Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
TOP INSTITUTIONAL & MUTUAL FUND HOLDERS
There have been a few updates and I'll get the spreadsheet updated when I have a little time , along with the Wells Production spreadsheet.
It looks like the net change in the Inst. & Mut. Fund Holders is relatively minor.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=TIV
jonesie
lesnshawn , personalizit , from what I can see ....
.... that rumor (news?) about NeoMedia and Hutchison Whampoa was put on two blogs around the same time. I posted some 'timeline' info the other day trying to figure out who posted it first.
There has been no further clarification on source and/or what if anything is on that Chinese website that connects Whampoa with Neomedia.
On July 14 I emailed a question to the Neomedia Contact name in Neomedia PRs , asking for clarification regarding what seems to be either an unorthodox method of 'news' dissemination .... or what could appear to be the blogging of a rumor disguised as actual news. No clarifications forthcoming.
jonesie
It is indeed difficult to know what TIV gets ....
.... for a barrel of Zaca tar crude.
It's confusing enough when it comes to what they say they get for oil coming out of the Temblor , Edison , etc wells.
Remember the below from earlier this year? In TIV's annual report for 2007 they stated they sold barrels of oil for an annual average well below (~20% below) what one might expect by looking at industry-published prices.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=29269273
================================================
Operating Results cont'd
Specifically , TIV's Oil and Gas Sales Prices
From the 2007 10-K:
Average Sales Price
2007 2006
Gas(MCF) Oil(BBL) Gas(MCF) Oil(BBL)
$7.15 $58.23 $6.45 $57.10
Closed AT the HOD!
100,000+ shares
Up 8 1/2%
The way it started trading earlier today I thought some upcoming news had leaked out again!
jonesie
LOL , you're entirely welcome!
Y'all come back now , ya heah?
jonesie
p.s. 'you guys' , hmmmm. Little ol' me might not qualify as 'you guys' , and I never said there was any fraudulent activity to begin with , so you didn't really "get somewhere". But thanks for playing along at home!
Nice , trading much close to the HOD ....
.... than the LOD.
$7's it is!
jonesie
It is absolutely what I would term "inside info".
Has NIR ever done it the way Yorkville has done it? I've posted a 'Network Connections' graphic on the YA board showing 10 YA clients, most of whom have had , at one time or another , a Yorkville designee on their BOD or hired as a 'turnaround expert' consultant. The same person. (Along with myriad other common persons involved with the companies , no less than seven people who have all had interchangeable roles in various companies amongst the 10.)
Anyway , while the common shareholder only sees what's in PRs and other publicly available information .... the entity which in some cases ends up being the largest shareholder of some of these companies knows absolutely everything that is going on behind the scenes ... or not going on.
Anything illegal going on? Far be it from me to know or say. Situation fraught with opportunity for such? Certainly.
NIR ever have such a person , their 'man on the ground' as it were , involved with more than one of their clients?
jonesie
p.s. Hedgeman , "worked up"? LOL , hardly. Like I said , I am enjoying watching you tilt at windmills.
Are you talking to me?
I didn't set this board up.
But I am enjoying watching you express your concerns over what this discussion board should or should not be doing .... in your opinion.
If you want everyone to adhere to your opinion of what you think they should do .... become a dictator in a third-world country! Hire somebody so you can be their boss! Buy IHUB!
Have a great day!
jonesie
Nice little 'low' volume pop this morning ...
... which puts us back in the trading range we saw in February.
$7'ish beats $6'ish!
jonesie
Version? That's no 'version'
Those are just the facts ma'am.
cashing his paychecks every week (Ok, I admit, I DID make an assumption there)
taking his options (per SEC filings)
traveling around the world with no visible benefit to NeoMedia (per his appearances at various shows and meetings etc around the globe which produced no visible benefit , i.e., revenues)
sitting there in a CC listening to GO say an equity investor was 90 days away (We all heard that and it's recorded for posterity)
hiring a $30,000 per month CFO who did nothing but SEC filings supporting their dilution addiction and salaries-for-nothing addiction (per SEC filings)
awarding himself every performance bonus he could get his hands on whether there was any performance or not (per SEC filings)
waltzing off into the sunset with a nice exit package (per SEC filings)
jonesie
Plenty of other 'theories' proposed lol
Yet the facts visible to the investing public say all that CH had his hands in was the NeoMedia Honeypot ....
.... cashing his paychecks every week , taking his options , traveling around the world with no visible benefit to NeoMedia , sitting there in a CC listening to GO say an equity investor was 90 days away , hiring a $30,000 per month CFO who did nothing but SEC filings supporting their dilution addiction and salaries-for-nothing addiction , awarding himself every performance bonus he could get his hands on whether there was any performance or not , and waltzing off into the sunset with a nice exit package.
There's no 'shield of secrecy'. Nothing productive was done. Nada. Zilch. That's why he's not there now. That's what the facts indicate.
jonesie
Someone at NeoMedia told Bena Roberts ...
... that Neomedia is a startup company.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=30194724
From Bena's blog:
4/1/08
"I overheard a conversation at Showstoppers last night and the same questions were thrown at NeoMedia that even I asked about eight months ago. I felt like shouting at the guy and saying move on! I didn’t and nor did the Neom people at the show. They were focused and calm and said, we are a start-up in mobile barcodes vying to get a lead in the market."
http://www.gomonews.com/ctia-showstoppers-neomedia-is-a-start-up/
Since we have reason to believe ....
.... that Iain's going to be based in Scotland and NOT at Atlanta HQ , wouldn't it be logical that he will most always be 'out of the office'?
NeoMedia could respond to the USPTO's ....
.... non-final action nearly immediately.
"OK, NEOM's attorney, the CEO and consultants have probably been working on the claims for 6 months also. They probably were close to completing their position on the claims, before, the PTO agent submitted the non-final 95 claim position."
Of course they were, and are already close to completion , because as you said before
"I am reasonably certain that CH is in ongoing communication with the examiner".
Maybe he was getting bad vibes from that ongoing communication.
Maybe he got everybody started on completing their position.
Maybe, maybe, maybe.
Maybe we won't get a PR just yet because NeoMedia will respond to the USPTO, not in the foot-dragging allowed 60 days , but ... next week!
;)
jonesie
p.s. It does seem a little unfair that months and months ago NeoMedia didn't immediately tell the USPTO they would NOT be responding to the granting of the re-exam. Did they just let the 60-day clock run down and waste two months? It seems like we could have gotten NEOM's response to 95 claims being rejected right now , instead of waiting until September.
Excellent post bleedingedge, thank you.
And thank you for the links showing perfectly reasonable yet agressive verbiage on the part of Tessera management. Tessera's shareholders must have been happy to hear the company address the situation head on.
Perhaps when Neomedia execs and transition-period consultants finish reporting their options holdings to the SEC , they will move on to what is obviously their Number 2 or Number 3 priority and PR something similarly informative after consulting with our heavy-hitter patent attorneys.
jonesie
Thanks success.
Seems that's about all these guys do any more.
File 8-K's detailing the latest payday loans from YAGI.
Submit filings showing us how many options they have or are going to have.
Cash their paychecks.
Perhaps one day one of them will do something productive for common shareholders!
regards,
jonesie
Yeah, I don't really understand what the 'beef' is ....
.... if there are a few of us out here who choose to spend some time providing informational background and analysis of facts , who could possibly have a problem with that?
Anyone so inclined can always look into starting an IHUB discussion forum with the purpose of promoting/evangelizing N/I/R and the CEO's who partake of their toxic nectar.
I think before I started going around (if IHUB allowed it) attacking people for posting facts and opinions , I might consider taking some time to confront some of the organized gangs of stock pumpers that ALSO get involved in a lot of these toxic-financed stocks. However I think it's simply more civil to post facts and opinions and allow the reader to determine whether or not he agrees.
IMO it is NO accident that in my Yorkville Table A there is so much GREEN in the first 8 weeks following the initial financing of so many of these companies ... just before the serious RED begins.
JMO
jonesie
Can we do it again?
Per that 'Trades' window on NEOM here in IHUB , so far today the buy volume is roughly 2 to 1 ahead of the sell volume.
You're welcome.
geoscience posted what is the correct answer to that question right after I sent the email to DOGGR. So DOGGR's response was merely corroboration.
re: 'permitted more wells at Moffat' I think Geo has the answer to that as well:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=30815681
"TIV must first go thru the time intensive process of permitting wells/production facilities thru Ventura County (one of the worst counties in CA), which can take many months, and then get a permit from the DOG."
jonesie
gumshoe, re: "I just forwarded your question to DOGGR. I'll let you know when I hear back."
I just received the answer to your question from DOGGR ... the answer is YES, a company does have to make a public notice to drill even if it involves a confidential field.
I think we kinda figured that was the case , since we've seen that 'c' designation next to some permits in the past. At least this clarifies that it's not an optional thing for a company.
jonesie
Bena is really digging for NeoMedia ....
.... (Yorkville?) on this patent thing.
Offering comfort and solace and calling lawyers in that effort. Amazing.
Background as we know it:
"my head is spinning after getting horrendously lost in my car with Yorkville Advisors Managing Director Paul Strzelecki"
"Last, but by no means least, we have Michael Nowak, Paul Strzelecki and Terry Griffin shameless trying to plug NeoMedia"
Q: "(Bena):Who owns the patents on Barcodes?
Answer:(Strzelecki): Neomedia."
"so I phoned Yorkville Advisors last minute asked if they had time for me for an overview .... They did and I had a couple of drinks (ended up at a private members only Boat club in swanky Mayfair) called The Royal Ocean Racing Club. .... So this time, I didn’t get dinner, but I did have a lovely few hours with Yorkville’s MD Paul Strzelecki."
"I met Brian Kinane from Yorkville Advisors for drinks last week."
http://www.gomonews.com/?s=kinane
http://www.gomonews.com/?s=Strzelecki
Now if YA would just wine and dine someone who could buy NEOM stock , or buy NEOM ..... for $200MM.
(I'm going to need a bigger Network Graphic , now I need room for Bena on it lol)
jonesie
"Does anyone know if the 2058 BOED's they quoted in the June PR are 100% TIV "owned" BOED's, or gross amounts produced (but not necessarily sold?)?"
I would assume that since OPUS does not report their 'portion' of TIV's production to DOGGR , and since DOGGR wants to know the total production from each producing well ... and since DOGGR doesn't care how TIV splits up the sales revenues with other parties ... the amounts published on DOGGR are 'gross amounts produced'.
JMO
jonesie
I hope so gumshoe! It would be nice to know.
There are a few factors which may still make it difficult for us to figure that out, even when the 2Q08 10-Q is filed.
- Info provided will most likely be in dollars , not bbl or mcf. From that we would have to divide the dollars by the price per bbl or mcf, but if the dollars aren't detailed as to what's oil and what's gas, even that is hard to do.
- We never know until an annual report is published exactly what TIV gets for its oil and gas. One thing I DO remember is that the avg. price for oil/gas that TIV stated they received in 2007 was a lot less than might have been assumed based on generally published prices for oil and gas. So there again, it will be difficult to convert dollars into bbls and mcfs.
- TIV has in the past lumped revenues from the sale of equipment into the revenues which include revenues from oil and gas. I believe we talked about that after the last quarterly filing. TIV put out a PR regarding the sale of some rigs around the end of June, which would be in the 2nd quarter. Without some detail as to how much those rigs sold for, and if TIV combines that into oil/gas revenues again, it will again be difficult to interpolate what the oil/gas production was in 2Q08.
And so it goes.
JMO
jonesie
"This non final position presented by the PTO agent is the proper format"
Wouldn't it have been great if Anjan Deb had issued a non-final action saying he saw no connection between any prior art and NEOM's patents. There is an option in the uspto process for him to have said "All Claims Found Patentable".
Or perhaps at that point , since NEOM preempted any further EFF participation by not making a "Patent Owner's Reply" to the USPTO's allowing of the re-exam to go forward ... it would have been a final action?
Oh well, but that didn't happen, so we are where we are.
"I hope this is clearly understood by you and others. If you do not understand anything else - understand that the PTO is not responsible for defending NEOM's patents."
Yup , I think everyone understands that. Still ... it would have been great if the uspto had ruled in our favor ... since it was all about our 'rock-solid' patents. This would all be over now.
JMO
jonesie
What did you differ with in my post? (edited)
My post was an accurate portrayal of the events leading up to the current point in the reexamination.
(edited) I do agree that by not filing a response earlier , Neomedia did preempt the EFF being part of the process from that point forward. That was a good thing.
But which part of my post did you disagree with?
jonesie
Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964
"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"
I have to agree with BSWB ...
... and I don't really think anyone who talks about these toxic financings is saying it's N/I/R's "fault" or Yorkville's "fault" , unless there is additional behind-the-scenes shorting going on.
"it would be better that many of these scams be forced to go bankrupt"
Agreed. But I don't think there's anyway to force that lol, it's America and anyone can start a business, run a business, and get any kind of financing they want to including hocking the company copy machine (or IP or all other assets) at a pawn shop , and anyone with the know-how and financial wherewithal can start a business which finances these struggling companies.
Thanks for pointing out Sargent's 'findings' , do you have a link to any documentation they provided on that or did they just report their general findings? In other words, did he provide anything like a summary of exhaustive research like I did in my iBox here? #board-9964
"This boards purpose is to enlighten those who care to take the time and learn the tactics of these predatory lenders."
BSWB nails it with that statement. That's also the point of the info provided in the iBox of the board linked to in my signature , the point being to illustrate/discuss the nearly total destruction of shareholder value after these financings ... which most likely has as much or more to do with bad business models and bad management as it does with the financing terms these bad models and execs are able to secure.
"main issue is with the CEO's of the public companies taking this kind of financing"
Of course.
In a discussion forum of this nature we may take the occasional conversational 'shortcuts' which make it sound like N/I/R or Yorkville are the issue , when in reality the issue is to show any interested readers what happens to shareholder value while company execs pay themselves handsomely via these financings with the complicity of BOD members.
"no one is forcing investors to buy stocks of these tiny companies"
Agreed. And no one here is forcing them not to.
Between just the N/I/R board and the Cornell/Yorkville board there are nearly 180 board-marking readers , of whom many say they have benefited from the information provided which has perhaps enabled them to make more educated selections amongst the thousands of otcbb/pinky companies out there.
That's my "agenda" , and I think it's also the "agenda" of BSWB and others who have similar educational boards out there.
Hopefully it's not too much of a stretch to entertain the possibility that there are at least a few of 'us' who seek only to educate and inform in an effort to help fellow investor/traders lose less money in the stock market by possibly avoiding the uphill and nearly un-winnable battle against toxic death spiral financings.
JMO and best of luck to you in the stock market , or with a hedge fund , or whatever your endeavors may be.
jonesie
The EFF didn't disallow them.
The EFF simply made the request for re-examination.
And along with that request they provided documented information regarding what they believed to be prior art which might have caused some or all of NeoMedia's 95 claims in the subject patent to be rejected.
So far , the USPTO has agreed since they did in fact reject all 95 claims in a non-final action. They did so in a 78-page document detailing the connections between prior art and NEOM's claims.
I guess one perhaps silly analogy would be ... a field referee (USPTO) made his best call at the time of the play (awarding NEOM that patent). Then someone on the team the call went against (EFF & their backers, whoever they may be, if any) requested a review by video replay , and they even provided a view of the play from a camera they held on the sidelines.
The field ref. has been overruled by the replay-review judge (Anjan Deb) who has made a preliminary reversal of the field ref's earlier call.
Now Team NEOM has the opportunity to see if the camera THEY held on the sidelines was (1) working and (2) if it was working , see if it taped anything helpful and (3) if so , hope the replay-review judge looks at that camera's view and reverses the reversal.
LOL
jonesie
Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964
"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"
re: where we are in the patent re-exam process
krays posted an excellent link after we found the USPTO's preliminary determination rejecting the 95 claims.
We're at the "patent owner response after non-final action" point in the process. Neomedia has various options for their response including narrowing or otherwise modifying some or all of the claims. An 'appeal' would come after a final action.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=30546594
jonesie
There are a lot of public companies out there ....
.... which shouldn't be public and have access to public funding. Even if they were at one time viable as an otcbb-traded company , when they are no longer viable , that should be that.
There certainly shouldn't be any such thing as a 'pink sheet' stock. That's nothing more than one additional license for Market Makers to make money and for company 'executives' to dump shares on the market for their own personal gain , with absolutely no reporting requirements.
Either be a fully reporting company , or be de-listed.
jonesie
That's a good observation al44 ....
.... terms will most likely get worse.
Have you ever done an IHUB search for posts containing ALL of the words
loyal shareholders
???
I wonder who the first person was who attached that phrase to otcbb and pinky stocks? lol
jonesie
Good gosh yes they are required to do that.
DOGGR might grant them requested confidentiality for the reasons stated on their website , but that doesn't mean the SEC is going to allow a publicly traded company to slack off on being 'fully reporting' in their required SEC filings.
jonesie
I thought Yorkville's terms were 'rough' ....
but then they could be worse.
From the N/I/R board
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=11792
comes this financing by one of Corey Ribotsky's companies:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/861058/000101968708003100/0001019687-08-003100-index.htm
and I excerpted the below
(I never saw a 50% discount before , and while I'm used to seeing Yorkville's 20% conversion discounts on a 10-day VWAP , a 50% discount on the average of the 3 lowest intraday trading prices in the 20 days preceding a conversion is amazing to say the least. Wow.
"1.2 CONVERSION PRICE.
(A) CALCULATION OF CONVERSION PRICE. The Conversion Price shall be the
Variable Conversion Price (as defined herein) (subject, in each case, to
equitable adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends or rights offerings by
the Borrower relating to the Borrower's securities or the securities of any
subsidiary of the Borrower, combinations, recapitalization, reclassifications,
extraordinary distributions and similar events). The "VARIABLE CONVERSION PRICE"
shall mean the Applicable Percentage (as defined herein) multiplied by the
Market Price (as defined herein). "MARKET PRICE" means the average of the lowest
three (3) Trading Prices (as defined below) for the Common Stock during the
twenty (20) Trading Day period ending one Trading Day prior to the date the
Conversion Notice is sent by the Holder to THE Borrower via facsimile (the
"CONVERSION DATE"). "TRADING PRICE" means, for any security as of any date, the
intraday trading price on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (the "OTCBB") as
reported by a reliable reporting service ("REPORTING SERVICE") mutually
acceptable to Borrower and Holder and hereafter designated by Holders of a
majority in interest of the Notes and the Borrower or, if the OTCBB IS not the
principal trading market for such security, the intraday trading price OF such
security on the principal securities exchange or trading market where such
security is listed or traded or, if no intraday trading price of such security
is available in any of the foregoing manners, the average of the intraday
trading prices of any market makers for such security that are listed in the
"pink sheets" by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc. If the Trading Price cannot
be calculated for such security on such date in the manner provided above, the
Trading Price shall be the fair market value AS mutually determined by the
Borrower and the holders of a majority in interest of the Notes being converted
for which the calculation of the Trading Price is required in order to determine
the Conversion Price of such Notes. "TRADING DAY" shall mean any day on which
the Common Stock is traded for any period on the OTCBB, or on the principal
securities exchange or other securities market on which the Common Stock is then
being traded. "APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE" SHALL mean 50%."
Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964
"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"
al44 , thank you very much
There have been a lot of contributors to this board/effort.
I need to get busy updating some things lol , but hopefully the general 'point' is visible and valid.
A board which keeps track of another toxic financier is shown in my next post , along with a financing the likes of which I've never personally seen before.
jonesie
I never saw a 50% discount before ....
.... and while I'm used to seeing Yorkville's 20% discounts on 10-day VWAP , I haven't seen a 50% discount on the average of the 3 lowest intraday trading prices in the 20 days preceding a conversion. Wow.
"1.2 CONVERSION PRICE.
(A) CALCULATION OF CONVERSION PRICE. The Conversion Price shall be the
Variable Conversion Price (as defined herein) (subject, in each case, to
equitable adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends or rights offerings by
the Borrower relating to the Borrower's securities or the securities of any
subsidiary of the Borrower, combinations, recapitalization, reclassifications,
extraordinary distributions and similar events). The "VARIABLE CONVERSION PRICE"
shall mean the Applicable Percentage (as defined herein) multiplied by the
Market Price (as defined herein). "MARKET PRICE" means the average of the lowest
three (3) Trading Prices (as defined below) for the Common Stock during the
twenty (20) Trading Day period ending one Trading Day prior to the date the
Conversion Notice is sent by the Holder to THE Borrower via facsimile (the
"CONVERSION DATE"). "TRADING PRICE" means, for any security as of any date, the
intraday trading price on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (the "OTCBB") as
reported by a reliable reporting service ("REPORTING SERVICE") mutually
acceptable to Borrower and Holder and hereafter designated by Holders of a
majority in interest of the Notes and the Borrower or, if the OTCBB IS not the
principal trading market for such security, the intraday trading price OF such
security on the principal securities exchange or trading market where such
security is listed or traded or, if no intraday trading price of such security
is available in any of the foregoing manners, the average of the intraday
trading prices of any market makers for such security that are listed in the
"pink sheets" by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc. If the Trading Price cannot
be calculated for such security on such date in the manner provided above, the
Trading Price shall be the fair market value AS mutually determined by the
Borrower and the holders of a majority in interest of the Notes being converted
for which the calculation of the Trading Price is required in order to determine
the Conversion Price of such Notes. "TRADING DAY" shall mean any day on which
the Common Stock is traded for any period on the OTCBB, or on the principal
securities exchange or other securities market on which the Common Stock is then
being traded. "APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE" SHALL mean 50%."
I would think they have that control, Howard
http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dog/faqs/Pages/Index.aspx
8. Why are some wells confidential and how and when can I get copies of the well data?
Most well records in California are open to public inspection. However, wells that meet certain criteria may be kept in confidential status. The records (including monthly production/injection reports) for confidential wells are not open for public inspection. To be considered for confidential status, a well must be classified as an exploratory well, or there must be extenuating circumstances (defined in regulation as conditions beyond the control of the operator, preventing the operator from utilizing the competitive advantage from the information obtained from a well). Extenuating circumstances include, but are not limited to active competitive leasing or mineral rights sales in the immediate vicinity of the well; governmental or judicial action delaying oil, gas, or geothermal development; natural disasters; or scarcity of materials and equipment. Onshore wells are granted confidentiality for a two-year period, and offshore wells are granted confidentiality for a five-year period (with the possibility of extensions).
I don't know gumshoe , but ....
.... I just forwarded your question to DOGGR. I'll let you know when I hear back.
jonesie
You would think.
I suppose in the next 10-Q (mid-August? Coinciding with the promised CC?) we'll be treated to a recap of what all YAGI converted and sold in 2Q08.
We won't know how much they are dumping on our heads right now until the 3Q08 10-Q comes out sometime in November.
jonesie
I hope they turn out to be 'cheap'!!
At least for every sell , even if it's at the bid , and even if the single largest trade of the day was at the low of the day .... there's a corresponding buy.
So ... who's buying?
I wonder if our ever-friendly market makers end up net short after the rumor-fueled runs to between .004 - .0049 - .0053 , when retails are 'buying on the rumor' and the MM's back off just a bit to let the PPS float up a little bit.
Then the MM's are the ones buying to cover their net short position down here.
It's amazing to see , even in this slight little uptrend we've been in for over a month now ... there's more volume whacking the bid than hitting the ask. That's what makes the Acc/Dis line so negatively sloped , and what keeps CMF in such decidedly bearish territory.
Money has been flowing out of the stock for over 4 months now.
JMO
jonesie
p.s. If an earlier trade 'reports' after hours , it's not coded as a Form T trade. That trade did in fact occur after 4 pm. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/formt.asp
"In the Quote and Summary windows, Form-T trade volumes will update, but, because of NASD requirements, session-specific information such as Last and OHLC (Open High Low Close) will not change. There will be a color flash with each update. Form-T prices appear on charts and also in the Quote window if the Quote
window has been set up to include the Form-T session change,% Change, and Last/Form-T fields."
http://209.85.215.104/search?q=cache:uP64Fbmbnw4J:www.esignal-central.com/university/esignal/manual/ch14.pdf+%22form+t+trade%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=6&gl=us&client=firefox-a
Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964
"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"