Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
And all of the clowns love to come out and start selling into these low ball bids again after they could have sold yesterday at .05+ lol. Always fun to watch.
“We” lol.... so you found PCTL to be a good buy again?
If I bought in and sold for a loss, then bought in again and sold for a loss again getting impatient I guess I could see why I would be frustrated and continue to wish bad upon the PPS of a ticker. But its getting pretty absurd lol. We might not hold .05 today or we might kick it to .06+, regardless this ticker is clearly trending up again and when filings hit then it is off to the races to create more frustration for those impatient sellers at the bottom.
Not sure if I wrote my response in a confusing manner.
I meant:
Share price is undervalued in a big way when analyzing the amount of revenue expected this year and expected margins to be very healthy. Share price will make big moves through the end of the year as filings get in order and people start realizing that revs are going to be more than all of the weathered expectations from Gary's "$4 million in sales" number presented in the last podcast (basically I expect revenues to exceed $4 million in a big way based on knowledge of our tentacles stretching into the market through all of these distributors and new systems getting installed).
However, the share price will continue to get hit if the company does not make changes with their current auditor as I don't see this problem going away based on their history.
My take at this point in time is that PCTL is doing the right things and clearly very busy expanding their influence in the industry. I think fundamentally they are probably going to deliver in a much bigger way then people have been generally thinking since that last podcast announcement of $4 million in sales. However if they don't address this joke for an auditor they have at this point then the PPS will suffer. I think we are close to bottom of the barrel we will ever be with PPS at this point but the filings will definitely effect our momentum when the price is climbing based on fundamentals and news announcements.
Happy birthday rocko, another year has gone by. I remember your last birthday and it seems not so long ago. But boy have times changed since then.
I’m really hoping that the Judge at least considers Chanbond’s request to have the other trial dates set. I feel until this happens there is no reason for the big dogs like Comcast, Charter, or Cox to even consider negotiating a fair settlement value.
So it is definite that PCTL has $0 in revenue for Q2... lol I love it.
Love the “we” statements. As if it hasn’t been the same negativity since day one. Soon many here will go missing and it will be lovely to start replying to their posts and ask where art thou.
But before it was “they need to stop all 8ks until the fins are out”... which is it? Anything they do there are nonstop complaints lol.
Can I ask why?
There are probably over 500 posts on this board related to that exact topic. I urge you to do some reading as this has been discussed extensively.
Here comes the dumbass that undercuts the ask by 1 tick and then goes on to start lowering his ask by 1 tick throughout the day until someone buys lol. This is always fun to watch the desperate idiots that think lowering their ask undercutting the last trade price is going to work out. Sell into the bid and move on loser.
I’m glad PCTL is addressing this in the right way. Professionalism, now let’s get these filings and get a new professional auditor.
One of these days that seller playing games on the ask with will get took when the news comes or just from simple accumulation. Trying to block the run to acquire more shares in this range is dangerous enough to lose the position you throw out there on the ask.
Looks to me like trial proceedings have been continued (pushed to a later date) through August now, whereas it was through July 31st prior. So not looking good for us with this update. Hopefully things can open back up in September or October. Only makes sense that our journey continues with more delays that are not even pertinent to our lawsuit.
That should be quite clear to the defendant who I think should realize she is not the one for the job, but I assume it's way too late to get rid of her completely. I wouldn't want to be defending their position either.
I mean we all expected that when we first bought this anyhow... The only change for me was that I was ignorant to patent litigation early on and thought settlement was very likely in 2018 when all of the wins were piling up. Little did I know what these large companies are capable of. Another surprise for me was the lawsuit being unconsolidated. From the get go I thought it would be one lawsuit against all 13 at once and the small guys would take a backseat to let the big guys argue the case for them. Little did I know that the Judge would make the decision to unconsolidate after the 13 were the ones to request consolidation from the beginning and then requested for the opposite when it came down to the wire.
I cannot be angry with the Judge for his decision and I think anyone against his decision is being a little unrealistic given the current circumstances. As zomby has pointed out it is possible for the trial to occur in current circumstances - however the district has already set a precedent with the Stark decision for continuance at this time. What I would like to see from the Judge at this point is cooperation with Chanbond's request for trial dates to be set for the others in fairness of these continued delays that table settlement talks.
Me thinks Google takes a nice slow approach with this one. Why pay before you have been ordered too, much less why pay before pre-trial conference when you are demanded to sit with the plaintiff to negotiate settlement options. They will file their writ of certiorari as it is their right. SCOTUS will take their time to throw it out, then we get a trial date after NLST has taken all of the proper steps to do so.
That would seem to be the case. I just hope this doesn't turn into a drag my feet scenario where we don't find ourselves at trial until next year. My thinking is it mostly has to do with the state of this pandemic in the next 1-3 months.
Not a bad idea, but I assume the 13 lawyers have at least done enough DD to realize that Deidre Leanne and Carter have a working relationship that dates back to pre-UOIP days. Deidre and the inventors have a lot more skin in the game for this lawsuit than the little peanuts $5 million plus interest payments in the purchase agreement.
The ending will be fireworks for those holding shares. No way around it once you have the success these two tickers have had with their patents through the PTAB patent death squad and then affirmation from the Circuit Court of Appeals. Getting to the ending is the journey which many don't like to wait for and they end up missing out entirely.
What is the probability we see a trial before end of year? I guess it all depends on the state of COVID-19 through the end of the year wouldn't you say?
These dips are normal in this penny world. Knowing what is coming here is what matters and it's how we make money. I wish I would have had funds available on the dip to the .50s but that it okay-fine with me. I bought more today and will continue to buy as money becomes available.
Look for Google to file their writ of certiorari close to their deadline for filing to drag it out as much as possible.
These tech giants are notorious for kicking the can down the road. The other ticker I kept referring to that is very comparable to this ticker just got a postponement on it's trial date for August 18th as the defendant filed a continuance motion due to the dangers of COVID-19 and a potential prejudice in jury members (young people are more understanding and savvy of tech, therefore they want to make sure they have their shot at older folks who might be ignorant to the systems in question). The Judge had no choice but to approve the continuance as another Judge in the same district just days before approved a continuance due to COVID-19.
Just an example these guys will do anything to book the expense later.
The only thing I cannot stand about this new update is that it's postponed with no set date. I hope that Chanbond's request does not go unheard as they have very reasonable demands considering the current circumstances. We will see what happens shortly hopefully.
Lol you guys are getting a little carried away... Let's at least find out when the trial has been rescheduled for. If it is going into November - the Judge will not be scheduling the trial for November only for the defendant to have the ability later to say "we are going on vacation"... They would never have proposed that time frame in the first place and if they tried that the Judge would say the same - why request a continuance into November if you were going to ask for vacation later anyhow.
If anything we will get delays from COVID if it is still as bad as it currently is by then which most assume it will be. However, vaccines seem to becoming closer and closer by the day now according to the market confidence.
We will see how it plays out but this is exactly why the price used to fall off 20-40% because of a bunch of people whining about some minuscule delays when looking at how far we have come.
Yeah, knowing these emotional penny traders omg... We would dropped 30% today because of a little couple month delay lmao.
If you have been following the same case as me, I don't agree that the Judge is sleeping with the defendant. If anything it seems as of recent appearances that he has been starting to lean his favor in our direction due to the shenanigans constantly played by the defendant.
Chanbond responded saying that they basically agree with the continuance if it's needed and did not object. So if you want to place some blame then maybe look at the Chanbond lawyers who were okay-fine with this delay. I don't have a problem with the Chanbond lawyers I think they did okay in this situation by demanding trial dates be set for the other 12.
I'm not sure what the procedures are in this situation but I would assume that Judge Andrews still wants to keep Cox as the first trial being he had a reason for it from the get-go... They are a medium sized infringer which can set parameters for the smaller guys and the bigger guys. I would assume that the trial is for Cox will still be first and get postponed to a later date with the other trials hopefully getting scheduled thereafter with a definitive date (this seems to be what Chanbond wants to set in stone). Whether or not it is possible for the Judge to do so in that regard - I'm not sure - however, it makes a lot of sense for us to push that pressure point as it would force the 13 to continue settlement discussions with and end date in mind for trial.
It’s very simple... the settlement discussions are taking place. Without a definite date for trial the discussions will be hampered as the defendant have nothing to force their hand. With a scheduled trial date there is a date of definite judgement in place where they know end game will occur. Until those dates are defined, the defendant can and will continue to kick the can down the road.
Yes this was my first time seeing Chanbonds full reply. After seeing this I got that idea from the end as well. I agree with Specialneeds here
What is another 3 months tacked on to our 3 years here lmao. It gets ridiculous.
I see what your thinking I mean but there is a slight difference in my mind LOL. Regardless exciting to think settlement numbers are being negotiated and maybe getting close.
Yes but one could also make the judgement - Chanbond is not an operating company with any type of monetary needs to keep cash flow due to any potential damages rendered. Therefore, what does it matter if they have their chance in court in August or November in order to try and acquire any monetary award due to damages.
Interesting thoughts... I can agree with this sentiment.
Can you expound on your thoughts?
Are you saying you think that COX is basically saying they can wait a little longer on any monetary award being that they are not effected monetarily as they are not an operating company?
Interesting.
I also find it preferable to get this thing done immediately even if we sacrifice our court experts showing up to report back to the board. Although having our team onsite was very important to me, I would much rather then thing gets going next month as agreed prior. The continuous can getting kicked down the road is getting really absurd and COX has the nerve to claim that Chanbond is not an operating company so it will not effect them for a small further delay... If we continue saying a small delay does not mean anything as they are not impacted as an operating company would be - this will never get solved. Their excuses and reasoning is very disrespectful in my view and I hope it gets blown up in their face - although I have my doubts that it will be as Chanbond has not taken a stance of opposition to the move.
LOL!
I have a certain level of love for the posters on this board. You guys are awesome.
I would give up my mod seat for long so that we can keep goodbuddy up top there.
I always enjoy your posts. Very well mannered and splendid vocabulary. Thank you for checking with the Delaware courthouse on their continued operations during this pandemic. Hopefully Judge Andrews brings the hammer down on them once again.