass Capital, as defined in the Agreement.
f) Absent exceptional circumstances and following the Court’s final approval of the Agreement, Unico shall hold quarterly board meetings.
g) Absent exceptional circumstances and following the Court’s final approval of the Agreement, Unico shall prepare and maintain written minutes of each board meeting signed by members of Unico’s board of directors.
h) Unico shall adopt and implement policies and procedures to ensure in good faith that at any time Unico or any of its executive officers and/or directors learn of any Unico Securities Holder who is not in compliance with Section l3(d) and/or Section 16a of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that Unico shall promptly notify such Unico Securities Holder of the Unico Securities Holder's filing obligations under said sections and demand that such Unico Securities Holder comply with such obligations.
Defendants Ray Brown, Mark Lopez and Ken Wiedrich further agree to pay a maximum settlement amount of $850,000 to Unico in a two-step process. Within thirty (30) days after the Effective Date, as defined in the Agreement, they will pay $500,000 (the “Initial Payment”) to Unico which will be used to reimburse Plaintiffs’ Counsel for attorneys’ fees and expenses and to pay an incentive award to Plaintiffs, described below. Any remaining balance of the Initial Payment will be retained by Unico. They further agree to pay up to a maximum of $350,000 (the “Deferred Payment”) to Unico within three years after the Effective Date of the Agreement. The Deferred Payment is determined by taking the total of Unico’s directors’ and officers’ insurance policy limit of $1 million, and deducting the Initial Payment and the cost of defending this Action and any future costs incurred in defending any other actions during the three year period. If none of the Deferred Payment insurance funds are used to pay such costs, Unico will receive the entire $350,000.
III. DISMISSAL AND RELEASES
If the Agreement is approved, the Court will enter a judgment dismissing the Action with prejudice as to all Defendants, their heirs, insurers and assigns. This means that Unico, or any Unico shareholder derivatively on behalf of Unico, will be barred from ever pursuing any of the alleged claims, or any claims that could have been alleged, in the Action against Defendants, their heirs, successors, insurers or assigns. For a complete list of Released Persons, please see the complete Agreement.
IV. APPLICATION FOR FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES, AND INCENTIVE AWARD
At the Settlement Hearing, Plaintiffs’ Counsel will request that the Court award attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses incurred in the Action. Plaintiffs’ Counsel will also request, on behalf of Plaintiffs, that the Court award an incentive award payment to each Plaintiff, in recognition of Plaintiffs’ time and effort dedicated to this Action on behalf of Unico.
Plaintiffs’ Counsel will request payment of attorneys’ fees and expenses, and incentive awards of no more than $500,000, the amount of the Initial Payment. Defendants agree not to object to a request for attorneys’ fees, expenses and incentive awards up to that amount. Plaintiffs’ Counsel will file a motion for payment of attorneys’ fees and expenses, and for payment of an incentive award, detailing their requested amounts, which will be on file with the Court for any shareholder to review. The attorneys’ fees, expenses and incentive awards must be approved by the Court at the Settlement Hearing.
V. NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
A hearing (the “Settlement Hearing”) will be held before the Honorable Yuri Hofmann, Superior Court Judge of the State of California, County of San Diego at 10:30 a.m. on February 5, 2010, at the Hall of Justice, Department 60, 330 West Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101. The purpose of the Settlement Hearing will be to determine: (1) whether the Settlement should be approved as fair, just, reasonable and adequate; (2) whether Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s application for attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses should be approved; and (3) whether the above-entitled action should be dismissed on the merits and with prejudice. The Settlement Hearing may be continued or adjourned from time to time without further notice to the shareholders.
VI. THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD AT THE HEARING
Any Unico shareholder who objects to any aspect of the Agreement or the attorneys’ fees and expenses application, or the incentive award application, may appear and be heard at the Settlement Hearing. Any such shareholder must submit a written notice of objection. Such objection must be filed with the Court at the address above and served on all Parties so that it is received at least ten days before the Settlement Hearing by each and all of the following:
CLERK OF THE COURT, DEPT. 60
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
330 West Broadway
San Diego, California 92101
To Plaintiffs’ Counsel:
Vincent D. Slavens, Esq.
Krause, Kalfayan, Benink
& Slavens, LLP
625 Broadway, Suite 635
San Diego, CA 92101 To Counsel for Brown,
Lopez & Wiedrich:
Daniel J. Navigato, Esq.
Navigato & Battin, LLP
501 West Broadway, Suite 2060
San Diego, CA 92101
To Counsel for Unico, Inc:
David Baumgarten, Esq.
Yale & Baumgarten, LLP.
5030 Camino de la Siesta,
Suite 308
San Diego, CA 92101
To Counsel for Javelin
Advisory Group, Inc.
John E. Dolkart, Jr., Esq.
1750 Kettner Blvd, Suite 416
San Diego, CA 92101
To Counsel for
Shane Traveller:
Ashley B. Hennessee, Esq.
3205 via Alicante, Suite 9
La Jolla, CA 92037
This Notice of objection must a) demonstrate the objecting person’s or entity’s shareholder status, including the number of Unico securities owned and date of purchase, and b) contain a statement of the reasons for objection. Only shareholders who have submitted written notices of objection in this manner will be entitled to be heard at the Settlement Hearing, unless the Court orders otherwise.
VIII. EXAMINATION OF PAPERS
This Notice is a summary and does not describe all of the details of the Agreement. For full details of the matters discussed in this Notice, you may review the Agreement, with exhibits, in the Office of the Clerk of Court, Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego, Hall of Justice, 330 West Broadway, San Diego, California 92101.
If you have any questions about the Agreement or this Derivative Notice, you may contact Plaintiffs’ Counsel by writing to:
VINCENT D. SLAVENS
Krause Kalfayan Benink & Slavens LLP
625 Broadway, Suite 635
San Diego, California 92101
PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT OR
THE CLERK OF THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE.
BY ORDER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Dated this 17th day of November, 2009
TAKE NOTICE! Here's another repost of the PEE COCK GAME.
This is just an amazing and informational post I reviewed on another board which references Shane Traveller who was the interim CFO here who resigned a couple weeks ago under charges of stock fraud, this also shows the relationships between Steven peacock/Javelin and the "friendly Lawsuits".....anyone see a pattern?....anyone see a pattern forming with the recent departure of Javelin from AERO before the end of their "consulting Contract"? Looks like Rinse and Repeat cycle to me folks! Nice work Derbenski! The following is just amazing DD and insight sir!
Posted by: DERBENSKI
In reply to: None
Date:11/21/2007 1:50:26 AM
Post #of 488
"So what up? Here is my take. After Mr. Peacock’s company, Javelin Advisory Group got caught up in the “free trading share” BDC disaster, they had been looking for another loophole in the law. Apparently they found one, in Section 3(a)10 of the securities law.
Utilizing this loophole, Javelin Advisory Group companies have been issuing unregistered shares in lawsuit type settlements in the State of Florida, 12th Circuit courtroom in sunny Sarasota.
Starting in the fourth quarter of 2006, all of the Javelin Advisory affiliated companies have had claims filed against them for defaulted debt, which is settled at around 1/5 of market price on the defaulted debt. The plaintiff? In all cases it was Sequoia International.
In a true case of penny stock genius, nobody seemed to have the foresight to realize that it might look slightly strange if all the companies you were involved in were getting sued by the same entity.
Worse, a lawsuit posted by an investor on a stock message board exposed Shane Traveller signing as the representative of this Sequoia entity. This same signature also appeared on a Javelin managed company FCCN, this time as the CEO of Sequoia International.
So who is Shane Traveller? Shane is Steve Peacock’s long time partner in Javelin Advisory Group, who at least by printed report, had left Javelin at around mid year 2006. Shane currently resides as the interim CFO for FCCN.
So if the real reason for zipping off at the last minute to Turks and Caicos is not primarily related to the travel industry, what could be the other business being attended to? Here is a little tidbit. Sequoia is listed as having an address in the Turks and Caicos. So are numerous other entities that have used this same exclusion to obtain unregistered shares with Javelin Advisory Group related companies.
My guess is that other entities will start appearing utilizing the same legal exclusion other than Sequoia International with Javelin involved companies in the near future.
Here are the lawsuit lists against mostly Javelin involved companies along with today’s press release appended below.
Sequoia International
Case Number Uniform Case Number Party 1 / Plaintiff Party 2 / Defendant Filing Date Case Type
2007 CA 013222 NC
582007CA0132220000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC WELL RENEWAL INC 11/1/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 012192 NC
582007CA0121920000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC FRANCHISE CAPITAL CORPORATION 10/11/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 011858 NC
582007CA0118580000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC ACTIONVIEW ADVERTISING SYSTEMS INC 10/4/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 011532 NC
582007CA0115320000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC HAZ HOLDINGS INC 9/27/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 011147 NC
582007CA0111470000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC DOLL TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC 9/19/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 011148 NC
582007CA0111480000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC TECHALT INC 9/19/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 011040 NC
582007CA0110400000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC WELL RENEWAL INC 9/18/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 010262 NC
582007CA0102620000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC FRANCHISE CAPITAL CORPORATION 8/30/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 010212 NC
582007CA0102120000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC ACTIONVIEW ADVERTISING SYSTEMS INC 8/29/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 008978 NC
582007CA0089780000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC WELL RENEWAL INC 8/1/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 008979 NC
582007CA0089790000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC ACTIONVIEW ADVERTISING SYSTEMS INC 8/1/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 008284 NC
582007CA0082840000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC HAZ HOLDINGS INC 7/18/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 007086 NC
582007CA0070860000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC HAZ HOLDINGS INC 6/20/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 005891 NC
582007CA0058910000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC WELL RENEWAL INC 5/23/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 005892 NC
582007CA0058920000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC CLX INVESTMENT COMPANY INC 5/23/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 005515 NC
582007CA0055150000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC WELL RENEWAL INC 5/16/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 004918 NC
582007CA0049180000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC HYDROFLO INC 5/2/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 004009 NC
582007CA0040090000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC HYDROFLO INC 4/12/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 002774 NC
582007CA0027740000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC S3 INVESTMENT COMPANY INC 3/14/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 002114 NC
582007CA0021140000NC SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC GLOBAL TRAVEL EXCHANGE INC 2/27/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 011599 NC
582006CA0115990000NC OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS
SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC UNICO INCORPORATED 12/6/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
Unico Incorporated, a Javelin involved company.
Case Number Uniform Case Number Party 1 / Plaintiff Party 2 / Defendant Filing Date Case Type
2007 CA 010209 NC
582007CA0102090000NC COMPASS CAPITAL GROUP INC UNICO INCORPORATED 8/29/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 010210 NC
582007CA0102100000NC OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS LTD UNICO INCORPORTED 8/29/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 007088 NC
582007CA0070880000NC OUTBOARD INVESTMENT LTD
COMPASS CAPITAL GROUP INC UNICO INCORPORATED 6/20/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 005180 NC
582007CA0051800000NC OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS LTD
COMPASS CAPITAL GROUP INC UNICO INCORPORATED 5/8/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 002497 NC
582007CA0024970000NC OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS LTD UNICO INCORPORATED 3/7/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2007 CA 001026 NC
582007CA0010260000NC OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS LTD UNICO INCORPORATED 1/30/2007 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 011599 NC
582006CA0115990000NC OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS
SEQUOIA INTERNATIONAL INC UNICO INCORPORATED 12/6/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 011600 NC
582006CA0116000000NC COMPASS CAPITAL GROUP INC UNICO INCORPORATED 12/6/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 010492 NC
582006CA0104920000NC UMBRELLA HOLDINGS
BLUE MARBLE INVESTMENTS
KENTAN LIMITED CORP
REEF HOLDINGS LTD
OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS
YANZU INC UNICO INCORPORATED 11/1/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 010169 NC
582006CA0101690000NC REEF HOLDINGS LTD CORP
KENTAN LIMITED CORP
YANZU INC UNICO INCORPORATED 10/25/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 010171 NC
582006CA0101710000NC COMPASS CAPITAL GROUP UNICO INCORPORATED 10/25/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 010172 NC
582006CA0101720000NC UMBRELLA HOLDINGS UNICO INCORPORATED 10/25/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 010173 NC
582006CA0101730000NC OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS UNICO INCORPORATED 10/25/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 009619 NC
582006CA0096190000NC COMPASS CAPITAL GROUP INC UNICO INCORPORATED 10/12/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 009620 NC
582006CA0096200000NC KENTAN LIMITED CORP
REEF HOLDINGS LTD CORP BLUE MARBLE INVESTMENTS UNICO INCORPORATED 10/12/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 009621 NC
582006CA0096210000NC REEF HOLDINGS LTD UNICO INCORPORATED 10/12/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 009020 NC
582006CA0090200000NC OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS
KENTAN LIMITED CORP
UMBRELLA HOLDINGS
BLUE MARBLE INVESTMENTS
REEF HOLDINGS LTD
YANZU INC UNICO, INCORPORATED 9/26/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 008312 NC
582006CA0083120000NC COMPASS CAPITAL GROUP INC UNICO INCORPORATED 9/7/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 008313 NC
582006CA0083130000NC BLUE MARBLE INVESTMENTS
KENTAN LIMITED CORP UNICO INCORPORATED 9/7/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 008314 NC
582006CA0083140000NC REEF HOLDINGS LTD UNICO INCORPORATED 9/7/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 008091 NC
582006CA0080910000NC UMBRELLA HOLDINGS AND OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS
KENTAN LIMITED CORP
YANZU INC
BLUE MARBLE INVESTMENTS UNICO INCORPORATED 8/31/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 008094 NC
582006CA0080940000NC KENTAN LIMITED CORP
REEF HOLDINGS LTD UNICO INCORPORATED 8/31/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 007516 NC
582006CA0075160000NC COMPASS CAPITAL GROUP UNICO INCORPORATED 8/17/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 007517 NC
582006CA0075170000NC YANZU INC
OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS
BLUE MARBLE INVESTMENTS
UMBRELLA HOLDINGS
KENTAN LIMITED CORP
REEF HOLDINGS LTD CORP UNICO INCORPORATED 8/17/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 004264 NC
582006CA0042640000NC YANZU INC
REEF HOLDINGS LTD CORP
BLUE MARBLE INVESTMENTS
KENTAN LIMITED CORP
OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS
UMBRELLA HOLDINGS UNICO INCORPORATED 5/10/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 003851 NC
582006CA0038510000NC REEF HOLDINGS LTD
YANZU INC
UMBRELLA HOLDINGS
OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS
BLUE MARBLE INVESTMENTS
KENTAN LIMITED CORP UNICO INCORPORATED 4/27/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 003385 NC
582006CA0033850000NC BLUE MARBLE INVESTMENTS
REEF HOLDINGS LTD CORP
YANZU INC
OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS
UMBRELLA HOLDINGS UNICO INCORPORATED 4/13/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 003067 NC
582006CA0030670000NC YANZU INC
UMBRELLA HOLDINGS
OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS
BLUE MARBLE INVESTMENTS
REEF HOLDINGS LTD
KENTAN LIMITED CORP UNICO INCORPORATED 4/5/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 003068 NC
582006CA0030680000NC YANZU INC
KENTAN LIMITED CORP
OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS
UMBRELLA HOLDINGS
REEF HOLDINGS LTD CORP
BLUE MARBLE INVESTMENTS UNICO INCORPORATED 4/5/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 002597 NC
582006CA0025970000NC REEF HOLDINGS LTD CORP
BLUE MARBLE INVESTMENTS
KENTAIN LIMITED CORP
OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS
UMBELLA HOLDINGS
YANZU INC UNICO INCORPORATED 3/23/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 002111 NC
582006CA0021110000NC UMBRELLA HOLDINGS
OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS
REEF HOLDINGS LTD
BLUE MARBLE INVESTMENTS
YANZU INC UNICO INCORPORATED 3/9/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 001825 NC
582006CA0018250000NC UMBRELLA HOLDINGS
YANZU INC
KENTAN LIMITED CORP
REEF HOLDINGS LTD
BLUE MARBLE INVESTMENTS
OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS UNICO INCORPORATED 3/1/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 001229 NC
582006CA0012290000NC YANZU INC
BLUE MARBLE INVESTMENTS
REEF HOLDINGS LTD
UMBRELLA HOLDINGS
OUTBOARD INVESTMENTS UNICO INCORPORATED 2/9/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
2006 CA 001230 NC
582006CA0012300000NC KENTAN LIMITED CORP
COMPASS CAPITAL GROUP INC UNICO INCORPORATED 2/9/2006 Contract and Indebtedness - Circuit
GRXI PR Nov 20 2007
GRXI share price Wednesday .0008
http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release.do?id=794868
GTREX Capital Announces CEO Attendance at Environmental Conference in Support of Acquisition Strategy
Global Travel Exchange
GTREX Capital Website
MURRIETA, CA--(Marketwire - November 20, 2007) - GTREX Capital, Inc. (OTCBB: GRXI), a holding company with subsidiary operations in the travel distribution industry, today announced that Steven R. Peacock, consultant chief executive officer for the company, is attending an environmental conference hosted by the government of the Turks and Caicos Islands at which he is exploring additional acquisition opportunities for GTREX Capital. Gary Nerison, chairman of the company's Board of Directors, is attending the event with Mr. Peacock.
The acquisition opportunities being considered at this event include companies in the travel industry that present significant synergies with GTREX Capital's current subsidiary, Global Travel Exchange. Global Travel Exchange is a travel distribution technology company that provides a more efficient and cost-effective connection between customers and travel suppliers.
The conference, "Fostering a Green Culture in Small Island Nations," which is being held from November 18-20, 2007, will also serve as a venue for Ministerial Heads and Ministers of the Environment from the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and the British Overseas Territories to meet and discuss policy initiatives, legislative advancements, technological innovations and research that have been undertaken in environmental management in their respective countries.
The keynote speaker at the event is former U.S. Vice President and 2007 Nobel Peace Prize recipient Al Gore.
GTREX Capital is a fully reporting over-the-counter bulletin board company that has been positioned as a public vehicle for an operating company that will bring value for shareholders. GTREX Capital management is focused on acquisition candidates that possess the potential for significant long-term growth in their respective industry segments.
"There are several high profile opportunities within the travel industry that have been presented to GTREX Capital, and we are attending this environmental event to discuss the possibilities with the appropriate representatives and perhaps to begin negotiations for a proposed transaction," stated Mr. Peacock. "Management has always maintained there are a number of interesting acquisition options for GTREX Capital, and our discussions with numerous acquisition candidates confirms the level of interest in the company as an attractive public vehicle."
To subscribe to the company's email alert system and receive information directly from GTREX Capital whenever new press releases, investor newsletters, SEC filings, or other information is disclosed, please visit http://www.gtrexcapital.com/investor.php.
Sounds like another PEE COCK SCAM......LOL
Tune in this fall for the new show on Fox called "LEAVE IT TO PEE COCK" It's a reality show where PEE COCK and his croanies, SWINDLE, LIE, FILE PHONY 504's RELEASE BOGUS PRESS and SCREW the Investment community over with Brands they don't even own. Watch and see real life investors get screwed while PEE COCK and his croanies sip Margarita's in the TURKS & CAICOS.
Tune in this fall for the new show on Fox called "LEAVE IT TO PEE COCK"
Yes probably some more BS about the Brand that PEE COCK doesn't even own. Can't wait to read the comics from the lying, fraud, swindler, con artist PEE COCK.
More PEE COCK & Sequoia selling today I see!!!
So by now we all know PEE COCKS control on GGII. The board fired him when the found out the gig was up with a Brand he never owned since the deal taht was struck was never paid for, and then he turned around and illegally fired the board by using his majority share position. Let's face it, thats criminal enough, but the share trading on the pump and dump scheme has gone on long enough. Why he filled his pockets with $ the rest of us stood by reading his phony PR's and to pump and then dump the stock he has with Sequoia. So let's recap, PEE COCK funds the company with his company Sequoia which is a crime with is phony 504 scams then pockets the money on the sales of securitys with Sequoia back to the Turks & Caicos and his other company Javelin gets paid for being the management company doing PEE COCKs dirty work. So all roads lead back to PEE COCK. All the investigators have to do is follow the money trail.Since the British Government is now investigating PEE COCK in the Turks why isn't the IRS? This scheme of his has gone on long enough, we must blanket the IRS and the SEC for results from this SCAMMER. There are so many illegalities here its pathetic. To make matters worse he's trying to sell a brand that doesnt even belong to him and then spin the shell again. Where does it end??? PEE COCK in jail!!!!
AWESOME ronning thanks for the news!!!!
We all hope its zero hour for PEE COCK and Croanies. Orange Jumpsuits should fit nicely with a zipper in the back!!!!!
GEE I am waiting to see what other BS PEE COCK will release tomorrow on GGII. Maybe that he has turned himself in to authorities for stock fraud and manipulation. That would be nice, but hes too dumb for that. Maybe he will release he's sold the brand that he never paid for and has no rights to and reverses into another pump & dump? Any guesses out there?
Unfortunately PEE COCK never allows anyone to have more shares than himself and Sequoia. That itself is against the law, but he's been doing this for over 10 years and getting away with it.
The funny thing is PEE COCK thinks he's on top of the world and does nothing wrong, all the while him and his croanies are the ONLY ones that make money on his BS deals!!!!!
Wickw,
You're right, it's all the same just different company. PEE COCK is the CEO along with his henchmen basically run everything then do it all over again. Bring em down!!!!
There is no doubt that the "Rat" PEE COCK will go down on the sinking ship and the other Rat's , Nerison, Beyer, Traveler, Bickel, Cox, McCoy and the rest of the no namers will sing like birds to save their Rat Asses. PEE COCK will be the only one standing with his pants down as the rest of the Rats on the SS PEE COCK become Mutineer's. There is no loyalty when the G men show up at your door.
ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR, Blow PEE COCK DOWN!!!! He won't be getting anymore booty, he'll be giving it, in the FED PENN!! Another PIRATE behind bars!
Remember also that Bickel and PEE COCK have had their outs fighting over the fraudulently raised money but they are thicker than water. Case in point, NERISON is still involved.
Bickel is an old timer with PEE COCK and a regular with the pumping & dumping. Everyone remember S3i?????
Could be, but dont be too sure that the same players are not playing the scamola in the background. PEE COCK likes to keep the same crew as I am sure you know thoughout all his "PUMP & DUMP" schemes.
I his name is Craig from So Florida. He's an old time pumper and dumper
Sounds like the Ole Perverbial PEE COCK BS STORY.
What a nice bunch of past felons and wannabe felons!!