Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Coronavirus survivors banned from joining the military
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2020/05/06/coronavirus-survivors-banned-from-joining-the-military/
A past COVID-19 diagnosis is a no-go for processing, according to a recently released MEPCOM memo circulating on Twitter.
“During the medical history interview or examination, a history of COVID-19, confirmed by either a laboratory test or a clinician diagnosis, is permanently disqualifying ...” the memo reads.
The memo is authentic, Pentagon spokeswoman Jessica Maxwell confirmed to Military Times.
PS
What do they know we don't?
I don't know but many vaccines he promoted did not do too well.
I would rather consider him like a hedge manager in biotech business.
Bill Gates is an investor in many vaccine companies. Consequently, his investment in a specific company has very little weight. Further more, his expertise is not in medicine and/or biology. No arguments, Bill Gates is a super businessman.
Long time ago, I came to ABT's R&D.
2 weeks after I started my job, my boss told:" Do not rush making your decisions/conclusions. Take your time, collect needed amount for data, and most important do it right".
It was an excellent advice.
As I stated many time, we know very little about COVID-19. It is too early to make long-lasting conclusions.
Well, regarding to drug usage, smoking, alcohol or other risky behaviors, people make their choice knowing the consequences.
It is not your choice getting COVID-19, dying or becoming crippled from it . You have not choice or any control over it.
Once again, we know very little about COVID-19.
* Are recovered pts cured or just in remission?
* Are pts with presently measured antibodies immune to new reinfections and/or infectious or not?
* Is a vaccine against COVID-19 even possible?
* How to treat COVID-19 pts effectively?
* The list is quite long with very few answers.
"Google Scholar ranks him among the world’s 100 most-cited scientists. He has published more than 1,000 papers, many of them meta-analyses—reviews of other studies.
I am very suspicious of somebody publishing more than 50 papers specifically reviewing other people work.
From personal experience:
Once my major customer (USAF) asked me to make a presentation on a major conference
before "cutting money". It was uneasy to make a major commitment before "experts" review and approve my invention.
At a major conference I had a stand with a poster presentation and an oral presentation. They were scheduled at the same time. Furthermore, our art department did a great job. The stand was excellent but they screwed up equations big time. I discovered the problem 3 days before the presentation and it was to be loaded on a truck the next day to be trucked from coast to coast. I was told that there is no time to fix errors. I ordered to send it.
After my oral presentation, I made my way to the stand. There was a large crowd and some guy was explaining the presentation and answering the questions. My costumer asked me who was the guy. I replied: no idea. The customer smiled and said: may be we should hire him since he is very knowledgable. My reply was: "Go ahead and hire him but the stand equations are incorrect. I know what is wrong but he does not!"
Quite often, companies deliberately patent unworking stuff to mislead the competition and most important/vital info is never disclosed.
IMHO, based on what I have read, it is not a question of the results accuracy but rather there is still a very poor understanding of COVIR19 disease. Consequently, the present test result interpretations are very iffy and these result extrapolations are not worth even a paper they are written on.
Recovered, almost: China's early patients unable to shed coronavirus
https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN2240HI
"Reuters report quoted doctors in Wuhan who say they've found some patients who tested negative for the virus who later tested positive, suggesting that either they were somehow reinfected (studies have shown that some recovered patients have low or no levels of antibodies needed for immunity) or that the virus simply reemerged on its own."
From:Seeking Alpha
COVID-19 antibody tests a 'disaster' - Roche CEO
Apr. 22, 2020 4:38 AM
"Some of these companies, I tell you, this is ethically very questionable to get out with this stuff," Roche (OTCQX:RHHBY) CEO Schwan told reporters after scrutinizing some existing products.
"It's a disaster. These tests are not worth anything, or have very little use," he added.
Roche plans to offer its own blood tests by early May to identify those who had been infected with the coronavirus and plans by June to boost production to "high double-digit millions" per month.
Speaking about Chinese.
Sometime they deliberately falsify scientific/engineering data/results published in very respectable publications. Why? I don't know.
In the last 10 years, I and a company I work with have witnessed 4 such cases.
Biowatch,
Thank you very much.
Caravon
The Spanish Flu came & gone. It also was associated with pneumonia.
Did it mutate itself out of existence?
The Chinese mutation ref
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.14.20060160v1.full.pdf
Found on RT Internet site
Chinese scientists have found that Europe and America’s East Coast have been infected by some of the most aggressive Covid-19 strains, as they discovered dozens of virus mutations. These destroy a host’s cells faster than others.
The ability of the novel coronavirus to mutate has been previously vastly underestimated, a team from China’s Zhejiang University, led by Professor Li Lanjuan, says in a new study. The group found as many as 33 virus mutations in just 11 coronavirus patients they examined in the city of Hangzhou.
The researchers say that 60 percent of the strains they discovered turned out to be entirely new. In a worrying development, they also discovered that the virus’s mutations directly affect its deadliness. Their research revealed that the most aggressive type of Covid-19 could create a virus load 270 times greater than the least potent one.
Despite only 11 patient-derived isolates being analyzed in this study, we observed abundant mutational diversity, including several founding mutations for different major clusters of viruses now circulating globally,” the study said.
The virus load is the measure of its quantity in a certain volume of bodily fluid, usually blood plasma. It particularly shows how quickly a pathogen could propagate through the organism and destroy its cells. Unfortunately for Europeans, one of the most aggressive strains found by the Chinese scientists appears to be similar to the one that has spread across the continent, particularly Italy and Spain, the pre-print of the study published on the website medRxiv.org revealed on Sunday.
The same strain came from Europe to New York, which has since become one of the worst affected US states. America’s West Coast, however, appears to be infected by another, less deadly strain that arrived directly from China.
Nonetheless, that doesn’t mean those on the West Coast have less cause for concern, as even less powerful strains can cause a serious ailment, the Zhejiang University team warns. They note that two of the observed patients, in their 30s and 50s, who contracted a weaker strain, still suffered severe symptoms.
Most importantly, though, the scientists say their discoveries could affect the development of the much-needed vaccine, because a one-size-fits-all solution might not work in case of Covid-19.
“Drug and vaccine development, while urgent, needs to take the impact of these accumulating mutations, especially the founding mutations, into account to avoid potential pitfalls,” the team says.
I went quickly over the paper looking at the time when various treatments (HC, HC+AZT or no HC )were administrated.
I did not find such info.
My understanding: COVID19 HC+ AZT+zinc treatment must be given as soon as possible well before before pts are critically ill.
PS
Would like to hear comments
Statistics is a very old and established science. Therefore, statistical calculations are straightforward.
What really changes the Stanford final results are pts selection and data extrapolation.
Coronavirus: CDC reviewing ‘stunning’ universal testing results from Boston homeless shelter
(correct reference below)
https://www.wsbtv.com/news/trending/coronavirus-cdc-reviewing-stunning-universal-testing-results-boston-homeless-shelter/ZADQ45HCAZEVJAZA3OTCUR7M6M/
We, the human race, are in a fight with very powerful enemy we know close to nothing about.
The military logic is very simple: postpone an open confrontation, learn as much as possible about the enemy and only then marshal your forces against weaknesses of your enemy. In other words, use your brains and do not be an idiot unless Swedish government is trying to destroy its own population.
PS
China can afford to lose 100-150 million people. Can the USA do the same?
Plain Number for Sweden and its neighbors who practice "social distancing":
Country -- TOTAL CONFIRMED CASE -- TOTAL DEATHS
Sweden -- 14, 400 -- 1,540
Norway -- 7, 000 -- 165
Denmark -- 7,300 -- 355
Finland -- 3,800 -- 94
The numbers speak for themselves.
CDC reviewing ‘stunning’ universal testing results from Boston homeless shelter
https://www.abc.net.au/news/health/2020-04-17/coronavirus-vaccine-ian-frazer/12146616
BOSTON — The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is now “actively looking into” results from universal COVID-19 testing at Pine Street Inn homeless shelter.
The broad-scale testing took place at the shelter in Boston’s South End a week and a half ago because of a small cluster of cases there.
Of the 397 people tested, 146 people tested positive. Not a single one had any symptoms.
So much for the accuracy of various scientific/government projections.
-----
Is homeless immunity is a way of future?
We've never made a successful vaccine for a coronavirus before. This is why it's so difficult
https://www.abc.net.au/news/health/2020-04-17/coronavirus-vaccine-ian-frazer/12146616
I am very suspicious about government statistics.
Just few weeks ago, we were told by the government officials there is no need to wear masks. Now, we advised to wear masks. The explanation is simple: there was a very severe shortage of masks and now masks are more available. So, we were lied to. What else is new?
Regardless of the test accuracy and pts selection, it is obvious that a large percentage of people who are "asymptotic" and are walking around and infecting other people.
As Boston survey indicates, some of these infecting people are working in hospitals, nursing homes, food establishments, etc.,
So far, we know/understand very poorly COVID19. Some "recovered" pts are becoming COVID19 positive again. It appears that it is not clear what does it mean being cured?
So, MA State and local government official can congratulate themselves for COVID19 epidemics in MA.
No wonder MA is just behind NY and NJ in the official numbers of Confirmed COVID19 infected.
There is HUGE difference between real scientists and "consumer society" scientists.
The old British saying: It take Five generations to transform a commoner into a gentleman.
I worked with leading scientists/engineers from former and present communist countries. For them, it is OK to falsify everything or just lie. Lie to everybody including their own superiors. Chinese are very "good" doing so.
<That means we should consider that USS Roosevelt as the best example of random testing so far and it is highly unlikely that the percentage of asymptomatic patients would change by an order of magnitude.>
Strongly disagree.
jog,
I agree. During the last 45 days, Chinese reported almost no new COVID12 cases and just few days ago Chinese double the actual number of deaths.
Still, the yesterday remdesivir results are close to be spectacular. Well, for God sake, I wish the results are true.
U of Chicago/Gilead remdesivir trial results appears to be great
BUT
just recently relieved the compassionate trial results showed that 63% benefited from remdesivir treatment and China shot down its remdesivir COVID19 trials all together.
So, what is the truth?
Spoke to a Primary Care Physician in Boston Mass.
Asked him about COVID 19 testing availability. His reply: the State is following the CDC guidance trying to ration the testing. There are no any meaningful attempts to follow the infection.
No wonder that Mass is being only behind NY and NJ in the numbers of total COVID19 cases and deaths in the USA.
"Opaganib was administered in addition to standard-of-care, including hydroxychloroquine background therapy, and was well tolerated. "
S. Korea 10.5 K infected/ population 51M
Spain 167K infected/ population 45M
Italy 157K infected/ population 59M
With similar population and being near China, S. Korea infection rate is ~16 times smaller than Spain and Italy.
Consequently, I think S. Korea achievements fighting Coronavirus 2 are outstanding!
Interesting today British Daily Mail article related to the Coronavirus 2 origination.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8211257/Wuhan-lab-performing-experiments-bats-coronavirus-caves.html?ito=amp_twitter_share-top
I would be interesting to hear thoughts about following comment to this article:
"the virus was modified. It's basis is with the bats, but it could not crossed species without surface protein modification.
The leaders at the Chinese lab in Wuhan literally gave symposium talks describing how they did this in 2017. The bat virus was harmless to humans. It had no path to infect us until a lab modified the viral surface with a protein that acted as a key to particular cells in human lungs."
“If you don’t have a vaccine, you have to treat,” said Dr. Robert Gallo, co-founder and director of the Institute of Human Virology at the University of Maryland School of Medicine.
“We don’t know when a vaccine will be available, absolutely don’t know ... and it could be never.”
When did Coronavirus2 start in China?
Facts:
"Clinical Progressive Characteristics and Treatment Effects of 2019-novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV)"
Clinical Trial # NCT04292327 with 400 pts conducted by Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
-- Actual Study Start Date: January 1, 2020
China a communist state with huge bureaucracy:
- Something extraordinary important event has happened forcing the China bureaucracy to move very fast but it takes time
- The China bureaucracy must find, negotiate, finance, and approve a new clinical trial.
- The conducting Hospital must make all the arrangements to organize and prepare people, facilities, procedures, etc.,
My estimate that it took as minimum 3 months before the trial initiation with the Coronavirus epidemics starting sometimes in late Sep. - early Oct. 2019
In Dec. 2019, Chinese leadership was in panic starting to build new hospitals
Without Antibody Testing the entire population, economic consequences are very grim.
Thank you Biowatch
<Viruses lasts longer in humans than on inanimate objects>
May be a coronavirus replication/multiplication rate substantially exceeds its death rate in human environment.
Unfortunately, truth and integrity (even in scientific publications) were highly compromised in our society.