Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yep. Excellent call, that was.
Merry Christmas to you too.
And I got yer PM. Will do.
Imperial Whazoo
Yeah, thats obviously a massive plus for JBII
Its a tweakable output solution.
A potential customer shows interest. Heres what the fly on the wall told me the conversation went like...
:o)
JB: "So, the sample #2 and sample gasoline I sent over to you passed your initial analysis testing with flying colors?"
Cuustomer-to-Be: "You bet, JB... and what we really liked was the fabulously low presence of any bad stuff like sulphur. I mean, this stuff is just claen as a whistle. Clean big-time."
JB: "You are right on the money about that. And thats just a fact. We take the waste plastic and here's the skinny on why: When the plastic gets made, its already been thru all the regs at the plants where the manufactured. So obviously, when we turn it back into hydrocarbons and its gonna be clean."
Customer-to-Be: "So, then, are we stuck with #2 or gas as our only output choices? Cause.... we have those segments already under contract..... We need #6 heating oil."
JB: "No problem. Our process is tunable. You need #6? We tune it and you get ultra low sulphur #6"
Customer-to-Be: "Fantastic. You mean that what we specifically need, you can deliver? Simple a that?"
JB: "Absolutely. You name your needs & we tune it to meet them."
Customer-to-Be: "Allrighty then. Let me run this by the decision making committee and we can get this baby airborn. And listen JB, we are not married to getting the other products from the guys we buy from now."
JB: "So, you will look at us again for the other products when your existing purchase agreements come up for re-consideration?"
Customer-to-Be: "You can count on it."
:o)
Imperial Whazoo
Well, yeah, obviously.
The business is out there to do and its is viciously viscous to have JBII get this bit of business.
I mean, how selfish....how inconsiderate......
I mean.... what with the fuel oil # 6 being so viscous and all.
Bad JBII..... BAD boy....!!
Bad viscous. Bad JBII
Now JBII.... you give that bit of viscious viscous business to the other guy.
And go to your room..... here, son, give me your Nintendo 3DS.... you lose your priviliges. Now go to your room.
Not letting this bit of viscous business go to some other company.... I mean, really!!!
Bad JBII.....
Bad boy....
:o)
Imperial Whazoo
Yeah... so let me try to grasp what is being put forward here.
A nationwide distributor decides to buy #6 fuel oil from somebody. You and I all know that they chose JBII.
OK... so, due to the fact that #6 fuel oil is rather viscous, it thus logically follows that it is
BAD
for JBII that they have been selected as the source of this product?
Really?
Due entirely to the viscosity of the product in question, the announcement that this #6 oil is involved is bad for JBII?
REALLY?
Bad news for us because of the viscosity?
REALLY?
Bwaaa haw haw haw haw haw haw haw haw haw haw haw!!!!!!
So, due to the viscosity of fuel oil #6, its good news if another company gets a contract and we do not?
RIGHT???
Normally, its considered GOOD news to get a long term, serious bit of repeat business, but not in this case, apparently.
Nope.
Not in this case.
It would have been better for all of us pathetic shareholders for another company to have received this busineess.... what with the viscosity of the product involved being SO TERRIBLY bad for JBII, and what not...
REALLY?!?!?!?
Oh yeah... I gotta say that this all makes PERFECT sense....
Yes indeedy-weedy... boy howdy.....absolutely PERFECT sense...
Uh huh.
Viscousity
Sure... yeah... obviously.... indubutably....
:o)
Imperial Whazoo
Yeah, well.... it may or may not be in need of heating, but it remains 100% unnecessary of confirmation that JBII's generated "PRODUCTS" are, one & all, LOW SULPHUR
Simple truth.
Uncontestible.
Unarguable.
Irrefutable.
Absolute 100% advantage to JBII.
Pure D, undiluted, uncritcizable FACT: JBII's products are LOW SULPHUR
P E R I O D ! !
End of story.
:o)
Next????!!!???
ROTFLMAO
Imperial Whazoo
Yeah I live down here in Texas and down here, you have to know that the refineries on the Gulf coast are locked and loaded to make the specifics of what they are engineered for on a seasonal basis and what the market tells management ahead of time they have to make for any given time of the year. They lack flexibility, and anyway, the boiler goo is garbage compared to the high quality product JBII makes.
First of all, the garbage goo that is being conteneded is the gunk the contract covers comes out of refineries dirty as can be, while the JBII stuff is big-time low sulphur. IMHO, to compare the two is to compare a critter that is lying on the roadside as road kill on Hwy 6 as though its the same as sirloin at $16.99 a pound from Simon David, LOL.
Notice this particular word: "PRODUCTS"....
Plural
Now, remember that JBII told everyone that they were busily sending samples to interested parties for evaluation.
OK... so guess what a distributor does when they look at JBII's "PRODUCTS"? They select the product they have an immediate need for.
JBII is not locked in to an existing stringent refining structure like other "PRODUCTS" sources are. They are on the front end of their business solution and they can be flexible and configure their generated output to conform to gaps in the "PRODUCTS" that distributors face in their product lines.
So, why is there all this nonsense about the first of the many "PRODUCTS" being somehow undesirable to sell?
Sheer nonsense, folks.
JBII meets the specific needs by being flexible and that is self evident and obvious to me. Duh!!
Way to go JBII!!
Well done!
Imperial Whazoo
Oh my my my my!!!
ROTFLMAO baby!
I told everybody that there was absolutely zero credibility to the long list of historical criticisms of JBII!
There is none that holds up. Never did in my mind and now its writ in large letters.... chiseled in gigantic stencil letters with a sledge, baby!
The company is doing it, big time!
Somebody tell Bloomberg that JBII is a real game changer. Get the news out there!!!
Absolutely fabulous!!
Imperial Whazoo
GALT jumped just now. Here are 3 recent news PRs:
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=135403&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1640844&highlight=
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=135403&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1640426&highlight=
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=135403&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1637921&highlight=
Something's cookin', or so it seems. You know anything about what gives?
TIA
Imperial Whazoo
What kind of news and why do you expect it?
TIA
Imperial Whazoo
Thanx. I'm not much for private pages. been at this too long to think many of them are worth it.
Peace.
IW
I don't know anything about this Cox guy. You need to supply the board with links, I'd say.
That way, we can chase it down and get on the same page of the playbook.
My thought is that they are gearing up to put a flash on the end of the year somehow and that its proly genuinely good news of some sort.
In any event... link up the Cox guy for all the rest of us, if you don't mind.
TIA
Imperial Whazoo
Yep. I checked for news. Not yet (soon perhaps????)
In my experience, someone always knows something. So, there is someone stepping in with big buying. That tells me there is something in the works.
Imperial Whazoo
EDITED: When you go to their site and fill in their PR inquiry form, Todd Falls is the guy to contact you in reply. I guess its his job to interface with investment inquiries.
I don't know the Fletcher guy. Not that I actually know the Falls fellow either, but I do know that he replies when you fill in their inquiry form.
Imperial Whazoo
And there it went again. 100K at the 382 Fib pullback point of .182.
This is a pro job of big lot buying boiz-n-goilz.
Timestamp on it: 11:02:52 AM
Plain and simple: pro's wading in in huge chunks.
Bodes well.
Imperial Whazoo
Hey folks -
I just went to the last hour or two of trading and I added up the size of LARGE trades that have happened.
Just looking at trades larger than 50K that got bought/sold in a single transaction, it looks like roughly 950K LARGE position buys have happened during the climb thusfar today.
If I'm not mistaken, what it looks to me is happening is that there is at least one big entity who appears to be very interested in the news that got released this AM because, as this puppy has been climbing throughout the morning, they have not hesitated to snap up huge chunks on every small pullback.
What this effectively does is it builds support in steps.
When a buy of 490K shares gets snapped up at about .165, this says to me that there is a player in this thing and his/her buy points speak volumes about where any major future pullbacks will have trouble punching below.
This gives me great comfort in this little stock for obvious reasons.
:o)
Merry Christmas everyone. I like this action a great deal.
L8r
Imperial Whazoo
I'm unable to affordably call Canada under my calling plan, so I was unable to make a phone call to inquire of the company regarding the Bloomberg show's scheduled time for Monday.
If any of you folks are in Canada, or if any of you folks have a better calling plan than I do, please call the company and ask about the time.
Then, please post the response you get for the benefit of the rest of us.
The phone # from their web page is: (416) 364-2551
TIA
That said, I emailed the company with this email a few minutes ago:
"I read your press release annnouncing the Bloomberg Innovators segment that is scheduled to air on Monday.
What time is it to be on so I can be sure to watch it and/or record it, should it be the case that it is scheduled for broadcast at a time that is inconvenient for me?"
I'd favor a multi-pronged approach, personally, so I do hope somebody can make a phone call and post the info they obtain.
For my part, if and when I get an email reply, I'll post it.
Thanx
Imperial Whazoo
Well I just searched the Bloomberg site for a schedule of the times of the "Innovators" program. It is a program but there is no schedule for when it gets aired.
I hope this means that it gets aired during the day and that they use the taped version of it repeatedly during the daytime hours as filler info.
Again, does anyone know for sure when the piece is going to FIRST air?
Or whether it is daytime or after hours?
Anyone know?
Imperial Whazoo
I listen to Bloomberg all day while I trade. Does anyone know whether the show will be on Bloomberg Asia, Bloomberg Europe AND Bloomberg America, or is it scheduled only for Bloomberg America?
And which interview show is it scheduled to be on? Tom Keene, who I'm listeneing to online right now? Or is it another of their scheduled interviewers?
Or it could be Tom Keene in his radio show pre-market thru post opening bell.... is it on the radio side of Bloomberg or is it on the TV side?
9:30 AM Eastern is at opening bell. So, is it shortly thereafter or shortly before, as the time is presently set?
TIA
Imperial Whazoo
Notice the exact wording:
"IS BEING CONSTRUCTED"
Any questions?
LOL.... bigtime!!
The mere suggestion, at this point, that there is even the smallest thing amiss with this company's progress is, IMHO, tripe layered upon nonsense and sandwiched between alternating layers of blather and flatulence.
Imperial Whazoo
What I saw happening right in front of me was what you posted in your graph. Massive surreptitious accumulation over a lengthy span of time.
Like I told everyone, there was somebody hitting the bid vigorously and I was sure that it had been going on all summer long. Simple as that.
To judge by what is in the chart you posted, it looks like it has been someone's opinion for a long time that there was a play here. Very obvious that somebody is building up a secret stash of shares. Whoever is working this accumulation is not thinking that SFMI is a scam, thats obvious. They obviously think that getting as many shares as they can before their accumulation program gets discovered is worth exploiting the recent PR. Obviously.
I opined in my weekend post that this bodes well for shareholders because it is a public secret (LOL) that PQ wants to sell the company. So, logic says that the accumulation going on provides impetus to a bidding war. This assumes PQ will try to control who he sells to, which I think makes sense. So, with that being the logical expectation, when he gets to the point where he is under way in his planned sale, there might arise a large position holder who wants to make the company his own.
If this happens, then the bidding war will most likely drive prices up above where they would go if there is only the candidate for purchase that management favors. Having multiple parties interested never hurt a deal like this.
So, the A/D line is spectacular. I knew I was right.
Thanx for the chart.
I like what is going on here. IMHO, there is no way to now make a case that the value we presently see is deserved. Somebody thinks this thing is of considerable value and I think we are in process to gen up a real battle to see who ends up owning War Eagle Mountain,
Thanx again, HR.
Imperial Whazoo
Hey Hurricane Rick -
The timestamp on the post of the link to the 98 pictures..... I think that, once the 98 pictures showed up and people could eye-ball the ACTUAL state of affairs at the plant, the price decline reversed and the price ascent began.
Anyway, after watching this happen yesterday, I've decided it is incumbent on me to explain how I know more than your average guy about the behaviour of SFMI bid/ask activity.
Basically, its because I database the real-time tick data on 500 stocks, including SFMI, and I have done so for the last two years. So I can compare what happened after this week's PR to what is normal for SFMI.
I wrote a "black box" autotrading program that grabs real time ticker data on 500 stocks out of a socket.
I launch a data collecting database every morning, pre-market. I collect every change in the bid, the ask, the size of the bid, the size of the ask, every lot that gets bought/sold..... a whole bunch of data points....
....every single real time change gets databased in real time. I watch 500 stocks, including SFMI.
So, if there is a pattern to the trading of any stock I watch, I have the real time data on it. This includes SFMI.
So, I can tell you that it is my opinion that, after the PR this week about the Centurian deal, the buyer (or buyers) who is/are accumulating SFMI did so vigorously, and in larger lots, compared to earlier in the year.
The PR was an event, from a programmatic point of view, that resulted in a pattern that those of us developing automated trading solutions call "interesting".
What was "interesting" about it was that the buying at the bid looks like it increased in the size of lots involved, and in frequency of occurance. Then, the 98 pictures showed up, and this also proved itself to be a programmatic event that was "interesting" because it resulted in the accumulation appearing to have continued, but now at the ask rather than at the bid.
Very interesting, IMHO.
I've thought there was an accumulator in the background all summer long, and after watching what happened when the news this week got exploited, I'm sure of it.
That said, from a non-programmatic point of view, the following was what I think happened:
After the PR came out, the opinion that the Centurian deal was toxic financing was all but instantaneous. To prove this, just look at the various timestamps on things. The deal was labeled as dilutive and this happened so fast that there was no way that the particulars of the filing had even been read, IMHO.
The fact is, though, that the Centurian deal is not toxic financing and it is not dilutive. And that is FACT.
But this being the truth did not alter the momo on the chart. SFMI got labeled. The label stuck. Buyers look like they showed up with both increased size and frequency, at the bid. And price dropped. DUH!!
Its my opinion that an accumulator, who has been accumulating for some time, wants more shares and I think my data shows a definite pattern of accumulation that accelerated after the news of the Centurian deal got exploited.
Wow.... at a 24/7, three 8 hour shifts per day calculation.... mind boggling rate if they can do it.
Ar they running multiple shifts yet? Anyone know?
Imperial Whazoo
Glimmer of light??? You have to be kidding me.... this is not a mere glimmer. Its a 100000 candle power high beam on the nose of a jet aircraft launching up into the sky!!
Glimmer?!?!
ROTFLMAO
Imperial Whazoo
Hey everybody -
This agreement is NOT DILUTIVE.
This is not even close to TOXIC financing. There is absolutely no support of this outrageous & 100% untrue claim. NOT even close to toxic. Just read the document, folks; but better yet, read oryx's fabulous post on it.
Not even close to TOXIC.
Now that I've gotten the attention all of the folks who have already posted that this is a dilutive deal, (LOL), lets get to the ACTUAL facts.
To start, everyone needs to look at the top of the info box at the top of the iHub blog you view this SFMI blog via.
Notice the post put together by oryx. Click on it and read it.
Here's the link for convenience sake:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=65326275
Read it
Absorb it
Comprehend it
Grasp it
Appreciate it
Digest its details and its restraining conditions and its severe timeline.
Do NOT give in to the temptation to automatically label this agreement as a bad deal that is dilutive. Do not give in to theto the knee-jerk temtation to simply pan the deal.
Digest it and then admit the truth: this deal is not dilutive.
I know. I know. Most stinky pinkies do dilutive deals big time.
I know that this is GENERALLY true.
But just read the darn docs and oryx's mastery of the details and you will all get it.
SFMI is not your typical start-up.
Period.
I challenge everybody to actually digest the deal as it REALLY is and to quit the automatic condemnation that is so easily done.
Now, to start with, here is the link to the "old" doc and following after, the link to the one just out this evening:
OLD
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1464830/000109181811000305/sfmi060111s1.htm
NEW
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=50344572
OK.
So there are 6 bullet points found at the top of each of the two documents and guess how they compare, jot and tittle?
I'll walk you all thru the comparison.
OLD preface under the heading "Our Transaction With Centurion"
Yeah, does anyone know off the top of their heads the prior feed rates, for comparison?
Imperial Whazoo
Me too. Watching like a hawk.
You chart well, so draw this up. You'll like it.
Go back on JBII to the long legged high volume doji day of 7/21
Draw a horizontal line from the low wick of the candle and one from the high wick of that day, too.
See the channel?
Well, the way charts work is sometimes pretty darn cool. The pending stack test caused the chart to have a big ass white candle on 11/30.
Look at where it touched. The exact bottom of the channel formed by the two horizonatal clines off of the hi & lo wicks of the hi vol doji day of 7/21.
Clear baby. Clear.
The news is coming like a freight train and price is coiled like a spring just below the resistance level of the channel.
I'm absolutely sure the next move is going to be dramatic and it is going to penetrate that channel bigtime.
Absolutely certain, baby.
Take it easy, my man.
L8r
Imperial Whazoo
Why Friday, my man? Whats the flag on that? Why is it so & what is there about that date that makes the comment you made relevant? Just wondering.
Whats the basis of the import you place on Friday?
Imperial Whazoo
Not just that, although I fully agree, but the fact is that it is a tremendously clever chess move, IMHO. And its like bidding your hand in a bidding war of bridge where the way you bid the hand tells everybody who is paying attention that you are holding a muscle hand, baby!! Everybody watching the way this thing is unfolding can not walk away genuinely thinking that there is no substance behind the curtain here, LOL.
How many instances have we all been a part of (I mean, all of us who have played in the pinky puddle for any amount of time, that is) where there is the obvious need to raise a little bit more money and it never even crosses anyone's mind that the insiders could do this kind of thing instead of fabricating more shares out of thin air and hurting the average shareholder by the act of further dilution?
This guy gets shares for next to nothing. Every startup has this as the baseline story. Nothing odd or new about JB being fiat share rich. Standard fare. Not even the least bit unique.... check the inside group in the genesis phase of ANY start-up; there are always folks with bunches and bunches of shares that they got for being the creator (or one of them).
So, then, does it ever cross any of these guys that they could use their own shares to feed the $$ necessities as the startup runs into the standard need that all startups have for ongoing $$$$ ?
I've been at this game a long time and I've seldom seen very much of this happening. A few rare companies have it happen, but by-in-large, its the same old same old..... dilute till the cows come home.
But JB thinks. Thats the ticket, really. He thinks.
He thinks outside the box, too.
I mean, the machines themselves are "thinking-outside-the-box" on a molecular level, LOL!!
And IMHO, the very act of doing this kind of share-give-back thing is proof positive that this guy is not just here to milk us dry and evaprate like the morning fog, never to be heard from again.
The innovation is real; the machines are real; the agreement with NYSE:RKT is real.... and on and on and on.
I greatly like this having happened today.
Very, very nice.
Imperial Whazoo
Hey man, when you see a guy give back his own shares rather than diluting via issuance of shares, you gotta realize that, its not just that all heaven is GOING to bust loose soon; its a reality that we are watching a little bit of the heavenly happening right in front of our very own eyeballs!!
Way to go JB!
Eviscerate the assertions that you are a liar, JB; that you are in this to rip the $$ out of ordinary people's pockets; that this puppy is a scam in spades.
Not one of those arguments can be asserted with even the smallest particle of truthfulness in the future, IMHO.
Simple as that.
Imperial Whazoo
Ah, but you have in your own emphasized words, the seeds of the actual explanation that reconciles both your point and that of DC's statement that he personally knows folks who have a greater than 6 month holding length requirement.
The mere fact that the specific wording explains a requirement that such shares must be held AT LEAST 6 months does not necessarily mean that the shares have to be tradable at the 6 month point.
See, I could take a deal that says that I have to hold 2 years and in so doing, I would obviously be holding at least 6 months.
So, the two are not necessarily conflicting, and frankly (IMHO), it looks bad for it to have been asserted that the highlighted words you decided to insert support only the view that the shares have to necessarily be opened up at the six month point.
"At Least 6 months" includes shares issued with a governing agreement that sets the time as greater than 6 months, obviously.
Imperial Whazoo
Yeah, that would be the case in both of your suppositions, but I think the line blockman drew is angling downward and that a close firmly above that line, which is about 1.33 (more or less) is the needed number.
Only if horizontal lines are supposed do 1.40 or 1.50 become necessary, IMHO. So that means to me that the use of horizontals in this case is incorrect.
JMO, of course.
Imperial Whazoo
Hey blockman -
You think the p[unch thru today is a break above the yellowline or is it stilljust towying with it?
I believe that, when a pennant like this gets probed mostly to one side, that the statitistics support the expectation that the side it is repeatedly toying with will pretty soon succomb.
In this case, that means that the yellow line is soon to capitulate and while it is now resistance, it will automatically become support.
What say you?
Imperial Whazoo
Thanx. Again,as it turns out, your link is what I'm already in possession of.
Pretty clear tome then that there is no newer instance of JB appearing anywhere on the Canadian airwaves.
Imperial Whazoo
Well somebody provided a link to a transcript and there has been a bunch of discussion. I had the transcript found and on screen on one of my boxes but that PC has a blinky Broadcom chipset on its motherboard and it sometimes looses the internet I use internally, failing to see the Cisco router and what not.
Long & short of it is that I loose the box's connectivity and have to reboot and, since my setup purges my history, I can't retrace my recent suite visits on that box once rebooted after having lost the screen that way. Hence, I had to boot on a backup box and I could not figure out how I originally found the thing I was looking at at the moment the Broadcom did the bad nasty on me.
So, I thought I'd ask to try to shorten the process of retracing my steps.
Thanx anyway.... oh, and anyone knowing anything useful, please do not hesitate to chime in....
TIA
Imperial Whazoo
I just checked those two links out. I already had those.
I had come to understand, perhaps erroneously, this morning, that JB had appeared as recently as thie last week on a SECOND set of shows of some sort.
Perhaps I misread what I've read in my perusal of the blog today. If so, my bad.
But if not, is it or is it not the case that JB has been on a broadcast VERY recently wherein he said, among other things, some rather specific things about them having filed for the Canadian exchanges?
If so, thats the show I need to see, and it would be, as I said, a newer show than either of the two links you provided.
Anyone?????
TIA
Imperial Whazoo
Say folks.... can anyone please post the accurate playback link, or maybe a youtube link of the latest show?
I've been working this blog today and apparently the posted links (those that I've found anyway) are broken.
TIA
Imperial Whazoo
Hey ctb -
So, its a long list looking back. Where can I get the lay of the land looking out from here?
TIA
Imperial Whazoo
It pleases me enormously to read your cunning thoughts.
I have long felt that PQ is a rather smart guy. A lot of people who see their own ways as thoughtful (LOL) do not think this is the case, but I could care less.
He is a real estate guy. That is his root. I believe that the thing you speculate is happening is precisely why they have not trumpetted this little company very much. Not only is it true, IMHO, that they are very likely doing what you suggest as regards quiet accumulation of claims, I also think that they know that they are far better served by being extremely silent while they do the thing you speculate on. After all, if they were to get it to be a well known success story that there is fabulous value in the mountain, they might discover that folks who have long forgotten that they have claims on the mountain suddenly rediscover that they need to become proactive about them.
To pull this off (by accumulating the greatest possible position in and around the mountain) so that the company controls the bulk of what it needs to control, the company has a vested interest in running silent, IMHO.
So, as time goes by, it frustrates many, but it may be the smartest thing to be about. So what that the sluggishness and lack of pop and pomp feeds a chance to the detractors to continue to diss the company. If, in the end, SFMI ends up with a huge amount of control of the mountain, it will have been the smartest move PQ has made thusfar.
So, I like it. I want them to end up with vast control of the mountain, and whatever furthers that pleases me to no end.
Thanx again for your very thoughtful post. Solid thinking, my man. Well done.
Imperial Whazoo
Hey man, thnx 4 the shout-out over at you know where.. I checked your postings & found this one, which I sometimes follow. I think I've owned MDW once or twice. I'm in and out of things as a habit. MDW looks to be in a sideways consolidation right now.
BTW.... based on the Paulson filing today after market, I'd take risk off gold for a while. Just my opinion. (and he's n GLD, and not MDW, but its relevent just because it is what it is).
http://www.secinfo.com/dvJcw.qb.htm
Paulson's the holder of the world's bigggest hedge fund position in GLD (I think this is the case, anyway). Apparently, shortly prior to the Sept 30 2011 deadline for making the filing that got released today after market, he liquidated a full 1/3 of his gold.
Specifically.... a lightened up to 20273540 shares of the gold spider this qtr vs 31500000 the prior one... talk about taking risk off in gold!!! Can anyone say "Ripple effect"?
I bought the DZZ in anticipation. Turns out I may be spot on becuase, given the size of this revelation after the market today, I'd expect it to get a tad frothy over in the options pits tomorrow, LOL
Just a thought. A heads up that proly will manifest in all of the golds, including even MDW, I'd expect. I'll be watching for pullback opps across a lot of them.
And again, I'm limited to only one over at that other place, so I wanted to thank you for the applause.
l8r
Imperial Whazoo