Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
OIC, you are not yet a member of the 'off-shore' group. Thought that you might be...my bad.
Ohhh...my friend - it will most definitely happen, and happen soon!
"That's why we're rooting for the "uplist" that'll never happen."
You must fall into the "some short issues" part of my PM with someone else.
scion, all of us here have been around the block a time or two...as I just posted to a comrade in a PM:
I am just trying to get them to start buying - I honestly believe that they know now that this is not a scam company, and that several of them may be waist-deep in some short issues here.
Full disclosure...FWIW
I would venture to say that your bell was set to the 'speculative, non-technical level of detection'? Gotta' think out of the box on this one. Not trying to put anyone down here - just think that we can do this company better by falling in line behind the truth - not the untrue negativism! ~IMHO
That would like..."RING A LOUD FU-KIN BELL" - don't ya think?
I hope that it was the new F-Vodka - only available from select duty-free stores for now.
LOL...nice invention to say the least!
Nice pick-up! Got your back at 4.6!
I can understand and appreciate that trading style! Heck, I used to do that myself. GLTUA
Not to mention the 'snot-sucking' tissue!
Don't get me started on that shiatch! It should most definitely be an abomination (pun intended)!
Maybe I can qualify for this board:
#board-2700
One only loses once they actually sell for a lose. Your post would conjure up the theorist conception that a potential loss is indeed a loss. That would rather seem to be a bit of negativism I might add. Am I reading this right?
"The saddest thing for me is the MASSIVE LOSS from when it was up over $7"
Hmmmm.....
One could surmise that there may indeed be several cult factors to this rather complex equation...
Maybe you didn't read back far enough...
...#msg-48245027
LOL! Very valid point slojab!
"Is there a rule that says we can't discuss a stock until after it's completed the entire P and D cycle? "
That "D" part of the cycle will come at a much further distance away from here! ~IMO
I will never make less than 200% average here!
If that was the first posting of any reference to TRTN, then certainly you realize that the posting was a negative slant that was brought by an individual that initially thought it to be a scam.
The "good" ones only get 4 hours before indefinite parole. Damn! I wished that I was a good one!
[edit]
I believe it may have been up to 16 hours. My bad!
I highly doubt that the TRTN Board brought it over here, but that would actually take too much time to go back and review who said what first...it all begins to sound like blah, blah, blah after a few months of around the clock action anyways!
LOL...
So it's just a pump and climb I guess. That's ok with me.
I actually like duck, and where I am it is cheaper than Turkey in the local market - go figure.
It is true that I have been in since last October, and I actually did try to get in on the PIPE; however, I went about it in an unbeknown to me and inappropriate manner and had to buy back in just before the left-off in early December - it could be said that I started an uptick catalyst as I had to increase my ASK to 1.39 just to get the rest of my order filled. Have added up to 6.1 and will continue to add as I am financially able to do so.
I must disagree on your assessment of it being a 'classic', as not too many classics end up where this one is going.
Can we just agree to disagree on this one and leave it at that? I really would hate to resurrect the past...
...heck, let's face end, the only reason that I would post on this board would be to defend my position against those that would rather it be a scam, instead of the wonderful thing that it will be. I honestly believe that you all see this one as that 'diamond in the rough' that others have affectionately labeled it to be! ~IMO
It won't be breaking that 4.6 mark until I get the rest of my 3000 shares (didn't want you to get your hopes up too soon).
IMO, worth a re-post:
Posted by: Rikkitik Member Level Date: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:05:34 PM
In reply to: laurap who wrote msg# 32295 Post # of 34134
We may all want to consider the possibilities of a lil ole' site in NY somewhere...
"Well, in a perfect world we'd have a half dozen P2O processors permitted at our blending site so that we can make fuels for direct customer sales. I am excited about this site because it was not simply used just for distribution. It was used to blend gasoline and many other fuels and has a lab to self test and certify the fuel. Timing of full operation this site will depend on how quickly we can obtain permits to install P2O processors."
~John Bordynuik (2010)
That is one of the most honest and intuitive posts that I have read SteveF.
"The medical waste angle is actually a good one that I should have seen coming. Hospitals pay big bucks to have that stuff hauled off and incinerated, etc..."
JBI, Inc. will be able to save the health care industry millions of dollars by taking the hazardous plastic waste for a substantially reduced cost to the health care industry.
The current disposal methods of incineration and/or landfill are extremely expensive:
Medical Waste Disposal
Hospitals in the United States generate approximately 4.5 million tons of medical waste each year. About 15% of this waste is considered infectious waste. Incineration of medical waste, as with any waste, has the
advantage of being able to dramatically reduce the volume of the waste. Disadvantages of incineration include its high costs and potential pollution hazards.
In the primary combustion chamber, waste is dried, heated, and burned in the presence of about 80% of the stoichiometric oxygen (oxygen needed for complete combustion). The combustion gases produced in the primary chamber proceed to the secondary chamber. In the secondary chamber, the gases are mixed with excess oxygen and their combustion is completed. Temperatures are controlled by air input and can range from 1,400 to 2,000 0F. Surprisingly, these incinerators release only 1.4 pounds of particulate matter for every ton of waste combusted. The concerns raised in medical waste incineration revolve around the chemicals released from combusting plastics. Chemicals know commonly as dioxins and furans result from this combustion and are of course dangerous. The EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) reports that 20% of medical waste is plastic. I suspect that that estimate is very low. All things considered, incineration of this type is not a bad solution, but there are better ones.
A hospital in Pennsylvania burned their waste in a chamber with coal and limestone at 1,600 0F. The coal and limestone are good absorbing agents for many of the formed particulates. At the same time, the hospital is burning its waste, it's also producing energy (heat) that it can use. This is a key advantage over sending the waste offsite....if the capital spending can be justified.
Other methods of medical waste disposal continue to be explored. The problems associated with medical waste disposal are not as large as they sound. Overall, there are many larger problems facing the world, but don't be surprised if a chemical engineer helps to solve this one.
http://www.cheresources.com/medwastezz.shtml
Incorrect ole' wise one...
...the same questions/false accusations keep surfacing even after months of being discussed/refuted (it got real old, real quick). Most the answers are easily found if someone is willing to do just a little bit of DD.
"I believe they have a "Call The The Company" patrol to repeat the phrase whenever someone asks a question which might be too embarrassing to answer."
That little invention will certainly come in handy for some of those naysayers out there:
"I just invented a tissue with no patents that absorbs the snot into usable energy."
Congrats - see previous post...
A brief moment of sanity while he was tucked away. Thanks for the update!
Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy!
As you say...I am still somewhat skeptical though...
While we are theorizing, if you were the bank employee that he told the error to what would you do?
All he had to do was demonstrate his theorized hack to a bank employee instead of taking the money back after-the-fact.
Sorry, thought that you were seeking some clarification of her postings...
...and posts some clarification of that, and a few other things that slipped out in the heat of the posting...
She has pm capability, so you can ask directly for any clarification required. I for one have been.
What would the Siamese twin be doing then?
Buckey would probally just dangle his participle in her direction.
We all need to try and concentrate 'out of the box' on this one and live "happily ever-after"...
I would ascertain that at least the following listed countries would be interested in a P2O JV, as plastics is a major problem in that Continent:
ALGERIA
Mr Mustapha HANIFI
Ministry of Energy and Mines
TOUR A, VAL D’HYDRA
ALGER
GABON
Mrs Marie Christine NGANGHA
Ministry of Mines, Energy, Petroleum and Water Resources
BP 874, Libreville
ANGOLA
M. Estêvão PEDRO
Ministry of Petroleum,
Avenida 4 de Fevereiro 105
BP 1279, Luanda
EQUATORIAL GUINEA
Mr Vincente ABESO MBUY
Ministry of Mines, Industry & Energy,
C/12 de Octubre, Malabo, Bioko-Norte, BP 778 ou 844,
BENIN
Mr Anselme AGBAHOUNDO
Ministry of Mines, Energy & Water
06 BP 2049, Cotonou
LIBYA (GSPLAJ)
Mr Ismail N. SEDDIGH
Secretariat of the General People’s Committee for Energy
P.O. Box 2655, Tripoli
CAMEROON
Mr Jean-Jacques KOUM
Société Nationale des Hydrocarbures (SNH)
BP 955, Yaoundé
MAURITANIE
CONGO
Mr Jean Pierre GOMA
Ministry of Hydrocarbons,
BP. 2120, Brazzaville
NIGERIA
Mrs E.B.P Emuren
Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum
PMB 449, Abuja
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO
Mr BAFALA ITUMBELA José
La Congolaise des Hydrocarbures (COHYDRO)
1, Avenue Comité Urbain,
BP 7617 Kinshasa, Gombe
SOUTH AFRICA
Ms. Elizabeth MARABWA
Department of Minerals & Energy,
Private BAG X59, Pretoria 0001
COTE D’IVOIRE
Mr Gilbert KOUASSI BANDAMA
Direction of Hydrocarbons
01 BP V42, 01 Abidjan
SUDAN
EGYPT
Mr Abdallah GHORAB
Ministry of Petroleum
P.O. Box 2130, Cairo
TCHAD
Mr Mahamat GADAM GADAYA
Ministry of Petroleum
BP 94, N’Djamena
© APPA 2007
I am thinking that there will be solid handshakes that will amount to an abundance of JV's agreed upon, but 'caution to the wind' is recommended.
Are they still missing in action? What a hoot!