Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
what if anything does RSHN ANd XYZHEMP have to do with POTN? besides Goulding.
could be a big winner or not. This stock will not move until the fall when RBII puts products on the shelf and realizes revenue. Revenue or none have kept all shareholders in the dark. RBII must start showing if they are even a viable company. Expect no movement until the last quarter.
PoTN has been sending promotional emails for months and stating how great the company is doing. Do you really thing they would be doing this with the SEC staring at their every move? They do not want to go to prison or pay enormous fines. Tighten up your belt buckle and relax. You have a winner.
Ameritrade seems to think or make you think there is a value to this stock. Why would they post this as an asset?
Big Blue vs Googleheads. Does that surprise you? Google is in the market place buying or using whatever technology it needs. What happened to the American WAY? This country was built by small people making big contributions. They still do, except now the big googleheads of this world feel they can do or use whatever they like. When caught they think they can just keep buying of people to get what they want. They throw money around like its grass seed. It is time to stand up for the small investor or company that has either invented or bought the patent outright It this did not occur, everything we develop would end up with a Chinese, Korean, or Japanese name on. Remember all the inventions in electronics that ended up over seas because the USA would not fund them? In this case the googleheads want everything for nothing and then come back and charge you for the product. If we let this happen, we may as well reward the inventor with food stamps and pat him on the back on his way to the polls. Stop letting the big companies step on everything.
I have been an investor over the past 5 years and can't believe this is coming to an end, and the final result. Is there any precedent for a Supreme Court appeal? And why didn't Calypso have any dialogue during this case about it's past relationship with TM, the early years, and TM trying this technology? Sorry for all your losses. Is there any chance of any patent company, such as Vrng or vhc purchasing our patents, or filing against another ASNAP infringer?
Enjoy the ride up and don't cry on the drop down. This is a company that is presently built on 3D hype and no product. They seem to be in the process of puting something together. Maybe there will be a product. They are in the process of searching for hardware and software products. They don't even have the programmers and engineers in line. Looks like a huge scam. My guess is that there is no unveiling of any product in January. These posts make me laugh. So if you made a profit, keep it.
I understand the difference. But since we should be appealing to a Federal Court, and not the judge involved, I think the VirnetX case has similar points as ours. T Mobile pounded the point that distance was the factor that seperated them from CLYW. The made such a point of this that all other points of infringement were disregarded. The judge basicly was given a lesson on the way a signal is sought after according to TM. His conviction was based on what T Mobile's expert portrayed what the differences were. The differences were never met head on by the CLYW attorneys. It is not that they didn't tell the judge the difference. They didn't have a good expert that pounded the fact that what T Mobile was doing was the same as the CLYW patent. By brow beating the judge, TM was able to convince him that they had something entirely different. It just appears that they pushed and pushed until the judge agreed with them. It would be interesting to see if other issues were hammered home by T Mobile without a fight by our attorneys. There were too many other points that should have been in our favor but were totally disregarded. There attorneys danced all over ours until the judge willingly joined the dance. Our attorneys were either incompetent, or to complacent to confront the judge. Maybe they thought this was a slam dunk instead of a war of words. VirnetX attorneys have an attitude of going to war. Our attorneys were already spending the money and patting each other on the back.
I have been a shareholder for the past several years and have been following the T Mobil case as close as possible. Today I read an artilce about VirnetX filing for a new trial against Cisco because the the Cisco attorneys confusing the jury and not following the construction as instructed by the judge. You can read this on Seeking Alpha - VirnetX on the web. Just look up VirnetX on MSN finance and this new topic should appear.
In the filing it pointed out that the jury was directed and confused about the VPN in question and was told they use the industry standard VPN and led the jury away from the construction of a specific VPN patent that VirnetX owned.
This sounds so similar to the arguements that T Mobile used in the case of distance being predetermined or within a certain range. Confusion could have caused the judge to think there was substantial difference between the 2 different parameters. It is worth reading. It seems the tactic by T Mobile is the same as what the attorneys for Cisco used, and if so, an appeal on those terms may be valid.
Unis may show a short squeeze of 13%, but in reality it is closer to 55%. According to Seeking Alpha, since this was originally an Australian stock, 40mil share are in adr like share and are very hard to change, then you have the institutions, the insiders, and finally the shorters. So if the earnings are positive on Monday, this stock could have a major move. I wouldn't short this with the projections and rating of NO. 1 from Motley Fool. It could be a disaster.
I have owned this stock for years and have followed everything on Ihub throughout those years. I thank all of the members that have contributed over those years.
After reviewing the court rulings and comments, I would like to add some comments.
It appears to me that the judge has left himself wide open for an appeal. The could be several reasons for this. The judge may be under pressure from the T Mobile and the industry to rule in their favor and found this the easiest way to get out of this situation. There are all sorts of ways to apply pressure on the judge, so I don't want to say anything negative. The judge may also feel that he cannot figure who is right and therefor issued his decree, thinking the jury won't be able to sort this out either. In any case, I feel an appeal is mandatory whether it be the markham or the verdict itself. I sincerely hope we carry forward with an appeal and think we have an excellent chance of winning.
I originally invested at .05/sh. The original Globalcom company was suppose to be a big deal, sure thing. I think it was a scam from the start. The originators said the company was out of business. I stumbled on this by accident roaming around past stocks that I own. This whole thing sounds dirty. It keeps getting passed from one company to the next. If I am not mistaken, I saw that one of the officers is owed a six digit debt.
Has there ever been a share holders meeting? Usually one is required by law. This is a good one for the SEC.
Does Pat Hanley or Doug Morris bring anything to mind? They started this as a Public Shell and merged it with CCGC about 10 years ago. I have lost track of this company especially since its continous make over. Do you have any knowledge of what is going on?
I participated in a private placement when this was emerald investment. Since then it has beem CCC Globalcom, a phone company, a green products company, and last I heard, a Charter Airline company. I don't have a clue what is going on with this company. I was told years ago, 2004, that this company was bankrupt. Then I saw it as a Green products company with wipes made of bamboo. In 2010 it supposedly went bankrupt. With having heard it was a Charter Plane company, I have tried finding info on the internet without any luck. Do you have any knowledge of this being a legitemate company or is this a scam. This was initially set up by ACAP Financial in Utah. They would put together investment shells that were public companies and then merged them with a priviate company taking it public. Any Clue as to what is going on?
The SEC has indicted a previous CEO, Walsh, for scamming stockholders in various press releases he authorized at 2 other companies, not TWWI. TWWI has gone through all press releases and has the documentation for all releases including releases between 7-08 to 7-09, Walsh's tenure, which were legitemate according to TWWI, and accepted by the SEC. The suite against Walsh is for unlawful info regarding 2 other companies in which he was trying to scam the public. Trading in TWWI will resume in 10 days and is not under investigation from the SEC. The reason the stock was halted is because Walsh was a previous CEO, but was replaced because he did not fullfill his committments to a merger with the company. This company is only going to get better and should be coming out with some positive news in the near future. Have patience. I'm staying long.
I have been a long term holder of Clyw. I tried buying more shares thru Ameritrade but could not. Do you know what companies are allowing buy orders?
Has anyone read my post regarding the Fierce Broadband Wireless online infomation seminar? Your chatter is getting old. Wait for the courts to decide the issues. In the mean time, get the word out to our directors to tune into this webinar. They need the exposure and knowledge. If they cannot find or make appointments with the right people, help them get connected with the voice of broadband and get the exposure to help promote the Asnap patent. In O9 they wrote an article on the T Mobile case. Now they don't even know who Calypso is. Get this info to the directors and quit crying over something you cannot control.
Fierce Broadband Wireless is having an online seminar on Feb.15.
This is an hour long webinar to discuss the Issues and Solutions as Wireless Grows. They will have a panel of experts and have questions and answers. I emailed this info to CT to attend. I don't have DW's email. So if anybody does, please forward this infomation to him. You can get the information at Fierce Broadband Wireless, January 23, 2112 issue. Their website is www.Fiercwirelessbroadband.com. This is information that every shareholder should be aware of. We need our directors, even if they are not talking to each other, to listen and possibley ask questions and make contacts.
If you want to judge performance of management, all you have to do is count the number of royalty contracts and infringement cases they have won. Zero!!! About 2 years ago someone on the board noted that there were over 100 infringers. If the directors and technical staff only made phone calls, there is a probability that one of these companies would have signed up. The truth is that our fantastic management has done nothing to secure even one customer. They are pathetic. Nothing will ever be sold, or resolved in court unless this bunch of do nothing executives are replaced. We need a leader who will assemble a staff that will pursue all avenues of revenue. Get rid of the DO NOTHINGS.
Don't bet on getting back into the pinks in Feb. In an email from Ct in mid December, he said that we must have audited financials submitted to the SEC, at a cost of $250,000, to get relisted on the pinks. Anyone know how the company can raise the money? How about a royalty contract!
The blog sounds like a bunch of mouths on the playground. Turinni accused Williams of numerous things but said nothing specific. Williams accused Turinni of numerous things but said nothing specific. Each could have documented their statements but chose not to. Since all we have ever heard is a bunch of undocumented instances, let's let the judge sift through the BS and give an outsiders view, and his best judgement. Then let's support the judgement and support the company. Why be so negative. It is sickening.
It would be fantastic to see the pps start moving skyward. What you have to realize is Calypso has no money. They need $250,000 to pay for audited financials. They need cash to build prototypes of the various phone platforms with CLYW ASNAP technology inside for testing. Every phone prototype is different and has to be set up on each companies platform. That costs money. The customers are not meeting in Houston or California. Calypso must travel to their location. Lawyers are expensive. And with the holiday period here, we will not see anything significant accomplished during this dead time of the year. One fact is certain we will not be put back on the Pink Sheets until we have enough money to pay for the Audit and comply with any other SEC demands. So be realistic. Unless anybody has big pockets or can figure out how to raise sufficient funds to get this done, this stock will stay right where it is. Anybody have any ideas in raising money. What about a preferred stock offering with a conversion price of $2. That gives some serious thought for those who buy. Or how about closing a royalty contract. Calypso needs money to function, in the area of over $300,000 is my guess. Probably more. So unless you have a solution to the funding, sit back and watch the paint dry.
I am still waiting for a reply to my previous post yesterday. I have a lot of unanswered questions that I believe downsideup can answer. After going back through the old messages, I find it impossible to come up with answers.
Also. On Aug. 19th an 8K was filed saying there was an agreement and that it only needed finalizing. I don't think the SEC looks at almost 4 months as being responsive to that filing. Many people including myself bought shares on the news of an agreement. Was this a pump and dump by Turinni? It sure seems like somebody has highly profited by it. I know I lost my but on those shares. When is it stock manupulation and insider manipulation. It did not have to be for his shares. He could have given his 10 best friends the update with instructions to sell. Since then we lost 80% of its value. Where is the investigation? When will the stockholder band together to file a law suit against these crooks? There are obviously shareholders here that have been keeping records to file that law suit on behalf of shareholders.
For downsideup: I have been an investor for 2 years. I bought the stock on the merits of the patents. I don't know much about the present or past management. Can you answer my questions to give me a little clarity on the present situation. I have tried going back in the messages to get updated but that has not worked. It seems that this story is so intertwined that it is impossible to put it back together. I know I am not the only one without knowledge of past and how it is tied to the present. The answer to my questions may give some shareholders an insight they don't have now. As a new person to the blog, all I hear is the word fraud. If there is fraud, why is it allowed to go on?
My questions are:
You say the 2008 agreement with Daic was a scam? How is that? Didn't Daic agree to NOT have any ownership of the Asnap patent?
The Baxter Patents was a scam, how is that?
Who hired Turinni? Who appointed him CEO? Who hired Pierce?
Who made them directors? Was there Ever a vote for directors?
How did Turinni steal $3MM from the company?
Does Daic have any claim to the Asnap patent? If so, why?
Do we now have a fifth board member?
Has anybody asked Williams for an explanation about what is happening? He should be allowed to voice his situation.
Has anybody asked Williams if he has gone through the financials and discovered fraud? or theft?
How are Turinni, Pierce, and Daic connected? If this is more than heresay, why hasn't there been a class action suit against the people running this company regarding theft and fraud. Or criminal charges made?
I know there are a lot of questions, but it is the only way I can catch up on the workings of this company. I believe other shareholders are in the dark as much as I am. And I believe that there are numberous shareholders that wonder why the fraud and theft is allowed to continue.
Williams side of the story is of high importance. The meeting is to remove him? They don't give a scenario why. There is no factual information why they want him removed. It is very alarming to find that the solution to breaking a deadlock of directors is by having one voted off. It is not like Williams tried to nominate one of his inside people. It was Pierce and Turinni who nominated names of people that had a history with them or CLYW. Instead of voting on a tie breaker director, it has been decided by Pierce and Turinni to eliminate the problem. This is also the same person who claims the financials will show fraud done by Turinni. It is the same person that refused to give up the financials. And the vote to remove this person is called for by the same people that put us on the grays, caused a scam of a meeting in LA, claimed to have a settlement, have not gotten the financials done, reportedly committed fraud, and use to work with Daic. I think I have it all. Yet nobody has tried to legally stop these directors from sabotaging the company. Where is the shareholders legal representation? Why not get a pool of shares and hire an attorney. At least get an attorney to stop the shareholders meeting by filing an injuction with the courts or the SEC. I hear about all this fraud and felonies, are the charges for real? Why don't we stop Turinni if they are real. Or is it that all of you want to keep this story going or you will be bored to death. All I hear is talk and accusations. If it's real, do something about it. Maybe those that feel the same will give 5% of their shares to an attorney. There has to be a way. It seems that all the bloggers have been talking for years and must know each other by now. It doing something now or forever hold your peace. Or hold your worthless piece of paper.
The is no guarantees that if you let this vote go through that Williams will still be a director. And if the company is dissolved, you may all end up with nothing. So stop the shareholders meeting. Find out what is going on with Williams and Walsh. If a felony or fraud, get rid of the head honcho. NO MORE TALK.
So if this is correct info, let's let the board fire Turinni. We have Walsh and Williams against Pierce, two thirds majority. How do we get the message to Williams and Pierce. It should be done. Urgency is everything. Or accept Daic as your final victor and holder of the key to the kingdom.
It's so tiring of hearing "oh you are right, let's get rid of him". Cougar has the right idea. Find someone who can do the leg work and get something started asap, or there is no asnap. DSU said he was convicted of a felony. CT should then be removed asap. We need the right format according to the bylaws or Delaware law or whatever the hell law presides. But let's quit talking about it or you all will have a Xmas stocking full of worthless certificates. Like I said in a previous post, I don't know the facts or the history, and don't live anywhere near Texas.
We need to get this done. Because of the felony, get Turinni removed immediately. There has to be legal way to get this done before he can damage this company any further or at least an injunction to stop him from proceeding with this shareholders meeting and agreement. But it has to be done now, before the shareholder meeting and before any agreement is signed or we all lose. He a felon, which is immediate dismisal. So somebody who knows all this info, and can prove it, and will work with whom ever in Texas or wherever, must get to the finnish line before the race is over. Now we have a board of 3 and Pierce is a non-factor. If that's his employment agreement he must be terminated immediately. How do we get it done. We have to act, and quit talking about it or you can use you certificates for toilet paper. Cougar--can we get this done. You sound like you are the only one with a plan.
All I hear is that we have a ceo that committed a felony which eliminates him from being ceo. If that is the case, what would it take to remove him from office and negate anything he has done since the felony. Would it be a vote of the remaining directors? a law suit from shareholdere? a letter to the SEC? the FBI? I read about this chatter but never hear of anybody coming up with how to deal with it. Out of all the ihub members and stockholders, it seems strange that nobody cares to do anything if this is really true. It he, ct, cannot be ceo or a director because of his signed employment agreement, let's get rid of him. HOW? If it is illegal, how do we make it right. How can everyone just say it's ok to let someone illegally run the company into the ground. You say there is fraud. Let's get a law suit going. Expose him to the SEC. If this company is going nowhere, what is another delay that might straighten this out. I read about members that have been hear for several years and have all the documentation for all past events. But I never hear anybody trying to put it together and fight the crooks. I am just a bystander that thought this was a good investment--and most of you are responsible for that. So Good LUCK talking this into a nothing deal. I guess there are no doers on this blog only critics. Are there any attorney's on this board? Can we get Williams side of the story? CT can try to dump him from the board without any apparent reason, so why can't Williams or Walsh speak about this in their defense. It is not insider info. It's is asking us to do something because CT said do it. Let's hear from Williams and Walsh. Or-----you have the option to vote blind and follow CT.
Would it do any good to ask the SEC to investigate CLYW or would it hurt the company. If so, someone would have to give them details on what to look for. I do not follow this close enough to have that kind of input. I know there are members here that could give the SEC an earful. Does that make any sense? What about stock manipulation? 100 share traded at .02. Should not the SEC have a posture on that? It seems to me that outside scrutiny into the BOD and the trading might force the BOD to make strides in the right direction. I don't think anybody would want tie SEC on their case. If wrongs are being done, it might help correct the situation. Or---it might help to get things moving in the right direction.
TD Ameritrade will not execute trades for CLYW. Can someone give me the name or a couple of ON LINE trading companies that do. I tried buying today and TD said "no more trades" until relisting.
Fierce Broadband Wireless article on offloading calls to wifi should be read by all shareholders. The so called experts have no knowledge of ASNAP or Calypso Wireless. This is the voice of the "wireless world" that has no clue about technology from Calypso.
To read this article, google or whatever: Fierce Broadband Wireless, todays article on "offloading". Calypso should have been in constant contact with the editor and should be pursuing all avenues and companies that are mentioned over the years. A subscriber asked why can't the entire industry do this because T Mobile already does this. You know the answer. Read the comments after the article. I have been a major stockholder for years but have never posted. I thought this would be of interest to shareholders knowing the lack of leadership and excuses over the years. There are no acceptable excuses from the board any more. We need positive results.