Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Many thanks for your thoughts, ex. EOM
Biopharm, shouldn't that NASD Rule 2711 that you highlighted in red make us a tad nervous? As it read it, Piper Jaffrey must have materially substantive reasons for terminating coverage of a company they know so much about, and that they would be in trouble if it were for a reason such as "pique" with PPHM as has been suggested. Am I missing something? TIA.
Merry Christmas to all on this magnificent Board. And if I may proffer a Dickensian sentiment: "God bless us, everyone!"
Peek A Boo:
http://tinyurl.com/ohrgz7c
Thanks, Chris, for the hard work.
May I presume the conclusion that your information is at odds with the generally accepted narrative of this board? Thank you.
Ebola Virus Hides from the Immune System?
http://www.techinsider.io/ebola-survivor-health-issues-bizarre-2015
Thanks for the effort, cheynew, and sharing the results.
jimsgtx: to your point: if charts don't lie, the general market is going down and going down big:
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$SPX&p=M&yr=20&mn=0&dy=0&id=p90567470275&a=425609082&listNum=1
Goat -- That's like Custer's Last Stand!(EOM)
I've wanted to find out what would happen to PPHM when Wall Street begins the correction of the Biotech Bubble. Perspective:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-28/biotechs-battered-7th-straight-day-longest-losing-streak-7-years
I think I'm finding out.
EVERY tool will be dragged out of the closet to make people sell PPHM cheap, drive them out and pile amounts of shares to sell in the BOOM UP.
I remember those posts, CP. I guess many of us cringe whenever we hear the popular truism that insanity is doing the same things over and over and expecting a different result. After 15 years, the retail SH has every reason to question his sanity.
However, there are some things one must just see to the end. This is one of them. There are strong and valid reasons to believe that this science is the real McCoy. I guess, it's just the fear that despite many of us having been right on the science, the machinations of Wall Street will guillotine the retail SH in the end.
I thanked volgoat a couple of months ago for keeping me in this stock. I meant it then and I mean it now. Despite everything, one cannot miss a possible opportunity of a lifetime. But the bigger the opportunity, the bigger the risk. Everything is now beyond our control. That makes a big risk seem like climbing Mt. Everest with one arm.
Thanks for everything.
Thanks, cheynew. You're sentiments reflect those uneasy senses that have emerged. I will not bore this Board any further with my "unease." GLTA.
Thank you CP. It doesn't quite allay my underlying fear, but that's not really your responsibility. You've provided so many fine and reflective thoughts/information here, and I am grateful.
I think many of us who are LONG time investors are in the same boat. After so many years of investing and the hope that seems to be indicated by the science, we have thrown the dice.
I just cannot shake this haunting sense that all is not in order for the retail SH. I hope (pray) that my senses are wrong.
CP: I fear your #2 scenario.
This company's management has never been retail SH friendly. I don't believe we figure into any of their options going forward. I was around for the 1:10 RS (I think it was 1:10; I know I had 40,000 shares built up, they were reduced to a fraction of that number, and then we got shorted into the pits of hell). I was here when, at one of the quarterly conferences years ago, the CEO (not the present one -- I don't think) was asked about the corruption of SH value and he actually laughed. As I've grown into my Senior years holding this company's stock, my memory is fading; but those incidents remain crystal clear.
The #2 scenario frightens me because your last sentence under scenario #2 reads: "I don't see this option 2 as a real possibility because it would imply that while BoD works for share value they also decided the faith of the deal up-front without consulting SHs." THAT assumption would be difficult to demonstrate.
I'm here for the science and what it should produce in terms of share price; but I've always worried that, in the end, the retail SH somehow will be shafted.
If you could relieve that fear (not eliminate it -- just relieve it), I'd be grateful.
Condolences at your heartbreak. And you relay a very poignant point about the personal cost of the dose switching. The cost is far more than financial.
Just saw PPHM symbol cross CNBC ticker +.03 cents. Extended hours above 9000 shares.
Goat, frankly I'd rather have this chart correct a little bit before PPHM makes its run.
http://tinyurl.com/qyogyvu
That money flow divergence on the IBB with the price so far away from the weekly 200MA is massive. Not saying PPHM could not buck the trend if or when the "adjustment" takes place. I'd just like to see how PPHM holds up if such a correction was to occur. I've always thought that PPHM so close to a run would not be acquired so easily at these prices. I'm cautious of a possible massive shakeout in the entire sector which would be wildly demoralizing to many shareholders if they didn't see the wider perspective.
You kept me in this company a couple of years ago when I was prepared to walk away after holding for more than a decade. Thank you for talking me out of it after you answered a question with a pithy and no-nonsense response.
Sean
Thank you, Rawnoc, for your response. However:
(1) Posters on this board have posted emails sent to them by Dr. Seymour in private correspondence. That, in itself, does NOT constitute the revelation of "insider information."
(2)I ask the question within the specific context of your explanation as to the recent advance in the share price of NNVC. You stated, unequivocally, that this run up, according to your sources, has been because of "... management passing along insider information of events that will never actually materialize...."
That is a very SPECIFIC charge to which you, as a moderator, owe a MUCH fuller explanation.
Again, thank you for your attention.
This is NOT the insider information that I requested. This was a PUBLIC post from the Silicon Investor from June 1, 2015.
You have stated plainly that your private sources have told you that INSIDER information is being passed.
I am asking for the data to which you alluded in your post of today where you said, "My sources say the recent rise is based on management passing along insider information of events that will never actually materialize...."
Thank you.
Again, I make the request of a moderator of this Board who said: "My sources say the recent rise is based on management passing along insider information of events that will never actually materialize...."
This is a very serious charge. I think it would be incumbent upon you to specify "the insider information that will never materialize."
Thank you.
If your sources know that the "recent rise is based on management passing along insider information of events," then they certainly know the nature of that information. Care to share it with the board?
Speaking of old timers. Does anyone know whatever happened to a poster by the name of odd_sod? I think he was from Canada and was very active and then wasn't here anymore.
Thank you, leif, for the effort and the sharing of Dr. Seymour's response with this Board.
Hold your breath
This is the chart I've been watching and don't like.
http://tinyurl.com/qfobd4p
Thanks, Wook, for the effort and the reporting back.
Since 19:24 6 trades/14000 shares at $1.65
Form 13G Definition:
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/schedule13g.asp
Sulaco.....hopefully not at anywhere NEAR this price.
Thank you, CP, for taking the time to offer a reply which actually makes sense.
CP I've been an investor in this stock for the better part of 15 years. My knowledge of the complexities of the science pales by comparison to yours. But I do question one thing you've said. Wall Street is filled with sharks. They biotech analysts can smell a winner like a shark smells blood from a long distance away. I simply find it difficult to believe that the potential of Bavi is not recognized by these professionals and that they "don't even know yet that PPHM exists." This has always bothered me, and increasingly so as the immunotherapy technology comes into its own.
I sincerely hope you're right about this.
Sean
Continued Positive TA Divergences on Weekly Chart:
http://tinyurl.com/nf4lgup
FWIW.
Weekly TA divergences galore (with narrowing Bollinger Bands):
http://tinyurl.com/nf4lgup
I have wagered a nice pile of cash that Bavi and the anti-PS platform will make us a nice profit.
So have I.
There will be no mammoth battles over Bavi and the anti-PS platform. If that were the case, the SP would $140, not $1.40.
That's where we disagree. I'm increasingly asking the question as to whether or not Wall Street has fleshed out the patent question and the share price reflects its verdict.
I hope you are right and my suspicions are completely wrong.
Seems to me that he knows quite well that flipped PS must be targeted and only one company has the patent rights to it.
That may be the patent battle of the century.
That is my nightmare, Biopharm. That PPHM eventually will be tied up in patent infringement lawsuits for years that will drain profits from the company and even the effective marketing of Bavi. Even if PPHM should finally prevail, it may take such amount of time that victory would be, effectively, a moot point.
I hate to bring this issue up because it'll add fire to the negative naysayers. But it's a real fear. I even wonder if the suppressed share price is related to the fact that Wall Street understands the patent nightmare scenario and is rendering its verdict.
Sean
Thank you, CP, for this post. After 15 years of being invested, sometimes PPHM seems like a bit of an illusion. It's treatment of the retail investor has been at times despicable. BUT, your post reminds me that, in a fallen world, things are never as you would want them to be and sometimes one just has to make a stand and say, "I'm in this damn thing to the end, come hell or high water."
Glug, glug.
Again many thanks -- not just for this post -- but for all of your informative posts for which I've, ungraciously, never thanked you.
The market is getting hit, but this stock being down almost 10% in a day means that there's something more going on. I suspect that with all the news about Ebola spreading like wildfire that there are investors saying to themselves, "If they had something, this would have been the time to show it." I'm not saying I agree with that point of view, but I think it's definitely a factor.
The good news is that, while the volume will end the day heavier than usual, it is not a high volume sell-off.
Life long monthly chart
I'm working from an iPad and I'm not very good at it, so please bear with me. I posted this chart several months ago. The ONLY good news is that often a triangle is overshot to the downside before it breaks in its true direction. It's a monthly chart, so this could still require time to play out. There is not a lot of good news on the indiividual indicators. But they can change on the drop of a dime.
tinyurl.com/q9v5pfb
This is a LOG SCALE OFF life time chart indicating that the Bollinger Bands have never been tighter in the entire history of the company. Something's gotta give -- but remember this is a monthly chart and we may still have a bit if time before it plays out.
tinyurl.com/nhvk8e9