Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I have never seen any verified follow up on any of their info. Maybe I just haven't looked in the right place, but they always felt like rumor, never to be substantiated. (rumore- Italian for noise). On the other hand, the surge today suggests...?
I'd like to think somebody knows something. CR, for example.
Security TransCode Amnt Acq Price AmntOwned Direct
CommonStock P(purch) 10,000 A $4.62 189,711 D
Some new holding changes
SHARES MKT VALUE CHANGE SOURCE DATE REPORT DATE
STATE STREET ...........497,578 $3,941,000 476,378 13F 2019-06-30 2019-08-14
VANGUARD GROUP 1,423,870 $11,277,000 198,467 13F 2019-06-30 2019-08-14
OSTERWEIS CAPITAL 119,333 $945,000 119,333 13F 2019-06-30 2019-08-14
GEODE CAPITAL MAN 376,461 $2,981,000 138,189 13F 2019-06-30 2019-08-14
NORTHERN TRUST..... 123,217 $976,000 68,451 13F 2019-06-30 2019-08-13
MYDA ADVISORS (CALL) 68,10 $539,000 68,100 13F 2019-06-30 2019-08-13
APIS CAPITAL ADV LLC 90,000 $713,000 90,000 13F 2019-06-30 2019-08-13
BLACKROCK INC. .... 1,780,753 $14,102,000 1,630,229 13F 2019-06-30 2019-08-13
Bank of New York Mellon 81,837 $648,000 57,456 13F 2019-06-30 2019-08-12
Declining short position
7/31/2019 4,716,309
7/15/2019 5,528,867
6/28/2019 4,979,748
6/14/2019 4,353,963
New Steve Elms beneficial ownership statements
http://app.quotemedia.com/data/downloadFiling?webmasterId=102648&ref=13052060&type=PDF&symbol=MRKR&companyName=Marker+Therapeutics+Inc.&formType=3&formDescription=Initial+statement+of+beneficial+ownership+of+securities&dateFiled=2019-08-08
http://app.quotemedia.com/data/downloadFiling?webmasterId=102648&ref=13052071&type=PDF&symbol=MRKR&companyName=Marker+Therapeutics+Inc.&formType=4&formDescription=Statement+of+changes+in+beneficial+ownership+of+securities&dateFiled=2019-08-08
Early day trading on this stock is weirder than anything I've seen, at least on some days.
Marker Therapeutics Reports Second Quarter 2019 Operating and Financial Results
https://www.markertherapeutics.com/2019/08/marker-therapeutics-reports-second-quarter-2019-operating-and-financial-results/
Mr.Elms was involved in over60 financing/M&A transactions, helping clients raise in excess of $3.3 billion in capital
(compare-similar experience- Mr. Hoang was a Managing Director and head of healthcare mergers & acquisitions advisory for CIT Group (NYSE: CIT). He also served as a senior investment banker in the M&A departments at Oppenheimer, J.P. Morgan, Merrill Lynch, and Deutsche Bank
Mr. Elms joined Aisling in 2000 and serves as one of the Managing Partners. Prior to Aisling, he was a Principal in the Life Sciences Investment Banking Group of Chase H&Q (formerly Hambrecht & Quist, “H&Q”). During his five years at H&Q, Mr. Elms was involved in over 60 financing and M&A transactions, helping clients raise in excess of $3.3 billion in capital. Prior to H&Q, Mr. Elms traded mortgage-backed securities at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette. His previous healthcare sector experience includes over two years as a pharmaceutical sales representative for Marion Laboratories and two years as a consultant for The Wilkerson Group.
Mr. Elms currently serves as a director of ADMA Biologics, Ajax Health II and Zosano Pharma, and as a board observer of Marker Therapeutics and Verona Pharma. His prior board service includes Adams Respiratory Therapeutics, Advion BioSciences, Ambit Biosciences (acquired by Daiichi-Sankyo), Archimica Cooperatief (acquired by Euticals), Avera Pharmaceuticals, Bioenvision (acquired by Genzyme), CeNeRx BioPharma, Cidara Therapeutics, EarLens, LENSAR, Loxo Oncology (acquired by Eli Lilly), MAP Pharmaceuticals, NextWave Pharmaceuticals (acquired by Pfizer), Novazyme Pharmaceuticals (acquired by Genzyme), Oculex Pharmaceuticals (acquired by Allergan), Pernix Therapeutics, Scerene Healthcare and TRIA Beauty. He also serves on the INVO Board at Northwestern University.
Mr. Elms received his M.B.A. from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University and his B.A. in Human Biology from Stanford University.
Aisling Capital is one of the largest shareholders, now totaling 5.5 million shares.
HOUSTON, Aug. 6, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Marker Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: MRKR), a clinical-stage immuno-oncology company specializing in the development of next-generation T cell-based immunotherapies for the treatment of hematological malignancies and solid tumor indications, today announced the appointment of Steve Elms to its Board of Directors, effective August 6.
"We are pleased to welcome Steve to our Board of Directors," said Peter L. Hoang, President & CEO of Marker. "Steve has built an impressive career, holding numerous leadership positions in the healthcare sector and we look forward to his many contributions as we continue to advance our pipeline of next-generation T cell-based immunotherapies."
Throughout his career, Mr. Elms has held numerous leadership roles in the healthcare sector. Mr. Elms currently serves as Managing Partner at Aisling Capital, a leading life sciences investment firm. Prior to joining Aisling, he was a Principal in the Life Sciences Investment Banking Group of Chase H&Q (formerly Hambrecht & Quist), where he was involved in over 60 financing and M&A transactions, helping clients raise in excess of $3.3 billion in capital.
Prior to H&Q, Mr. Elms traded mortgage-backed securities at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette. His previous healthcare sector experience includes over two years as a pharmaceutical sales representative for Marion Laboratories and two years as a consultant for The Wilkerson Group. Mr. Elms currently serves as a director of ADMA Biologics, Ajax Health II and Zosano Pharma and was previously Chairman of the Board of LOXO Oncology. He also serves on the INVO Board at Northwestern University.
Mr. Elms received his M.B.A. from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University and his B.A. in Human Biology from Stanford University.
Since I gather that they may not be totally blinded to what's happening in this kind of trial, unlike many other trials, just how much can they know about the progress of a patient/trial subject? Could they already have a pretty good idea about the likey outcome for some patients?
If they had at some point soon, say another CR or some other positive development, what would be the reason, or maybe necessity, of waiting for some forum to announce it? I guess that they like to have a large scientific forum to release such news, but if they have any concern with SP, is there any good reason to hold off? I'm not sure what all goes into deciding on how to release news. Granted it probably doesn't look good to continually release only good bits of data as they come up. This would look like trying to manage the SP. They probably would have to wait until they had enough to look like a substantial update in the trial. If they wait for that much, trying to make it coincide with some event, including a scheduled company CC, does make sense, I suppose. So, when is the next expected webcast? I'll optimistically predict that the day of, or before, there will be a very positive upgrade in trial results.
Wedbush buys 20k today to initiate a position. Just a small buy, but we can use any good bit of news.
How many times do some people need to be told that AH trades mean nothing. With this stock, sometimes it seems trading day numbers mean nothing.
Trying to tell myself that I am part owner of a company with a great, great future, not a speculator in a paper asset. Not to concern myself with the market's temporary mis-valuation of this science/technology. It takes some effort to hold this image of the future in front of me. But it is there.
How's this for a clueless possibility? BP driving down price to make lowball offer. They've seen enough to make it worth $200million. Not a novel idea, but given the circumstances, wtf.
Despite being low volume stock, I always found it strange that there is usually more than a 1 cent spread on this stock. Often a lot more. Other stocks with lower volume usually show 1 cent. In any case, you would have trouble finding a stock more tempting for someone to f%$# with. I don't think it would take much resources to repeatedly push this down. When do buyers get tempted by the price? I don't usually agree with the call for management to put out positive words/action to prop up price, but I wonder if a little catalyst might be useful here, as a reminder of not distant upcoming trial updates. Insider buying would be helpful.
PhD.Math, maybe super computers/AI will win trading wars.
You maybe shouldn't fight that war. If you have belief in the science, and can have patience and relax a little, a company like this can change your life.
Market not helping, but I think this turns very soon.
Stock finally turns green, looks like this is finally turning,
some geniuses apparently think this is a good time to sell, and we're red again. I'm sure there's some logical explanation, but I'm not interested in hearing it. This is a foolish time to be shaken out, and I'm sure this is nearly over.
Really stabilizing here.
With stability buyers will regain confidence. Tempest is over, I think.
The folks at Marker are not wringing their hands in anguish over recent
price gyrations. It's not that they don't care. They are just too busy following
up on the exciting, great results to expend much energy on seemingly irrational
stock price behavior. They know anyway that these things happen; they've
been around a while. They understand that they only need to continue developing
their multi Taa products, and before many months go by the value will not
only be recognized, but reflected in share price. Investors who just hang in there
will get to share in this, and not have to wring their own hands in anguish over
being out at the wrong time.
Company comments regarding higher dosing
AML
HOANG "we would like to explore higher dose levels... submitted a clinical trial protocol amendment
...to explore dose levels at 40 million cells per meter squared..and at 100 million cells per meter squared
... to very efficiently query the safety profile of these 2 higher dose levels...we hope to enroll
potentially all the way through to approval...we wanted to insure that we weren't leaving
potential efficacy on the table with higher doses; while we've never seen direct correlation between doses at
the levels that have been explored so far, we do note the the dose levels that have been used are exceedingly
low doses; with the higher doses we still don't anticipate any dose limiting toxicities"
Pancreatic
ZHONG - "Do you think more cycles ot T-cell therapy could allow them to achieve better response?"
SMAGLO - "I certainly think it's possible... we've been really blown away by how well these patients have done beyond what our expectations were, so I think it's certainly reasonable to think about how may doses we want to give to our patients."
VERA- "...the cells are very well tolerated, and in our other, AML study, we'll be targeting greater cell doses, so it's
something that we will intend to incorporate, which will be the administration of greater cell numbers in the repetitive fashion
similar...to our pancreatic cancer study".
I'm as eager and hopeful for more CR's as any
But let's remember that there is also lots of room for efficacy demonstration in the PR's and even SD's. Everything doesn't hang on CR. (But that next CR sure will be great, and I think it will come.)
Red also said-
"this is fast in pancreatic, fastest way forward. Then safety established for larger pep pools in breast or other solid tumors. This is the pancreatic strategy, to use this to expand pools faster."
T-Cell tumor infiltration, surgically confirmed
Smaglo- "what was surprising, what was pleasing in Arm C was that the T-Cells were actually able to get in there...these were patients that had received some amount of chemotherapy up front and perhaps that's just what we needed to poke the holes to get the cells in there....not surprising but exciting to see that the cells got where we wanted them to go..." "...we did have one patient who progessed because of an obstruction, we were able to get some tumor when that patient underwent palliative surgery and we were able to confirm that there was an infiltrate in that tumor..."
Juan Vera- "...suggests that our cells are able to actively infiltrate the tumor causing these levels of anti-tumor activity."
Synergy with Chemotherapy feasible, unlike others
"Most therapies ...force physicians to discontinue the use of SOC chemotherapy, which physicians are always reluctant to do. In this case because the cells do not seem to add any meaningful toxicity... you can use this as an additional therapy, and we do believe in this case that the cells have synergy with chemotherapy, that is, that with the tumor lysis, and the activity with the chemotherapy that it may be exposing antigens and effectively heating up what was previously a very cold tumor to be more amenable to t-cell therapy." Peter
"We've been really blown away by how well these patients have done beyond what our expectations were" Smaglo
"confident moving forward w/this combination" non-optimized
Juan said that they will do research for adding different antigens for pancreatic, but they were "pleasantly surprised" by the result with non-optimized, and they "feel confident moving forward with this particular combination at the moment". Then he (Juan) said that after evaluating epitope spreading, they could select antigens to be used in a future clinical trial. So, he said they were confident moving forward with the present mix "at the moment", then the remark about optimization.
firefox didn't work; needed IE
Analysts and Price Targets
Date Brokerage Action Rating Price Target
7/3/19 Oppenheimer Init Cov Outperform $15.00 Matthew Biegler
5/30/19 Roth Capital Init Cov Buy $10.00 Tony Butler, Ph.D
3/29/19 WBB Securities Upgrade Buy ? Strong-Buy $7.29 Steve Brozak, DMH
3/1/19 Janney M. Scott Init Cov Buy ? Buy $6.22 Yun Zhong, Ph.D
12/3/18 Piper Jaffray Upgrade Neut ? Overwt Edward Tenthoff
11/21/18 Nomura Init Cov Buy $16.00 Christopher Marai, Ph.D $16.00 Christopher Marai, Ph.D
can't be absolutely sure these are the latest
Medpage Today article-
Nonengineered T-Cells Active in Pancreatic Cancer
Simultaneous targeting of multiple tumor antigens, potential for reduced toxicity
by Charles Bankhead, Senior Editor, MedPage Today
July 19, 2019
Six of seven patients with inoperable or metastatic pancreatic cancer had objective responses or stable disease when treated with their own nonengineered T-cells plus chemotherapy, investigators reported.
One patient had a complete response, two had partial responses, and three had stable disease for more than 6 months. One other patient treated only with T-cell infusions also had stable disease for more than 6 months.
Although the study was limited to patients with pancreatic cancer, other types of solid tumors might be amenable to the treatment, Brandon Smaglo, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, reported at the Immune Cell Therapies for Cancer (ICTC) conference in San Francisco.
"Recognizing that we've treated a small number of patients so far, these are still some things that are exciting to see and encourage us to look into this therapy further as we move forward," said Smaglo.
In contrast to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, cells harvested from the cancer patients were not genetically modified to target a specific tumor-associated protein. Instead, researchers developed the therapy from single T cell lines that simultaneously target five tumor-associated antigens (TAAs): PRAME, SSX2, MAGEA4, NY-ESO-1, and Survivin. Targeting multiple TAAs should reduce the odds that tumor cells can evade immune response, said Smaglo.
The autologous T cells (a combination of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells) were expanded in a culture that included a mix of peptides from the targeted TAAs. The cells were then infused back into the patients, who have received as many as six infusions.
"The product we're generating is a cultured version of their T cells, having only been modified the way they normally would by being exposed to something foreign," Smaglo told MedPage Today. "As a result, we're able to grow them up in a number of different targets at once, which hopefully will cover our bases more completely within the tumor and address some of the tumor heterogeneity. We end up with a product that is intended to be better tolerated because it is autologous, reducing the chances of some sort of a reaction against it."
To date, Smaglo and colleagues have generated 35 clinical-grade multi-TAA T cell lines, and they have treated 18 patients with pancreatic cancer: nine with disease that was responding to initial treatment with chemotherapy; six who had disease that progressed during or after chemotherapy; and three who had resectable cancer.
The nine patients responding to chemotherapy received the T-cell infusions along with chemotherapy. The six patients with progressive disease received only the T-cell infusions, and the three patients who underwent surgery received one infusion before surgery and additional infusions after surgery.
Seven of the nine-patient subgroup were evaluable for response, which demonstrated clinical benefit (response plus stable disease) in all but one patient. One of the six patients with progressive disease had ongoing disease stabilization at 6 months, and two others had symptom stabilization. The three patients with resectable disease received the preoperative T-cell infusion and remain in follow-up as they receive postoperative infusions.
Clinical benefit correlated with the detection of post-infusion tumor-reactive T cells in blood samples and tumor specimens. Smaglo reported that the T cells have demonstrated activity against the five targeted TAAs, as well as several non-targeted antigens.
Thus far, no patient has exhibited signs of treatment-related systemic or neurologic toxicity.
Beyond continuation of the current study, Smaglo said investigators have identified other potential areas of investigation: the feasibility of using the therapy as maintenance to give patients a break from chemotherapy and whether postoperative T-cell infusion reduces the rate of recurrence.
Sponsored by the American Association for Cancer Research, the ICTC continues through Monday, July 22.
Not just a random editorial decision to put Marker's trial result on the top of the "AACR News" section. The editors didn't put it there because they saw it as a failure. Just an indicator of how those in the know saw this result?
Back to my net worth of Jun10. Tragedy.
Love to hear people buying on this kind of day
Wise.
Look up.
"Mesa" chart for last hour+
Never seems like human trading when it looks like that.
And 2,341 Aug7.5calls, and 2,035 Aug10calls
Better Lucky Than Smart-buyers today will be both lucky and smart, being offered this buying opportunity and taking it.