It won't be long-

a nickel a share- at best-once IP tells you the truth about B v C

Look out below!!!

What I have read so far says nothing about th clinical course of the patient improving. But agree- how much can anything help when given when conditions are so dire-

yes I am pessimistic, and I remain rightfully so. Just one opinion. They let all those people die while we had a cure? All those people? When the data were all available last May? Just cannot be.

Just one opinion.

ha- guess what- we will soon be at 5 lousy cents. Opinions change obv.

the results speak for themselves- not a chance. No one came on board after the B OM data before. But can he somehow drag current shareholders through a bogus P3 with dilution and toxic financing? That is the real question before us.

your opinion, not shared by me. 10K just stated the new company plans post B v C demise...and it's on to B OMP 3(a complete expensive joke) and to B UC- delayed by Leo for PRECISELYthis moment.

B v C fails and so he needs talking points top get people to buy at a nickel

That is exactly where IP will be whenever Leo coughs up the truth about C beat B

10K plans: So Leo announces(essentially)- B v C is done(it failed) and for my next moves, it is B OM and B UC. That is where we are now after all this COVID focus.

Could he have worked on those a long long time ago. Of course he coulda. B UC has been languishing so sadly. Disaster for us. No explanation for the failure

Now he wants to provide a reason to buy at 5 cents.

Is it good enough?

B OM- forget about it already- failed to make the grade.

And now IP also says that B OM will be back- coming soon a P3 that one one else would bother to fund, Leo will somehow fund.

what is next? Leo has squandered many many months for B UC. Why? Pathetic. Now he says something will start in Jan? really?

Mr Toad's wild road almost over, folks. The big B v C distraction is just about to come crashing down. The share price will be a nickel in no time

Of course the patient might improve and we need to wait and see. I was responding to the silly pretense that saying COVID negative after B Rx meant much of anything.

I am responding to this silly frenzy of glee over "compassionate use" which means next to nothing in my view. Much ado about nothing. We woulda heard already if big demand from a trial site-

diff to comment after getting b x 10 d pt remains on a vent. that is mostly what matters. so what if covid- now, damage done long ago. nothing to celebrate here at all.

very personal details to share.

says nothing about B to get excited about.

if you disagree pls explain.

but let's be honest- does anyone expect B to have any impact on a pt already on a vent for 12 days?
No of course not.

Difficult to read about. compassionate use clearly appropriate here

soon to be 5 cents. I am sure all those plans for B OM P3 and B UC will start as mentioned in 10k. Right? 2022 will be rosy?

As if.

It is simple to understand, agreed I am talking about compassionate use and the pretense here that is is really meaningful in oh such a big way...LOL. By process you mean the nonsensical wait for data that was in the book late last spring????

Hey Vladimir- there is a process. Protocol must be observed

Vlad- You would rather my citizens fill the hospitals and then die?

But Mr Putin, Protocol dictates-

Vlad- Grow up. Get a life. Next!

compassionate use by dozens at trial sites would be legit big news. Is that what Leo announced?

umm, no.

This is all total baloney folks

embarrassing really. So much hoopla by so many for so long- take the most recent compassionate use stuff.

Leo leads on the willing and they pretend it means something when it clearly does not.

No fanfare, no notice, no details, no nothing.

So it is available. Big whoop.

trash talking by investors who like me have lost money here for years.

Oh- except for all those who got all their shares at single digits....
LOL

Winter is coming.

Your summary was fine. Just sad at how much the company has had to jettsion as it almost vanished from the planet - only to get a reprieve with COVID stuff.

So when B v C fails- it will be grim here.

Winter is coming

and K- so many wasted years, as if the half life was just discovered....

Such a joke. Take K- half life was known 10 years ago, and yet no trial ever reflected that reality. Never.

And so- SAFETY was never even established at any reasonable dosing schedule.

Sham.

K never even got past safety, folks.

B-IBD ? As if they could not have done anything at all- anything- for the last year?

Total pretend sham

#5- those pretending that FDA compassionate use is HUGE is nonsense. Not even vaguely close to HUGE.

But you know that, right?

It means nothing-

Expanded access by FDA says zippo about whether B has any impact on C. Just went to the site for expanded access for physicians.

#1 it is a pain in the rear. forms to fill out. People to notify.

#2 I have trouble believing that it is a popular option anywhere. I suspect that is why we have been not told even one little detail about it, such as where it has been given, and how often it has been used. No chatter on the web means next to no use and no success-

#3 Totally bogus to pretend this means the FDA must think it is a good idea. They state specifically otherwise. Just a hope and a prayer when people are dying.

#4 You want compassionate use? How about releasing trial data 4 months ago, when was all available, and ready for public consumption? How about timely reporting? No, instead we get this completely bogus process, which is not compassionate. there has ben this foolish pretense at waiting for information, but it was all known a very long time ago, unless you are concerned about long COVID indication for B- not what the world needs now.

We're on a road to nowhere!

the decision to order raw material B for B OM is horrendous news for all of us. Big need, no good Rx, easy to take drug, and yet the trial got B OM exactly nowhere. And that was years ago already.

Now Leo plans to resurrect BOM for a Phase 3? Paid for by whom? Me and you probably.

All of big Pharma waiting and watching for those results to come out- extra careful scrutiny for a GOLDEN opportunity and no deal.

Scary bad news for every one of us

This is a bizarre statement. How could IP ever afford to do this? B OM has failed to attract a P3 suitor for years already, years- a total flop measured by all that counts- did the drug move forward? Did anyone offer to partner up/buy etc?

And now we hear leo says they will go forward? Hard to believe.

If B beat C they will have enough money to do whatever they want to do. But we are told Leo does not know one iota of data.

Bad news for shareholders, I think. How about move forward with B UC???

Why focus instead on a drug that had a Phase 2 and failed to get anyone to line up behind it? So we are going to foot the bill for a possible loser? Again?

How does this make any sense when B UC languishes....

As if. Nothing would make me happier than to see B beat C. That would indeed be a miracle, for all mankind- to say nothing of my financial benefit.

Wishes do not make it so.

perhaps we all remember the patient report of a response to Prurisol? In this very space? Before it never came true?

Leo could tell us and the world exactly what is happening- if he had the guts to do so. Instead he gives coy responses to posters' emails. That is bogus.

How many uses ? Where?

He failed- miserably -to inform his company owners re Prurisol and I suspect this is more of the same.

Again: let' s say B worked in a few compassionate care cases? How long would that be silent in today's world?

10 minutes, maybe

If IP CEO really has big news about big upswing in compassionate use at trial sites- then he should say so in a PR. A real PR with numbers and info.

I think it is all nonsense. If there were multiple people getting better from B then it would be in the national news by now

This "compassionate use" bogus PR add on by Leo will be shown in the end to be cringeworthy nonsense, with a 1% chance of some veracity maybe

Umm, yes. Of course. I still would expect her to say what any doctor would say in such circumstances. Please point me in the direction of some data and I will pursue it.

sorry to have missed this

It reads like nonsense

5-10 x worse?? In other words , nearly dead. And those patients are responding to B? really?

Why no real answer to trial sites question? Why yes to both?

How many patients?

IF there is a very large trial sites call for COVID then why are people waiting until they are almost dead? And if it worked on even 1 patient, then why is it not in the news? And demand up everywhere?

Why no follow up PR on HUGE spike and interest in B v C?

This does not add up in my view.

Yikes. Report back to us about what your oncologist daughter thinks. i can assure you that she will very likely say: why not wait a month until data is back to guide therapy, when there is only lab data thus far, with NO patient experience reported re COVID.

Compassionate use requires common sense, at least.

I do not know how other states work, but my guess is that it is the same everywhere. Patients that are ill are sent though the ED almost uniformly as a kind of triage- where do they need to go? Telemetry? Floor? Unit? Their docs send them to the ED.

But we in turn send them elsewhere-slowly, it is fair to say, the wheels turn slowly-and decisions about a rescue therapy would be made by hospitalists and intensivists, and not by ED docs. The ED doc would have other things to do than investigate a compassionate use drug and would expect someone else to worry about this problem.

I have way too many shares this sad sack of a stock and I can buy way more at a nickel later this year. But will there be a reason to do so? Leo has just completely dropped the ball on B UC Like totally.

1- They have never heard of Brilacidin.
2-There is no data in B v C for humans.

Gee, that about covers it.

What a complete joke

So guess what-no real info means that it is a scam, a fraud and Leo would us to hang onto hopes of B beating C.


He provides no info because he is a carnival artist who is string shareholders along. Sorry.

who ordered what? one hundred doctors want not in Russia- that'd be great

Some crazy lunatic here or there?

Leo tells us nothing.

would not consider it without data. Neither would any other physician. To give a drug you have to put in the order: who in their right mind would order B for C based on what we know right now?

You would have to be nuts.

I think the compassionate use bit is an IP ploy to keep interest alive.

We shall see.

The data has been delayed/ hidden for so long now that it's hard to remain interested. Bound to be a disappointment, yet there is always a chance B might help. A very slim chance.

But to order it now in a hospital? Crazy

1900 deaths per day in the US and you still don't get it? Really? The trial failed. B did not beat C

Nothing could be more obvious

Headed for 5 cents when Leo finally reveals what happened- complete bogus delay reveal...

But the grapevine says nothing... so C beats B. Simple common sense. Sadly so.

lipstick on a pig...compassionate use bogus nonsense fraud

UNLESS ordered by many dozens of Russian ICU/pulmonary docs. But guess what? We woulda heard about that already

through the grapevine...