InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 392
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/16/2014

Re: Capt_Smith77 post# 9564

Tuesday, 09/23/2014 6:58:15 PM

Tuesday, September 23, 2014 6:58:15 PM

Post# of 27076
End of last year, the Stanley Brothers had applied for the name CHARLOTTE'S WEB HEMP PRODUCTS which had been refused, as i understand it, because of the reference to an 'illegal' substance in the name.

In march Inergetics applied for the names CHARLOTTE'S WEB RX and CHARLOTTE'S WEB, apparantly on their own, without cooperation with the Stanley Brothers.

The funny thing is, a month earlier another American company had also applied for the name CHARLOTTE'S WEB, for use in Medicinal herbal preparations.

So I think chances are very little they will recieve this trademark. If the patent and trademark office would see no problem in granting the name to another company than Stanley Brothers Social Enterprises, it would go to the company which applied first, I think, which is not NRTI.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.