Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Okay, thanks
Here in Europe that's different. Here you apply for a trademark first. Then you go to market with your product. I also have a trademark myself for a service. The trademark got granted before anyone in the market had ever seen the name.
It's a very difficult business the way you describe it, cause it would mean you have to put your name on products without any protection which makes it hard to prove that you were first, no?
By the way, I don't think a decision has already been made in the application for the trademark. But chances for NRTI are little, as another company - Ultra Health, LLC - applied for the same trademark a month earlier than NRTI
It's all about perception indeed.
Trying to get this trademark was, in my mind, a very smart move. We're talking about business here, not being friends, and securing this tm would have given NRTI a huge advantage.
I do agree it's not completely fair to the brothers. But then again, it's business. The little girl has nothing to do with it.
ok, deal (;
Bottle of champagne ready for market close? Enjoy!
Don't worry bout me. I've been doing great with my investments last months. And expecting even better results tonight with new sales figures. And i'm perfectly happy with my stake in nrti also
Just saying people should be careful with money they might need for other things. Can't be sth wrong with that
I hate to spoil the party but i really think it's important to urge everybody to only invest money they can afford to loose. Rewards could be huge here, but the risk is also substantial. Pls be careful
Are you sure you got this right?
you keep amazin me (;
I just realised, if this stock reaches $500 soon, cn is gonna be a billionaire
Guys, I do respect your opinions, but as you might have expected, I do not completely agree.
As a matter of fact, I think I'm one of the long-term, patient investors Nutrion is referring to. I bought my shares back in december last year. It's true I sold quite a few, just like some other patient investors have done in the last weeks and months.
That's why I don't think sharing my thoughts is harmful.
I'm pretty sure they do listen at NRTI headquarters. They might not agree, and they don't have to, but I'm sure they read what's being said here. And they might as well think about it.
Having said that, it's my pleasure to announce another silence period for me. You're all quite right that there is no sense in repeating it over and over again. So it's all yours again (;
Meanwhile I will be paying attention to other stocks and options in my portfolio cause I think it's an exciting time for investors with so many over- and undervalued companies jumping around at the moment.
My stake in NRTI is good as it is. It's an amount I'm prepared to loose if all would go wrong. And it's enough to enjoy if things turn out just fine.
Good luck all (and keep an eye on the share count - it's really important cause a factor ten in amount of shares could be the difference between 1 dollar and 10 cents one day)
Thing is it seems the company does not have enough people who feel it is worth the wait. So I want the company to step up.
It's not that I'm asking them to do something that has never been done before. We all want this company to be regarded as a company with high standards, well above the pump & dump the OTC market is associated with. So I feel they should do what high standard companies do and I will continue to say so.
The problem on short term remains imo that they only paint part of the picture. For example: to turn the first mover aspect in an advantage, they re going to need a large marketing budget. Also, if cbd could go mainstream, there will be a lot of the large players stepping in. I can't possibly imagine they are ignoring those facts, yet they choose not to give any insight on how they anticipate.
One could say the questions weren't raised in the interview, but then it's hard to believe that a website which charges more than 300 dollars for a subscription would not be more ambitious in painting the complete picture.
Anyway it's about time we get an update on the financial situation. Otherwise we risk to run out of unprepared investors willing to drive this thing higher.
That's true. It's a nice picture they're painting. Let's hope they succeed
Low SP too (;
I was reading this green rush interview. Thanks for sharing CN.
It feels so good to be invested in an overperforming company.
Hey, wait, what did I miss here, lol
I do worry about the share count, and I'm not the only one. You just had an institutional investor asking his money back.
Well that's an answer, thank you. But please, don't doubt my knowledge. I'm not talking about encouraging to buy at the ask. I'm okay with that. I'm talking about the intention to drive the price up at the end of the day. But really, I don't care. It's the cost of next funding that matters. I don't agree we should not worry, cause the day this business turns cash flow positive, the amount of shares will be counted to see what they're really worth.
In the mean time we can have fun gambling, of course, and I'm really sorry if I ruin the party. Hell no, I'm not sorry
I really don't see any value in this discussion but facts are facts.
1. I've seen a few posts here on Friday encouraging people to buy a few shares at the ask at the end of the day to be sure the stock would end in the positive. Will the SEC or someone else be bothered? No. Is it legal? No, but it's so ridiculously useless that no one will care about it.
2. I got a strange feeling this discussion is pampered by a few to ignore the one issue that really matters: how much dilution will we see in the next filing, and how soon is it about to happen? This company is far from break-even and the recent folies we had won't make the next funding round easy. So bulls and bears alike, what's your thoughts on this?
Well thanks (;
I must say i'm not from the uk though. I know it does not matter, but it could maybe help you save a lot of money if you realise soon enough that the loudest screaming guys here are not always right.
For myself, i've come to the conclusion that they don't care about shareholders. At this moment there is only one question that should keep shareholders busy and the company chooses not to respond.
But miracle, oh miracle, what a coincidence, they just happen to have ended phase 2 of the process they 've cut in phases to make it look more scientific than it is.
In their defence: if they would not pimp, there would have been no survival. Next statements are going to look really ugly and they're about to arrive really soon
By the way i'm long, with 130,000 shares left after cutting down my risk.
As moderators want this board to be about facts, and only facts, it has to be said: you're absolutely right Crusen
Thank you!
The fun part is I don't care about the money anymore, as I have made the mental switch to accept that it's lost. It's really about integrity now. If this management does not respect holders of common shares and chooses to not inform or disinform them, I just don't want to be involved anymore.
It's been an expensive lesson for me. I have this weird feeling it's gonna be an expensive lesson for them also. Though it canonly be a lesson if they're prepared to learn of course.
And yeah, this might as well start running again. But I would only get in again after getting a decent briefing on where they are and where they are going.
I have been wondering, by the way, if the institutional investors get as little information as we do. It's something I find hard to believe. And if not,
ah wtf, why would i care
End of last year, the Stanley Brothers had applied for the name CHARLOTTE'S WEB HEMP PRODUCTS which had been refused, as i understand it, because of the reference to an 'illegal' substance in the name.
In march Inergetics applied for the names CHARLOTTE'S WEB RX and CHARLOTTE'S WEB, apparantly on their own, without cooperation with the Stanley Brothers.
The funny thing is, a month earlier another American company had also applied for the name CHARLOTTE'S WEB, for use in Medicinal herbal preparations.
So I think chances are very little they will recieve this trademark. If the patent and trademark office would see no problem in granting the name to another company than Stanley Brothers Social Enterprises, it would go to the company which applied first, I think, which is not NRTI.
Nice to hear from you again. I really felt sorry for you a couple of months ago.
For me it's been a long proces to accept I made a big mistake here ignoring every lesson I had learnt in the last few years investing. I'm gonna keep some shares also but after making my decision yesterday evening I also feel better now gaining the lost money back elsewhere.
This company has still such a long way to go and so much more to learn about marketing, investor relations, etc. I really hope they succeed, but I'm really worried now they won't.
Just an opinion, of course, and a discussion I should not be starting as I've still a lot to sell (;
No, it was MM buying
Tried to sell another 70K but the MM only took 1K. To celebrate our friendship you can have the other 69K (;
i still own 220K but you're not gonna get them cheap (;
True. It hurts really bad. One starts to wonder how many weeks they think ahead at nrti headquarters. I don't want to support them no more and sold 80k shares today.
I've made some big mistakes here and learnt some expensive lessons.
Looks more like you're lookin for a buyer for your damned shares.
Luckily, it's not as bad as you might be suggesting (;
A lot of questions you raise have been answered
and i do have confidence in their approach to this CBD stuff.
What i referred to, is that most companies give more insight on their business as it is. For example, NRTI compared their figures of last Q to the same period a year earlier, which they know (and we all do) does not tell anything at this stage. To build investor confidence, they could give some more insight, for example: sales of Bikini Ready products have been growing x %. We are happy with this or we plan to improve this by doing x, y and z. For next Q we aim at X revenue. Etc.
It's what normal companies tell their shareholders cause DD is built on this kind of info. I think if they want to get out of this gambling arena they should be prepared to give that kind of info.
My statement was actually a reply to another post where a comparison with Apple was suggested to say we shareholders should be promoting these quality products more. I think it's comparing Apples to oranges. I haven't seen news bulletins about queues at Walgreens when new NRTI products were launched. Also oranges are more easily squeezed than apples. Most longs will agree by now (;
Product quality is only one part of the marketing mix. As you say, it's a tough market. NRTI needs focus. They need to be very clear about what they're doing, so they can build a crowd of long term investors. If selling stops, share price goes up, funding becomes less expensive, shareholders get even more confident...
I do agree things would look a lot better if the company had a solid base of long time investors who believe in the products and brands. But it's up to the company then to give more factual information on where they are and where they're going. If you look at last q figures and deduct an estamated (we don't get facts from the company) revenue for the mmg deal you see there's hardly any growth in sales. So what is happening? Is mse growing a little? It would mean bikini ready is declining? Etc.
It's no surprise this stock has become a playing field for gamblers. There are some promising signals, like the reduction in costs, but even there we have to take a gamble on the signals. It's simply not possible to do any real dd
I agree we should not blame anyone here for the decline, including the mm, but i do blame the company for leaving investors with good intentions in the dark. With the little info we get there is no other option than relying on the next mj hype. Or have blind faith in the future untill frustration takes over and then sell. Imo that's what happening and that's what took us down.
Luckily we've reached the bottom. Just my opinion
If we're counting on the shareholders to create the revenue, it's not really a business, is it
I would love to use the products but ran out of money investing in the company (;
Wonder why the ceo could not add a comment this time. It would have been fun if the pr agency had done an attempt to descibe his amazement in the typical nonsensical mba-language that is always used for quotes that are presented as coming from the ceo. Hope mr James will get a chance to see the pics cause it looks like our president is taking his copy of the mag home tonight.
One would even forget sp looks good imo. Think we've been testing the bottom lasr few days
Someone took the volume to 88,888 - buying nrti can be so much fun (;
Would be nice to hold .03 and end this week on a positive note
Give it some time pls. We don't want to sound like second hand car salesmen desparately trying to sell the least rusty car we ever had in our portfolio
Don't get too expeditiously lol. If I needed a friend, I'd buy a dog (;