Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Aries - How do you mean this ? Are you refering
to share price, or is MSRM (the company) doing
some thing ?
No Harry was just going through his comic book
collection again.
dragon man- Sounds like a real good idea to stop
by there office and meet the people, talk about
their technoligy and find out when it will be
available. A question I would have is, will they
be the ones that run this business ? I get the
feeling their only a development company, and will
franchise this business to one or more partners.
I'm also not sure their patent's have been aproved
as yet.
I'm currently in a energy stock that moved up to
the Amex at the end of last year and once they
did the big boys (mutual funds) jumped on it.
I would expect the same thing will happen with
OUR CSMG.
Major institutions will not look at a stock that's
not on a major board and they would prefer the stock
price to be over $5. In the case of mutual funds
these limitations are built in to their bi-laws.
Momentum_Trader - The information shown in the
header of this board is some 5+ months out of
date. Do you intend to do the necessary work to
maintain the header, or have you in effect walked
away from the board and the stock ?
No one ever accused Harry of having both paddles
in the water at the same time.
New PR dated 3/8/2007
Global Resource Corp. Updates Progress on Conversion of Oil Shale To Oil and Gas
Thursday March 8, 9:23 am ET
WEST BERLIN, N.J., March 8 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Global Resource Corp. (OTC Bulletin Board: GBRC - News) has, for the past four months, been running tests with microwaves on oil shale. After exposing the rock to the patent-pending microwave process, Global Resource collects the byproduct gases and heat exchanges them into oil and gases that do not convert back to liquids.
The liquids range from C-14 to C-28 and up to 70% of the initial weight of the oil shale (depending on where the sample was mined) is gasified. The energy balance for this gasification is running at approximately $30 per barrel which produces Fractionalized Petroleum Products, as opposed to the bitumen that is normal to shale and tar sands, after they are liberated from their raw material. From the oil shale itself, GBRC's Gas Chromatograph shows GBRC is producing finished products of diesel fuel and heating oil. This potentially eliminates a refining process!
Frank Pringle, CEO of Global Resource Corp., said, "Our tests are ongoing and evolving, but we have made fantastic discoveries and we will continue to develop them. The next phase of tests will concentrate on the energy and material balances but we anticipate that the results will improve through the next round."
About Global Resource Corporation:
Global Resource Corp. has a patent pending process that allows for removal of oil and alternative petroleum products at very low cost from various resources, including shale deposits, tar sands and waste oil streams with significantly greater yields and lower costs than are available utilizing existing known technologies. The process uses specific frequencies of microwave radiation to extract oils and alternative petroleum products from secondary raw materials, and is expected to dramatically reduce the cost for oil and gas recovery from a variety of unconventional hydrocarbon resources. GBRC's technology will not only be developed to extract oil from shale, but from depleted oil fields in the US and elsewhere, many of which still contain more than half of the hydrocarbons originally in these fields, because the residual hydrocarbons are too viscous to extract with conventional technology.
Contact:
Global Resource Corp.
Phone: (856) 767-5661
Fax: (856) 767-5664
inquire@Globalresourcecorp.com
This news release contains forward-looking statements regarding Global Resource Corp's business strategies and future plans of operations. Forward- looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release speak only as of the date hereof and Global Resource disclaims any obligation to provide public updates, revisions or amendments to any forward-looking statements made herein to reflect changes in Global Resource's expectations or future events.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Global Resource Corp.
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070308/clth096.html?.v=35
dragon man- I already have a base number of shares,
now what I'm looking for is for the company to give
me a reason to add more shares. The December 2006
report should be out by months end, and I'll be
looking for signs of orders being shipped and of
course revenue.
dragon man-To buy a fare number of shares I would
have to sell some of my other positions, and that
I don't want to do at the moment as my other stocks
are moving up at this point. I can wait.
TheDane - I was lucky this morning when I was
filled at $0.87/sh.
I'm in for a few shares today.
New PR looks great, but many of us are holding
back on larger share purchases pending SEC
fileings and positive results on the bottom line
of our quarterly reports over next 6 months.
Don't get me wrong, I think this company could
be a real sky rocket if every thing works out.
I just want to see a little verification before
I pile in.
male - Your form of DD works for me. Look forward
to hearing what you learn.
Ninjat - Our company looks bullish to me as well,
and I'm still adding shares as I can.
Your right, this is what I was refering too.
this type of action happens all the time.It's
not fare to the little guy, but such is life.
IF this company is interested in being part
of the oil sands business in Alberta Canada
they should consider the following.
New research centre to seek ways to reduce water use in oil sands
Lab Canada, 3/5/2007
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New research centre to seek ways to reduce water use in oil sands
Edmonton, AB - Water use in oil sands development is currently a significant concern, particularly as the industry develops and grows over the next 20 years. A new research centre at the University of Alberta is poised to tackle this issue through a new partnership with Imperial Oil and Alberta Ingenuity.
The Imperial Oil-Alberta Ingenuity Centre for Oil Sands Innovation's mandate is to find more efficient, economically viable, and environmentally responsible ways to develop Canada's oil-sands resources, one of the largest crude oil deposits in the world. The centre will be led by Dr Murray Gray, scientific director.
The centre says it expects to invest over $15 million in research over the next five years, and recruit more than 50 faculty, graduate students, and researchers. It will encourage interdisciplinary research and apply the emerging tools of nanotechnology to the oil sands.
"This is exactly how the ingenuity of Albertans like Dr Gray will be felt. He is taking on problems that are crucial to Alberta - the oil sands and our limited water supply - but that also have impact around the world," says Dr Peter Hackett, president and CEO of Alberta Ingenuity.
"At Imperial Oil, we strongly believe that investing in research and innovation is of critical importance to satisfying increasing energy needs, all the while meeting increasing environmental expectations. We share the commitment of the University of Alberta and have long recognized that research and technology is the key to developing Alberta's oil sands," said Randy Broiles, senior vice-president, resources division, Imperial Oil.
In addition to evaluating the use of non-aqueous solvents to separate and extract bitumen from oil sands, research activity this year will also focus on bitumen extraction and upgrading projects. One of the projects involves nanotechnology, where technologies are scaled down to a minute scale by modifying the structure of catalysts. The use of nano-structured materials holds promise to both reduce energy requirements and improve operating efficiencies in bitumen upgrading.
Table of Contents
http://www.labcanada.com/article.asp?id=66163&issue=03052007&ref=rss
Yea I've gotta stop that, people will get the
wrong idea.
Boring comes to mind.
MM may have been accumulating shares for big order
all day long for a preferred customer.They got what
they needed and closed it out.
First things first. First our missing moderator
would have to give up control or assign an
assistant with full authority to make changes.
2)New person would have to be a paying Subscriber,
and I'm not one. 3)New person should be good at
DD and computer skills and I can assure you it's
not me.Also be a skilled cheerleader would be
helpful not not required
Time & Sales most recent next page
Rec. Time Action Price Volume
3:56:56 PM Trade 0.7935 30,000
3:26:40 PM Trade 0.84 109
3:26:36 PM Trade 0.85 230
2:52:04 PM Trade 0.82 2,000
2:48:22 PM Bid 0.82 2,500
2:48:06 PM Ask 0.85 2,500
2:48:06 PM Ask 0.84 2,500
2:48:00 PM Trade 0.82 5,000
2:47:58 PM Trade 0.82 2,500
2:47:46 PM Bid 0.81 2,500
2:47:44 PM Bid 0.8 2,500
2:47:42 PM Bid 0.79 2,500
PR's of importance have to be agreed to by both
parties.Again read item #9, it's there in black
and white. Innova is limited in what they can
say without ABB's agreement.
As outlined in floridany's post #5899 you need to
read item #9,both parties agreed not to say
anything.We can wish till hell freezes over but
nothing is going to happen.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1156784/000114420407011059/v067509_ex10-1.htm
2. Section 9 is very interesting. It states that both parties should maintain confidential the terms of agreement, except legally required by SEC to minimize the exposure, in this case the only publicity is the PR Friday. The last Friday's PR was carefully crafted by and agreed by both parties. My whole impression of this section is that ABB was trying to muffle the negative effect by this lawsuit and settlement. ABB has to pay big price to RWT for not making big deal out of this settlement. THer will be no more PR related to this settlement from either party, as clearly stated in the agreement.
Your right that does amount to being a spped bump.
Has any one noticed that since this board was established on
( Created: 9/27/2006 3:36:21 PM ) Shown at top of board info
section by our moderator ( Momentum_Trader ) The board info
has never been updated, the board moderator has only posted
twice (post #1 and #2 both dated 9/27/2006) In all this time,
and that there are only 17 boardmarks ? Who reads this board.
Seems to me that if your going to establish a message board
you have a certain responsibility to keep it up to date
and to be some what of a cheerleader.Being the primary contact with the company and relaying information back to the the board would also be helpful.
chunga -At this rate your going to be president of
Walt's fan club.
Let's see, the last time Harry stuck his head up
was about 8:53 last night. I geuss he didn't want
us to think he had anything to do with todays PR,
so he's keeping a low profile
Well I added a few shares today just to help
keep the party going.
I wonder how long it will take to shake out the
day traders tomorrow who don't do any DD and
just follow the crowed. JUst trying to time my
next buy. LOL
27 day's or less till FDA applications are to
be submitted. Life will get interesting.
I stopped at a local book store to day and quickly
thumbed through the WSJ, Barons,Investors Daily
and as mentioned earlier today The Chicago Tribune
and two suburban papers and seen nothing about any
settlement. So ABB keeps their low profile and now
let's see if or what Walt gained from this other
than the obvious $3M.
I checked the Chicago Tribune and other local
papers and seen nothing about the settlement,
so unless the WSJ or Investors Daily mention
it ABB got what they wanted "low Profile"
Good post, thanks for your input.
chunga - Your right, and as you might remember
Harry and I went a few rounds over this issue.
It's time to see what management has to offer
now that this distraction is out of the way.
You expected truth from a rumor ?
Money is money, do we(the board)care how we
get to it? I would very happy with good on
going business as opposed to a one time
windfall.
Are we trying to say Harry bought a cup of
coffee for the right guy this time and the
notes scribbled on the napkin was right ?
Well it's starting to look that way,however
we will have to see how the whole thing
plays out.
From what I can see we need at least three things.
1)Sec filings.
2)Positive quarterly earnings
3)Greater exposure. Take a look at this board, we
have only 17 board marks.
ionu - And we should listen to you why ?