Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Please send this to Stevey ....
To what ends ?
INteresting READ ...SUpreme COnflict .... about the battle to control the supreme court
Thats why we entrench the term "ENHANCED STATIN" with every doc every article every news outlet
ie we get a competent marketing team put together ...
Capt Beer - can Amplify the last several quarters ? Current graph makes it look like V hardly being touched when in reality its getting flogged
If legal avenues fail Get rid of vascepa
Launch Vastor
Vastor A-10
Vastor A-20
Vastor A-40
Vastor A-80
Vastor R-5
Vastor R-10
Vastor R-20
Vastor R-40
Vascepa with two of the most used statins atorvastatin and rosuvastatin
only possible use is REDUCE IT indications there can be no legal infringement - price the same as the generic put the statin in free -
SO easy to advertise
'Enhanced statins'
Docs will write it so easy to niche
DOnt even mention fish oil
Capture the whole damn market and be done with it
Supply doesn't appear to be much of an issue ....
DOnt know if anyone posted this before but just more evidence
Greater Change in the Eicosapentaenoic Acid to Arachidonic Acid Ratio Is Associated With Decreased Incidence of Cardiovascular Events in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients With Elevated Triglyceride Levels
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/circj/advpub/0/advpub_CJ-20-1312/_article/-char/ja/
To me 'insights' mean ...it didnt really work out but we learned a few things ...
Its very very sick... and since AMRN is so quirky the paradoxical world of quantum mechanics fits it well - AMRN being what it is - when the box is opened on Monday there is a good possibility that we will not be able to tell whether this cat is alive or dead - furthermore seeing that a cat has nine lives whether the cat is dead or alive may not solve our riddle ...
Schrodinger's cat got sea sick from the wave equation and vomited all over the inside of the box
WEll did the SC swoop down and lift AMRN on high ?
Excellent summary LM for us nonlegal folk Thanks !!
well MArzan we can only hope you are correct ! If you are my hat is off to you !! What time do the good justices cease working ? ie whats the latest this decision would be made today
FFS see below
What part of
I'm in at $4's
ralphey Thursday, 09/10/20 09:54:47 AM
Re: None 0
Post #
298004
of 343647
Thero needs to eat a lil humble pie and contact the CEO's of several BP companies and request instruction on how to handle this situation - he needs a mentor now more than ever but does not recognize such. My guess is BP is not even aware of most of what has happened and many CEO's of BP would offer him some guidance. I'm in at $4'S
Nope bought at $4 rode to I think we $8 or $9 and rode back down to where we are today struggled with selling at $8 and wish I would have - did not follow my own rules bulls win pigs dont
You are not making any sense I am on record indicating I rebought at $4.xx I still hold those stocks ...
Once again I bought at $1.xx sold at $3.xx (average - some lots low $4.xx) - AFTER REDUCE IT hopped back in at $4.xx and hold those shares - have well explained my goal is to double my money within several years which if any investor can do they are way ahead of the game. I tripled my money pre - REDUCE it did not think REDUCE IT would be a success so got out now am back in at $4.xx hoping to onCe again double or triple my money in under five years
Now I know doubling or tripling your money in 4-5 years is nothing like that stock you have that is going uP 2000% but hey we all cant be successful day traders ...
Please show me where I stated I sold at $4.xx. i BOUGHT AT $1.xx sold at $3.xx and rebought at $4.xx which I still hold
I dont know why he thinks buying at $4.xx was high ?
Of course - if that wasnt the case then why do SC nominations split down party lines ?
Nothing at all that isnt what the post was about ,,, Hey I love JOe and would be more than willing to take him out for ice cream ...
Please cite long term generational wealth generated by day trading - the point is most long term wealth especially generational is not made that way
The literature overwhelmingly indicates Less than 1% of day traders are successful in the long term - now many people fail as business men / women as well but a few more than 1% make it - and pass those businesses on
like I said you are undoubtedly in that 1% - I can tell by how many successful predictions you have made
YOur citation of making 2000% with little risk is like me citing I can buy a lottery ticket with the potential for great reward at little risk - and yes we all know a few lottery winners- but its mainly a tax on the not so bright ...
For me the wonder of compounding of interest by starting very early in life has been very successful and I will stick with that model best of luck with day trading
AS opposed to yourself who retrospectively makes predictions I am clearly on record stating I bought at $1.xx and sold at $3.xx and then again am clearly on record stating I bought again at $4.xx
I am on record indicating I did not expect REDUCE IT to be positive and was surprised when it was so
I am also on record indicating that I dont expect COVID studies to be positive - albeit I may change my mind on that as the evidence on cytokine reductions increase
I would refer you to books such as Family Wealth etc that talk about building generational wealth - its not done on day trading
Statistics reveal just 1% of day traders make money consistently, year after year. n other words, day traders who try and make a career out of it are betting their life savings that they will be the 1 out of 100 who can make a living doing it. It is for this reason that people often compare day trading to gambling, and it is hard to ignore the similarities. Both offer the possibility for getting rich quick, and some people actually do get rich quick. Both are fast-paced, high-risk, and can provide a bit of an adrenaline rush or a “gambler’s high”. But can day trading actually offer individuals an alternative to traditional or more conservative investment approaches? Statistics (and history) prove that it is extremely unlikely
It is indeed a tragedy - if we take the example of LOvaza vs vascepa - the research has opened up a completely new understanding of the mechanism of atherosclerosis, cytokine storms etc etc -
Yet according to Mr. Bidens brilliant administration there is no difference between a combination of chemicals and a single moiety
Think about the number of lives that will be saved because AMRN took the time and money to tease out the difference between a combo med and a single moiety med - very disheartening that Mr. Biden and crew dont want to give science a chance - they must have consulted Dr. Nissen .....
Meme stocks day trading - etc are not what long term sustainable wealth is built upon - Although I must say I enjoy seeing the little guy occasionally win as I think Hedge funds have screwed over the average mom and pop investor for years -
Thats great news Bob - yes it seems like some doors are starting to open !!
Corruption is fundamental to most human behavior - the founding fathers well recognized this and attempted to balance powers - but people being people they find ways around that - a good start is term limits ! Next you can only make what your paycheck is ...period .... next no lobbying jobs after leaving Washington - people can vote anyway they want on one or a hundred issues thats THEIR choice ... corruption exists in socialistic and capitalistic system - but at least in the capitalistic system if you want to succeed by playing fair you are given that option
Exactly why doesn't anyone call politicians on this How do you start out with nothing and end up with 20 million in 10 years when you make 150K per year ??
Hmmm EPA is beneficial for cell health and DHA isnt ... where have we heard that before ? Just wondering if you sent this to Dr. Nissen to help him further his education
SOunds to me like the TRade secret is they lied to shareholders and the general public - this should be blasted all over ...
Dr Reddys tells investors they have adequate supply of EPA yet in sealed law suit against AMRN state their supply is inadequate ...
SO they are upset because they don't have enough supply to break the law and infringe ?
WOw Stillness hmmm have to wonder why Dr. Reddy dropped the case (If they did) I will let the legal minds speculate
MAybe its already slowly leaking .....
Same copay whether one month or three a patient told me .. why would an insurance company require a patient who is on a lifelong med go the to the pharmacy every month ? Three months seems much more reasonable
Yes that is what I meant 30 days that way the patient has3 copays instead of one
Excellent point !
Nice review 2015
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4537710/
From what I am reading a big issue us getting Omega 3's across the BBB
WOw NS I must admit that is very interesting . I have been on record that I really doubt there will be any benefit for COVID or Alzheimers - hope I am wrong - that study is very interesting
Thanks LTRO makes sense now ...