Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Wanna help "make SFOR great" and the country more cyber secure? Then write the Directors of the CIA & ODNI. They are tasked with submitting the National "Anti-Hacking Plan" to the POTUS in June.
If you believe SFOR's patented OOBA/MFA should be part of the plan
you can contact Dan Coats the Director at the following address:
Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Washington, DC
20511
To contact Mike Pompeo the Director of the CIA the address is simply
Central Intelligence Agency
Office of Public Affairs
Washington, DC
20505
Every letter counts! Also please consider sending them copies of GID and MT as I have for their examination.
Wouldn't a bidding war for SFOR between heavy hitters like MSFT, TPG & Intel be the cat's meow! Thanks for finding & posting that article on their acquisition priority, cyber-security.
Consider sending POTUS MT or GID as I have. We have until June to get SFOR's patented OOBA/MFA mentioned as a foundation stone in the National "Anti-Hacking Plan". It is currently being drawn up by the directors of the CIA & ODNI. It must be on the President's desk, as ordered by him, in June. Knowing that, I sent him MT for his android via Amazon. Yes, I received confirmation it was delivered and no it wasn't returned. Amazon allowed a brief note. I asked him to consider OOBA/MFA for plan inclusion. I called HSN and the sale is still going on today. If the WH got several from concerned citizens, at the very least, some West Wing staffers would notice. I know this sounds crazy, but it might just work! Never underestimate the power of your well written, sincere note. The address is simply as follows:
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC
20500
You bet it's intimidating! My question is how can microcap SFOR possibly afford a half dozen of the best IP legal firm's hired guns for Vasco alone? Who is footing this substantial litigation bill?
Looking at the 10-K it's obvious SFOR cannot carry on four court battles of this magnitude for long. Something is going on beneath the surface that the that common share holders are presently completely in the dark about now, and that something is good IMHO! It kind of reminds me of that classic Western, "The Magnificent Seven" in a way. The SFOR Mexican village can not possibly afford all these legal gunslingers! Somehow the bill is being paid, but how and by who? Inquiring minds want to know!
In addition to the cup & handle forming on the short term chart it is also quite visible on the longer term 6 month chart. Also, you cannot argue with the ascending triangle pattern on one year chart.
Great catch! I believe McAfee needs them a lot. McAfee is an older, good bit of anti-virus software. Combined with SFOR products it becomes great! It then offers the whole enchilada to consumers. Without it, the Achilles heel of missing keylogger & click-jacker protection and lack of keyboard encryption is a glaring vulnerability. Do you think Intel and Texas Pacific Group are aware of those vulnerabilities and the potential SFOR fix to their problem? I do. Now if you were them, and had just spun off McAfee as a stand alone, pure play, cyber defense company would you like to enhance the quality of your product? Would you want to do that before another company gobbles up SFOR? You know, that other company could then be in the position to deny McAfee SFOR IP. That wouldn't be good at all IMHO. I also find it fascinating that multi-billion dollar Intel & TGP share the same lawyers as microcap SFOR, R&G. Don't you? Finally, isn't it nice that Ropes and Gray has a mergers and acquisition office? I think it is.
Agreed. I was also encouraged by the 3rd quarterly report that noted OEM bundling as SFOR's greatest growth area.
I agree Ropes & Gray doesn't "deal with peasants." My only question is how can microcap SFOR afford them? I've seen nothing to the effect that they are on contingency or giving a discount rate for legal services have you? This leads me to conclude something is up.
R&G represents multi-billion dollar Intel & Texas Pacific Group who spun off McAfee as a pure play cyber security company. Last week on Bloomberg I heard a partner of T&G talk about that then state "We will be acquiring small computer software companies in the cyber defense landscape" Does SFOR meets that criteria? I think it does! Do you?
"HSN party at the WH" Dear Director Coats Please consider SFOR's patented OOBA/MFA for inclusion in the National Anti-Hacking Plan to augment anti-virus software. 4 Sleddogs Major USAF Retired
His package of MT arrived on Monday 10 April according to Amazon which stated "Your package was delivered."
Have you written the WH, CIA and ODNI yet? I have and sent them copies of GID or MT. Time is running out for consideration of SFOR IP to be included in the plan. It must be on President Trumps desk in June.
Starting the HSN innovation sales presentation as a "Show Stopper" and now having SFOR's item # 543100 GT/MT named a "Best Seller" on HSN.com will definitely help raise product awareness.
You're an honorable man to do so. Yup, Mr. Kay done good!
That's you. Other people buy what they know stock wise.
Off to a great start with the Home Shopping Network!
Great. So we'll just have to stand by to stand by.
Joe did a great job! His pitch was concise and accurate in covering the threat and how it is countered. The live demonstration of the keylogger capturing everything typed and the total encryption when he turned on Guarded ID was very effective.
Well, the popcorn is done. Time to grab a cold one, tune into HSN and watch what I believe will be a very interesting show with SFOR as the leading product vendor.
What I caught was Gemalto, which is a DoD's SIPIR net supporting vendor recently announced it's enhancement with "their" OOBA/MFA. R&G is already suing them for IP infringment and Gemalto goes and digs their legal hole deeper. Unbelievable! When R&G puts the bite on them SFOR stands to get a slice of that Pentagon pie IMHO.
Disagree. You are completely discounting the cash flow from retail sales, OEM bundling and license fees.
If CCTC busts the SEC suspense date for filing the year-end, audited, 10-K it is something problematic. Or, they obtained an extension from the SEC on the 17 April no later than date IMHO. Have they done that before?
Don't you find it an interesting coincidence that R&G represents multi-billion dollar Intel, Texas Pacific Group and microcap SFOR? Don't you also find it interesting that during his Bloomberg interview this week on the McAfee spinoff a TPG partner stated "We will be acquiring small computer software companies in the cyber security landscape?" Does that sound something like what SFOR is? I think it does!
Let's not forget Blank Rome is working on contingency. That speaks volumes to me of their confidence in the strength of SFOR IP and their inevitable victory. As far as Ropes & Gray is concerned that's a mystery to me. Now I know they represent the multi-billion dollar companies of Intel and Texas Pacific Group who spun off McAfee two weeks ago. What I don't know is how microcap SFOR can afford the expense of hiring the country's best IP defense firm to represent them in four cases! I also know TPG has an active M&A office. I also recall this weeks Bloomberg interview with the TPG partner who stated "We will be acquiring small computer software companies in the cyber defense landscape." Is SFOR in that landscape? I think it is! With all this smoke there must be a fire being kindled somewhere. Long & Strong SFOR.
Agree. "SFOR simply doesn't have the money for a large marketing budget. (Mark did however hire a marking guy) I (also) don't think it would be a good use of it's resources." At this critical juncture of SFOR's growth & development, Mark Kay's banking background is a tremendous asset. This man is a fiscal conservative. That is just what we need now!
He is wisely shepherding our company resources in accordance with his four pronged company growth plan. Like Jesse Livermore, the 20th century's greatest stock investor said "It takes time to make money." Give Mark Kay the time, I believe he will make us money, a lot of money. Long & Strong SFOR.
The initial HSN sales are not as important as raising SFOR product awareness is IMHO. Once people get their packages & put it on their devices they will know their data is more secure. When they are happy with the product that's when they will tell family & friends. This will contribute to even greater sales.
Tonight, between 6 & & PM EST, Home Shopping Network is raising SFOR product awareness. That's a good augmentation to the nation wide printed sales flyers with SFOR product in them by the brick & mortar that have partnered with SFOR IMHO.
Why are you expecting the year-end, audited 10-K financials to be that good? Hello world, we're on thin ice!
"started the application process" is a long way from having the estimated 3/4 to one million dollars needed to move the plant from OK to WY! Then there is the need for operating capital. Unless CCTC scores big with the DOE, railroads and/or another deep pockets investor attending the WY conference it's goose is cooked IMHO.
Au Contraire about "patenting something everyone else uses then sue them." Go to the United States Patent Office site. Now what are Ram's initial filing dates? That's right. He was the first! Others are infringing on SFOR's IP. Don't try to revise that history.
I can confirm that. I had asked him about getting off the stinky pinkies. Mark's response was that he was "working on upgrading to the QB". Once that happens, SFOR will appeal to new investors who avoid pink sheet listed stocks. I also agree that depends upon HSN sales figures tonight. GLTA SFOR investors!
Yeah, people shouldn't be concerned about that 50K IMHO. As Mark wrote it's "still accruing" it's not that SFOR got stiffed! Remember, Mark came out of the conservative banking industry. If the independent auditor tells you to take something off the books you comply. I appreciate a CEO who takes great pains to avoid even the appearance of cooking the books.
"If Wyoming turns out to be another bust, RS will probably be unavoidable" IMHO an RS will be the least of our problems, it'll be the death knell for CCTC IMHO!
I respectfully disagree about the potential buyout year. I base that on this week's Bloomberg interview with a Texas Pacific Group partner. After talking about the Intel/TPG McAfee spinoff he stated "We are going to be buying smaller computer software companies in the cyber security landscape". Consequently, I believe this year is still a possibility. I base that belief on the fact McAfee needs SFOR augmentation to be able to offer complete protection. TPG would not want another company to beat them to the punch, then potentially deny them the benefits of SFOR IP augmentation IMHO.
Thank you for reposting the ENTIRE e-mail exchange. As you can see that $50K is not in doubt WHATSOEVER as it "is accruing".
Reread the e-mail, "accruing" was a word he used. Just "Not yet been received" sounds like SFOR was being stiffed. I don't believe it has been stiffed by a deadbeat!
When the ACS briefer stated emphatically "We own that one a hundred percent!" that implies the mortgage has been paid in full to the bank (SFOR) unless he made a very poor choice in words.
WRONG! Please read about the fifty thousand dollars that, according to Mark Kay "was accruing".
Don't forget that fifty thousand dollars that Mark wrote "was accruing" (for accounts receivables) in an e-mail to a previous poster inquiring about the 10-K figures.
Thank you for posting that. Also I thank the poster who provided the direct link to the ACS webinar. You'll recall from his verbiage during the last slide, showing patent numbers, the ACS presenter proudly states "We own 100% of that patent (SFOR's keystroke encryption one)" Can you say 9 million dollars? Long & strong SFOR.
You hit the proverbial nail on the head. Short term traders are disappointed they didn't hit the jackpot with the 10-K. I'm not!
I look at what Mark Kay highlighted, the 42% improvement from last year. What's wrong with this picture? In my book, nothing. It's all a matter of perspective. I follow Jesse Livermore's advice "But right, sit tight" He was the 20th century's greatest stock investor so I believe he has some wisdom & market insights applicable to today. I did my DD. I know what I own. Apparently, some do not. So sad. Long & strong SFOR.
WRONG! Beating last year by 42% IS new and that's right from Mark Kay! A CEO that leads his company to beat the previous year by 42% does not "suck" IMHO.
Sorry but close counts in horseshoes and hand grenades!