I've consistently made accurate price predictions based solely on the company's history. If I believe the stock will reach .00001 soon, it's my opinion. Criticizing someone as a moderator for claiming manipulation is similar to someone only highlighting a stock's positives without full transparency.


.00001 soon.

Lies and manipulation? Please explain..

.00001 soon

Lies? Please elaborate.

.00001 soon.

No matter how much one delves into finding a “gotcha post,” the undeniable facts persist: this company lacks transparency, profits, and misleads its investors.

.00001 soon

Expressing negative views on a stock doesn't automatically invalidate them or strip someone of their right to be part of the discussion, even if you don't agree. In this instance, the negative facts carry more weight than the positive ones.

.00001 soon.

There's nothing odd about it; I simply decided to respond. Keep reaching, though. Confirmation bias can be quite misleading.

I'm sure I've got the right stock, and BIEL is consistently hitting new lows month after month.

I'm on a brief pause, and it seems we're hitting a new low, just as anticipated. Expecting .00001 soon.

I apologize, but success isn't assured by hope. Even if doors close, I maintain the belief that the narrative will evolve into a fairytale, akin to the drama surrounding some stocks now officially declared bankrupt by the court. The greatest challenge for many investors lies in acceptance.

A decade ago, when I held shares in this stock, I dismissed those on this board highlighting the company's negatives as "bashers." It was only when I took responsibility for investing in an unprofitable and opaque company that I gained clarity. Interestingly, those who once agreed with me during my ownership now label me a "stock basher" since I've sold and shared my experience. It seems some "true long" investors depend on optimism to cope with poor investment decisions.

I appreciate how you regularly incorporate my quote.

If your statement is accurate, what poses a greater concern: fabricated numbers or concealing them due to a lack of transparency, particularly for an iHub board member or the company board?

With 89 million shares traded today and a 12.5% decline in share price, celebrating prematurely seems unwarranted. It indicates a notable eagerness among some to sell and move on from this investment.

A day with a billion shares traded won't lead to the substantial price increase you're suggesting. But I presume you're already aware of that.

Despite the surge in trading activity, I doubt this will transpire. Similar situations have occurred before, and I anticipate a sell-off in these shares at the market open tomorrow.

Where are the financials…

Where are the financials…

Where are the financials…

Where are the financials…


This is truly astonishing!

Kindly begin following the iHub guidelines.

https://ihwiki.advfn.com/index.php?title=Moderators%27_Guidelines

I'm genuinely struggling to comprehend the aggressiveness in your post. Are you suggesting that individuals expressing factual information about a company might be influenced by financial incentives? It seems you're advocating for the removal of discussion boards entirely, and I'm having difficulty grasping the rationale behind this perspective.

Disagreeing with the current fundamentals of a company doesn't necessarily equate to "bashing" a stock.

I completely agree with your point of view.

However, it appears that people are surprisingly accepting of the fact that the financial reports are delayed. Wouldn't you agree that having timely and transparent information about a stock you've invested in is essential?

This number represents just 0.084% of the total available shares for purchase.

In this scenario, "acquisition" essentially means "Get me out of this investment as soon as possible."

That's not accurate. I believe there might be some confusion because this was precisely what was occurring before certain mods were removed. Interestingly, it was happening even before I became a mod, and no one said a word. In fact, I was receiving mocking DMs about it. Now that I've become a mod, people are suddenly vocal about it. It's the epitome of hypocrisy.

If you'd prefer not to delve into the realm of facts versus fiction, that's entirely understandable, as there are indeed compelling arguments for us to discuss. I understand your perspective.

Wouldn't it be considered progressive to discuss a topic you're passionate about rather than deflecting when faced with an argument?

The comment mentioning the "insider circle, financial DM" was made by TooHoot.

When you add ‘Nuff said’ to the end of a statement, it makes it real.

Additionally, I highly doubt that any news will significantly influence this stock. They are reluctant to disclose financial information, and only a select few have access to these details. Doesn't that raise suspicions?

Observing the chart spanning the last 20 years, it's evident to anyone which direction the stock is moving. It's a straightforward observation.

I wish your investment success, but based on the charts, it appears that prices might undergo an 80% price decrease in the near future.

What's the status of the financials?

New investors should consider everyone's opinions, not just those who have experienced a 99% loss in their investment.

I've been on this journey for almost three years now. I held onto my investments for a decade, and my posts were being taken down. Now that my predictions have become reality, should I suppress a chuckle? This is the result when message boards lack transparency or become one-sided. You begin to buy into the misinformation while those who mislead slowly fade away. Just because someone believes a stock is bound for the moon doesn't mean the rocket ever gets off the ground.

Having said that, we will approach .00001 sooner than I'd prefer to acknowledge. Nevertheless, best of luck, and we'll reconnect when that moment finally arrives.

Today, we've seen the lowest trading volume ever, which is quite significant considering there's a 20 billion share float.

Embarrassing

I believe the financials haven't been disclosed because the Board of Directors has a clear vision of their stock's direction. Releasing financials would only speed up the journey to .00001.

That call was spot on. Since that post, we've plummeted 50% to reach all-time lows at .0002.

‘Nuff said.

I never made that statement. I'm just underlining exactly what you mentioned. That's it. Hopefully, financials become accessible to everyone. How dire is the situation with them?

We seek truth and transparency. Financials are elusive, shared only among a select few investors via direct messages. This lack of transparency is what I find concerning. It's unjust that this information is withheld from everyone else.

I couldn’t of said it better myself.