Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Mr. Gates started in a garage too.
I hesitated to buy actually. I am wary even after the up look in financials, as surwin does have it correct based on the past track record. We are up from several days ago, which is nice to see, but in the long term, the stock price has significantly dropped. The quarter report should be interesting to see.
Willy even jumping ship to pick up shares is unexpected based on everything I have been reading on this forum over the past two/three years. Everything.
What voting power does Frenkel have in the company by maintaining his current percentage? Say the company did want to move the validian product to a shell company and go private. Wouldn't his vote be needed?
Someone mentioned that they were having difficulty with the integration into the latest Mac update/OS? That could be the cause for the delay but who knows...
Still showing as halted though...
Who doesn't think this was a play for more time to pay off toxic loans? God that would have been a brilliant move...
Financials don't lie. I won't say that I am not sceptical due to past performance but I also understand the scope of what could be accomplished here.
That is also why everyone else is here. Fun times!
I'm not buying at the moment cuz I do think the prices may go lower. But am primed and ready for if word does come out.
You and me both and others much longer. Why some are still here with their negative rant, while still holding too, is beyond me.
I am more curious now about the demonstrations that were done with Ganthet...
I don't think he is right. If Validian was to announce a major deal Monday, that entire past history that he claims is so relevant, means nothing.
What a buzz kill...
For as long as I have been on here reading all the posts and banter... You all do make me chuckle about the onset of validian.
My intrigue lies with the concept that the exchange of the note with Ganthet was to be at the time testing and integration concluded.
With having exchanged the note, that means that all integration and testing phases concluded and successfully.
What comes after all that is what I am curious about.... Maybe it will be by summer that ganthet releases the app?
No need then as long as you assert that it was an unbiased assessment of the current state of the financials...
Since you have been very good at determining much of the course of the current state of the market price and how things would occur, I am curious if you would make an entirely unbiased breakdown on the current 10-k, with no consideration of past track history except for maybe the last two years.
Well why don't you tell us where it is going? Everything else you have said seems to be spot on....
No one can argue with the past history of numbers as we have no idea what was going on at that time. Why not look to the future and what the current present facts are showing us?
Sooooo you're upset because he didn't confide in you his business plan? Instead of being excited that ganthet decided to move forward with the product where? by validian was able to cash in on the note? Makes sense...
And let's see, cyber security, what does it do. Well anti virus, based on common and know attack patterns, detects, prevents and secured a systems integrity. Basic 2-3 years to make...
Encrypting, based on key algorithms, prevents the transfer of data in clear text. Maybe 3-4 years to make a product. Basic...
Everything we see today from HIDs are relatively the same thing. Validian is taking it much further.
Validian, encrypts everything at the binary level, never done before. Yeah let's wonder why it may take awhile to get that working and into the market.
If only Rome was built in a day. Anyone taking this 10-k negatively doesn't know what they are talking about or has ulterior motives. Like seeking to dilute? the shares... Why would we want that...
Obviously this as not as Grand as we would like, such as a contact with a major, but I do believe steps in the right direction are being made.
475K reported as income. Not sure about the rest, will dissect later.
Do we have any eyes or ears at the conference this year? Wondering if there will be any highlighted information to see from the conference.
That's why it is frustrating, especially for those who have been holding for so long.
I am anxious for April to roll around, in hopes that some light will be shown in the financials.
Less a PR is released prior, with a major announcement.
Yeah but I thought ganthet was the only company they were in negotiations with at the end of the year. Or was it the only company they received payment from?
That is why April is such a crucial period. We will find out if everything is just smoke and mirrors come April, IMO.
I'm still waiting on the report that was suppose to be released that the product was tested and a failure, by who was it, SAIC?. As well as the report on Bruce Benn being taken to court over this. I guess that information just doesn't exist either.
No, but it will be a change from that of which we consider the norm. One of which I hope will be the change that we all have, some not so, gracefully waited for.
Let's wait for April to reproach this. As I don't wish to dismiss it but don't want to jump to conclusions.
If you blame small name brands for turning away and deciding their environments don't need such heightened security. More over are unable to decern if it is working, that is not the fault of VLDI.(this technology works behind the scene without front facing interaction). That is why the verification process is necessary and why ganthet could turn out to be a huge stepping stone.
To keep up with the requested change in features. To keep up with the change in protocols and standards. To further increase the scope at which the tool is capable of...
Of course he spins, it's called marketing. Not his fault he has a product that is so far advanced that corporations couldn't deem it worth while back when network security, at this level, wasn't necessary.
Good thing he found successful investors to keep it alive to reach this point. Else he would of had to sell.
That is a PR statement from the person selling network security products. That does not mean that there was a need back then, as there is today.
Quantum mechanics/computing has been employed by the government for years...
Just because we move to quantum computing does not diminish the need to encrypt the data at any level. The lowest level being binary, is still existent in quantum computing and always will be.
Yet we have investors who have seen the product and invested millions. So I am going with the investors who have invested millions, who are intelligent enough to have millions to invest, and have seen this tangible non existent product and are restricted from commenting.
We grasp for straw by following paper.
I can only surmise that between 2006-2010 and before the need for network security at such and advanced level was not needed. Especially depending on the companies who were looking into it, if they were not major companies, this could have easily been dismissed after initially looking into it.
Also, back then how would a company validate if such technology was actually working?
We have now received confirmation on the validity of the source code. Yet how do we know that it can in fact do what it claims. Extensive testing on such a product, especially when it claims encryption at the binary level, must be done.
This testing and the changes validian had made to keep up with the changing technology advancements, are on pace with each other.
With looking at current trends, network security is at a crucial point and validian could be poised to take network security to a new level.
To touch on quantum computing, you all are a bit of base. Quantum computing will not been something we see commercialized, probably. The inherit benefit in quantum mechanics can not be fully utilizes, per cost, to be sold. Things like artificial intelligence, huge databases that require the computing power for systems like what we see utilized for weather predictions would really be the only systems to benefit.
Yet, even so, quantum mechanics, quantum computing will use binary just the same. Although in different states, encryption could still increase the security of these systems and would not put it past validian to be working, in the future, on something that coincides.
Would love to see something come to fruition before hand though.
Going back to my cave, carry on.
Now I would love for you to show me proof that it is not. By law, it is a legitimate company. Maybe to our personal standard of what we desire it to be, it may not be. Allowing one's personal feelings, tpp, to get the better of us, will always blind us to the truth.
Of that, I yet am not certain. I do however hold optimism and know, just like everyone else here, what this technology would do, if it is real. So I hold and choose to believe, as I know you too are doing, otherwise you would not be here.
True but we are looking to see if the claimed 400k went on the sheets or not. That would be a first and a huge change!
Yet here we are still dissecting the facts that Bruce provides us. When all other information points us to failure, except all this past years information and the significant amount of funding that came in. April holds the truth, IMO.
If this reaches .02 I may pick up another 500k, at this rate.
Wrong link. Here you go, for the inquisitive minds.
https://ecorp.sos.ga.gov/BusinessSearch/BusinessInformation?businessId=1577693&businessType=Domestic%20Profit%20Corporation
Come April we will know, at this point, if this latest round of PRs/financials were true. Else, it may be just as everyone is saying.
Open yet inclusive...
Not trying to pump, just stating my opinion based on what I have been reading over the past 2 years, while keeping everything mentioned in their past history in perspective. The recent events are far from what they had achieved in the past. Being listed on the EDGE website alone, is something I can not dismiss so readily. Of course, I am one of the crazies, who go all in, to make it or break it.
If they have encryption at the binary level and are able to switch key algorithms on the fly... You don't sell the company, that is game changer. EDGE is government facilitated and you don't get listed if you are fake. Who needs to be at the security conference when you are in the process of implementation. Once this hits they will be running the conference's, in my opinion.
Been reading and listening to everything said. You don't get listed on the EDGE program if you have nothing to show. End of story.
I like to keep it practical. I do believe that validian does have something. However, I don't like to count my chicks before they hatch.