![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Monday, July 21, 2008 8:33:25 AM
Wouldn't it have been great if Anjan Deb had issued a non-final action saying he saw no connection between any prior art and NEOM's patents. There is an option in the uspto process for him to have said "All Claims Found Patentable".
Or perhaps at that point , since NEOM preempted any further EFF participation by not making a "Patent Owner's Reply" to the USPTO's allowing of the re-exam to go forward ... it would have been a final action?
Oh well, but that didn't happen, so we are where we are.
"I hope this is clearly understood by you and others. If you do not understand anything else - understand that the PTO is not responsible for defending NEOM's patents."
Yup , I think everyone understands that. Still ... it would have been great if the uspto had ruled in our favor ... since it was all about our 'rock-solid' patents. This would all be over now.
JMO
jonesie
Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964
"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Innovative Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Texas, USA • Jul 29, 2024 9:07 AM
INDEXR AI Merges With Moon Equity Holdings Corp. (MONI), Creating a Leading-edge Technology Company • MONI • Jul 29, 2024 9:59 AM
BNCM AND DELEX UNVEIL POST-MERGER MANAGEMENT PLANS • BNCM • Jul 29, 2024 9:00 AM
Glidelogic Corp. Announces Revolutionary AI-Generated Content Copyright Protection Solution • GDLG • Jul 26, 2024 12:30 PM
Southern Silver Files NI43-101 Technical Report for its Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Las Minitas Project • SSV • Jul 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM