watching
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Not worried at all... SGSID has a great future and has met their goals so far. TD Ameritrade is a little behind in showing my positions and trading them... it make take up to 2 more days, or less depending on how quickly they get official R/S information. So be it.
I look forward to the positive information coming this year.
10+ years
Hmmmm... selling shares not consistent with recently reduced O/S share and removed convertible dilution. SGSID trend much better than a guess.
Huh? Just keep it to one's self is my request and not clog up this here with personal actions. If you can not handle that then consider me your adversary, sir! I am here for business, not monkeying around.
It is not usually wise to tell the world your strategy... best to you.
It would be more appropriate to see posts here that discuss the market, formal documents, potential, etc. of SGSI. The banter about shorts and buybacks etc. is yawning. How does that help the PPS and future investors here? Please consider...
SPS50 10+ years faithful
Link?
Another fake assault on SGSI pps. Sell at .0051 was below O/S buys higher that had no restrictions.
EcoMikke - thanks for all you and Drugmanx do!
Still trader game playing in the background. I had early day buy at .006 without restrictions of any kind and it was passed up in a dump to .052. Nice future here.
SPS50 10+ years...
More fake sells. EcoMike is right... hang tough!
Very quiet today here...
THanks for reposting for others and us. The wording of the date of the "closing" could have been made more clear in that 10Q. Just the CMA in me.
I am sure that most here and management can do the math, too. Just wondering, was this trying to say R/S was part of acquisition strategy or...
Thanks,
THAT... may be a wise thing...
Reminder - in the past two years there have been serious investors, loan conversion and loans from sharp financiers who keep and eagle's eye on this company's actions. There is no payback for them unless this company rises in true value as they have way to much to dump and walk away. Others have given up stock, etc. as EcoMike has often pointed out, just to assist in jump starting the fortunes here for all. "We must all hang together or we will most certainly all hang separately..."
Benjamin Franklin 1776
Did the "hit" yesterday because the reward outweighs the risk at this level. Given the steady succession of progressive news from SGSI, it is very reasonable that favorable events will continue month by month. One never knows when an acquisition will occur, but the increasing revenue is a nice sight to sore eyes.
Revenue is the best "forgiver" of some short-run overhead if margins are wisely crafted. All this investment by SGSI is part of their growth as you succinctly pointed out. No amount of penny pinching that often inhibits income from volume service can offset the lost margin. Basic economics...
and that from a conservative CMA Public Accountant firm owner. Hmmm...
What might be our portion of this new entity transfer and how communicated?
In addition, the Company transferred all of its ownership interests in and to its subsidiaries Carbon Commodity Corporation, Mantra China Limited, Mantra Media Corp., Mantra NextGen Power Inc., Mantra Wind Inc., Climate ESCO Ltd. and Mantra Energy Alternatives Ltd. to an entity controlled by the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, Larry Kristof. The new owner of the aforementioned entities assumed all liabilities and obligations with respect to such entities.
From recent 8-K,
SGSI has consistently shown favorable news for the last 6 months and positive plans for the future year(s).
So who is kicking the pps tires that only stubs their own toes? So sorry for them.
A wise investor researches a stocks background and invests before the expected news hits. It is sharing of expected news, the why and transparency that makes this board and SGSI worth while... AIMHO
SPS50 9+ years
Trading asset acquisition debt for non-tradable equity (for some time to come) is a win-win for all as the company grows its revenue and income. The PPS should reflect this nicely with promising future customers.
I wonder what the ROI or payback is on ADEX vs the purchase dilution expected to buy it? Analysis anyone?
My link at 5:27 est worked... hope it will for you.
Of course that means purchase of an ongoing and growing business to ensure MVTG's better future... thanks for reminding me!
Yes, very trivial. Any Fortune 100 firm can be found with such. The key is in the DD as a whole. Those who are so easily swayed by such a gotcha perception should invest more conservatively with corresponding results. Best to all here who see...
Hmmm...
I have found no proof of the following...
"that ICLD was nothing but a share selling scam?"
Companies move forward as best they can under the circumstances. Too many armchair quarterbacks perhaps.
Having been here 10+ years and in the same boat, Larry & Co. could not overcome the greed and short-sightedness of a great technology by our investing and financing community. Such tech financiers, looking for shortcuts to do baby-steps instead of applying Edison-like solutions, leads to long times of missed opportunity. Logic does not always apply and GE is one example. May the future look brighter IMHO.
$18 of low is no statement worth remembering nor trend. MEA is not shut down as someone incorrectly stated. Of course in time it must perform...
My, what a bold statement for about $18 ! Hmmmm
It is good that Larry is focused and not in the "boiler room", IMHO... right?
MVTG has new growing revenue and potential for profit while applications for ERC/MRFC are being developed. IMHO our planet needs major environmental answers such as above, not old tech mini-steps. This is not a race but needs a cooperative effort from all serious players.
Voting done via broker. Easy as a cake-walk...
No maybe about it... does not fit the definition especially after all these years of exposure to major corporations which would have blown the whistle. Business decisions based on situation and corporate predetermined priorities is a different matter. Ah, lack of industry vision...
Ask him, Echo20. not us. Money is one issue to pay for this approach with no mentioned price tag. (ouch!) Puerto Rico and other such places need something that can be implanted now. It seems lack of vision in the industry is hindering the synergy of MRFC, Solar, etc. in a larger project. May it come soon.
Team effort yields opportunities... it happened. May our future be brighter. The application market should have jumped on ERC/MRFC long ago but pride and short term greed are ever present. Why not tell MVTG/AW some of your suggestions?
I read the whole 10K and did not get that sense of capitulation. There was wording of continued support from AW funds, etc. This was as of almost 4 months ago. To comply with SEC guidelines/rules, companies often give worst case scenarios to protect themselves though no plans exist to implement that. Just saying... Best to all here!
SPS50 10+ years
There is no MVTG statement to support this comment:
"MVTG management is no longer interested in the ERC and MRFC and some as yet to be seen energy storage device."
On the contrary, published documents indicate support and Mantra Energy's focus is still intact.
Go MVTG!
I do not watch daily as trader actions in the short run are so fickle and not a good measure of potential value. If news comes next week, it all changes again. Smile...
Thanks for the kind words....
I live 90 minutes from the MGVT office. With grateful hearts to God, it was not as bad as expected. I am sure they will communicate when they can and no move to Canada necessary. Their cell tower services in PR, FL just might be in greater demand after the storm. Time will tell but my hopes is that all the HQ staff are safe.
The filing clearly addresses this reason so it does have viability.