Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Well, he isn't batting 1,000 today, that's for sure...trying to prove people wrong and stepping in a big stinky pile of misunderstanding!
lol, ok, get your point, but both are factually correct, of course, Nancy did not like the unnecessary foul, for sure...
Well, glad we got that settled, but I sure don't see the Trumpy thing AT ALL, no way! When someone is live on TV, they usually tend to trend a little on social media, no?
*************************************************
Your post:
“In order to conserve Company resources, the CEO agreed to accrue a majority of his salary.”
Once again, Mojo isn’t wrong. You even managed to prove yourself wrong with the above statement. Try doing a little math with all those numbers you gave and you will see that not all of his salary for last quarter was accrued. Also, he receives quite a bit of other compensation outside of salary which has never been accrued. I’ll let you figure out what that is.
*************************************************
I made no such statement, you extracted that from the filing. You do whatever math you want to answer whatever questions you may have, but I raised no such query.
I simply addressed Mojo's "kim hasnt deferred any salary for years...the increase in "accrued salary." is simply the interest on the millions owed to him.."
Mojo can defend his erroneous assertion as needed, but to use your words..."You even managed to prove yourself wrong with the above statement." You said above "you will see that not all of his salary for last quarter was accrued". Why are you proving Mojo wrong in this regard, lol? With friends like you, he doesn't need enemies.
Nor do I flavor it with the context you describe, rather it being something already obviously self evident by prior conduct of the felonious Trump in this and former trials where he directly attacked and stoked animosity to jurors, judges, witnesses and others. It is not her fault nor intent to whip anyone up, but her responsibility to fairly describe the facts as she sees them and potential repercussions thereto.
No it is not; these facts can be independently verified by sources you trust, then you can decide what you believe. Things aren't always quite so absolute as you seem to infer. Sorry about your council person.
Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/can-trump-vote-november-convicted-felony-new-york-rcna154286
Excerpt below:
Florida defers to other state laws when it comes to disenfranchising voters who are tried and convicted elsewhere. That means Florida voters like Trump lose their voting rights only if the states where they were convicted would disenfranchise them for the crimes, too. And if the states of their convictions would restore their voting rights, so would Florida, said Blair Bowie, an attorney at the Campaign Legal Center who advocates for the end of felony disenfranchisement.
New York prohibits those serving time behind bars for felony convictions from voting, and voting rights are restored as soon as a person leaves prison. Those convicted of felonies who do not go to prison never lose their voting rights.
In the New York case, “the only way he wouldn’t be able to vote is if he is in prison on Election Day,” Bowie said.
AZ, so...you and Deacon miss the context completely, it was more about the huge potential negative implications if their identities get out, and what perhaps MagaNuts might want to do to them or their families, not to mention the personal weight of doing that jurist responsibility given the historic nature of the whole process. Apply some nuanced thought after you view and listen to what she said and how she said it...I believe she was just reporting the facts as she saw them and applying some perspective to consider, but you decide...
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1106455413790753
Pardon my minor correction, lol...RNC?
That is simply not a certainty at all, unless his is actually incarcerated on election day, then you may be right.
You usually are better than this...look at the Summary Compensation Table and Employment Agreements and Related Party Transactions for the facts to refresh your memory and correct your statements!
05/29/2024 Form POS AM Post-effective Amendment to a Registration Statement
What arachnodude was referencing:
On November 10, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Kim Thompson, its President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and sole director, effective January 1, 2011 through the December 31, 2015. The agreement was for a term of five years at an annual salary of $210,000 in 2011, with a 6% annual increase thereafter. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the annual salary was $281,027, but in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson deferred such compensation. On January 1, 2016, the agreement was renewed with the same terms for another 5 years with an annual salary of $297,889 for the year ended December 31, 2016, but in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson deferred such compensation. On January 1, 2017, the agreement renewed with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $315,764for the year ended December 31, 2017, but in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson deferred such compensation. On January 1, 2018, the agreement renewed again with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $334,708 for the year ended December 31, 2018, but in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson deferred such compensation. On January 1, 2019, the agreement renewed again with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $354,791 for the year ended December 31, 2019. On January 1, 2020, the agreement renewed again with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $376,078 for the year ended December 31, 2020. On January 1, 2021, the agreement renewed again with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $447,915 for the year ended December 31, 2023. In order to conserve Company resources, the CEO agreed to accrue a majority of his salary. As of December 31, 2023, the accrued salary balance is $3,511,776. See, “Certain Relationships And Related Transactions, And Director Independence - Accrued Salaries and Officer Loans - Mr. Thompson, CEO/President.”
Annual Compensation:
Between December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2023, Kim Thompson, our CEO accrued $3,511,776 of unpaid salary, which represents a portion of the annual compensation owed to him pursuant to the terms of his employment agreements during such time period. As of December 31, 2022, there was $3,077,393 in accrued interest on Mr. Thompson’s accrued salary; such interest accrues at the rate of 3% per annum. As a result of these accruals, as of December 31, 2023, we owed Mr. Thompson $6,192,012 in salary and interest related payments.
EOD
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/dec/18/blind-amphibian-named-after-trumps-climate-change-stance
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4247132/Yellow-skinned-Cowfish-resembles-Donald-Trump-spotted.html
https://x.com/GranadaReports/status/823842175507197954/photo/1
https://imgur.com/gallery/new-hobby-putting-donald-trumps-mouth-on-puffer-fish-RQgZ4
Nothing new to see here, so guessing maybe that's your ambiguous point? Are you saying that it's new or old phrasing? Pick one! I'm sure you'll pick the correct one now, but it doesn't matter since it's old news.
So...just propagate lies under guise of satirical license it seems. Not that I'm defending Maher, just showing what the interview actually consisted of. All good; now I know.
"The God Pod is a satirical comedy podcast hosted by God and Jesus. The Divine Duo review the news of the week and try to make sense of the world they created."
I'm confused what interview was being referenced as the book is not "Smug Bastard", but "What This Comedian Said Will Shock You", and many, even most of the attributed comments were not made at all, so here's a link to the actual interview...for what it's worth, or not.
Amen to that...this is so worth a listen, and re-listen...
Say, bot123...as you posit, yawn, lame, etc. I'll go with Jordan any day vs. your multitudes of what videos? He's legit funny and sharp: are you in one of these, Einstein? Lots more where these came from. BTW, you write that funny language convincingly, but you can't spell worth a damn! Next time, maybe choose your own screen name, not a rando one your computer chooses for its mindless owner.
Well, she did write this, so pretty dang close!
"[T]he Court finds the Special Counsel's pro forma 'conferral' to be wholly lacking in substance and professional courtesy. It should go without saying that meaningful conferral is not a perfunctory exercise. Sufficient time needs to be afforded to permit reasonable evaluation of the requested relief by opposing counsel and to allow for adequate follow-up discussion as necessary about the specific factual and legal basis underlying the motion," Cannon wrote.
"Any future, non-emergency motion brought in this case — whether on the topic of release conditions or anything else — shall not be filed absent meaningful, timely, and professional conferral," she warned. "Failure to comply with these requirements may result in sanctions."
per... https://www.rawstory.com/aileen-cannon-denies-jack-smith/
Undoubtedly a sociopathic disability you express repeatedly with your disgusting commentary...
Maybe ask a question with more specificity if you really want an answer. Here's a start...https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/living_wage.asp or "According to research from MIT, the living wage in the United States was $25.02 per hour ($104,077.70 per year) before taxes per year in 2022 for a family of four (two working adults with two children)."
It demonstrably wasn't, isn't and never will be a wise choice according to her own words...and it's decision, of course. Her choice infers she must think Biden is even worse, naturally, but she is simply starting the necessary major kneeling needed to regain or retain any semblance of a political future in the Grossly Offensive Putarty.
And if we had a President then who gave a shit about anyone or anything beyond his political gain, the maps would all have been A Whiter Shade of Pale
Keep proving my point by pumping out more crap as apropos for you who wouldn't know nuance if it bit you in your dirty, sick perverted mind which is obviously breaking down into a fetid clump of worthless mush!
POS you are making light of it, sick men you and the originator!
My thoughts, too; quite perverted attempt as gallows humor in quite poor taste coined on unreliability of GHM. Some here lack filters.
Nice and true and FU Rowe!
That happens a lot or most or every time they use Newsfile rather than GlobeNewswire, take your pick. Dollar wise and pound foolish!
So I submitted this on https://www.kraiglabs.com/contact/ page. Maybe that will help?
When you use Newsfile rather than GlobeNewswire, your press releases are not reaching various brokers so Newsfile is not doing a very good job of getting the information out to as wide an audience as possible. Were you aware of this and can you include GlobeNewswire as a distribution channel? Thank you kindly.
Never mind...you got me, too...
I'm guessing silence after last week's dust-up, but I hope not!
You didn't miss much, just La. Sen Kennedy having fun with a liberal judge...but oh, no, Alito?
The logic for the tariff position is well covered in the NPR article you referenced if you read, comprehend and incorporate it into your thought processes rather than simply dissing everything being done. Link: "Biden will keep Trump's China tariffs, and add new ones on electric vehicles". It makes perfect sense that:
"Tariffs are a piece of Biden's industrial policy-The new items that will be subject to tariffs align with Biden's policy priorities on climate, technology and manufacturing, the source said. These areas are covered by Biden's Inflation Reduction Act and the CHIPS and Science Act, which made hundreds of billions of dollars available to boost the domestic clean energy and semiconductor sectors." It has already been pointed out to you that "Biden in Pittsburgh sought to contrast his approach as "strategic and targeted" and has said Trump's broader approach would raise costs for U.S. consumers." Add a little nuance to your thinking?
To enhance the positive impacts of these legislative successes, it makes sense to enhance the effect as much as possible, and coincidentally, run on that!
Rather unlike Trump's permanent Infrastructure Week and repeal and replacement of the ACA, lol. Bleating nonsense and not getting it done...the R's way as also evidenced in overseeing the "118th Congress...on track to become one of the least productive in US history." Run on that!
Very true; it seems Newsfile Corp does not have the same reach/connections as Globe Newswire. The former's are missing in action, the latter's go where intended. No idea why the change in distribution outlet...
Facts and proof don't matter to you that is true! LOL, and what was it MTG said that fits you perfectly during a SOTU? Oh, yeah, YOU LIE!
You said: "that doesn't matter it just happens that the trump election is the most recent. but those other people haven't come forward and correct what they said about their elections so it still stands that they are just a much deniers as any republican"
Already dis-proven here and oh, yes they have conceded: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174389135, but you just keep on making more fodder for history's dustbin.
Your assertion: "That would be the democrats. Let’s see Al Gore denied the results of his election and almost ended democracy. Let’s see Hillary still won’t accept the 16 results and is hurting democracy every time she bitches about it. Let’s see Stacy Abram’s still thinks she the rightful governor of Georgia. Hmm"
The facts sure are inconvenient things, right? Your assertions dis-proven:
Gore concession
Gore: “I accept the finality of the outcome, which will be ratified next Monday in the Electoral College” he said. “And tonight, for the sake of our unity as a people and the strength of our democracy, I offer my concession.”
Clinton concession
Clinton: Hillary Clinton conceded defeat in the 2016 presidential election on Wednesday morning, calling on her supporters to give Donald Trump “an open mind and the chance to lead.”
Abrams concession
"I may no longer be seeking the office of governor, but I will never stop doing everything in my power to ensure that the people of Georgia have a voice," Abrams told supporters at her campaign’s election night party at the Hyatt Regency in downtown Atlanta.
And none of them filed and lost 60+ lawsuits or planned and encouraged an armed and deadly insurrection, did they? Tying your brain into a pretzel like Tim Scott never committing to accepting upcoming election results and manufacturing patently false equivalencies, I must admit, you do a wonderful job at that!
EOD
Just saw your comment, was curious, checked a couple of things you said were bs and addressed that for grins and certainly not upset. Hope they get this major issue resolved, lol...
Yes, that's gonna keep some up all night, TBM?
Facts say 6-22 and 7-6, so yeah, seriously. Perhaps and so what?
No, you?
I have no interest in DJT boards at all, and the odds are no good since they are not the same.
Don't care about all the other whatever your beef is...just addressing your same date, same time crap. Go after them all you want.
igotthemojo
Level Icon
Followers 78
Posts 20,964
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/07/2006
Mojocash
Level Icon L2 Icon
Followers 446
Posts 30,108
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/22/2006
So you say, "So they were NOT created the same day ?!?! Seriously ?!"
Duh, seriously! 6-22-2006 and 7-7-2006 need I say more, quit making shit up and lying. What are you trying to prove? How wonderful your due diligence is? I don't have a dog in this hunt, so have at it!