Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Lol he's still mixing together different/incorrect actions and not discussing properly what came out last fall in the totally separate action where it's clearly states the "concentrated net short position in GTII" was the cause of Alpine backtesting charge deficiencies...then gets it stickied somehow? Laughable
It doesn't matter if the charge goes away. Nakeds are rarely in plain sight. You'll see what I mean soon. As for the GTII case not sure what you mean by "release Cannacord" after case was filed there were several extensions to the timeframe the MM's would have had to answer the complaint. Typically when extensions happen it means they're negotiating. If this wasn't true then they would have immediately answered and or filed a motion to dismiss the case. They did not. So not responding with an answer to the complaint is not what you think. As for the Alpine original PR I think it's safe to say that counsel knew what was coming from FINRA and the Wells notice and decided they'd let FINRA try first. And if you look up Rule 11(as mentioned at the bottom of the dismissal) you can get a clue as to whether your "fictitious" suit claim would be accurate
You still don't want to admit you made a mistake by thinking this recent decision was the Nov 22 one. Ok let's get back on topic. Of 130Ish OTC stocks Alpine touched the Main driver of the more recent Backtesting Charge was a "concentrated net short postion in GTII" if you break those words down we get "net short" meaning they didn't have the long shares to cover this substantial short position. We know what the real short was and we all saw the FTD's(yes we known they arent culmulitive) and shocker the math doesnt add up. We also know Alpine used one sided offers(one of a few ways to NS) which is NOT acting as a bona fide market maker etc etc...if that more recent issue were moot then they wouldn't keep kicking down the road(wjy would they do that? Are other agencies involved now?). The water deal is the water deal??? They take time and would a prospective deal partner want more $$ or less? Because it would be paid for in restricted shares. It didn't say in the report the water deal was off(like was mentioned with 1-800 deal) I also think you should DEFINITELY keep saying things like "you don't get it" and "I know you don't understand this" it REALLY shows how smart you are and makes people believe you LMFAO
You're not explaining anything to ME lol...as I don't need it. Point is you thought the last decision was the more recent backtesting issue and it was not. While we are talking about it though you do understand that in the Nov 22 action that Alpine’s audit report was not accurate. They did not correctly calculate their net capital correctly and they tried to use an add back for the liability? Seems they should know this stuff huh??? Lol
As for the deals it seems you are trying to make it seem as if they weren't real which is mot the case. If you read the filings you will see what was said about 1-800-law firm i.e Wildfire Media. CRTD deal was pulled back and all you have to do is see where the new ticker name of that company is now trading(VOCL) as compared to GTII. GTII court case is still going as expected. Speaking of that case it contains proof of manipulation form a trusted source of the court. If you have a company with a manipulated stock price it makes it difficult to do deals with other entities as GTII more than likely would use restricted stock to fund the deals at least in part.
So of course no mention that you acted as if that was the most recent NSCC case when it wasn't? Lol ok got it. And you have zero clue that any of what you just claimed happened as you are not privy to ANY of it. Still waiting for proof that the Backtesting Charge was "wired back to Alpine" by the way which you don't have. Thanks for playing though
Mentioned several times here already...BY THE COURTS.They know its legitimate.Has been used in multiple cases that were settled.
The evidence of stock manipulation(spoofing) is already on the record for GTII and that cannot be denied.(but why do this for a crap company with no NS'?) Shareintel data is 1 of 2 trusted sources acceptable as evidence and it shows multiple spoofing events. The point of that data is to seek discovery. It easy to say things don't "exist" when they are buried, offshore etc. ANY American should be pissed as this affects them and their families..period
I think there's definitely confusion on who wears the black hats and who wears the white ones.
Once again FACTS are important. This recent Alpine decision posted was from the original application for review the FIRST time Alpine apealed the new backtesting policies NOT the most recent one involving GTII.This is the one filed Dec 2018 and may explain why they kicked the can on the more recent one from last fall since it's a similar argument. Surprised with the "intimate" knowledge espoused of NSCC/DTCC etc people don't read or pay attention LMAO WOW!
Excellent post or maybe we can set up a youtube with Susan Trimbath Phd and former DTCC employee as well as Author of "Naked Short and Dirty" to explain the sheep narrative pushed by doubters of NS's amd big $$ is fatally flawed even when the government agencies claim "nothing to see here". Meanwhile billions of FTD's show up regularly even though Reg Sho "fixed the problem" Highly recommend a convo with her by the way she's very open and easy to talk to for anyone who's tired of being robbed anyway.
You don't seem to understand I'm not actually asking your opinion. Everyone knows what you will say it's just fun to see you type it out and defend wrongdoers lol. I spoke directly with the TA. I know All about the kramer biz model but you're missing crucial portions. No worries though you will need to "learn" a new narrative soon I suppose.
Notice how they are no longer crying about their name in lights? NSCC issue pops up soon after then shareintel then lawsuit seeking discovery. Please explain to everyone how the Kramers have made their money? Every company they contract with goes away? Also why did they move from NY? Hmmm interesting huh? Lol. Also had you even an incling to want to look around you'd know GTII lawsuit is alive and well. Currently the dividends are a cluster as brokers are trying to figure out how to deliver them to their customers although they are unrestricted at DTCC per the TA and waiting for brokers to get them so kinda odd right?
The purpose of that PR was solely to distance the company itself from all the kramer talk on social media(at that time). They were not saying the naked shorting information came from social media..nobody would read it that way LMFAO!
Are you implying the company was using Twitter postings to verify naked shorting? You can't be serious lol. It doesn't say anything like that
I don't think that's how anyone read that...they were simply addressing the Kramers and "letting them off the hook" at least temporarily while discussing the naked shorting of the company. That info didn't come from Twitter posts lol. They hired Shareintel the next month then after getting that data Wes Christian...seems a waste of money if was no "there, there"
You live in a day traders world wow lol
Thought it was implied based on track record but ok..wrong every other day as well about everything..now we've graduated from a P&D( the world's longest by the way) to a mini P&D how exciting
Wrong, Wrong and wrong today
BTW, upon further investigation (and after several calls from those trying to buy ALL of my $FNGR and $GTII), I'm going all in on $GTII shortly, having discovered that the AI company they have ALREADY installed is on pace to do better than $15 million in revs, and profitable.
— Daniel Borders (@borders_LLC) November 2, 2023
Every broker will need to deliver real shares to their customers one way or another. The company knows how many shares they alloted to the brokers through the TA based on a count they would have gotten after ex dividend date. Now we watch what they try to do. Pretty simple. The company has previously PR'd there were discrepancies with real count vs broker count the time before when attempted a digital dividend. Last year when the warrants given were in the money s when all hell broke lose on the SP and FTD'S piled up and borrow rate hit 1300%.. buy yeah that's all normal right? Lol
How could there be mass covering when all that is in SH's accounts are placeholders? If you researched a little you'd see that for example with Fidelity they are getting the shares from the TA by customer request in batches. Hmmm interesting right? Buying time maybe?Then they also have said "we will put them in your account and lift the restriction, but you can't trade them" We will see if they change their minds or are forced to. Fidelity also was the broker calling large SH's this time last year asking to loan their shares when GTII was at a 1300% borrow rate.
On mobile app it only showed what I said "outstanding shares" and then under "suppressed image" most aren't on laptops...75% of your gifs/memes/pics never show up either lol
Intro to what? Your post only shows total outstanding shares
Watch new Wes video above where he discusses GTII and how naked shorting is not a conspiracy theory as well as how things are finally changing..baffling for some to continue to ignore the elephant in the room and support theft and defend criminals while their own finances get raided...kinda odd don't you think? Lol
Oh c'mon now at least in the past you used to post the shares that were restricted and unrestricted
..very misleading indeed lol
If you think #1 The planned and PR'd minuscule sales each month by the board would somehow help a NS and #2 matters at all to longs is hilarious and tells me you still don't understand this stock at all or math. If this were a blue chip stock with a major inside selling 10%- 20% of their holdings then yes that would matter otherwise nobody is swayed by 1/12 of 1% each month lol
Please explain how it would be possible for a NS position to still be open from last year for what you said to even make sense? Because that doesn't happen according to your thought process? Very confusing LOL
This is a precedent set for Federal Court not the rinky dink fines from government agencies. So a company would be able now to hold the broker accountable for the manipulative/illegal trading it allows to happen/participates in. So again off the mark lol
👆
— Dodger (@realscottdodge) October 19, 2023
The blueprint is in the SEC document, but no one likes to read past the first page pic.twitter.com/VzKjbLe16g
False they were not able be to held fully liable for their customers actions thats the point #1 ..#2 this has nothing to do with "Pumping" or "painting the tape" it has every thing to do with any and all manipulation of a stock i.e naked shorting. Spoofing is just the initial vehicle to get to the discovery phase. I can see you didn't listen to the space call I posted either. I'd advise it if you want to hear from real professionals who know it happens all the time and have seen it and proved it. It's comical to stick to a losing argument and or ignore and twist facts/deflect when everyone knows what's happening in reality. The "dumb money" ,"covid money" "newbie investors" mantra is over even though it was absolutely bs for stocks like GME. And everyone can clearly see what side those who ignore everything happening are on..we ARE NOT OK with allowing theft and fraud to continue for us or future generations
Well you understand that the brokers have to deliver real shares right? And they are already slow walking it. What is in everyone's account currently at Fidelity is a placeholder only and they have already said it may be "weeks" before they will be able to transfer any shares to shareholders. The GTII legal team PR recently explained the hoops they will need to jump through so not sure why people continously try to magically determine a timeframe out of thin air. Seems pretty easy right? They do dividends all the time. Why so much trouble delivering a simple dividend?
There I fixed it for you with my last 2 posts #1 listen to the space call posted by one of GTII's attorneys Wes Christian along with one of the fathers of Reg sho Dr. Robert Shapiro. #2 I think you missed all the words in Hummingbirds post before the stock talk and the point.
100% related if you actually READ it. If you want to say naked short positions in GTII are fairy tale conspiracy theories this shows exactly how it happens. Just like it does in many stocks...which must just be ok by some right? Totally fine to rob people? Ironically ok to rob those also who post this never happens?
Right right just conspiracy theories about Naked shorts in GTII right?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/finance.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/scilex-holding-company-provides-notice-165900324.html
100% accurate statement..they are too dumb to understand we know the games and the why and the who... its comical. It's like watching a play about wall street with wannabe trader clowns who got kicked out of clown college. With GTII it always picks up when the real short goes up...they lost about 4.5 million last year but keep thinking they can win. They have NO IDEA whats coming but I hope they keep shorting it till their fingers bleed lol
The senate committee doesn't think what I mentioned for folks to look into is a conspiracy theory? Wanna defend criminals constantly? Whose the real conspiracy theorist? GTII folks aren't going anywhere and they never gave which put yet another false narrative pumped here to rest