Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
actually the law says that was not proven ebcause the conviction was overturned. The law says he isnt guilty... that is fact
It doesnt say its still in affect. It was a temporary stop of trading so if that was years ago the document doesnt matter.
Factless statement..... where are the facts?
no thats just plain wrong... many people go to jail and then are let go when courts find out they got it wrong. Those people are not assumed guilty for the time they spent there WRONGFULLY. Most humans feel for them and the years of their lives the courts STOLE from them. Again, they dont get let off if they are truly guilty by the law. The courts rules are part of the law. If the court broke the law they were not truly guilty... hence they are FREE and INNOCENT!
where is the date on that temporary document?
LOLOLOLOL NO JOKE! Hilarious the attacks made on tron!
whatever words you wanna use doesnt change he was tried unjustly and let go ebcause of it meaning hes not guilty by the courts. OR... he would be in jail.
thats called breaking the law... SMH
i agree and i keep pointing it out. Really DD shows tron is for real.
yeah ive read it and it was overturned because the courts broke the law... Plain and simple
PROOF? Hes not in jail! Law says you are wrong.
its more false outdated evidence... SMH
guilty people dont get cases overturned. Its called a mistrial. They get let go free for a reason... WRONGFUL CONVICTION!
again... only part of the puzzle here. Ignoring facts doesnt change that they exist! Also 20 years ago.
thats misinformed. Thats only a piece to the puzzle. He had thousands of pages of documents taken into custody which was evidence he needed in court. This was all part of why the conviction was a joke. These are facts....
actually the court withheld evidence and that was a fact. The evidence was finally released which was proof of his evidence. The loophole was helpful but welcome to the law and court system. He was wrongfully convicted and that is a fact and also all that matters. The facts
more speculation but where are the facts... SMH
This hijacked shell label isnt true or even a thing lol It was purchased legally.
If you read it you would see she posted shes managed their website from Sept 2012 - present. InMedGroup Inc owns it, and she built and operates it. Those are facts. Where are your facts to support wayne has anything to do with the website?
actually she does if you look at the resume she posted lol smh
if you look at the source of the news links you can differentiate which ones are put out by the owner of the OTC site and which are linked articles automatically. The fake pr was a linked article from yahoo and was not put there by Toron. lol smh
This also makes no sense... in this case you are saying they let the buyer (if you are claiming wayne is associated with toron) have control of a company website where the deal is in default and that he is allowed to say its on a person to close the deal that in your theory is a ghost... inmed wouldnt want that either! Like what is the point... this theory is absurd...
that is talking about protecting their login info... lol It says nothing about if other news sources are posted under the news section...
The point is the company is in control of who has control of the site. They chose you. They also own the site still and will care about its content which represents their brand. If Inmed owns their site which they do they would not have someone putting news up there to push their own agenda and not be aware of it and they would care if someone was falsely claiming their company was for sale...
This is 100% false. prove that or its just irrelevant.
you think inmed is letting hayes run their site for them and they dont know hes posting news updates about selling their company?! comon where is this going?! None of this even remotely makes sense....
WHAT?! It shows by fact that its owned by inmedgroup inc... this is literally how the internet works... LMAO
You cannot park a site on the domain name without a username and password that the person who registers a site creates at the time they register it.
It is a fact InMedGroup Inc has registered the domain name Inmedgroup.com and Wayne could not have control of their site because they own the domain name.... This is really simple...
see below
what are you talking about that shows the domain name which is where the site is parked is registered to the company inmedgroup inc.... If its registered to them they own the site.... wayne cannot own the site... how is this difficult?
what are you talking about!? The site is parked at that domain name! This is just plain and simple how the internet works! lol
not only did i supply the lookup info showing its owned by inmedgroup inc but to the claim they have the same design. Any knowledge of web design would show that is also false. They use two completely different content management systems as can be clearly seen as well. Assumptions lead you here... DD would show you these are not only completely false but impossible. SMH
This is not even in the realm of possibilities. LONG ago before the original inmed site went down I pulled the IP of these sites when we were investigating the sites and when it came back those IP had not changed. I do this for a living and I can tell you the Website belonging to anyone but InMed is completely far fetched and beyond reaching. If you dont believe the deal is still on the table that is your prerogative but claiming that anyone but inmed has control of their site is absurd and 100% false. Again if you really think that happened call inmed and ask if they have a website. That has nothing to do with the acquisition and i garuntee anyone on the phone from inmed offices will be able to tell you to navigate to http://www.inmedgroup.com/ and you will be able to put that crazy idea to rest.
closed green lololol
Not everything under the "news" section on OTC is put out by the company. The official company PRs yes, but OTC also links company news from other official locations. This one was linked from yahoo. Yahoo posted the news without vetting it and the OTC auto linked the article.
no... just no... that claim is an assumption, a stretch, a twist and a number other things.... Talk about no facts or evidence at all. This is completely fabricated and there is nothing to support it.
Exactly, there are so many reasons why that theory is absurd.... lol
yeah thats wrong
By this logic.... Wayne if in control of InMed site would be the one posting the deal is in default!? How would that even remotely make even the slightest bit of sense!?!?
still no evidence to support statements... just claims... lol