Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Question for you or anyone else:
Wouldn't be better for a "major stock mover" to invest with TAO directly and not Sanwire with it's baggage of debt.
"facts are stubborn things"
With the SEC gone, this still leaves the company with what it is.....not much. I would still like to know what the TAO relationship is from someone who does not bash the stock.
Could someone kindly summarize the Tao relationship with Sanswire?
I know a lot of you folks like to say due your own DD, but if you could just briefly explain it that would be great.
So, since Sanswire still owns 50% of it, you think that they are involved in top-secret operations?
Boy this board is great.
I would not forecast based on that. The way I see it, they're taking a bet, just like we are. Besides, who else will give them money to keep the company operating? Don't think there is a concern or Gov't. that's so impressed with what they're doing that's willing to give them a deposit on a contract.
What makes you so sure?
Hey I was going too, can I get a ride?
How can you post that? Is credibility a consern?
just asking your opinion, that's all. Why not give it? Said nothing about my entry point or my cost basis.
What else is there than the past to make a judgement about this company and it's prospects for success?
If I may ask you a question... What is your opinion of the likelihood of making a return on your investment in this company if you invested at the current price?
Thanks for sharing
Seems like you guys have it all figured out. I tell ya this board is great!
You open yourself up to attack when you post that there have been accomplishments. Only a contract, at this point, would legitimize the company.
Most likely not a scam but not for those reasons.
Check the past, we had relations with the government, had chairman with reputable pasts all during the Huff criminal years.
Are you suggesting that the Skysat is worth less than the agreed upon figures. And they are for some reason disguising a loan as a sale?
If the company did not need their money, than I would agree, I would take it as a buy signal. But you like to ignore the reality...the company desperately needs money, and I am unaware of any orthodox sources of capital that would give them a loan.
Difference? If it's for working capital, maybe they had no choice? The company needs capital to achieve its goal, the success of which is unkown........still, even to them.
if they invested on the open market, funds would not flow into the company.
sO if I follow your logic, any risk taken by an insider is a buy signal? Is not risk for them the same as everybody?
ARE They buying shares directly from the company's treasury? I think so, no? If so, is it for their own investment or to provide working capital. If working capital, I take it for what it is, not a bullish signal. For all you know they could be taking a risk with their money just like I do.
but of course!
I told you folks, you cannot make this stuff up.
Glad to see that at least some of you remember the past.
Enough already, show us the money before another company takes the cake.
"flying wind sock" That's polite. I could think of some other descriptions
SECRETARY is a corporate officer title, you _ummy. Not an employee who files and answers the phone.
Thanks,
But other than the PR, that's all we heard from them, no? the conference was embellished here not by the company. To me it was just another industry trade show.
I may be wrong, which is usually the case, but did the company make a big deal of attending the conference? Or was it a member from this board who keeps posting about it?
Mig,
Now what has happened to your long and strong $5 in two months mentality??!!
There is a mountain of evidence that the parties that would care about his level of genius, don't. WE saw the Skydragon concept demonstrated along time ago, and it was around for a while before that. Yet there is still no government or commercial interest for it in the form of contracts. I posed this question to you before.........if it is SO wonderful, then where is the interest in it?
This is not a secret or black progect. The cat has been out of the bag on this for a while. We are way past the "show me the money"
At least you think so.
I have been a shareholder for a very long time. I hope this will make money for me, but I doubt it will.
This board cracks me up. Seriously, do you read some of this stuff?
Black Ops, mega contracts in two weeks, Lockheed Martin wants us, the Russians are coming, my cousin's brother-in-law reporting from Mexico City with a mighty wireless signal,etc.......
Well I hope that's because you have huge piles of cash and can afford to lose some of it or your bal_s are a lot bigger than mine or your just doing your job.
Must be his expertise in the baloon field. The dealerships here have them all over the place
Well, it has been years since then hasn't it?
Honestly, I thought Bob Jones and the team he put together is better and more legitimate than Mr. Zeplin and his students over there. Of course I only base this on the fact that he was from our military and Nasa, for whatever that's worth.
I agree, "nuts" as you say. That is why I posed the question to him: If he can't believe why this issue should not be in the .20s then he should easily explain why, in lieu of all the negatives with the company.
my mistake. But what bias do you think I have?
But I will tell you my position:
I believe that this is a penny stock trading where it is because the market dictates this. I think it is an extreme long shot that this company will not fail. This is under the very risky portion of my portfolio. In the line of work I'm in I know many financial planners of different ideologies, everyone I asked their opinion of said don't touch this unless your willing to lose your money. Four years ago I was intoduced to a penny stock promoter, who posts here, knew of the company very well and flat out told me that Huff was going to jail.
I guess you can call it a bias, but I bet any rational person would beleive that it is a truthfull summary of this investment.
That would still be a 100% gain. So I hope he could elaborate why he can't believe it not in the .20s
Then you should be able to explain why it should be in the $20s.
I'm looking for information to give me the courage to invest more.
There have been no segmented airships sold.
did the conference end?
"proven so effective"? What have I missed?