Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Financials? When?
LOL. I wouldn't put it past Sam to release something big on 4/20 day!
CSLI is like a hot ex-girlfriend. Lot to like, but once you buy-in, you could wake up and find all your jewelry has been stolen. That said I just doubled my position. Lot of support in this range, so don't feel that I am risking much. Revisited all my DD on this and additionally looked into the character of the people leading this. Some red-flags but really good people IMO. Hopefully Munck's experience and Sam's charisma can get this moving. News coming in the next couple of weeks IMO, and this is going to pop. It's go time $CSLI!! GLTA!
Don't worry there will be another one.
Those are good points. He did build that from pretty much nothing. The restaurant business is hard work, I guess I shouldn't judge. Hopefully he can put some hard work into this, and use his charisma to form some profitable partnerships. I'm Holding, but I'm not convinced he has the experience and brings the kind of leadership that will help this be successful. Time will tell. GLTA!
No issues with Munck. But why Sam Barraza? Didn't he own a failed restaurant business? And print pod seems like something Jimmy McGill did to make a few bucks?! :) Sam was not super successful in either venture IMO. What qualifications and experience does Sam bring to the table?
Here's a question for the board...
Anyone know how in the heck Munck and Barrraza hooked up? Anyone know or can speculate? Just curious. I'm kicking myself for buying the hype and not doing more DD on this one. :(
Good post explaining intervening rights. I completely agree. GLTA!
Well I hope it flies to my mid .03’s average because this is turning out to be my stupidest play of 2021 thus far.
How can you not pull for this company? Everyone is pulling for the little guy. I’m not a server/hardware guy, but everything I have tried to digest seems to scream infringement. The question to me is how much. So I don’t think NLST walks away from Googs with their tale between their legs. Googs has spent an awful lot of effort trying to disprove the accusations, I think that speaks volumes as well. California? Banana republic? Guess time will tell. GLTA!
Looking forward to the next Haywood report. Questions still remain about total drilling depth. Also still waiting on a flow test, 3D seismic, more core analysis, and a lot more holes to be drilled. Nevertheless, excellent news! This is still up in the air in terms of total value, but still undervalued right now IMO taking into account risk. GLTA!
Nice try anyways! :)
Looking to get back in under 2.00. $1.80-185??
Don't 10 tweets equal one 8-K? :(
Everyone is wondering that same thing? $2.15 - $2.25?
I personally think Chuck is very impressive. I have worked for CEO's at tech companies that could barely turn on their computer. Super cool - I know a lot of it is canned, but he done good IMO. Price dips again tomorrow, but future earnings reports are going to be great! Well poised for big time growth and revenue. Supply terms are most likely very favorable - can not publicly disclose obviously to protect/upset other clients. Relationships will be built, and long term stability and profits are here! And don't forget about the other litigation - the company will approach those situations differently just watch!
Lol I did sell a large portion at open. That said I’m wrong quite often haha and do have a tendency to take profits too early and have left quite a bit of money on the table in some situations. Praying this is not one of them! I’m happy for the company, and hopefully this is just the beginning for them! May look to add again at some point. GLTA!
I’m honestly surprised the retrace is not more drastic. It’s all in the 8-K folks. While the news is positive for NLST, and provides some credibility and additional revenue prospects, it is overvalued currently. Those thinking the conference call will somehow reveal something magical will be disappointed. IMO I think this settles somewhere around $2.20 in a couple weeks time. Hopefully I’m wrong, and Hong has something additional to share that might sustain the PPS.
Good news guys!
I just exited this cuz I needed funds. That most likely means a 10 bagger here in the next week! GLTA!
PS - May try and reenter at .0004 if I am lucky and able.
Guys good news!
I just exited this cuz I needed funds, so I expect now it will be a 10 bagger in the next week. GLTA!!!
PS - That said, I'm back in at .0001 if I can get em'.
PR says completes purchase, but all I read is a term sheet (which is non-binding). I hope I am not f'd.
Wow thought this was going to possibly dip a little after open. It looks as though I'm wrong again. :(
You know decent website, but why no direct to consumer? And why no pics of product in store except for a closeup of some dirty old cooler with no UPC labels that quite frankly could have been sabotaged. I mean if I had a dollar for everyone one of these guys that proclaimed their products are in stores without evidence I'd be wealthy. Plus I don't understand the relationship here between VGID, FHBC, and SNTX (and quite frankly I'm to lazy to dig on this one right now). If I could figure out how all those tie together I'd be tempted with a couple of shots of whiskey to take a small position with this, because at these levels it might be worth a shot. Beverage market is just so competitive though and shelf space is so precious.
Pandemic sales are a factor. The pandemic has forced IT areas to increase server related hardware/centers to accommodate a remote workforce. That said, this may be more of a trend than a temporary situation, and server infrastructure rarely scales backwards IMO.
Satan has already reserved a place in Hell for Koos.
Just wanted to reiterate what most of us already know, and what we believe to be the likely outcome along with a very bright future for Netlist.......
Who’s/What’s Netlist?
Netlist holds several patents in server, storage, and hybrid memory, as well as rank multiplication and load reduction.
What’s goin on here (the main course anyways)?
Netlist has been in litigation with Googs since 2009 over allegations that Googs infringed upon Netlist’s seminal 912 hardware patent. Netlist alleges that Googs infringed the patent by building servers using the 912 patent technology. Netlist sued Googs on December 2009 in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The judge in the case ordered a random cross section of servers to be examined which showed that Googs indeed was using technology described in the 912 patent. Googs then asserted that the patent was invalid. In 2010 Googs requested an Inter Partes Reexamination of the 912 patent by the USPTO’s (United States Patent and Trademark Office) PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board). While the reexamination was going on the Northern District Court granted a joint request made by both companies to stay the 912 patent infringement lawsuit until the USPTO made its findings. On January 2019 the PTAB upheld the validity of Netlist’s 912 patent. In April 2019 Googs appealed this decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In June 2020 the US Court of Appeals upheld the PTAB’s decision on the validity of the 912 patent. Because of the Covid-19 pandemic Googs was granted a 6 month extension to decide if it wanted to appeal this decision to the United States Supreme Court. Googs did not choose to appeal. On February 16, 2021 Netlist moved to lift the stay in the Northern District of California so the patent infringement lawsuit could continue. The Court granted the request and ordered that both Netlist and Googs shall appear for a telephone Case Management Conference on March 11, 2021.
So, what’s the big deal?
Netlist has a seminal patent. A seminal patent is defined as a patent that describes an invention so impactful that it creates or shifts the technology space. Netlist believes that the teachings of the 912 patent can be found in various DDR3 and DDR4 server DIMMs (Dual Inline Memory Module) as well as future products that will be produced under the DDR5 server DIMM standards currently being established by the industry. Furthermore, Netlist asserts that the 912 patent enabled Googs to build servers with high capacity and rapid memory that allowed servers to store an entire Oracle database in memory which allowed lightning fast search results. The 912 patent played a large part in Googs dominance in search engine capability. Right now, it is not a question whether Googs infringed the 912 patent. That has already been established. Now, Googs is at the stage where it can settle with Netlist or go to a jury trial to determine damages.
What are the damages? Are they substantial?
Damages will take into account both the product itself (internal factors) and the environment (external factors) in determining pricing. In this case Netlist will argue that the 912 patent established Googs dominance in regards to their search engine, which allowed monopolist profits that funded Goog’s entire ecosystem. While at the same time, Goog’s infringement of the patent prevented Netlist from establishing itself in the server memory marketplace. Netlist will most likely seek billions in damages. Also, the prospect of treble damages is in play as Netlist will allege willful infringement on Goog’s part. The most likely scenario is Googs will settle the case rather than risk going in front of a jury. A settlement would include a large lump sum plus licensing of the patent going forward.
Anything else going on?
Yeah you bet! Netlist also sued Inphi for infringement of the 912 patent in the US District Court for the Central District of California. That case was also stayed pending the Court of Appeals decision, and now that the 912 patent was upheld it is expected Netlist will resume court proceedings once it is finished with the Googs case.
Also, on March 2020 Netlist filed a patent infringement lawsuit against SK Hynix in the US District Court for the Western District of Texas based on the infringement of Netlist’s 218, 523, and 595 patents in SK Hynix’s RDIMM and LRDIMM server memory products. SK Hynix petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) to change the venue from Texas to California. This petition was denied and the case will be tried in Texas. The Markman hearing was set for March 4, 2021 with Jury trial set for July 6, 2021. The Western District of Texas is notorious for being very pro-patent holder friendly. Recently, on March 2, 2021 in this very same court under the same judge that will be preceding over the Netlist case, Intel was found guilty of infringing on two of VSLI’s patents and the jury awarded $2.1B in damages.
What can Netlist shareholders most likely expect?
Once Netlist either settles or wins cases against these three defendants other infringers will quickly move to settle. Netlist will have established itself as a necessary licensor for pretty much any high speed server memory product, much like Qualcomm did with its patents in cellular technology. This would enable Netlist to become a very lucrative gatekeeper. The shares are still greatly underpriced at under $2 as of March 9, 2021, but that won’t last long as the market becomes aware of Netlist and its strong position in the lawsuits it is currently engaged in. Large settlements or jury awards will quickly drive the share price up as the market cap currently is only roughly $300M. There is also a poison pill set in place at the price of $6.56 which would come into play in the event of a hostile takeover attempt.
What was the number that you called?
.0008’s likely tomorrow. .0006’s possible end of week. That MIGHT be a good entry point. News/catalyst can still move this. GLTA.
Look at the second to last line. :(
Entity Name:
MEDICAN ENTERPRISES, INC.
Entity Number:
C8634-1988
Entity Type:
Domestic Corporation (78)
Entity Status:
Active
Formation Date:
10/27/1988
NV Business ID:
NV19881029974
Termination Date:
Perpetual
Annual Report Due Date:
10/31/2021
Name of Individual or Legal Entity:
AGENCY SERVICES OF NEVADA
Status:
Active
Jurisdiction:
NEVADA
Street Address:
245 E LIBERTY ST STE 200, RENO, NV, 89501, USA
Mailing Address:
Individual with Authority to Act:
KELLY L TURNER ESQ OR RITA KOLVET
OFFICER INFORMATION:
President Dana Belle 263 W Olive Avenue, Unit 289, Burbank, CA, 91502, USA 03/02/2021 Active
Secretary Dana Belle 263 W Olive Avenue, Unit 289, Burbank, CA, 91502, USA 03/02/2021 Active
Treasurer Dana Belle 263 W Olive Avenue, Unit 289, Burbank, CA, 91502, USA 03/02/2021 Active
Director Dana Belle 263 W Olive Avenue, Unit 289, Burbank, CA, 91502, USA 03/02/2021 Active
CURRENT SHARES:
Common 40,000,000,000 PV 0.001
Preferred 6,000,000 PV 0.001
Can someone help me cross the t’s on this. Sorry I’ve been digging around for info but ended up spending the last hour and a half trying to put my closet back together so I’m exhausted. Honestly I truly believe if I would have a 500 sq foot closet my wonderful wife would still find a way to fill it up. :)
So I see the patent has been renewed:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=10,566,089&OS=10,566,089&RS=10,566,089
https://technology.nasa.gov/patent/TOP2-169
And it appears that it at one point at least it was connected to VNTH:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1497130/000149315214000042/ex99-1.htm
https://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/tb/pub/features/articles/16612
But that agreement was initiated in January of 2014, and was only for 5 years.
Redwood City, CA – January 7, 2014 – Vantage Health Inc, (OTCB: VNTH) and its parent company Nanobeak Inc. today announced that NASA and Nanobeak have entered into an exclusive 5-year license agreement to commercialize mobile healthcare products derived from NASA patented chemical sensing technology. This exclusive 5-year license agreement has been sublicensed to Vantage Health Inc.
So my question is, is that agreement now void? Does VNTH still have exclusivity or is this expired? If the agreement is not void, where can I find that info proving this? Any info or insight someone could provide would be much appreciated.
Can someone help me cross the t’s on this. Sorry I’ve been digging around for info but ended up spending the last hour and a half trying to put my closet back together so I’m exhausted. Honestly I truly believe if I would have a 500 sq foot closet my wonderful wife would still find a way to fill it up. :)
So I see the patent has been renewed:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=10,566,089&OS=10,566,089&RS=10,566,089
https://technology.nasa.gov/patent/TOP2-169
And it appears that it at one point at least it was connected to VNTH:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1497130/000149315214000042/ex99-1.htm
https://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/tb/pub/features/articles/16612
But that agreement was initiated in January of 2014, and was only for 5 years.
Redwood City, CA – January 7, 2014 – Vantage Health Inc, (OTCB: VNTH) and its parent company Nanobeak Inc. today announced that NASA and Nanobeak have entered into an exclusive 5-year license agreement to commercialize mobile healthcare products derived from NASA patented chemical sensing technology. This exclusive 5-year license agreement has been sublicensed to Vantage Health Inc.
So my question is, is that agreement now void? Does VNTH still have exclusivity or is this expired? If the agreement is not void, where can I find that info proving this? Any info or insight someone could provide would be much appreciated.
Thank you. Maybe it's wishful thinking, but that statement alone almost sounds like they are admitting wrongdoing, just limited wrongdoing to minimize the damages. I just keep thinking that G00gs spent quite a bit of time to try an invalidate the patent; seems like they are doing some retracing now.
They had what I thought was a really good product/patch. I thought they were profitable with it as well. What happened here? I'd like to take a position here but I just can't connect things???
Good luck! There are definitely much worse plays. Not saying this one doesn’t have a chance. I’ve been watching this one for awhile. I was hoping you could change my mind.
Waiting for Hong to start talking about a Board of Directors and Nasdaq!
As of September 30, 2020, the number of shares outstanding of our Common Stock was: 1,847,361,580
As of June 30, 2020, the number of shares outstanding of our Common Stock was: 1,231,714,834
As of December 31, 2019, the number of shares outstanding of our Common Stock was: 232,318,275
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/263556/content
Given the share structure, dilution, and a POS Reverse merger, why would you throw money at this? How’s this going to run?
https://opengovus.com/georgia-business/2063649
Can someone tell me at what point (i.e. the date) Katzaroff became affiliated with this?
Any reply from Shipley. I emailed too. Nothing.
This may be a dumb post but why does it appear (at least initially) that RECON and Deans Knight Capital Management are sharing the same office space at 999 Hastings in Vancouver? Can someone offer a plausible explanation or have insight?