Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Wouldn't this area normally have been Steve's? Now that Steve is gone perhaps Shiva doesn't have the time to stay up to date.
I wonder if Shiva is aware they need to pay? Maybe too busy to notice.
jewz, or someone with close connection to Shiva, could you inquire as to why the T/A is gagged? I doubt there has been any dilution. Should be about 1.25B O/S if I recall correctly.
CWR* has a 4.3 billion O/S and last year reached .03+. It will be topping that soon. No doubt there are other billion share companies where the pps exceeds .01
I am and continue to buy.
It appears the stock was pumped by quite a few newcomers on Wednesday and you didn't find many (if any) of those people posting today. Those who spontaneously show up profusely pumping one liners are normally gone in a day or two taking as much profit out of the stock they can. They could have been a buying club like Tim Sykes' who watch for stock ascending too rapidly. He and his followers then descend upon a stock to pump it up and quickly sell within a day or two leaving all the honest investors buying during much the run up with a loss. Tim justifies his action by saying all Penny Stocks are scams and should be put out of business, but the fact is these people would do anything for money. They are not the type you would want fighting beside you in a foxhole.
Then we also have those who, for whatever reasons standing behind their agenda, attempt to drive down stocks, e.g. Buzzie, Brian39, OTCdoc, NewPontiac and KaiserSore. No doubt these guys can scare off investors, but have a hard time looking at themselves in a mirror. Money is not worth that.
Then we also had some longs selling so they could buy back lower, and I won't say much about that other than it obviously does the pps no good and helps scare investors off.
Many reasons for the selling but the common denominator is excessive greed.
Glad to hear that. Thanks
"Gotta love the NON DTCC spin interview thing. What a great idea that was to create panic"
Shows just what a corrupt system we have when people are given congrats for being dishonest.
In a previous post you mentioned we would be watching paint dry until at least September. Any reason to change that date?
Don't know how to copy the L2 but there are 2.2 million .0022's left
Believe Mar 21-24
Its been awhile since I last listened to the STT program, but as I recall the interviewers are pretty sharp. Shiva may not just get softball type questions, so he had better be on his toes. Hope he has some answers other than he can't talk about it now. Go Shiva!
See post 36184
That's what some with Zecco would tell me, I could sell but not buy. The next Cust Rep would go ahead and place a trade for me, and none of them knew what their commission would be due to the Penson problem. I finally told them goodbye, and their Reps told me they fully undersood why.
I had the same problem with Zecco and transferred to Fidelity. When I was with Zecco one Cust Serv Rep would tell me I could buy TIVU (and others) and the next Rep would tell me I couldn't. If earlier you called them and asked that they place a trade for you, you might give it another try and see what happens.
Got me! Perhaps will be on StockTradersTalk.com (STT radio)with whom I think IHUB has an association. STT website is showing various CEO interviews. Imagine either NicPlatoNic or a PR will provide details.
Great! Hope they put out a PR about the interview.
The below is from last PR. Should give us all confidence.
"I look forward to a renewed and invigorated communication process with our valued shareholders and seek to take strategic steps to build shareholder value," Prakash concluded.
Should give other Host GM's an opportunity to check out the Tivus system. Hope we see a TIVU PR on meeting/sponsorship.
Cool! Nice to see our logo there with the big boys. Things just keep looking better.
Does Cemex have a plant in the area where CWRN can truck the aggregate directly to them? Wonder what kind of volume would be involved?
Will the fertilizer in containers be shipped motor/water or motor/rail?
What radio interview? Didn't Mr Prakash do a radio interview a year or so ago? Maybe I'm thinking about a previous CC. Regardless, I have a hard time understanding his english and don't want to be disrespectful, but if listeners can't understand what is said then he might as well have said nothing at all. I would hope an assistant would be there answering some of the questions and perhaps clearly emphasizing points on which Mr Prakashs' language may not have been understandable. On the other hand perhaps things have improved since the last CC.
I am encouraged by recent developments. Go TIVU!
Your crystal ball must be working well. Would think much of the selling is due to flippers willing to drive the pps down so they can rebuy at a lower level. Would be nice to see them get their a$$es burnt.
If the system is fully turned on next week as previously indicated, with the contract execution following in 30 to 90 days as previously indicated, I wonder just how long it would then take to obtain financing having the executed contract in hand?
Or could it be financing has already been sought and final approval is awaiting only contract execution? If financing has already been requested and could be finalized only a few days after contract execution, then perhaps we are looking at anywhere from 35 to 95 days till uplist? Any thoughts as to the status on financing?
Anything mentioned recently about when the uplist might occur?
"We are pleased our PCAOB-compliant audit was concluded successfully," commented Shiva Prakash, TiVUS' chief executive officer. "With this important milestone behind us, we can move forward with all necessary regulatory filings to register our securities and become a fully reporting public company under the United States Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC).
"In conjunction with the audit's completion, we are currently preparing SEC Form 10 to register our securities and qualify for an up-list market tier on the OTC Markets trading platform from OTCPK to OTCQB."
Anything mentioned recently about when the uplist might occur?
"We are pleased our PCAOB-compliant audit was concluded successfully," commented Shiva Prakash, TiVUS' chief executive officer. "With this important milestone behind us, we can move forward with all necessary regulatory filings to register our securities and become a fully reporting public company under the United States Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC).
"In conjunction with the audit's completion, we are currently preparing SEC Form 10 to register our securities and qualify for an up-list market tier on the OTC Markets trading platform from OTCPK to OTCQB."
Debt to be paid to noteholders through financing, VERT backing off now for weeks, and Shiva's message below are very encouraging.
"I look forward to a renewed and invigorated communication process with our valued shareholders and seek to take strategic steps to build shareholder value," Prakash concluded.
Post 34474 from jwez
"Shiva did say that none of the debt holders are or will be converting (which is why VERT is off the scene). All debt holders will be paid with an already worked out financing deal once Host finalizes everything on their end."
Steve had previously indicated the 5500 add slots would probably not be filled and the full system turned on until early 2nd quarter. Since they are turning on the full system next week, do you know if all 5500 slots are filled or just filled enough to justify turning on?
That is certainly a good report and is just about what the honest, mature people on this messageboard expected. Thanks for the message.
"It's their problem" sounds good to me. Just hard to get my head around the fact that tonnage may have been sitting on the dock since last October. The purchaser certainly sent a slow boat to pick it up. Go CWRN!
I hope so, but if CWRN or the consignee has been given dock storage relief/waiver from EIT I hope they got it in writing. I can recall various instances where shippers were "told" some charge would be waived but in the end the published tariff charge was billed and paid. Funny how a year or two after the shipment the memories of those who did the "telling" fade and a post audit shows additional charges are due.
I hope that shipments 3 and 4 are already gone and that CWRN just didn't report it because they are no longer involved in the ocean shipping part, or because of the "quiet period/news blackout". If the tonnage trucked in Oct/Nov/Dec is still sitting at the dock I would think the port probably just about owns it by now with all the storage charges that would have accrued.
It would be great if CWRN did issue YTD information about their progress. Perhaps it would catch the attention of other big iron ore users who might want to offer a long term deal.
Perhaps a big iron ore user in India ought to catch the next plane and give Mr. Cotton a visit.
RM - your previous post advised "3rd Shipment is bought and paid for, confirmed" Is the "paid for" telling us tonnage passed over the rail and the 3rd shipment was actually made? Wouldn't a shipment have to be made before payment?
Choice No. 1
It would be much easier for Bob to have the permit and just get the tonnage to the port and let the buyer take over. The purchaser/receiver should be in the best position to negotiate the larger volume rate discounts, but would mention if the purchaser's contract rates are held confidential he may also be in a good position to play pricing games with the various shippers. The purchaser/receiver, if not trustworthy, can for bidding purposes tell a shipper to figure an ocean rate from Port X to China of $30.00 mt when it actually is $25.00 mt. In that way the purchaser "makes" $5.00 mt on transportation. I must admit I'm not up-to-date in the ocean rate area but am sure Dillon would have a good handle on the matter.
If a port is fully closed during a holiday period then storage charges would surely not apply. I can't imagine any port getting by with charging a customer who, due to the port closing itself down, couldn't ship his tonnage or even get to it.
Then you are saying the two posters who said they spoke to Bob today about a December shipment were mistaken?