Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes. I think earnings will be decent. I think they've set themselves up for a beat and good guidance with rate hikes in the future. Expanded buy backs, analysts ratings and upgrades , etc., lots of OI and option volume - overwhelming amount are calls. Wise guy flow - so you already know it's just a matter of time.
Yeah there's gotta be at least one in my time frame for options.. Although I am betting on pps increase due to performance without factoring in rate hikes.
Seriously. This turd is fubared.
I've been loading June $15 calls in addition to buying up common. This should pan out to be a solid play.
It appears that he is the real deal OTC scammer in that he gets companies and dilutes. Wiping out shareholder value to line his own pockets.
What DD do you have to indicate the contrary? I do not have much faith in the BTZO management.
Time to get the Law Offices of Douche, Douchey, & Douchest to go after DSCR.
It seems that this is always the reasoning to justify the NT.. Usually it is due to not having money (accountants), time, or a real business where management cares to fulfill its obligations in a timely manner.
I have personally rarely seen an NT result in release of positive financial statements.
Interested to see what the reports show, although I think they will confirm what the 'Bears' suspect.
Why you go from extreme pessimism to esteemed optimism is beyond me.. But I guess no matter what, you'll be able to say you were right, regardless of the outcome.
I hope this goes to .001 for you all, but man the likelihood of that is so slim with the massive amount of outstanding shares, and not enough substance to propel it upwards.
I'm going to order some. Are any of these seeds from DSCR?
Um probably.. Definitely not. Hah
I could care less about civil suits. I agree - lock them up. Scumbags.
I bet someone could press legal action against this company. They've made some bold claims that have cost people money, as they didn't deliver and turned out to be "empty promises." It's one thing for a company to speculate, but it's another for a company to go into hemp, CBD, and alternative energy business, creating momentum and buying of stock, only to not deliver and go silent, taking the pps to the toilet.
Along with that royalty letter too, I'm sure..
Not.
If moving up in quantity of shares it's bad .. That is showing us that more people are putting shares up for sale at .0001. If the ask is moving up in price, that's good, but it's not because there is no bid, so this is merely indicative of more shares being put up for sale, so that longs can sell once this catches a bid.
Lol. What is more likely with 8 billion shares in circulation:
1. That news, actual revs, a pump move this bloated ticker
Or
2. An RS happens because it's the only last resort available for BTZO to continue?
I'll go with option 2. You can stick with option 1. We'll see what happens.
The only thing enlightening about this is the back door accounting and mis-match of words regarding how debt will be paid and/ or restructured -- when in reality the only way to pay debt is through dilution, which will still keep the shareholders screwed.
There are no revenues no strategic, viable operations. Just phony bologna.
There are no lines. Only BTZO-BS.. Soon to be BTZOD.
Dang bux, look at them big ask slaps we're seeing today!!
How many CD holders are still out there? I wouldn't think there are many, as I don't recall many restrictions on the notes.
Wow. OTC is notorious for reporting short interest that is absolutely incorrect. Maybe if they didn't report data driven by sells on the bid this would happen so frequently.
Either way the margin requirements to short this trash would make it practically cost prohibitive to do so, let alone finding a broker with borrows for FBEC.
Agreed. We will see. I am open to anything happen. My hope is I am wrong and everyone makes money. Truly I would prefer people to make money with their endeavors and obtain financial freedom.
However my experiences and with what I have seen here, would indicate that most will lose money, and that BTZO is a sham.
I do not believe that my "negativity" on the matter is brining BTZO down or holding it back, which I'm sure some longs here will think, since I have said I hope that I am wrong and I hope that everyone makes money.
Problem is they need money to buyback and retire shares outstanding. They don't seem to have the money or be willing to do that. Instead they have issued gobs of shares, convertible at a fraction of .001 (preferred) and .0001 (common) par value.
This kills an OTC stock. They do it to pay debts and pay themselves. There is such a slim chance that anything BTZO could do would actually move the shares required to move the PPS. They could RS and try a new foot forward approach.
Time will tell.
I understand why you would question why a ticker would legitimately destroy its own share price, but it happens. Either as a last resort or because it's just another OTC scam stock. I think BTZO has done it for both reasons.
Absolutely.
My assumption is there will be an RS. At this point it is unavoidable. Business operations and strategies along with PRs have failed to generate enough buying pressure to move this stock. Management has continued to offer convertible debenture to operate the business as well as dilute shares to pay themselves (pretty greedy IMO). As I've said an RS is inevitable.
What will remain is how BTZO operates after the RS. Will they work to create shareholder value and increase their market cap, or will they take advantage of shareholders and print shares, diluting this back down to trips and no bid? As you're aware I think management will dilute, post RS. They do not seem inclined to care about generating a legitimate business.
Desperate times call for desperate measures!
Sad story - BTZO.
What a scam stock.
Finally Del, we can agree to something. At last!
Again my claim: BTZO will RS before catching a bid. After an RS trading may start again, but will be followed by rampant dilution back to the bottom of the barrel.
I didn't say they lose value from an RS. RE- read it Del.. I said they'll lose value when the company amends their Articles to increase authorized shares, following a reverse split, to then dump shares - aka d-i-l-u-t-e. This happens in stinky pinky land.
Face it.
Volume tells a tale. A short one. One that's no good. Dwindling interest as people see what is really going on here. Share selling. Pocket lining. Taking advantage of investors/ traders.
Haha that's exactly how it works when they RS, amend articles to increase AS, run a pump and dilute again. Value goes down for shareholders while management used you all as an ATM.
Yes, RS coming before this catches a bid today.
Volume tells the tale.
Yes per year. However you can carry forward losses for next year, etc.
Dude why is it such a joke to you? Why would someone come here and bash? Because they want you to lose money? Because they're paid to do so?
No to both.
Mainly due to the fact that they/ we are spreading the most likely scenario that will happen.
Truth can be ugly, so don't delude yourself!
Yup. This turd really stinks!
Honestly I'm tempted to buy up a crapload of shares for:
1. Tax write off on a losing trade for 2016
2. To again (since I've owned BTZO in the past) own shares so maybe my argument will carry more "sway" with all you people that believe BTZO can't do any wrong LOL!
Yup. FBEC is the gristly under-belly of the energy shot industry.
OTC reports lots shares as shares sold short which is incorrect. This is due to shares being sold below the ask - at the bid. Not sure why OTC does this, but they do.
Instead of telling me wrong, tell me how on earth my math is wrong. I'm sorry to inform you but you're wrong. Reverse splits serve to decrease the amount of shares tradable. If you have 100 shares and a reverse split is done at 1:100 then the company exchanging to you 1 share for every 100 you've owned.
What is so complicated that you people can't understand this?! It's utterly baffling.
To RussTheBus - sorry my words were incorrectly chosen about share price not increasing. Of course it proportionately increases due to the split of the stock but the value remains the same. Share holder value, market cap, etc., stays the same. What's worse is that there is most always a long restriction on secondary shares being traded after the split, which is your shares. All along the company and its creditors will convert its preferred shares to common at a fraction of the current price and dilute it down before you can sell to break even!
PLEASE before you so quickly tell me how my math is wrong (which it isn't) please show me how it is. You can't.
ShoeGlue - you are no better off trading your 100 pennies for 1 dollar. While you think this may be good, it has no change on the value of your BTZO shares since your shares are proportionately reduced so the value is the same. As I said before if you have 100 shares worth a dollar and a company reverse splits 1:100 than they take your 100 shares and replace it with 1 share. After the Reverse Split your 1 share is worth the same as your previous 100 shares were worth!
No it's educational and with merit.
Lol the math is correct. Get a clue. A 1 for 100 reverse split is you getting 1 share for every 100 you own. I made it simple and said it would be you getting 1 whole dollar for every 100 pennies you have.
See?
Math is correct. Lololol
Lol Russ keep trying. The Share price doesn't increase and add any value. Do you think any shareholder here would prefer having ten shares worth .0001 per share or 1 share worth .0010? You can debate the semantics of an increased share price through an RS all you want.
I have shown you through examples and proved enough sources that indicate a Reverse Split doesn't add value and the value is proportionate both pre and post reverse split.
Wait I'm sorry you just want to run our mouth acting like a know it all over semantics. Well duh a RS increases share price but it's proportionate to the pre split price. There's no value added. Share holders are in the same situation as before with regard to share value, now they just have less.
No math is correct.