I was talking about a 2011 d/e when MSFT paid them 200 million and they paid shareholders .50. I did well on VHC recent 1.00 D/e bought the stock around 1.30 after the spike to 2.47, held it about a week and sold it on the pay date for .72 cents and received the 1.00 D/E, not huge money but a 30 pct move in a week…Based on those 3 patent play examples the charts tell you to sell into the first victory or settlement as that will be the highest pop. But again those amounts don’t compare to VPLM. This is not a growth play as the Revenue stream will not be as consistent based on those 3. But a nice pop solves that problem or a reasonable buyout. Just like most stocks make their high as they grow and split like IBM, but the past 6 years has been harder for IBM to grow and really has a tough time around the 150-160 area even with the red hat acquisition but it does pay a nice d/e and you can use options to increase your income without selling your position.

If you read one of my previous responses to you it said Netlist, Parker and VHC were only suing for 100-400 million where VP’s lawsuits are in the billions. As I stated just the TMobile lawsuit equates to 1.00/ share and that’s only one defendant. I can only make an educated guess that VZ is more being the top provider in the US. The value of Mobile Gateway is less then the RBR.

Vhc was a BB stock took in a licensing from MSFT paid a nice D/E then moved up to the big board. There are lots of SnP companies that won’t make, big fing deal. I had a Nasdaq company go belly up on me, and you were no were to be found. I also owned SMTP, paid me a 9 pct d/e while I waited for them to uplist then I sold much higher and they stopped paying a D/E after the uplist.

What were they producing ? And what revs did they have before the patents? Call them what you want but it’s their property and should they lose it cause they a an NPE ? No and that’s why this judge is great as he follows the constitution, do you have a problem with the constitution (US) in case you’re a Canadian? This judge believes that if someone is gonna lose their property it should be by a Jury of their peers and not a lazy ass judge.

I would never say that I just go by my DD and base it on many things and percentages of risk and reward. There are many positives here, you don’t knock out 36 IPRs with weak patents, some of the early developers even had MSFT pay them to apply for LI but too bad VPLM was first to file. MSFT has some of the best patent engineers and they thought the patents were worthy enough to pay these guys and apply for a patent. That tells me the tech is real and potentially strong. Apple applied for the same patent (RBR) as VP and Apple was denied. So Patents are strong. And the list goes on but personally I’m not gonna share all of my hard work with someone else that doesn’t brin* anything to the table.

Back to tax loss selling, do you really think most bought this ticker cause they had a strong grasp of the tech or maybe they bought it cause of (FOMO) or (Momo) who really knows and who really cares I’m expecting it to do what I believe it can and that’s it. I’m not expecting this to end like Rite Aid or BBBY. And to be honest I don’t care if they ever take in money that’s Hudnell problem I’m out on a significant pop and goodbye.

I believe your wrong, in the past insiders would just report sales from the previous week but about 60 days ago I’ve noticed the insiders reported an amount of what they intended to sell and the wife’s amount was 15 million and Williams was 2 or 3 million and not sure about Chang. This could be the new way of doing things so I don’t expect her to sell more then 15 million. We will have to wait and see.

Large shareholder, it didn’t even trade a million shares. Market had a good year and people will sell whatever they’re down in. So are you saying something big is happening by December here?

Just cause you group all otc stocks as crap doesn’t mean shit to me. The 3 patent plays I follow were all Nasdaq stocks, and they really don’t compare to VP. The infringements are billions for VP as the other 3 patent plays are in the millions.

I’m expecting a nice pop on licensing, or nice steady climb north going into a trial date. It could even be a buyout, who knows. Anything over .30 cents will give me multiple millions on this trade. Greedy no, just got to know what you hold But please stick around till a few weeks before trial. Not sure the date cause I haven’t seen a filing but someone posted early Feb on here.

Notice there is no reply to this, hmmmmm.

I’m gonna take a wild guess (knowing it is tax loss season) and say they were sells. LMK if I was right.

But the float tells you that is not the case.

Why do you never include the float in your bias posts?
Outstanding Shares
3,023,173,940
10/27/2023
Restricted
1,656,124,047
10/27/2023
Unrestricted
1,367,049,893
10/27/2023
Held at DTC
1,212,106,109
10/27/2023
Float
831,342,791
09/30/2023

Someone posted that TMO was on the hook for 3 billion and the OS is 3 billion, that’s a dollar per share so no need to rollback. But keep the bs rumors going. Keep in mind that’s only one defendant.

The Float hasn’t grown much

Good ole days!


bgfellow190
Re: keepemcloser post# 2000
Monday, October 10, 2011 2:55:46 PM
Post# of 125379 Go
keepmeclose. You are hearing the same Bull from Richard. Richard has history of non-payments. Truely a con artists. I have more info than you know. See below. Some items are marked **** for confidentiality. They failed to make payments simple as that.
BTV was sold not callarc. BTV registration in NV shows Mr Russell and Mr Assif. Shareholders agreement show the two. So someone made a claim against the two does not constitute ownership in Bleam. Richard new about this back in may 2011 in vegas when he met with the BTV guys. I will also find emails that suggest richard knew. This is just another excuse to avoid making payment. As you can see he states that he is unable to find fundingsmile LOL. What else do you want to know. I have done my work on the entire fiasco.


from richard kipping rg*******@gmail.com
to Francis <********@gmail.com>
cc ****** <******@aol.com>
date Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:51 PM
subject Re: Issues
mailed-by gmail.com
signed-by gmail.com
Important mainly because of your interaction with messages in the conversation.
hide details Aug 23
Francis,
This is an interesting perspective from Brent.
1..************
2.***********************
3.The market in New York crashed, and the financing fell through,again,I had no control over this
4.I have been trying to replace the financing and will.
5.************************

You covered this 10 yrs ago.

.

Since we have some time to kill let’s put up some DD before Emil, ahhh those were the good old days. LMAO there you go NYTWIT this may clarify some things for you.

If you were able to find it from a court doc then why not post all of it. That is public information and if it’s not public yet those parts would be redacted.

That could be, as I’ve posted here before there was no way they give VP money to help fight them on the RBR case.. I don’t have all the answers. The bigs usually don’t settle till before trial. I don’t think AMZN infringed much since they’re not a provider. The RBR is a different story. The two MG defendants most definitely are responsible for charging roaming charges not a cellphone maker like Samsung and whatever Amzn does in this sector. I’m willing to hold till it gets to a price I’m looking for. Hudnell and team have proven they can get the job done with all their pre- trial victories and winning 36 IPR challenges so I wait for a nice pop. Statistics show that cases in Waco settle 95 pct of the time.

You do clutter the board with nonsense but this is factual. We have yet to hear from the company about what went on here. If it wasn’t for court filings we would’ve never known about this settlement.

I compare this to a war. We don’t know how it will end but evidence shows that VP has been winning most battles in Albright’s court. And if it weren’t for that Judge and this legal team I would be gone.

Duh, could it be based on a future event. My good friends roommate was a CEO for a Nasdaq company and he told him that the payment is never made at the table, the payee would disclose a pay date sometime in the near future like 15 days for example which would mean the money came in the 4th qtr. But I don’t know why your here if your so smart you would know these things and your lack of DD makes you sound stupid even though you claimed to be smart.

Since the patents are solid and the Judge is fair of course they’re gonna fabricate so much bullshit. Don’t read the noise read the facts.

This one is perfect and it came from the Bible, Proverbs

So if they never file for a patent how would VoIP pal know of this prior art in a search? Even though Tmobil angle is totally outdated and not comparable to VP’s tech. This all seems like a waste of time, TMUS has a plethora of idiots working for them.

LOL! They’re under a buck.

That’s Funny!

Still waiting patiently, these patent plays are tough. Most likely the deposition of T-Mobile’s expert witness will be redacted, just like most of the good stuff on the filings. Does anyone know if there will be a court filing for the date of the deposition?

Correct, and funny thing is NLST is a QB stock. If they can win why cant VP. I see many errors in their DD, so it all boils down to being a QB. Fun fact VHC was a QB that went Nasdaq after MSFT paid them 200 million and they turnaround and paid their shareholders a .50 d/e. It’s all about knowing what you hold and ones DD. Just like the tech bubble only a few Nasdaq companies made it after the crash. Example PCLN made it but it was a battle and I made some nice money on that one buying it in the 50-70 dollar range many years after the burst.I’m just ignoring all of this bullshit noise, and that’s all it is.

Just post one example of this just one! I’m sure you know ONE or why else would you mention this in everyone of your posts. Come on just one example of what we should expect or one example and I’ll sell my shares tomorrow.

And he’s not right! So what, remind again why you replied to me?

Blah blah blah! There is no intelligent conversation with you!

Just Google it, it’s been posted here several times.I’m not doing your DD?

Some just don’t understand about a fair judge, let’s take a look back at the Apple case in NDCA. Koh never did claim construction and ruled on Alice 101. That would be an unfair judge as to quote Judge Albright that has 20yrs experience as a patent trial lawyer, he says that you need to do claim construction to have a better understanding of the patents and he also believes that if a patent holder is to lose their property it should be by a jury and not a judge. Very simple to understand, and I didn’t need a 1000 word post to sway you. Just Google Judge Albright and you can hear him say it in an interview. Great judges use the constitution as corrupted judges don’t.

No actually judges are only fair when they allow for claim construction and discovery so they have an understanding of the patents. Remember that kids! When there are only 2 federal court districts that use these methods in the US,it’s no wonder no one has signed a license or a buyout yet. Think about that!

Yes so well thought out, I mean to win 28 IPRs, a favorable claim construction and now discovery, in a fair court with a fair judge. This is truly an amazing scam, why hire so many lawyers? Doesn’t that take monies away from the scammers. Amazing all the bullshit that is said doesn’t match what’s going on in court.

Wells, wells, wells, you been saying this for 15 yrs and still nothing, I guess you’re not as good as you think in making these calls.