Sorry, it's been confiirmed that there is no illegal short in PYCT.

Why?

None at all, Hedge Funds don't play with Pinkies. Not enough money or liquidity with Pinks.

Yes, I believe this product has been shelved:)

Wasn't this supposed to be on shelves already?

Really, you think that's better than actually producing a penny of revenue?

Exactly who are you talking to? PYCT has confirmed that no shorts exists.

Try to keep your false and misleading information to a minimum.

Wrong...Your divi is worth a total...drum roll please...

$55.00

Market cap for PYCT today at .0001 a share is $1,985,000.

A shareholder with 110 million shares would receive 550,000 shares of stock at .0001 or $55.00.

Or Current market cap ($1,985,000) / 200 = $9,925

110MM share is .005541561% of OS 19,850,000,000

.005541561 X $9,925 = $55.00

Now this is assuming the divi is stand alone...meaning it's inclusive with no additional share issuance.

I bet my bottom dollar that the new Oregon Co. will have additional add on share issuance that will quickly dilute your $55.00 to nothing.

And what direction was that, PYCT becoming a world leader with money transfers?

BTW, what way is the wind blowing today?

Don't have to. It's a well know fact that PYCT and the DTC have NOT disclosed a reportable event, that being an illegal short which is mandated to be disclosed.

I trust you can understand this.

Please post the PR that states that?

The original plan was to have Paychest rival Paypal. ROTFLMAO

"Due to the recent changes in securities legislation"

LOL, what recent changes?

Another vague, silly PR.

Why would anyone be short a stock when it's at .0001?

Common sense.

dcjr4107, fact ... PYCT and the DTC report no illegal short.

PR's are being paid by share issuance. Documented by the filings.

Since the company hasn't disclosed any type of financing I would suppose most, if not all of your questions can be attributed to new share issuance. Dilution.

Otherwise the company would disclose this right?

You seem to dream alot.

Have you asked the company why they continually deny disclosing an illegal short? Of course this is your short right?

Sounds like someone has a case of the Mondays.

Pillay and Hands are punks

The DTC and 99% of all Pink Sheet companies have confirmed that no illegal shorting exists with it's stock as evidenced by the lack of full discloser for the event.

You can lie all you want but the facts substantiate the truth.

No evidence of an illegal short as confirmed by the company and DTC.

I'm so sorry, you're very wrong for the simple matter that it would be a material event and would need to be disclosed to shareholders.

Next time put some effort into backing up what you have to say.

I believe that is what was said two years ago when Pillay took over the PYCT shell.

He's been the ultimate in disappointment, on par with past management. What makes you think the future, with a tried and failed product will be any different?

Management promised PYCT wouldn't be reversed split. PYCT will be the worthless dividend.

The new company that will comprise most of the shareholders holdings is not bound by the "I promise no reverse split" language.

Watch and learn sheepal.

At the end of the day you'll be reverse split out of the flushaway shell and own a minute amount of the PYCT shell.

Why? The company produces nothing. Show me otherwise.

A spin off of nothing is nothing. Bagholders are left with the 20 Billion OS mess of Flushaway that has been a repeated failure.

Do you ever think this gem of a company of yours will ever produce a penny of revenue?

That should be your main concern, anything else is just silly nonsense unless the company is actually a going concern.

I agree...

with the company and DTC that PYCT is not naked shorted.

Why do you continue on with this fantasy and promote false and misleading information?

In case you haven't noticed, you're being very silly and not being taken serious by anyone, including the hard core longs.

dcjr4107, PYCT and DTC doesn't agree with your analysis.

So sorry.

The lawyers must be idiots or the company is bleeding this to no end.

"it's taking somewhat longer..(what I was told) due to the fact that they will be free trading"

How about an update on the sales picture or is discussing the actual sales of the product not a priority of the company.

dcjr4107, marked and noted.

Just another silly false prediction.

Got any other insightful predictions?

Mark this post IMO in 3 months we will see .01+

Nice rant, but very silly and full on nonsense remarks.

Let's look at one statement.."EVERY PINK HAS BEEN NAKED SHORTED"

Care to provide any substantial back up to this silly statement?

You sound like you're ready to have a nervous breakdown.

Trying to keep all the silly lies in place and furthering crazy fantasy theories must make one weary.

Try using common sense, it's always the best option.

You forgot the silly naked short fantasy that has some shareholders in a tizzy.

Is this company still a going concern or has it finally tossed in the towel?

How can any company survive when it fails to produce one penny of revenue?

With all due respect, I have no idea what your talking about.

The audit was done, completed...shares recalled, it's over.

The company and DTC have not disclosed an illegal short as required if it existed, what more proof do you need.

Because of the audits will only prove what has been released not anything else which would have been sold on the market.

Dip66, why? PYCT obviously doesn't agree nor does the SEC.

Could it be just a hope, dream or fantasy that has been fed to you from people like Dave Patch, Bob O'Brien and the NSS crazy movement that got you side tracked?

Common sense usually rules unless you happen to be a sheepal.

Someone should organize a PSII group (Penny Stock Idiot Investors) structured after AA.

That being said I do believe there is a massive short here, just my opinion.

Perhaps the 6,500 shareholder count is not correct. OR...

You do remember that during the PINO December 2004 pump, the share price was trading around .0020 with huge volume and massive pumping from many tout sheets. The message boards were full of hundreds of aliases in for a quick trade, unfortunatly many got left behind and held.

Do the math if someone bought $2,000 of PYCT at .0020, what is it worth now?

Common sense.

The stock audit has cleared the Pino problem as evidenced by the share reduction, right?

The company has never said a short exists beyond the discrepency in OS shares that the stock audit cleared up.

Since Pino was at the helm I would say there is a MASSIVE NAKED SHORT problem with PYCT.

dcjr4107, are you responding "NO" to the fact the company is not aware of an illegal short?

Thanks for confirming the fake shares were taken out of the market after the audit and the company had no further comment on share structure after this event. Common sense say's this should be put to rest, right?

UMMMMMMMMM the OS was reduced after the audit.

I see you can't answer my question or you're confused. I asked you to back up this claim...

MOST OF THE SCAMMERS ARE the MARKET MAKERS......They are the ones that dilute a stock with NAKED SHORTS, FAKE SHARES, PHANTOM SHARES

Or do you think that the MM's never do this??????????????

Did you not understand my post? Please re-read it if it confused you.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=31712507

OK dcjr4107, is PYCT aware of the illegal short?

Or just you?

A good old fashion cert pull would be just the right medicine to shake the shorts from the tree!!!

Then a reverse split during the cert pull promising the price will stay high, coupled with a special one time cash dividend that mysteriously gets delayed.

Belgian & German rumors of a DTC settlement in the billions.

Should I go on ... lot's of way of milking the cow, all 6500 of them.

Show just one verifiable instance of this and I'll show you 100 scammy CEO's who have issued billions of shares.

MOST OF THE SCAMMERS ARE the MARKET MAKERS......They are the ones that dilute a stock with NAKED SHORTS, FAKE SHARES, PHANTOM SHARES

Or do you think that the MM's never do this??????????????

If "The DTC probably confirmed" then PYCT is willingly violating the disclosure rule, right?