Is what it Is !
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
ya its a decent story
Independent Film Development Corporation wins Development of Feature Film, "Isom Dart"
no a blog is something completely different
Its user generated and has nothing to do with your mistaken opinion of management. The users bring the donations on this industry. That's how it works with the competitors
Can you tell us how and from what perpective ?
you sound like your in the industry, do you think IndieBacker provides a useful service for producers ?
I think everything just started in the last year to be fair...nothing meaningful happened before that. In the last year however lots have
I disagree...you just need to let this Eade thing go. These guys are just trying to build a company
I wonder if there is a lock up agreement or dribble out agreement with the company
Its good to see Indiebackers.com is getting some notice buy the big boys...read this :
http://venturebeat.com/2012/06/11/crowdfunding-the-next-generation-four-changes-that-will-shake-up-the-model/
Personally I think it is way easier as a private company but way worse for the investors because its harder to get an exit.
Does anyone know the valuation of Kickstarter ?
indiegogo just raised 15 million in another financing...and there private
No idea !....only talking conceptually that it would be a great idea don't ya think ?
The community.Call him yourself rather than relaying on this this third party information and tell us what he said...make sense ?
I think if they if they can can some celebrities on this Indiebacker and then put it through their fan base than this thing could lite up maybe
OMG this is all Irrelevant to the company. Eade was the formation attorney to do the company. I think we should just ask Ritchie to make some sort of statement to this board stating the facts once and for all
Ya its cool
It looks like he doesn't even hold stock anymore...so ya its a non event to the company I think as well
of course...all filings come from the company...i think you missed the point again
I don't think your right on this one either. I think we both proved to each other that the company never issued a press release since a year ago. Its was pretty much dormant for the early years. Which happens a lot in these BB deals
ohhh...does not sound like its anything relevant about the company
of course not. The brand is less than a month old and public companies make filings 90 days trailing.
ya it means that the project has been fully funded and now closed for new donations
what are you talking about ?
Indiebacker get mentioned by Venture Beat less than 3 weeks after launch.
http://venturebeat.com/2012/06/11/crowdfunding-the-next-generation-four-changes-that-will-shake-up-the-model/
Looks like indiebackers is starting to get more shows on the site.... That's nice to see
BTW -Business vernacular shorthand for- By The Way, kinda like lol
Yes it also does very clearly stand out to my point. Just as if he was an officer, director and shareholder of a jelly bean factory . It does not mean the jelly bean factory is the plaintiff. Let alone guilty of association. Your really confusing a lot of different issues.
Yes I did and you should read it again. It very clearly says that it is not the company suing but a description of who he was ( ken) and what his relationship to the company was. To make it simpler just read the document on the first page and it will name the plaintiff is ken Eade not independent film.....I think that's where you are confused. That's why I hub can continue to do business with film because they understand the difference
No the company never did file against Ihub and point in fact has advertised on the site. However it is an issue was with Eade personally not the company. The company did file the case with the guy and won the case as stated in the financials and looks like recovering 6,500,000 shares. I think you will find a different level of resolved with this company than 4 or 5 years ago
Its in the filings and looks like the company one the case but apparantly there is another being filed with some joker in Las Vegas but I don't know who and the company won't say till its filed. Will advise when I know
Well that's not really true. The company did its first press release in Sept and just announced last week indiebackers. The years 07,08,09.10 and most of 2011, nothing happened. No trading, no press. If you speak to the company they had nothing but Bozo's and nimrods and they had to fire some them them. Apparently they are even suing one guy...lol
Anyway, the way I see it there has been tremdous forward movement the last 9 months
I don't think your right. I think the net donations will be considered revenue as it relates to the financials. Obviously not trailing financials because they just went into the business. Do you understand ?
Its not an 8k its 10k. These are two entirely different documents and points. Its important to read this things and understand the points.
Would you like me to define the difference for you ?
I think what you should do is actually go to IndieBackers.com and actually experience it...its actually pretty cool
I hear you but you have no evidence of this. Case and point is the stock does not trade and therefor you position makes no sense
Looks interesting...like this croudfunding space
Your missing the point.
The point was he was confusing equity based crowdfunding which is equity based and donation based which is revenue based as it relates to the financials. In terms of the company, Yes, it has done little in four years and then a lot in 6 months on an accelerated basis
IT'S CALLED REVENUE !