Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Nothing has moved.
Deirdre has an arbitration hearing.
If moves now, wouldn't want to be Carter.
The inventors must be pissed.
Everyone can thank Billy for what is happening.
It's ALL of his own making.
Scruff-patrol
Oh, that's big. Thanks.
If we make it that far.
It's not looking too good for Billy, at least from my perspective.
Scrufferangle
Nothing really. Original poster thought something, but not.
Unless you're including "World Wildlife Day" or the "2nd day of Lent"?
LÖL, Scruffy-Wild
Plus, he could EVEN BE REMOVED from office.
With removal, his stock, even if has majority interest and control, may convert to non-voting stock.
https://yourbusiness.azcentral.com/consequences-violating-corporate-bylaws-27808.html
In it, to win it,
Scruff-Daddy
And you're most certainty welcome cinnamonpee.
Expanding on 1 of our MOST FAVORABLE SH FACTS
What exactly are "Ultra Vires Acts"?
A Memorandum of Association of a company is a basic charter of the company. It is a binding document which describes the scope of the company among other things. If a company departs from its MOA such an act is ultra vires.
Summing up the Doctrine of Ultra Vires
1) An act, legal in itself, but not authorized by the object clause of the Memorandum of Association of a company or statute, is Ultra Vires the company. Hence, it is null and void.
2) An act ultra vires the company cannot be ratified even by the unanimous consent of all shareholders.
3) If an act is ultra vires the directors of a company, but intra vires the company itself, then the members of the company can pass a resolution to ratify it. (No "Intra vires" existed for UOIP, Inc. That is what the BOD is for).
4) If an act is Ultra Vires the Articles of Association of a company, then the same can be ratified by a special resolution at a general meeting.
MOST IMPORTANTLY, "Ultra Vires" CANNOT BE DEFENDED IN COURT. They are in CLEAR VIOLATION of the bylaws. The law is ENTIRELY on our side.
Now, since UV's occurred, contracts, side deals, waterfall, almost everything done by Carter after the fact can and in all probability, WILL BE VOIDED!
Even original WAG guesses could be back in play! YES, IT'S VERY POSSIBLE, ONLY COMMON PAID (besides legal, inventors and what's outlined in original contract(s)).
And if Carter sold too many shares since purposely planned for stock to become revoked, the other remaining collective SH'rs (that being us), may EVEN have controlling interest in the company.
Thank you very much for 4 posting this long uoip.
KAMAL KIAN vs. WILLIAM R. CARTER
as per your request TonyJoe
STEVEN L. RADER (SBN 189979)
srader@centaurilaw.com
Jason R. Dilday (SBN 215968)
jdilday@centaurilaw.com
CENTAURI LAW GROUP, P.C.
15615 Alton Parkway, Suite 245
Irvine, CA 92618
Telephone: (949) 336-5716
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Kamal Kian and Gregory Collins
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE
KAMAL KIAN, an individual; GREGORY COLLINS, an individual,
Plaintiffs
vs.
WILLIAM R. CARTER, JR., an individual;
UNIFIEDONLINE, INC., a Delaware
Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No.30-2021-01219501-CU-MC-CJC
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND FOR
EQUITABLE AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
FOR (1) BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY;
(2) ACCOUNTING; AND (3) VIOLATIONS
OF THE DELAWARE CORPORATIONS
CODE
Plaintiffs KAMAL KIAN and GREGORY COLLINS (“Plaintiffs”) alleges as follows:
PARTIES
1. Plaintiff KAMAL KIAN is, and at all times relevant hereto was, a California resident
owning 100,647,563 shares of common stock in UNIFIEDONLINE, INC.
2. Plaintiff GREGORY COLLINS is, and at all times relevant hereto was, an Arizona
resident owning 27,909,259 shares of common stock in UNIFIEDONLINE, INC.
3. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and based on such information and belief allege that
Defendant WILLIAM R. CARTER, JR. (“Carter”) is an individual residing in North Carolina, who
purports to be, and holds himself out as, the majority shareholder, sole director, and officer, of UNIFIEDONLINE, INC.
4. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and based on such information and belief allege that
Defendant UNIFIEDONLINE, INC. (“Unified”) is a Delaware Corporation which owns assets located
in California, and/or has entered into transactions with residents of California, including, but not
limited to, Plaintiffs.
5. Venue is proper in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange in that the
damages and losses alleged herein were sustained in Orange County, California.
6. Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, are sued herein under fictitious names, their
true names and capacities being unknown to Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs will amend this complaint to allege
their true names and capacities when ascertained. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and based on
such information and belief allege that each of the fictitiously named Defendants is responsible in
some manner for the occurrences herein alleged and that Plaintiffs’ damages as herein alleged were
proximately caused by such Defendants.
7. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and based on such information and belief allege
that each of the Defendants named herein, including those named as DOE Defendants, were, at
times relevant hereto, the agent, servant, employee, joint venture, and/or partner of the other, and
in doing the acts alleged herein, were acting within the course and scope of said agency,
employment, joint venture, or partnership.
8. Plaintiffs have done all things necessary or required to be done prior to bringing
the claims for relief herein alleged, save and except where such would prove futile, including, but
not limited to, the exhaustion of any and all contractual or administrative remedies, where
applicable.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
9. Plaintiffs incorporate each and every allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 8,
as though fully set forth herein.
10. On or about October 26, 2015, Carter, as the sole member of a Delaware limited
liability company, UnifiedOnline! LLC, converted 400,0000 AA Preferred Stock of Unified into Common Stock with an effective date of January 5, 2015. The conversion gave Carter, an aggregated
903,825,954 shares of Unified common stock and control of the company.
11. On or about October 27, 2015, Unified purchased Chanbond LLC (“Chanbond”), a
Delaware limited liability company, from Diedre Leane. The purchase agreement provided
“Chanbond shall appoint William R. Carter, Jr. as sole manager (“Manager”) and thereafter Manager
shall have sole and exclusive authority over the business of ChanBond.”
12. Section 2.1 of Unified’s bylaws, amended April 23, 2014, states “[t]he Board of
Directors shall consist of three (3) members.”
13. According to Unified’s Delaware state filings, Carter is the sole director listed for
Unified.
14. Section 2.6 of Unified’s bylaws requires a majority of the directors, so at least two of
the 3-person board, for Unified to transact any business.
15. At the time Carter assumed control of Unified, it was a publicly traded company. In
2019, Carter’s inaction led Unified’s registration to be revoked by the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission, deleteriously affecting the value of Plaintiffs’ stock.
16. Section 1.1 of Unified’s bylaws requires annual meetings for, inter alia, election of
directors. Since the time Carter assumed putative control of Unified in 2015, there have been no
annual meetings of the shareholders and no elections held for the board of directors.
17. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and based on such information and belief allege
that, since the time Carter assumed putative control of Unified in 2015, Carter has used assets of
Unified to pay his personal debts, although Unified has not had a validly installed board of directors
and could not take any action during that time.
18. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and based on such information and belief allege
that, since the time Carter assumed putative control of Unified in 2015, Carter has caused Unified to
enter into contracts, and to institute, and purportedly informally resolve, litigation, although Unified
has not had a validly installed board of directors and could not take any action during that time, all
without any notice to Plaintiffs and the other Unified shareholders.
19. Carter, as a purported officer, director, and majority shareholder of Unified has engaged in self-dealing transactions to his personal benefit and which has caused, is causing, or will cause
waste of Unified’s assets, to the detriment of Unified’s shareholders, unless and until Carter is enjoined
from said acts and a valid, disinterested, board of directors for Unified is installed.
20. Unified is the sole owner/member of Chanbond. Carter has used his purported control
of Unified to likewise assume control over Chanbond. Chanbond’s assets consists of several patents:
US7941822; US8341679; US8984565; US7346918; and US9015774
21. Carter has caused Chanbond to maintain multiple actions for patent infringement:
ChanBond, LLC v. Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC; ChanBond, LLC v. Bright House Networks,
LLC; ChanBond, LLC v. Cable One, Inc.; ChanBond, LLC v. Cablevision Systems Corporation and
CSC Holdings, LLC; ChanBond, LLC v. Cequel Communications, LLC and Cequel Communications
Holdings I, LLC d/b/a Suddenlink Communications; ChanBond, LLC v. Charter Communications,
Inc.; ChanBond, LLC v. Comcast Corporation and Comcast Cable Communications, LLC; ChanBond,
LLC v. Cox Communications, Inc.; ChanBond, LLC v. Mediacom Communications Corporation;
ChanBond, LLC v. RCN Telecom Services, LLC; ChanBond, LLC v. Time Warner Cable Inc. and
Time Warner Cable Enterprises, LLC; ChanBond, LLC v. WaveDivision Holdings, LLC; and
ChanBond, LLC v. WideOpen West Finance, LLC.
22. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and based on such information and belief allege that
Carter has caused said patent infringement actions to settle in such a way that the assets of Chanbond
and Unified will be permanently lost, but Carter will be personally enriched.
23. Plaintiffs will suffer irreparable harm if Carter is permitted to distribute the proceeds
from said settlements without a validly installed board of directors, an accounting, and an annual
meeting of Unfied’s shareholders, in that the assets of Unified will be permanently lost and subject to
licenses and conveyances entered into by Carter without authorization.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
Breach of Fiduciary - Duty of Care
Against William R. Carter, Jr.
24. Plaintiffs incorporate and reallege, as though fully set forth herein, paragraphs 1
through 23, inclusive, of this Complaint.
25. As the sole director and officer of Unified, Carter has breached his fiduciary duty to
exercise care in that he has caused Unified’s subsidiary to license and convey assets without sufficient
consideration to Unified and its shareholders.
26. As a direct and proximate result of Carter’s breach of his fiduciary duty, Plaintiffs have
sustained damages in an amount according to proof at trial but in excess of the jurisdictional minimum
of this court.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
Breach of Fiduciary Duty - Duty of Loyalty
Against William R. Carter, Jr.
27. Plaintiffs incorporate and reallege, as though fully set forth herein, paragraphs 1
through 26, inclusive, of this Complaint.
28. As the sole director and officer of Unified, Carter has breached his fiduciary duty of
loyalty in that he has caused Unified’s subsidiary to license and covey assets without sufficient
consideration to Unified and its shareholders but to his own personal enrichment.
29. As a direct and proximate result of Carter’s breach of his fiduciary duty, Plaintiffs have
sustained damages in an amount according to proof at trial but in excess of the jurisdictional minimum
of this court.
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
An Accounting
Against All Defendants
30. Plaintiffs incorporate and reallege, as though fully set forth herein, paragraphs 1
through 29, inclusive, of this Complaint.
31. Plaintiffs invoke the equitable jurisdiction of the court to mandate that Carter and
Unified provide an accounting of the proceeds from the patent litigation settlements and the
planned distributions therefrom.
32. Without said accounting Plaintiffs’ legal remedies are inadequate in that the assets
of Unified may be completely disposed without due regard for Plaintiffs’ equity interests in
Unified.
33. The amount due to Plaintiffs on the liquidation of Unified’s assets is unknown and cannot be ascertained without an accounting, since the information necessary to determine that
amount is within the exclusive knowledge of the defendants.
FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
Violation of Delaware General Corporation Law Section 211(b)
Against All Defendants
34. Plaintiffs incorporate and reallege, as though fully set forth herein, paragraphs 1
through 33, inclusive, of this Complaint.
35. Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) section 211(b) provides: “an annual
meeting shall be held for the election of directors…”
36. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and thereon allege that no annual meeting has
been held since 2015.
37. Accordingly, Plaintiffs request an injunction commanding that Unified hold an
annual meeting of the shareholders, consistent with its bylaws, and that it be enjoined from
conducting any further business until such time as the meeting has been had.
FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
Violation of Delaware General Corporation Law Section 141(b)
Against All Defendants
38. Plaintiffs incorporate and reallege, as though fully set forth herein, paragraphs 1
through 37, inclusive, of this Complaint.
39. Under section 141(b) of the DGCL a quorum of the board of directors is required
“for the transaction of business…” by a corporation.
40. DEFENDANTS HAVE ENGAGED IN ULTRA VIRES AND VOID ACTS, BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF SAID QUORUM OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, WHICH HAVE, OR WILL, DEVALUE PLAINTIFF'S EQUITY INTEREST IN UNIFIED.
41. Accordingly, Plaintiffs requests a preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining
Defendants from any further corporate acts, including, but not limited to, appointing managers
and officers of Chanbond, until such time as Unified is able to act through a quorum of a validly
installed board of directors.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for judgment against Defendants, and each of them, as follows:
1. For compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial but totaling at least $1,
250,000;
2. For an equitable accounting of proceeds and distributions from the patent litigation;
3. For preliminary and permanent injunctive relief commanding that Unified hold an
annual meeting of the shareholders, consistent with its bylaws, and that it be enjoined
from conducting any further business until such time as the meeting has been had.
4. For preliminary and permanent injunctive relief prohibiting Defendants from any further
corporate acts, including, but not limited to, appointing managers and officers of
Chanbond, until such time as Unified is able to act through a quorum of a validly
installed board of directors.
5. For reasonable attorney’s fees and costs; and
6. For such other and further relief as the court may deem just and appropriate.
Dated: ___________________ CENTAURI LAW GROUP, P.C.
By:
JASON R. DILDAY
STEVEN L. RADER
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
GREGORY COLLINS
JURY TRIAL DEMAND
To the fullest extent allowed by all state and federal laws and statutes, Plaintiffs hereby
demand a trial by jury as to all claims, counts, and/or causes of action in this matter.
Dated: ___________________ CENTAURI LAW GROUP, P.C.
By:
JASON R. DILDAY
STEVEN L. RADER
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Good morning Big Dog Daddy & all UOIP Longs.
And still waiting for any proxy material from our brokerage firms, via the TA.
10th week and counting...
At least we're having awesome September mornings.
P.S. And your count here is fantastic professor.
I thank you Mr. PhD Marine. Great job.
"Top of the morning to you" chief.
And an ode to Carter.
And happy, happy, happy birthday.
Time flies, especially the older one gets.
Good morning AJ, DÜtch & your family.
God Bless America & UOIP Shareholders.
What is considered MATERIAL?
In financial accounting and auditing, determining the threshold level of materiality requires that an appropriate base level and percentage be decided on. Traditionally the financial community refers to accounting variables such as net income (before taxes) or earnings, revenue, total assets and total debt/equity as benchmarks.
The materiality threshold is defined as a percentage of that base. The most commonly used base in auditing is net income (earnings / profits).
Most commonly percentages are in the range of 5 – 10 percent (for example an amount <5% = immaterial, > 10% material and 5-10% requires judgment).
http://www.materialitytracker.net/standards/financial-thresholds/
Cisco's Net Income FY ending 07/31/2021 = $10,591 (in millions) so $10,591,000,000.
1% of 10.591B ~ $106,000,000
2% of 10.591B ~ $212,000,000
3% of 10.591B ~ $318,000,000
4% of 10.591B ~ $424,000,000
5% of 10.591B ~ $530,000,000
6% of 10.591B ~ $636,000,000
7% of 10.591B ~ $742,000,000
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/858877/000085887721000013/csco-20210731.htm#id9635782a2d344aaabc654401a5ad580_211
I guess my point is... "I have no idea".
Screwy Stupefied Scruffer
P.S. If Cisco is only ~15%, $300M would = $2,000,000,000 total ???
I agree 100%.
It's not over by any means.
Plus, some in too deep to have sold.
Yes, I avoid this arena (typically).
Better luck to try and find a decently valued biotech and hope gets played.
It seems like the big boys play something everyday.
Just have to be lucky to find beforehand and wait.
You must possess a little shine (vision).
Bought that other one and did exceptional (I hope).
Forgot what it was but rallied even more when posted about it here.
Edit: Just looked at history and saw/recalled symbol.
Hope sold, at least, half. It's dropped unfortunately.
Making an additional 6-figures (hopefully) always helps.
If remember correctly, bought a very nice collectible Vette.
TGIF, Scruff
Certainly hope feeling better. TY.
Hopefully, this is only a formal acknowledgement that settlement has occurred.
I'm not even sure if it's in the FY2021 numbers.
Too busy to read the detail.
Plus, they hide stuff in footnotes, etc.
Maybe it's the standard annual liability insurance payment being recognized (with a slight increase).
Who knows anymore, but good to see in the 10-K.
Dutch's buddy, Scruffer
I'm the idiot. You're the PhD professor.
Just trying to get rough idea of 1/10 of 1% of what?
$22.7B
Doesn't seem like much, unless their insurance contributes.
And not sure what else will follow (MSO 13, insurance, etc.)
I'm guessing this is only Cisco itself, for all legal for FY2021.
Doc: What's this mean exactly?
Legal and indemnification charge___________(0.1)%
of what amount (Product Gross Margin 63.3% of 22.7B, a multiple of ?) ?
I know includes other legal but of what total amount roughly?
Page 39.
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/858877/000085887721000013/csco-20210731.htm
Thank you and thanks Ice.
Potential NASDAQ Listing...
Hello Pal Engages Maxim Group LLC for Potential NASDAQ Listing and Advisory and Investment Banking Services
VANCOUVER, BC, Sept. 9, 2021 /CNW/ -- Hello Pal International Inc. ("Hello Pal" or the "Company") (CSE:HP Frankfurt:27H OTC: HLLPF), a provider of rapidly growing international live-streaming, language learning and social-crypto platform, is pleased to announce the engagement of Maxim Group LLC ("Maxim") for general advisory and investment banking services in connection with a potential up-listing of Hello Pal's common shares on the NASDAQ Capital Market ("NASDAQ") in 2022.
By up-listing to NASDAQ, Hello Pal aspires to gain new exposure and access to a larger base of retail and institutional investors in the United States and internationally. Hello Pal believes that the NASDAQ is the world's pre-eminent exchange for technology based companies. Management believes that the up-listing will bring significant value to Hello Pal. The listing of Hello Pal's common shares on NASDAQ is subject to the approval of that exchange and the satisfaction of all applicable listing requirements, and there can be no assurance that these requirements will be met.
KL Wong, Chief Executive Officer of Hello Pal, states "We are very pleased in taking this next step forward with our new strategic advisor, Maxim. Their expertise in the US capital markets, and experience in the NASDAQ listing process is accretive for Hello Pal and its shareholders. We look forward to working together as we continue to grow."
Hello Pal does not currently plan to undertake any financings in connection with an up-listing on NASDAQ and looks forward to keeping its shareholders updated on its progress as it moves forward.
Under the terms of the engagement, Maxim will receive a cash fee and up to 400,000 restricted common shares upon certain milestones being achieved. The initial term of the agreement is for a period of twelve (12) months.
https://www.hellopal.com/hello-pal-announces-record-2-820-million-monthly-revenue-for-june-2021-and-reports-on-crypto-revenue-and-profit-for-the-first-time-2-2-2/
Yes, holiday weekend so some giddy.
I know my animals are extra, extra frisky today.
I'm not sure if it's because of the beginning of the football season, the weather or what's going on with them.
Plus, it's been a giant playhouse (and mess) in here today.
Is Dutch getting frisky or happier since dad is recovering so well?
Love the relief of cooler weather approaching too.
Summers can be brutal here. Too hot to do much outside, unless swim.
Now if only UOIP can payoff?
All will be happy. And something worthwhile and life-altering, good nest-egg or something for investors to grow.
Plus, always thought outstanding team here and SO MANY AWESOME POSTERS.
Scruff and the canine pack and feline pride.
Yes, we all took a huge chance on UOIP.
"While you see a chance
Take it
...
Because it's all on you
Don't you know by now
No one gives you anything"
We all knew there was a tremendous opportunity here with wins over Cisco and the patents would be VALIDATED and upheld.
All the obstacles we've overcome... RPX, Cisco, Arris (CommScope), "The unknowns and all the behind-the-scene maneuverings by Deirdre and others" and now possibly Carter?
I wish he'd make contact or provide something formally verifying and confirming, "It's a WIN-WIN for all".
But, very unfortunately, doesn't appear to be the case.
Hopefully, all the ducks will align and reward us in more ways than some hope for (at this point).
I guess it's all going to depend on the actions taken and/or Carter.
Plus, it'd be great to meet in-person and learn who "All these unknown gamester risk takers" are.
As I've always thought, this was/is that once in lifetime opportunity for tremendous upside and unbelievable ROR.
Obviously, some took much bigger chances than others by what has been revealed.
Life's a gamble, that's for sure. Sometimes feels like a crapshoot. We gotta a "Shooter" here. Pay the frontline. Yo eleven!
GLTAL, Scruffer
ÜÖIP, ÜÖIP, ÜÖIP.
Good song. I prefer to think...
Hear, hear Marine.
1 out of 2 isn't bad. Batting 0.500.
And Happy Labour Day tomorrow, Mon, Sep 6, 2021.
https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/03/11/canadian-english-differen_n_2853947.html
Good morning AJ and fellow longs.
Just woke-up so slept in for me.
Watched too much football.
Providing you a good morning AJ before your early post.
It's a great time of the year:
• Fall
• Football
• Fans (are back)
• Friskiness abound (at least with canines, felines & whatever is in the air)
Scruff
P.S. BCM... It's a running joke since this (to a few) is one big fantasyland and all wishful thinking.
"Don't fight the Fed" or UOIP SH'rs.
Oops, what happened?
It's my ABSOLUTE FAVORITE (and only) "SUBPENNY TURD" tÖÖ.
Have a fun, entertaining and/or relaxing long Labor Day weekend ALL,
Scruffer
ÜÖIP, ÜÖIP, ÜÖIP
This is gr8. Only ~31 business days.
Thank you keeping this up AJ. It's awesome.
45-60 day guestimate was what many were projecting.
Carter's on vaca with Bentham money awaiting to be called back to sign.
Nothing written anywhere about deal finalized, even w/o any specifics (NDAs).
CLEARLY, a site would post something.
Scruff
Oh, you're post # 149. Thanks.
Will do DD later and provide feedback, FWIW.
Have a relaxing & great Saturday, Scruffer
As long as WE ALL WIN in the_long_run.
That's the only thing that matters at this point.
Plus, your niece and nephew (or children/step-children) will love, honor and appreciate you forever.
They may NOT know or appreciate what uncle Tony did for them until they're older and realize how difficult life (and paying the bills) is.
Money is only important if one doesn't have any, and unfortunately, most don't have savings, a decent nest-egg or much to rely on.
5454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454444444444444444444.
That was kitty, Tough Gal, coming to visit. She's purring and slobbering now. The neck and chin massage
P.S. I live in a large dog/cat house (until build new).
Oh, you're doing an ABSOLUTELY FINE job indeed.
I don't know the days that count. You've got the ball.
I was really wondering what all this Tuesday talk is about?
Figured going by your count, ~15 days.
Any ideas able to share?
Plus, saw your other post about thinking taking longer than 15 days (on other forum). FWIW, I agree 100%.
Moreover, you're the retired accounting professor who's extremely skilled (PhD certified, that is, a Doctor of Philosophy) at debits, credits, B/S, I/S, change-in-cash-flow, accumulated deficit, shareholder equity, common stock, preferred stock, bonds and most importantly, the buried and hidden footnotes.
Or lack there is, in this mucked-up case.
P.S. GME to the mn. LOL.
My calculation has: T+11 (mkt open days)
Drinking a screwdriver though. Lawn doesn't need mowing, yesterday dogs went to their annual check-up & shot-clinic and all around a very rough week.
Getting the canines in the car is a workout. Some go excitingly, some, well, it's NOT easy. We go in shifts. It's like lifting 75-125 pounds of dead weight.
So, I'm worked! ... Today = Relax, recalibrate, rejuvenate and recuperate.
It may turn into a "Control-Alt-Delete" of my brain though. It's telling me it may want it, so tomorrow may = Ugh! ???
01) 07/09 = Friday, the announcement to settle
02) 07/12 = Monday
03) 07/13 = Tuesday
04) 07/14 = Wednesday
05) 07/15 = Thursday
06) 07/16 = Friday
07) 07/19 = Monday
08) 07/20 = Tuesday
09) 07/21 = Wednesday
10) 07/22 = Thursday
11) 07/23 = Friday
12) 07/26 = Yo' MÖN
And, what's with all this posting about Tuesday?
Not sure what's happening Tuesday.
Is that ~T+15 day?
I just think it'll take longer to calculate each prorata settlement paid based-on the 13's market share, who gets indemnified, all agree to what is fair, etc.
Anyway, hope still recovering well and plan on seeing you at any future gathering.
Have a "Scruffer-Type" day, Scruff-Driver
P.S. Felt like posting so some can have something to read. Plus, I'm buzzed now.
Yes, I saw that.
That was gd.
Your post, # 150 got whacked. Only 151 posts here. Mind boggling.
I'm still loading and dollar-cost-averaging ~$0.50.
Just don't know a better stock to invest in or have found one.
GTAL, Scruff
P.S. This stock is still sÖÖÖÖÖ under-the-radar.
Also, and most importantly,
https://www.theblockcrypto.com/post/112299/bitcoin-big-part-twitter-future-ceo-jack-dorsey
"If the internet has a native currency, a global currency, we are able to move so much faster with products such as Super Follows, Commerce, Subscriptions, Tip Jar, and we can reach every single person on the planet because of that instead of going down a market-by-market-by-market approach," Dorsey explained.
And that's exactly what HelloPal has.
The TA rep?
All exposure helps. May try Bloomberg & others.
CNBC is the defense, the losers, a "Big media" powerhouse with 3x damages which will try to keep the kibosh on.
Not including the NDAs.
NBCUniversal Media, LLC is an American mass media and entertainment conglomerate owned by Comcast.
Parent: NBCUniversal (Comcast)
Right idea, but best opportunity for exposure is a non-MSO.
Thanks Mic
That's HILARIOUS. Glad saw. Made my morning.
Thank you Mic.
It's in the 4th contract.
Section III.
Subsection B.
Paragraph 14.21a**.
Line 19.
**See footnote (Attached 99.1).
But nothing got attached.
Go figure.
TGIF & good morning Dutch's "Big dog daddy".
Yes, it's quite a shame (for all).
Aren't we both long?
Aren't we both on the same team?
Yes, I could write something derogatory, since it wasn't started by me, but no reason to bother.
You already called it, friend-o.