Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
ret-big diff. here ceo not in process of selling. Hence, must first overhaul board and oust ceo--takes longer...
as far as 10 bagger--not happening w/out infringement suit win
eie
rose--trial during 2022, when?--depending when g. Andrew rules on motion to dismiss--since its holding everything up.
Verdict 6-months to 1+yr later--depending if fast tracked.
So you're correct. the bo could come first...depending how fast alex's mo of taking over a board works...I probably wasn't conservative enough with that timeline--more likely at least a year.
so its a close call....but both are good events for shareholders.
eie
Tal-m&a doesn't consummate w/in 30-60 d. It takes months of building a coalition of parties, electing and ejecting board members, to facilitate a hostile/forced takeover.
At minimum it takes 2 quarters, and more likely 3/4, which bty, corresponds with a likely infringement win in court.
Amrin should be sold at a premium (and a significant premium if infringement suit is won);
but not at soon as you predict.
eie
gg-as much as I dislike jt--you cannot rob him from amrn's vascepa accomplishment under his "HELM" (t.y. bid).
Like in football, the credit and shame goes to the qb...sorry
eie
gf--it was a"recommendation" from magistrate judge--not binding....
eie
gg--what is your conf. based on? hopes? good wishes?
btw: as much as jt was neg. he did get vascepa to market thru uspto and fda--much more than km will do imo.
eie
bid-ok. what has he done in his tenure as "real deal"? Nothing substantive...just talk talk and more talk.
What he hasn't done, is to join the MUCH NEEDED rule 60 motion--w/out joining it is dead on arrival.
btw--ty for the grammar correction.
eie
bid-you are defending him...give me his # or email and I'll call him asap.
eie
bid-why didn't km join marj's 60 motion? Ids he looking after the shareholders or Kennedy and co?
eie
bid-when he was announced ceo-what was the sp? from that time he already was "active" ceo and jt was ceo in name only...
eie
rose-they're avoiding bhatt's analysis and cropped table--if they agree with it--they are liable. It is all about them (including km--who is protecting them).
eie
skip-"He's the real deal"-sp down over 20% since he took the realm. So by what measurement has he proven to be the real deal?
eie
cbb-km wants to make a splash--didn't take the job to find bo. He wants to make a name for himself as a turnaround king.
Alex has his work cut out for him--to force the bo
eie
gg-I agree. BTW--bb's inaction is a "wonder"--watching their large invest. go down the tubes....unless they tried behind the scenes and management rebuffed a decent bo offer?
We will never know....unless one day discovery reveals all the skeletons...
eie
one-you're probably correct--he's not here for lt. Only question is how do you sell until after infringement suit? maybe add cvr?
eie
"I give up" :>)
gg-can he force km with only 2% for bo, especially when KM is waiting on the infringement suit, which will take 1-2yrs--
and a win will make amrn worth 5 times the price?
eie
North-$25 by December 31,2021??? 500% increase in 1.5 month?
Do you have inside info?
eie
lou--is that how a warm sweet respectful person speaks...even on a chat room? Every word you utter should be measured...
that is my point with P-dude....i am glad you got it now....
eie
lou-"seek help-and get some meds"--is that how a warm sweet respectful person speaks...even on a chat room?
that is my point with P-dude....i am glad you got it now....
eie
raf--P-dude! got it.... You write your parents in such manner?
hope not
eie
inv--guess you addressed professor's in college with prefix P-"dude"...
probably did not help your grades...
eie
lou--will you raise money for me? your posts caused me ihub poster sensitivity syndrome...
eie
lou-try to understand--you're only poster intentionally using pharm's handle in degrading manner....its "totality of circumances theory"--you use hyphen to emphasize dude--you're the only poster....
You have many defenders here--but you should apologize for you wrongdoing---not mine. Cannot help if you are oblivious
eie
raf-thought you were sharper...P-dude! is v. bad--especially followed by condescending "my friend"...
look it up: respect comes first before even ihub....
eie
bid-tea and toast--bad stomach virus-reading disrespectful posts here...
eie
Inv83-nobody calls him P-dude! It is disrespectful.
Most posters, refer to him as: pd, or p, or his full name. Even lou calls him: Pdude---not P-dude! (with the follow up of "my friend")--which is condescending at best.
A poster should be respectful regardless of the poster's handle.
We all know what lou was conveying by addressing him as: "P-dude!...my friend". words are used intentionally to rely a message...
Here is lou's post from 9/23/2021: check her posts if you like..
RE: Pharmacydude post# 355329
Post# 355333 of 359902
Thursday, 09/23/2021 12:21:49 PM
Pdude, a partnership or collaboration is in the wind with PFE/AMRN in the USA market. Whatever Amarin gives up in fees to PFE they'll make up with the EU markets opening up in the next few months. Do we know when the "Go To Market" rollout will take place?
ralp-Harvard scientist CHOOSE to stress the points that fit their narrative---just like lawyers and every corrupt person with a heart beat.
don't presume that the Harvard scientists are fools--we are the fools...
scientists know better than lawyers, or stock traders... :)>
eie
zip-glad I can assist you with family harmony! I think our wives have a lot in common :)>
eie
marj-100% must show what du did wrong-but since this case is based on "fraud"--and "mistake", you have the advantage of shifting the "blame" from Du to def. who mislead her, just imo--you know the best.
looking forward for justice here-hope the coa will let it come out by you!
eie
alm-I agree-except: "She rectified the position by applying her understanding of Kura"--she didn't actually "rectify the position" rather relied on def. and should have seen that uspto did reference kura.
But all in all we agree--cannot focus on du! rather def.!
v. good summary
eie
maj-imo direct gun at def. not du-b/c judges on panel are sympathetic to their own--but def. are not untouchable. I am sure you know this, just in case your dislike of du will get the best of you...
Yes, du should have looked deeper into your motion--but it is in her interest not to overturn HER ruling.
If coa uses standing to stop you in the tracks--I strongly suggest amrn's lawyers be held responsible for not catching the cropping and mori--they are almost as guilty (for our sake) as def.---as well as amrn for not joining your motion.
eie
"no big surprise that not everyone followed your advice"--
the point is I was ridiculed and slammed for being a troll/traitor--that's the attitude--when we only want to hear the choir--no opposing views.
I didn't "predict du's nonsense"--just posted that, I learned from other stocks with litigation that seemed 90% a sure thing--that anything is possible...
eie
tal-no b/o until infringement case over-Baker bros NEVER would allow b/o at depressed prices--sine infringement win will bring amrn back to 20's.
eie
bouf-I agree 100%-amrn's lawyers missed "mori"'s statistical mistakes--which is unforgivable--and cost us all dearly.
Anyone who wants to blame the system should try russia...
At the same time within the system there are flaws--dyk and coa judges didn't care to listen to singer's 2 population argument, which also distinguished mori based on law...
Dyk and company hid behind the USPTO's opinion that Mori was good law--and rejected amrn's patents based on mori--so we were essential doa.
But bhatt's showing, mori was a mistake was UNFORGIVABLE error of Lawyers...
eie
alm-j Andrew agreed with hichma's attorney consistently--w/out any hard questions.
Yet he grilled amrn's attorney and questioned his knowledge of his own complaint!
He didn't buy the argument that removing the cardiac disclaimer was infring. pe se, and only started to understand the main argument of amrn--that the label doesn't mention over 500.
Was very troubling till the end.
eie
alm-in us judges usually follow the report of the magistrate w/out another hearing. That is the point of the report--to delgeate duties.
8
NS-yet Du didn't care to be overturned so not sure Andrew (if he's a liberal j) would care either....
Hi marj-did the court agree to o.a? I assume you asked for it in your brief--but in some districts I think it is in the discretion of the judge.
btw--gr8 job! hope you get past "standing"--sinc the management refused to intervene....(I was thinking back when I communicated with JT to make the motion--but was concerned court would dismiss is without backing of pathetic ceo/board).
eie
J. Andrew is making an easy infring case complicated-and possibly dismissing it before discovery! outrageous!