Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Looks like we are in good hands today :) Supermoon power!
100% Agree with Carjockey, Please do sign up and post something! It is imperative!
This is the real link showing it as Active.
http://www.datalog.co.uk/browse/detail.php/CompanyNumber/USNV20071306281/SOLARIS+POWER+CELLS,+INC.
This is the current solaris power cells:
NV Business ID: NV20071306281
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=24uUSGFwtG9LWMfRZzvvhg%253d%253d&nt7=0
This is the old solaris power cells from the previous merge out:
NV Business ID: NV20131447622
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=dDT0OQtDlKhIcaqy2aj6ng%253d%253d&nt7=0
Company Number USNV20131447622
http://www.datalog.co.uk/browse/detail.php/CompanyNumber/USNV20131447622/SOLARIS+POWER+CELLS,+INC.
Compare the NV Business ID to the Company Number from your URL and it's obvious your link does not refer to the current Solaris Power Cells.
I love you guys... even though you're all insane... GO SPCL!
Anyone else notice that vertcapital and solarispowercells websites are powered by weebly like the same people set them both up?
SPCL&V ScreenShot Please
What is the URL you are looking at?
"All it takes is the one" GO SPCL!
This titan is about to get up and start running... At least a few people here get the point... BOOM...
Does anyone know who I can call for investor relations information for SPCL other than "Empact"?
"One sweet dream. Pick up the bags and get in the limousine. Soon we'll be away from here. Step on the gas and wipe that tear away!"
I printed out the 8K, and every piece of information I could find, looked at historical volumes, etc and it appears that everything they said they were going to do has been done. I think news will come soon based on those volumes in August... unless that was you guys :P
Pixel Holdings, Inc Taxes Delinquent:
http://delawarecompanysearch.com/pixel-holdings-inc
Why would they be delinquent in their taxes?
Has anyone bothered to pay the 20 dollars for the information here?
https://icis.corp.delaware.gov/Ecorp/EntitySearch/NameSearch.aspx -- Search For File Number 5708725
What is all this:
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SPCL/quote
MPID Ask Price Size Date/Time
NITE 0.0041 10000 15:58
CDEL 0.0045 1200000 15:59
ETRF 0.0098 150000 15:42
CSTI 0.015 261315 15:43
CANT 0.2542 2500 14:32
ARXS U 11/04
eTrade shows .004 and OTC shows .0041
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SPCL/filings
What could cause that?
Nope, the whole point of this stock is to not sell until well after it is uplisted and even then in extreme moderation...
Let the games begin!
Can I have your old yacht? lol
You know...the more you talk the less shares you will be able to buy...
This may seem like a silly question but what is the relation of NITE, CSTI, CDEL etc to SPCL?
I have noticed that this chart on yahoo looked all wacky for a while... seems to show normal in 5 day range now... so to look at some volumes in august, I click the chart and drag it to the right over and over to get to august in a 5 day window... when I did that, it stopped at August 17th... and wouldn't let me drag it over anymore...
https://finance.yahoo.com/chart/SPCL
There were some people saying the August volume spikes were an indicator?
Has this always showed par share count as 207,000,000
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=24uUSGFwtG9LWMfRZzvvhg%253d%253d
On this page it shows authorized share count as 2,160,000,000
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SPCL/profile
I hope it's not too soon... I need a wee tad bit more... :) I have a feeling though... couldn't this occur in late 2019?
I know the name of the law firm, I was asking for the attorney's name
What is the legal advisor's name? That link doesnt show anything
I think if your using a margin account you can contact them and ask them to change the securities type to cash... and that should do it..
Isn't it a good idea lock your shares by putting in an order at some really high sell price so that short sellers can't use them?
I saw one pixel light up... so I bought a million more... now I have a whole television worth!
Is this going to be an issue:
"But the thing that is tricky is that unless an S-4 is filed at the time of the reverse merger, the shares that issue to the private company's investors are not registered (contrary to what many people believe, when you "go" public, the only freely tradable shares are those shares registered in the registration statement -- therefore, the investors of the private company are receiving unregistered shares that are not freely tradable)."
https://www.quora.com/While-the-public-shell-company-is-required-to-report-the-reverse-merger-in-a-Form-8-K-filing-with-the-SEC-there-seem-to-be-no-registration-requirements-under-the-Securities-Act-of-1933-as-there-would-be-for-an-IPO-Is-this-true
Eh nevermind I must have been confused about what "unregistered shares" are
This means we're good?
"Rule 144(d)(3)(i) permits the shareholder to treat the securities received in a stock dividend or stock split or reverse split as if they had been acquired at the same time as the securities on which the dividend was paid or the stock split based. "
This powerpoint has important information regards to reverse mergers:
www.egsllp.com/AlternativePublicOfferings-ReverseMergers.PPT
Solaris was at one point a shell company because Rolling Technologies changed their name to Solaris Power Cells and Rolling Technologies was a shell company:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [X] Yes
Read more: http://www.getfilings.com/sec-filings/100611/Rolling-Technologies-Inc_10-Q/
"Effective August 12, 2013, we changed our name from “Rolling Technologies Inc.” to “Solaris Power Cells, Inc.”. We effected this name change by a merger with our wholly owned subsidiary, which was incorporated solely to effect a change in our name."
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1411730/000106299313004480/form8k.htm
-------------------------
"The shareholders of a company that was at one point a shell cannot sell their shares under Rule 144 unless the company is current in its regular SEC filings for the 12 months prior to the sale"
-------------------------
Solaris Power Cells, Inc. announced delayed annual 10-K filing
Mar 31 16
On 03/31/2016, Solaris Power Cells, Inc. announced that they will be unable to file their next 10-K by the deadline required by the SEC.
http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapid=37186265
-------------------------
They were a shell company at one point, so my question is: were they considered up to date with their filings in the 12 months prior to the sale?
Rolling Technologies changed its name to Solaris Power Cells so it is the same company. This 10-Q indicates that Rolling Technologies was a shell company.
http://www.getfilings.com/sec-filings/100611/Rolling-Technologies-Inc_10-Q/
So therefore it was "at one point a shell company"
"The shareholders of a company that was at one point a shell cannot sell their shares under Rule 144 unless the company is current in its regular SEC filings for the 12 months prior to the sale"
Was "Solaris Power Cells" considered regular in it's filings for the 12 months prior to the sale?
Evergreen Rule for Companies that were at any time Shell Companies:
The shareholders of a company that was at one point a shell cannot sell their shares under Rule 144 unless the company is current in its regular SEC filings for the 12 months prior to the sale
Non-Shell Companies
The non-affiliated shareholders of non-shell company can sell their shares under Rule 144 after holding the shares for six months if current in SEC filings; the company must remain current in its filings for the next six months for sales under Rule 144
After the one year holding period, unlimited resales under Rule 144 are permitted
Any way someone could explain whether this is relevant to this situation:
"In a reverse merger, because the shell is already public, in many cases it does not need to file a registration statement under the 33 Act. The entity does need to continue to make its 1934 Act filings and meet the requirements of any exchange it may be listed on.
Here is a description from a NY law firm which is pretty neutral to positive on them:
Reverse Mergers
But the thing that is tricky is that unless an S-4 is filed at the time of the reverse merger, the shares that issue to the private company's investors are not registered (contrary to what many people believe, when you "go" public, the only freely tradable shares are those shares registered in the registration statement -- therefore, the investors of the private company are receiving unregistered shares that are not freely tradable).
So in order to sell those shares, the investors must either go file a registration statement (bringing you right back to the 1933 Act) or rely on an exemption like Rule 144. And this article points out that the SEC frowns on people trying to use Rule 144 in these situations to make a public market. From a legal perspective, I thought the analysis in the article below was the most clear and thoughtful:"
Do they have to wait for 12/31 as their fiscal year end or the date when the 10-K for that fiscal year end would be normally filed?
Yep I'm gonna buy me a trailer house on devil's backbone and a beer fridge and a riding lawnmower
Did you know the center of the sun (solaris) reaches 27000000 Fahrenheit?
Looks like we've got a Bearish Harambe chart!