Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That's not accurate. I believe there might be some confusion because this was precisely what was occurring before certain mods were removed. Interestingly, it was happening even before I became a mod, and no one said a word. In fact, I was receiving mocking DMs about it. Now that I've become a mod, people are suddenly vocal about it. It's the epitome of hypocrisy.
If you'd prefer not to delve into the realm of facts versus fiction, that's entirely understandable, as there are indeed compelling arguments for us to discuss. I understand your perspective.
Wouldn't it be considered progressive to discuss a topic you're passionate about rather than deflecting when faced with an argument?
The comment mentioning the "insider circle, financial DM" was made by TooHoot.
When you add ‘Nuff said’ to the end of a statement, it makes it real.
Additionally, I highly doubt that any news will significantly influence this stock. They are reluctant to disclose financial information, and only a select few have access to these details. Doesn't that raise suspicions?
Observing the chart spanning the last 20 years, it's evident to anyone which direction the stock is moving. It's a straightforward observation.
I wish your investment success, but based on the charts, it appears that prices might undergo an 80% price decrease in the near future.
What's the status of the financials?
New investors should consider everyone's opinions, not just those who have experienced a 99% loss in their investment.
I've been on this journey for almost three years now. I held onto my investments for a decade, and my posts were being taken down. Now that my predictions have become reality, should I suppress a chuckle? This is the result when message boards lack transparency or become one-sided. You begin to buy into the misinformation while those who mislead slowly fade away. Just because someone believes a stock is bound for the moon doesn't mean the rocket ever gets off the ground.
Having said that, we will approach .00001 sooner than I'd prefer to acknowledge. Nevertheless, best of luck, and we'll reconnect when that moment finally arrives.
Today, we've seen the lowest trading volume ever, which is quite significant considering there's a 20 billion share float.
Embarrassing
I believe the financials haven't been disclosed because the Board of Directors has a clear vision of their stock's direction. Releasing financials would only speed up the journey to .00001.
That call was spot on. Since that post, we've plummeted 50% to reach all-time lows at .0002.
‘Nuff said.
I never made that statement. I'm just underlining exactly what you mentioned. That's it. Hopefully, financials become accessible to everyone. How dire is the situation with them?
We seek truth and transparency. Financials are elusive, shared only among a select few investors via direct messages. This lack of transparency is what I find concerning. It's unjust that this information is withheld from everyone else.
I couldn’t of said it better myself.
I hope the company's concealed information comes to light sooner rather than later, as it raises ethical concerns and feels potentially illegal.
It's evident that the message has been conveyed. Personally, I wouldn't consider this investment opportunity now that we're gaining insight into the situation. Financial information is restricted to a select group of traders via DMs.
Informing potential investors that financials are exclusively accessible to the "inner circle" of BIEL investors is undoubtedly unappealing to newcomers. Personally, I would steer clear of one-sided information that caters solely to a specific group, as it leaves everyone else at a disadvantage.
BIEL experienced a 25% decline in today's closing, shedding light on the .0002s.
This is the most accurate statement I've heard in months. I wholeheartedly agree.
The 33% increase is purely cosmetic; no one is benefiting from it.
This is the result of debates becoming more balanced.
The absence of financial disclosures is the most significant warning sign in my opinion. It should be self-explanatory. A genuinely transparent company will readily share this data with its investors. Failing to do so, or being opaque with existing investors, could spell disaster for the company. It's akin to making an online purchase with no product details provided.
This can be verified by reviewing your engagement history. When was the last instance you composed more than a single sentence? This is a clear indication of compelled or insincere engagement.
People spam stock message boards with copy-paste content for several reasons:
1. Promotion: Some individuals or groups have a vested interest in promoting a particular stock, often because they own a significant amount of it. By repeatedly posting positive or misleading information, they aim to boost the stock’s price and attract more buyers.
2. Manipulation: Pump and dump schemes involve artificially inflating a stock’s price by spreading false or exaggerated information to attract investors, only to sell their shares at a higher price once the price has risen.
3. Deception: By flooding message boards with repetitive content, spammers can divert attention from genuine discussions and news. This can confuse or mislead other investors.
4. Agenda-Driven: Some may have a personal or political agenda and use these boards as a platform to push their message, often unrelated to the stock itself.
5. Anonymity: The relative anonymity of online forums allows individuals to engage in these activities without immediate consequences. They can use multiple accounts or pseudonyms to amplify their efforts.
I've come to understand that your participation on these boards consists of copy-and-paste comments. People should be aware of this and consider it as satire. When you resort to insults and lack civil discourse, you're ultimately reflecting on your own character.
You appear to be more agitated by the individuals on these message boards than by the individuals who are effectively driving the company you invested in toward failure.
Who are those deceitful individuals, though?
Could you provide more insight into your comment regarding the impact on the share price? I've noticed this topic frequently discussed, particularly among long-term BIEL investors. Is this element a key aspect of the long-term investment strategy?
Exactly! I've stated this very point before, and my previous posts were taken down and reported. It's reassuring to see increased transparency in these forums since the moderators have been changed.
I'm still quite perplexed by that $50 to $100 profit estimate. Could you kindly explain how you came up with that figure? Also, I'd appreciate your insights into why the stock price is consistently reaching all-time lows.
You seem quite fixated on this "stock influence narrative," as you're the only one who consistently discusses it.
It's likely that these veteran board members have become proficient in using copy-paste to overshadow the current negative daily events regarding the company. I'm here to witness it come to a halt.
Of course, I agree. I have no immediate plans to trade, and I'm just quietly watching the situation.
To my understanding, what Toohot and a few others have said is that there are no available shares, implying it's impossible to buy shares, which is far from the truth. Once again, it appears to be shaping a different narrative.
Individuals should make decisions based on their assessment of the available evidence. Attempting to flood discussions with outdated information from 15 years ago might be considered manipulative. If you'd prefer not to see my responses, you can always use the block button, as I'm here to stay.
I might take a risky chance at making a quick profit through swing trading, but even that would be a considerable risk. Nevertheless, I don’t foresee this happening anytime soon.
Your willingness to inject more funds into this doesn't come as a surprise. I genuinely hope it proves to be a wise investment. As for new investors, I hope they can see past the superficial due diligence and understand the broader context.
Investors are left with no alternative but to be patient, as a significant number of them are likely in the red, possibly deep in the red.