Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Another great buying opportunity? Right?
We were out on the golf course this morning...did we miss anything?
And a big old LOL back at ya!
Did you want an answer to those questions or were they all just rhetorical?
Gee, look at that, I can membermark myself. I have 2 now! Figures YOU would know you could membermark YOURSELF.
Anyway, let's dry those tears and get back out there, champ!
Replying again to a message you deleted. I think that's funny. One-sided, but funny. I'd expect nothing less.
How many times do they have to tell you! Down 85% = buying opportunity! Trust them, its a good thing, not bad!
First things first...it's THEIR shoulder! ... show up with a chip on THEIR shoulder.
Oh, yes. The shoe fits. But I was poining out the irony in your post. It seems you and I have the same shoe size.
Well, thanks Ward. I DO make a conscience effort to differentiate between those two words, as well as other homonymns that a spell checker won't flag (right Spence?). I appreciate your noticing and a winkey face back at ya
As far as violating TOS, you know as well as I that I am no more guilty of TOS violations than most here, but it seems the more one's opinion is considered unfavorable here the more he or she is held to a higher standard when it comes to determining a violation or TOS.
I mean "we" because when His Redness deletes a post because it makes him sad "we" don't have the opportunity to make our own judgement regarding that post.
When the big red one stops deleting posts for personal or arbitrary reasons, I will then speak only for myself.
You mean like this:
Posted by: WayneC777
In reply to: None
Date:9/14/2006 10:35:46 AM
Post #of 44943
Hey OC Bad A$$. Why don't you pick on Me, why pick on Redcloud, he didn't do anything but try and help me.
Hmmm...I'll never fogure it out either.
HA! Just ask all those that "learned" their lesson here around this time last year...
Oh, We haven't been able to handle the truth around here for quite some time.
Moderators:
I'm seeing lots of deleted posts but for the most part, you folks have remained quiet.
Question: If a moderator has sold his/her position, should he/she still moderate a stock board?
Your opinion doesn't have support that BA is dumping. SHOW ME THE DD, not your opinion.......
Well, the fact that BA's shares are POSSIBLY unrestricted and this:
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=HISC&p=D&yr=0&mn=6&dy=0&id=p83221642432
I'm convinced. That's all the DD I need.
I still don't see how you think they are an affiliate per SEC rule 144. It's black and white!
An affiliate is a type of relationship in which one of the companies owns less than a majority of the other company's stock
That's correct, but only partly...
in a relationship of control with the issuer by contract
If you continued to the next sentence you would have read:
Control means the power to direct the management and policies of the company in question, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract, or otherwise.
Are you saying that BA has a relationship of control with HISC? Hmmm... sorry, no dice.
They may be affiliated, you're correct I suppose. But as far as the SEC is concerned, they are NOT an AFFILIATE.
...And I quote:
An affiliate is a person, such as a director or large shareholder, in a relationship of control with the issuer. Control means the power to direct the management and policies of the company in question, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract, or otherwise.
http://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/rule144.htm
It is of MY opinion that BA is dumping as fast as they can.
Any questions?
As for BA not holding for better days, if they are supposedly nursing this stock to grow as a client, the decisions are shared with HISC. They both know what is going on. I don't see BA hard up and needing to sell all of its HISC shares in massive dumps to stay afloat, thus killing off their client. BA has plenty of clients. Not good pr for themselves.
Would you consider these unsubstantiated opinions?
Funny, accusing someone of unsubstantiated opinions and in the same breath posting a bunch of your own...
You're better off sticking the the rum and island songs and that sophmoric humor everyone here seems to love so much...and that's MY unsubstantiated opinion!
BA is an affiliate and is limited by the 144.
???
Double check that...
The term "affiliate" refers to persons controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Company and presumably includes executive officers, directors, 10% shareholders and the immediate relatives of all of the foregoing.
Since 10% shareholders are affiliates, I'd think BA would want to dump ther shares to avoid having their monthly allowance restricted.
NITE upped their bid to .0085. That bodes well for the PPS if they keep it there.
Yes. That is my honest opinion. HISC shareholders are getting what equates to a 1 for 50 R/S...I just don't think we realize it yet.
Actsoft? I think that's a dead deal. The bridge has been burned.
IMO.
Thanks Capt. I'd love to battle your dim wit this morning but I'm sure my reply, no matter how "ON" topic I could make it appear, would only be deleted.
How about a TOS violation instead?
Or how about this...
I had similar thoughts regarding this scenario back in March or so...back when we were expecting an Acsoft deal and an undisclosed merger/acquisition of a third company. Its still applies even though Acsoft is history.
HISC moves its assets, "contracts", future revenues, past and future contacts to its "new" company EVSY. They keep a token portion of the business in the HISC "almost" shell...just to keep it legal. Continue to dilute the stuffing out of HISC in order to pay BA. And all the while, EVSY, moves on with the old and new business that was Homeland Integrated Securities.
Think about it. HISC has lost most, if not all appeal to the penny stock investing circles, our O/S is bloated, and our PR's are powerless. HISC is making no one rich...except for BA (remember, even the board was taking HISC shares, and those shares are losing value daily).
So, the scenario proceeds (IMO): We get a "dividend" from HISC in the form of one share of EVSY for each fifty shares of HISC. We thank the board of HISC and trust they will do the right thing. The assets and essentially most business now is conducted under the EVSY ticker. HISC continues on the pinksheets with its twice weekly PR's and its swelling O/S. EVSY benefits from the services of BA because of the obvious "relationship" with HISC. Meanwhile, HISC continues to flounder, hoping only to sell enough shares to keep BA happy.
Sounds like a great plan to me, and pretty smart of the board to come up with that one. lol...and here we are, thanking them for our R/S and restricting our shares.
If I were a betting man, EVSY moves onward and HISC continues the death spiral. All IMO of course.
If I may add also, its not the CKYS board!
Yesterday, I was called Captain Azzhole, and Bad A$$ and now today it's Wise A$$. Last I checked, that kind of name calling is not only childish but a TOS violation. (not to mention, my AZZ is getting a complex).
Looking at the negative is not pathetic...what's pathetic is putting your head in the sand to avoid the negative.
uh...nevermind.
You've been in HISC for over a year and a half? And you've made it this far? Amazing!
(FYI, NITE is a market maker and .005 is their current bid on level 2)
Holy Crap! NITE just dropped their bid to .005
Nothing to laugh at there. NITE has been a good indicator on this stock. When they're buying, its a good sign. When they're bidding .005, .005 pps is not far off IMO.
Slow your roll there, turbo!
Sorry. No.
...And I didn't post a threat. That would be a violation of TOS, kind of like your vulgarity and personal attacks which seem to be tolerated...hmmm
Uh...thanks for your input there, oh red one...but we knew what he meant. No need for condescending comments, its not very constructive.
Sheesh...
PUNTANG - yeah...what he said!
If you don't it don't Read It.
You got told! lol
HA! I should've figured the the foxtrot comment would never get buy you, the "pilot". I'll get you yet oh great cloud of redness! lol
Guilty conscience? Me? OK, I banked some good money on HISC and I shot a lousy game of golf today. Now that I got that off my chest, I still think the PR should have at least hinted to the value of the "initial payment".
I'm not saying it was a "bad" PR. But I think its just as vague as the PR's they've been releasing throughout this past year. The investors want facts and historical information!
Do you really want answers to that question? Or do you just want everyone to tell you what you want to hear?
Come on Spence. No negative spin from me here, but do you think they should have announced how much the initial payment was? THAT would be solid numbers! Wasn't it just a little disapointing? It's this constant disapointment that gets investors frustrated. Well, that and you and RCP making your childish, condescending jabs...
OT - No, seriously...
"horse blinders" lol.
Slow day today?
It was more or less food for thought and meant for the group, not just you personally.
Is he replacing anyone or did HISC create this position for him? Are they paying his salary in shares or something he can actually pay bills with?
I agree! There's much more control here at iHub, and its for our benefit...whether we realize it or not...lol